Public Hearing on Ballot Measure 2:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Grays Harbor County Cannabis Land Use Task Force July 31, 2013.
Advertisements

Ballot Measure 91 Recreational Marijuana Lauren Sommers Local Government Law Group
Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Update August 24, 2006.
Marijuana in Colorado by Rachel Allen, staff attorney.
Alaska’s Plan for Implementation of the Act to Tax and Regulate the Production, Sale and Use of Marijuana Jon Bittner Deputy Commissioner Department of.
Administrative Law Research (Federal and Washington State) Bridge the Legal Research Gap May 20, 2009 Ann Hemmens University of Washington Gallagher Law.
1 WASTE TIRE PROGRAM Utilities Department Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 14, 2014.
REFERRED MEASURE 1 A (MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES) Ballot Issue.
Amendment 64.  The 15 percent wholesale excise tax created by the amendment will not reach the goal of $40 Million for school construction as stipulated.
Amendment 64: What a Long Strange Trip It’s Been 2013 SDA Annual Conference.
C H A P T E R State Legislatures
2009 Payable 2010 Levy Certification Independent School District 196 Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools December 14, 2009 Educating our students.
BALLOT ISSUES 2013 League of Women Voters of Colorado Education Fund.
North Carolina State Government OCS Social Studies I Mrs. Bonifay.
Amendment 64 Use and Regulation of Marijuana THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO FIND AND DECLARE THAT  MARIJUANA SHOULD BE LEGAL FOR PERSONS TWENTY-ONE.
Regulatory Primer 101 Patrick Kennelly, Chief Food Safety Section California Department of Public Health March 11, 2014.
New Firearms Regulations A Summary Amends §790.33, Florida Statutes Board of County Commissioners Worksession September 13,
EXECUTIVE OFFICES of MINNESOTA
Marijuana Legalization In Alaska: Potential Economic Implications Jeffrey Dickson – Samuel Dixon – Lee Kearney University of Alaska Anchorage Public Finance.
INDIANA ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO COMMISSION OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR MARK E. MADER, PROSECUTOR There is hereby created within the commission a division to be.
Georgia’s Executive Branch. Like the U.S. Constitution, the GA Constitution provides for a separation of powers (SS8CG3a,b,c): SS8CG3 – The student will.
Orange County Building Safety / Consumer Fraud Unit Unlicensed Contracting Board of County Commissioners January 15, 2013.
MARIJUANA LEGISLATION IMPLEMENTATION Introduction Amendment 64 -November 2012  Legalized the personal use and possession of marijuana for adults 21 years.
Regional Planning CCRPC Board Training March 21, 2012.
PLN  Amendments to Chapters 3, 4 and 11 of the Adams County Development Standards and Regulations concerning the regulation of medical and.
M ARIJUANA A ND THE D EMOCRATIC P ROCESS March Brooks W. Chandler Boyd, Chandler & Falconer LLP.
GCHD Board of Health Meeting 9/23/2015.  Issue 2 seeks to nullify efforts to use the constitution as a monopoly jackpot and defeat the proposed constitutional.
CHAPTER 2 - LAWMAKING. BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT AT EACH LEVEL LEVEL Federal State City School President Governor Mayor Superintendent JUDICIAL Congress.
Mead Treadwell Lieutenant Governor Public Hearing on Ballot Measure 4: An Act Providing for Protection of Bristol Bay Wild Salmon and Waters.
Mead Treadwell Lieutenant Governor Public Hearing on Ballot Measure 3: An Act to Increase the Alaska Minimum Wage.
Will Humble, MPH 6/7/16AZPHA – ARIZONA PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION 1 How the 2016 “Regulation and Taxation of Marijuana Act” Would Work in Arizona.
Missouri Constitution!!!
County commissioners and Independent Boards
The role of government in the United States economy
Chapter 16: State and Local Government Section 3: Local Government & Citizen Participation (pgs )
ND League of Cities Sept. 17, 2016
Proposition 64 County Behavioral Health Directors Association
Potential Local Impacts from Proposition 64 and Measure L
The Do’s and Don’ts of Your Last Six Months in Office
State Governments.
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS): Local Ordinance Considerations
VENICE ISLE HOME OWNERS, INC.
Lesson 26: How Does American Federalism Work?.
State Law In 1996, with the adoption of Proposition 215, the California voters approved the Compassionate Use Act (Health and Safety Code § ) to.
Proposition 64 County Behavioral Health Directors Association

Retail Marijuana committee
P1. Vocabulary P2. Notes P3. Notes P4. CoachBook P5. Content Quiz
State Government.
Consideration of Action Re: Commercial Cannabis Businesses
General Election TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2018.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK FEBRUARY 26, 2018 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS CALLING FOR A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY OF PASADENA OF THE.
Public Engagement Session
State Government.
UNDERTAND RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA ARTILCES AND GET OUT TO VOTE
Leanne Emm, Associate Commissioner School Finance Division
Roles and Responsibilities of Public Officials
Consideration of Possible Action Re: Marijuana/ Cannabis Regulations
Local Government Notes
Twenty Questions Subject: Chapter 12.
Chapter 14: Taxes and Government Spending Section 4
Chapter 9 – The Plural Executive and the Bureaucracy
State Executive Branch
GATEWAY AREA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CITY BUDGET WORKSHOP February 20, 2019 Guest Presenter Mr. Andy DeMoss, CPA Partner RFH, PLLC Lexington, Kentucky.
Mr. Collins and Mrs. Kozlik CE 6b, 7a, 7b
Amendments to the Liquor Bill, 2003
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO marijuana regulations
Unit 13 – the Executive Branch
State and Local Executive Branch
Florida Courts Scavenger Hunt
Presentation transcript:

Public Hearing on Ballot Measure 2: An Act to Tax and Regulate the Production, Sale, and Use of Marijuana Mead Treadwell Lieutenant Governor

Agenda for Public Hearing Lt. Governor Treadwell presents sectional analysis and cost estimate of the bill Pro side presents: 10 minutes Con side presents: 10 minutes Public testimony: 3 minutes per person

Summary of the Proposed Bill Would tax and regulate the production, sale, and use of marijuana in Alaska; Would make use of marijuana legal for persons 21 or older, allowing them to possess, use, display, purchase, or transport up to one ounce of marijuana; Would imposes various restrictions on personal cultivation, public use, and operation of marijuana-related facilities; Would allow legislature to create a Marijuana Control Board in the Dept. of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development; Imposes an excise tax on the sale or transfer of marijuana, and provides for the enforcement and administration of that tax.

Sectional Analysis of the Ballot Initiative Section 1: Adds a new chapter, AS 17.38, Regulation of Marijuana, to the Alaska Statutes The Statute would provide that the production and sale of marijuana should be regulated and taxed such that businesses could sell marijuana and that such sale should be conducted in a manner that protects consumers and promotes public health and safety. The Statute would limit the use, sale, growth, and transport of marijuana to individuals who are 21 years of age or older, and imposed penalties for public consumption. The Statute would allow for the creation of a Marijuana Control Board while still allowing for local government to make decisions regarding its use and regulation.

Sectional Analysis of the Ballot Initiative Section 2: Adds a new chapter, AS 43.61, Excise Tax on Marijuana, to the Alaska Statutes This Statute would impose a $50 per ounce excise tax on the sale or transfer of marijuana from a marijuana cultivation facility (producer) to a retail marijuana store (distributor) or marijuana product manufacturing facility. The producer would be responsible for paying the tax. Monthly tax statements would be required by the Department of Revenue from each marijuana cultivation facility. If these taxes were not paid, the facility would be subject to civil penalties under AS 43.05.220

Duration of a citizen initiative if a majority of votes favor adoption The lieutenant governor shall certify the election returns. An initiated law becomes effective ninety days after certification. It is not subject to veto, and may not be repealed by the legislature within two years of its effective date. (see Alaska Const. art. XI, sec 6) Although the legislature may amend an initiative at any time after it is enacted, any amendments made during the first two years may not operate to effectively repeal the initiative by amendment, or vitiate the intent. (see Warren v. Boucher, 543 P.2d 731,737 [Alaska 1975]; and Warren v. Thomas, 568 P.2d 400 [Alaska 1977])

Cost Estimate of the Bill: Department of Revenue Personnel: The Department of Revenue estimates that it would need to create at least three new positions to oversee the new excise tax. Estimated Reoccurring Annual Costs: $300,000 Contractual Services: The Department of Revenue estimates that it would need a one-time expense of $500,000 for configurations to their Tax Revenue Management Systems. Estimated One-Time Cost Range: $350,000-$500,000 Total Cost Estimates, First Year $650,000-$800,000

Total Cost Estimates, First Year Cost Estimate of the Bill: Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development If the initiative passes, the responsibility for controlling marijuana will lie with the ABC Board until or unless a marijuana control board is established by the legislature within DCCED. As was done with Colorado, the department recommends the creation of a Task Force to identify legal, policy, and procedural issues that need to be resolved. From creating a database to purchasing vehicles, the estimated cost to create a Task Force is $1,563,960 for the first year and $1,413,140 for the second year. Total Cost Estimates, First Year $1,563,960

Cost Estimate of the Bill: Other Departments Department of Health & Social Service Estimate: $0 - $2,987,000 Department of Public Safety Estimate: $1,434,700 Department of Environmental Conservation Estimate: $0 - $136,900 University of Alaska Estimate: Indeterminate

Agenda for Public Hearing Lt. Governor Treadwell presents sectional analysis and cost estimate of the bill Pro side presents: 10 minutes Con side presents: 10 minutes Public testimony: 3 minutes per person