University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2012/13 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Measuring association and inequality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sociology 690 Multivariate Analysis Log Linear Models.
Advertisements

DTC Quantitative Methods Regression II: Thursday 13 th March 2014.
Sociology 680 Multivariate Analysis Logistic Regression.
The Consequences of Educational Expansion in Reforming China Maocan Guo, Sociology, Harvard Northshore Society Meeting, Oct. 1.
Educational Reproduction in the Czech Lands from 1916 to the Present: A Mobility Perspective Natalie Simonová Petr Soukup The analysis and its presentation.
(Correlation and) (Multiple) Regression Friday 5 th March (and Logistic Regression too!)
Operationalizing concepts
6-1 Solving Inequalities by Addition and Subtraction Objective: Students will be able to solve linear inequalities by using addition and subtraction.
Understanding Trends in Occupational Sex Segregation By Daniel Guinea-Martin Advanced Centre for Scientific Research, Spain (formerly at the Office for.
Cristina Iannelli Centre for Educational Sociology Edinburgh University Scotland in a national and international.
Cristina Iannelli Moray House School of Education Edinburgh University Education and Social Mobility : Scottish Evidence.
Family background and young adults’ housing outcomes, Rory Coulter Housing Studies Association conference, University of York,
Room at the top – and the bottom, too: the winners and losers in the "hourglass" labour market Craig Holmes and Ken Mayhew Education.
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education The Statistical Imagination Chapter 13: Nominal Variables: The Chi-Square and Binomial Distributions.
Period changes in men’s class reproduction in Scotland, Cristina Iannelli University of Edinburgh.
Origin, education and destination – an analysis of social mobility in Britain ( ) For presentation at Education and Employers Taskforce research.
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2014/15 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Week 7 Logistic Regression I.
Week 5: Logistic regression analysis Overview Questions from last week What is logistic regression analysis? The mathematical model Interpreting the β.
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2012/13 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) A glimpse beyond the module… (Week 20)
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2012/13 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Week 5 Multiple Regression.
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2012/13 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Survival Analysis/Event History Analysis:
Chapter 4 The Classical Model Copyright © 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Slides by Niels-Hugo Blunch Washington and Lee University.
Investigating Inequalities in Educational Attainment Michelle Jackson Department of Sociology Nuffield College, Oxford.
Pathways to the Professions Opening the door to careers in Law, Medicine, Veterinary Medicine and Architecture 10 th Birthday Thursday February 3 rd 2011.
Speaker Verification Using Adapted GMM Presented by CWJ 2000/8/16.
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2012/13 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Logistic Regression II/ (Hierarchical)
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2012/13 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Analysing Means II: Nonparametric techniques.
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2012/13 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Operationalisation of Concepts (Week.
Roger B. Hammer Assistant Professor Department of Sociology Oregon State University Conducting Social Research Logistic Regression Categorical Data Analysis.
Interpreting published multivariate analyses (using logistic regression) (Week 12) University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2012/13 SO 201: SSAASS.
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2012/13 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Survey Design: Some Implications for.
Economic Inequality and Development Barbara Liberda University of Warsaw, Faculty of Economics 18 October 2011.
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2014/15 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) A glimpse beyond the module… (Week 20)
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2012/13 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Week 1-2 Wedding Attitude by Sex Cross-tabulation.
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2014/15 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Week 6 Regression: ‘Loose Ends’
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2014/15 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Logistic Regression III/ (Hierarchical)
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2012/13 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Clustering and Scaling (Week 19)
Cross Tabulation with Chi Square
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2014/15 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard)   Week 5 Multiple Regression  
DTC Quantitative Methods Descriptive Statistics Thursday 26th January  
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2012/13 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Survey Design: Some Implications for.
Logistic Regression APKC – STATS AFAC (2016).
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2014/15 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Logistic Regression II/ (Hierarchical)
Interpreting published multivariate analyses
Is the freedom from Cognitive Impairment really at hand?
From: Lower volatility, higher inequality: are they related?
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2014/15 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard)   Week 1 Bivariate Analysis with SPSS.
Making Use of Associations Tests
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2014/15 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Analysing Means II: Nonparametric techniques.
Notes: Household survey-based Gini and p90/p10 measures use the same definitions as employed by the UK’s official income distribution statistics (source:
Quantitative data analysis
Lesson 3.1 How do you solve two-step equations?
Title J. A. Smith1, M. B. Fields2
Title J. A. Smith1, M. B. Fields2
Title J. A. Smith, M. B. Fields2
Title J. A. Smith1, M. B. Fields2
Linear Relationships coordinates reflections origin
Thesis Title Title – (Be concise, suggest the research question)
Random-Effects Model Aimed at Discovering Associations in Meta-Analysis of Genome- wide Association Studies  Buhm Han, Eleazar Eskin  The American Journal.
Variables Coefficient Prob.
Unit 1 Representing Real Numbers
Table 4.5. summary of anovabunder multiple regression
Investigating Inequalities in Educational Attainment
Title J. A. Smith1, M. B. Fields2
Financial Econometrics Fin. 505
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2014/15 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Index Construction (Week 13)
Correspondence Analysis
Table 2. Regression statistics for independent and dependent variables
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2014/15 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Clustering and Scaling (Week 19)
Cumulative Percentage
Presentation transcript:

University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2012/13 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Measuring association and inequality (Week 18)

Did social mobility increase or decrease in England and Wales during the 20th Century? ‘Classic’ finding based on 1972 Oxford Mobility Study (Goldthorpe et al. 1987): Constant ‘social fluidity’, i.e. no change in association once changes in the occupational structure (which allowed increased upwards mobility) had been taken into account. But this finding relies on the use of odds ratios as a measure of association, and arguably equates this form of association with ‘inequality’...

The data... Derived from Goldthorpe et al. (1987: 71 [Table 3.1])

The measures... Differences in ‘Service class’ attainment: 59.0% - 20.0% = 39.0%; 64.7% – 23.1% = 41.6% 41.6 / 39.0 = 1.067, i.e. a 6.7% increase. Cramér’s V = 0.296 and 0.329 0.329 / 0.296 = 1.111, i.e. an 11.1% increase Odds ratios = 5.752 and 6.107 6.107 / 5.752 = 1.062, i.e. a 6.2% increase (LR chi-square for difference within a log-linear model = 0.177 on 1 d.f.; p = 0.674 > 0.05)

... and more measures Gini coefficients = 0.169 and 0.183 0.183 / 0.169 = 1.083, i.e. an 8.3% increase. Tog coefficients = 0.329 and 0.375 0.375 / 0.329 = 1.140, i.e. a 14.0% increase z = 2.19; p = 0.029 < 0.05 [N.B. Based on a more detailed, 4 x 4 cross-tabulation; see Lampard (2000: 10).]

What is the Gini coefficient? Originally a measure of income inequality: see Marsh and Elliott (2009) or Marsh (2008) ... But can be adapted to measure other forms of inequality and segregation (see Le Grand and Rabin, 1986; Lampard, 1994). ... including inequality in educational attainment according to class background (Hellevik, 1997).

More data... Hellevik (1997: 391 [Table 2]) re-presents data from a paper by Heath and Clifford (1990) on educational attainment (‘O’-levels) according to class background: % differences in attaining ‘O’-levels or higher between Classes I-II and Classes VI-VII: Birth cohorts - 1930-39: 40%; 1940-49: 40%; 1950-59: 42%; 1960-69: 33%. Heath, A.F. and Clifford, P. 1990. ‘Class inequalities in education in the twentieth century’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series A) 153: 1-16. Class 1930-39 1940-49 1950-59 1960-69 I – II 58% 67% 84% 87% III – V 31% 46% 74% VI - VII 18% 27% 42% 54%

Other measures... Comparing I – II, III –V and VI –VII: Lambda - 1930-39: 0.46; 1940-49: 0.43; 1950-59: 0.49; 1960-69: 0.42. Cramér’s V - 1930-39: 0.32; 1940-49: 0.31; 1950-59: 0.33; 1960-69: 0.31. Comparing I – II and VI –VII: Odds ratios: 1930-39: 6.29; 1940-49: 5.49; 1950-59: 7.25; 1960-69: 5.70.

But... Gini coefficient (comparing I – II, III –V and VI –VII): 1930-39: 0.25 1940-49: 0.20 1950-59: 0.15 1960-69: 0.11

Debates! In addition to Goldthorpe et al. (1987), authors such as Marshall and Swift (1999) see the removal of the impact of changes in the distributions of origins and outcomes as a necessary step to assessing underlying change. However, authors such as Saunders (1997), Hellevik (2002) and Ringen (2006) are not convinced that odds ratios retain all the aspects of the changing patterns of social mobility and/or educational attainment that are relevant...