Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
Advertisements

What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
Montana’s statewide longitudinal data system Project Montana’s Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Loudon County Schools Student Achievement Data Results
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
2009 MCAS Analysis & Adequate Yearly Progress Report Mendon – Upton Regional School District.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY
South Lewis Central School District. Student Outcomes – Percent Meeting Common Core Expectations (District-Wide) ELA - Grade % Levels 3 and 4 BOCES Rank.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
Daniel Melendez. School Demographics  Language  English Learners  7% (55 students)  Socio-Economic  35% qualify for free or reduced lunch (276) 
2009 Report Card and TVAAS Update Recalibration 2009 October 26, 2009.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
Department of Accountability: “Anyone can measure the rain; we build arks.” Assessment Update: Preliminary Results Department of Accountability.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Performance Pay: Forging Ahead with Race to the Top Miami-Dade County Public Schools.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
Braintree Public Schools Spring 2007 MCAS Tests Braintree High School.
Communication Webinar:
Achievement and Accomplishments
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
NHCS READY Report October 2016.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics & Reading Grade 3
Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API December 12, 2011.
Hickory Public Schools Accountability Update - Math
2012 Accountability Determinations
Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API September 13, 2010.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Wade Hayashida Local District 8
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
CLINTON HIGH SCHOOL 2010 MCAS Presentation October 26, 2010.
AYP and Report Card.
Academic Achievement Alameda County School Districts
Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Academic Achievement Report for Washington Manor Middle School
Adequate Yearly Progress: What’s Old, What’s New, What’s Next?
Presentation transcript:

Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report August 9, 2011 1

AYP Results The 2010-2011 school year was our second year under the state’s rigorous new academic standards. As was the case in the majority of Tennessee districts, MNPS did not meet its Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) targets for all subgroups. 2

AYP Results MNPS remains in Restructuring 1 status as an error in the determination of district status in 2007 was corrected by the Tennessee Department of Education. Every subgroup in grades 3-8 made increases from 2010 to 2011 in the percent of students reaching proficiency in Mathematics and Reading. 3

2011 Percent of MNPS Students in Grades 3-8 Scoring Proficient or Advanced * Subgroup made Adequate Yearly Progress AMO: Annual Measureable Objective (Target) 4

2011 Percent of MNPS Students in Grades 3-8 Scoring Proficient or Advanced * Subgroup made Adequate Yearly Progress AMO: Annual Measureable Objective (Target) 5

2011 Percent of MNPS Students in Grades 3-8 Scoring Proficient or Advanced * Subgroup made Adequate Yearly Progress AMO: Annual Measureable Objective (Target) 6

AYP Results Every high school subgroup made increases from 2010 to 2011 in Math proficiency, with an overall increase of 12 percentage points. Our highest proficiency rates are for high school Language Arts, but this is the one area in which we did not see growth from 2010. 7

2010 Percent of MNPS High School Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced * Subgroup made Adequate Yearly Progress AMO: Annual Measureable Objective (Target) 8

2010 Percent of MNPS High School Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced * Subgroup made Adequate Yearly Progress AMO: Annual Measureable Objective (Target) 9

2010 Percent of MNPS High School Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced * Subgroup made Adequate Yearly Progress AMO: Annual Measureable Objective (Target) 10

Race to the Top Results MNPS met all of its First to the Top 2010-11 improvement goals: 4.2% improvement in Grade 3 Reading (Target 4.0%) 7.3% improvement in Grade 7 Math (Target 5.0%) 9.8% improvement in 2010 Graduation rate (Target 2.2%) 11

Gains in Social Studies fell short of the state targets. Value Added Results MNPS district single-year gains for grades 4-8 in 2010-11 significantly exceeded state targets in Math and Reading. District gains in Science significantly exceeded current state performance. Gains in Social Studies fell short of the state targets. 12

MNPS One-Year Value Added Results in Grades 4-8: 2008-09 Through 2010-11 13

Value Added Results High school district one-year Value Added gains were equal to the state for English II. District gains were below the state for English I, Biology I and U.S. History. Value Added gains were above the state for Algebra I and Writing and ranked among the top 25% of districts. 14

Questions? 15