Site-specific feasibility of alternate wetting and drying as a greenhouse gas mitigation option in irrigated rice fields in Southeast Asia: a synthesis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality of future N 2 O emission estimates: how might we improve? Keith Smith School of GeoSciences University of Edinburgh, UK.
Advertisements

S A L T M O D A computer program for the prediction of the salinity of soil moisture, ground water and drainage water, the depth of the water table, and.
Assessing Alternatives for Mitigating Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increasing Yields from Rice Production in China Over the Next 20 Years Changsheng.
Modeling Impacts of Water Management on Crop Yield, Water Use Efficiency and GHG Emissions for Rice Production in Asia Changsheng Li 1, Xiangming Xiao.
Factors influencing CH 4 and N 2 O emissions from Asian croplands and potential mitigation options Xiaoyuan Yan Frontier Research Center for Global Change,
The tradeoffs between water savings and GHG emissions in irrigated agriculture Shahbaz Mushtaq, Tek Maraseni, and Kate Reardon Smith Australian Centre.
OUTLIER, HETEROSKEDASTICITY,AND NORMALITY
Today Concepts underlying inferential statistics
Chapter 12 Inferential Statistics Gay, Mills, and Airasian
Tool for real time N management
6D.1 1 UNFCCC - NAI SOFTWARE Sector: Agriculture Practical Aspects and Exercises CGE Greenhouse Gas Inventory Hands – on Training Workshop for the African.
Analysis of Variance. ANOVA Probably the most popular analysis in psychology Why? Ease of implementation Allows for analysis of several groups at once.
6.1 1 UNFCCC – NAI SOFTWARE Sector: Agriculture Practical Aspects and Exercises CGE Greenhouse Gas Inventory Hands-on Training Workshop.
Rice and water Crop and Environmental Sciences Division International Rice Research Institute Los Baños, Philippines.
Challenges and options John Couwenberg Hans Joosten Greifswald University Are emission reductions from peatlands MRV-able.
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution What is it? How do we describe it? What does it imply for precision management?
Guide to Handling Missing Information Contacting researchers Algebraic recalculations, conversions and approximations Imputation method (substituting missing.
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution What is it? How do we describe it? What does it imply for precision management?
Performance of the “Three Reductions, Three Gains” Program in the Context of Sustainable Agricultural Development in Vietnam by Tran Che Linh Asian Institute.
Future atmospheric conditions increase the greenhouse-gas intensity of rice cultivation K.J. van Groenigen*,†, C. van Kessel ‡, B.A. Hungate* Discussion.
Possibilities for C / GHG mitigation in agricultural lands Pete Smith Professor of Soils & Global Change School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen,
1 Impact of uncertainty of land management practices on carbon sequestration Brian McConkey April 8, 2009.
Agriculture Agriculture Sector Inventory Training Workshop, Agriculture Sector 7/72008 Khartoum Higher Council for Environment and Natural Resources.
PCB 3043L - General Ecology Data Analysis. OUTLINE Organizing an ecological study Basic sampling terminology Statistical analysis of data –Why use statistics?
Climate Change Mitigation through Technology Innovations in Agriculture Bettina Hedden-Dunkhorst and Paul Vlek Center for Development Research, University.
Chapter 16 Data Analysis: Testing for Associations.
WP coordinator meeting June 17/ WP3 progress report.
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
Effects of parent material and land use on soil phosphorus forms in Southern Belgium Renneson 1 M., Dufey 2 J., Bock 1 L. and Colinet 1 G. 1 University.
PCB 3043L - General Ecology Data Analysis.
LATE SEASON N APPLICATIONS FOR IRRIGATED HARD RED WHEAT PROTEIN ENHANCEMENT. S.E. Petrie*, Oregon State Univ, B.D. Brown, Univ. of Idaho. Introduction.
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution What is it? How do we describe it? What does it imply for precision management?
Page 1 Rice innovation Practices in Bac Lieu province 19 th December 2013 Project: Adaptation to climate change through biodiversity promotion in Bac Lieu.
Educational Research Inferential Statistics Chapter th Chapter 12- 8th Gay and Airasian.
Contribution of fungi activity for N 2 O emission in no-tillage with cover crop fields Zhaorigetu 1,2, T.Nishizawa 2, Y.Sato 2, M.Komatsuzaki 1, H.Ohta.
Greenhouse Gases Emission and Carbon Sequestration in Agro-Ecosystems under Long-Term No-Till: Implications for Global Warming Mitigation Pierre-André.
Wood ash, the residue remaining from the combustion of bark, sawdust and yard waste for energy generation for forestry product operations, is an effective.
Best in Market Pricing. What is Best in Market Pricing ? An extension of parametric modeling for negotiating lowest pricing for a statement of work consisting.
5th Annual Meeting of MIRSA-2 project
MRV guidelines Kazunori Minamikawa NARO, Japan
The partitioning of N2O emissions between denitrification and other sources in natural and semi-natural land use types in the UK Fotis Sgouridis1 and Sami.
Summary of Paper Submitted to Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition Japan, 2017.
Project Overview kazunori Minamikawa NARO, Japan
Кnun=(Lmax-Lmin)/Lmed (1)
Aaker, Kumar, Day Ninth Edition Instructor’s Presentation Slides
Greenhouse gas emissions from paddy rice in Chile
Greenhouse Gas Emission from Paddy Rice Production Systems in Brazil
Merle Anders, Arlene Adviento-Borbe, Daniela Carrijo, Gabriel LaHue
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Irrigated Rice Paddies in Southeast Asia/ Part 2: Field Demonstration 2017 Dry Season Report (7th Season Field Experiment)
Are emission reductions from peatlands MRV-able
Effect of land use systems on soil resources in Northern Thailand
Topsoil Depth at the Centralia Site
Comparing Three or More Means
PCB 3043L - General Ecology Data Analysis.
Supervising Science Research Specialist
APPROACHES TO QUANTITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS
Partial Nutrient Balance at Farm plot level under Different Irrigation Water Management for Tomato production Muluye Gedfew1, Petra Schmitter2, Prossie.
C. Kallenbach1. , W. Horwath1, Z. Kabir1, J. Mitchell2, D
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data
Overview of the Paddy Rice Research Group
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Regression Computer Print Out
N fertilizer placements and greenhouse gas emissions from continuously
Gerald Dyer, Jr., MPH October 20, 2016
CGE Greenhouse Gas Inventory Hands-on Training Workshop
Using Soil Moisture and Matric Potential Observations to Identify Subsurface Convergent Flow Pathways Qing Zhu, Henry Lin, and Xiaobo Zhou Dept . Crop.
Institute for the Study of Society and Environment
Mean, Median, Mode The Mean is the simple average of the data values. Most appropriate for symmetric data. The Median is the middle value. It’s best.
Neil Sims, Glenn Newnham, Jacqui England, Carly Green & Alex Held
STATISTICS INFORMED DECISIONS USING DATA
Presentation transcript:

Site-specific feasibility of alternate wetting and drying as a greenhouse gas mitigation option in irrigated rice fields in Southeast Asia: a synthesis Agnes Tirol-Padre, Kazunori Minamikawa, Takeshi Tokida, Reiner Wassmann, and Kazuyuki Yagi

OBJECTIVES Analyze the effects of environment and soil properties on the extent of GHG mitigation by AWD Examine the potential trade-offs and co-benefits of AWD in terms of rice grain yield and water savings Compare the measured site Emission Factors and Scaling Factors for CH4 and N2O under AWD, with the IPCC’s default values

Inter-Site Variation in Soil Properties CLAYEY SOILS LOAMY SOILS Hue, Vietnam FAO: Ustic Epiaquert USDA: Eutric Vertisol Prachin Buri, Thailand USDA: Vertic Endoaquepts, Active, acid isohyperthermic sulfic Endoaquepts Jakenan, Indonesia USDA: Aeric Endoaquepts Muñoz, Philippines FAO: Dystric Fluvisols, USDA: Typic Endoaquepts

Inter-Site Variation in Soil Properties Hue Jakenan Prachin Buri Muñoz pH 4.18 6.46 4.93 6.44 Total C (g kg-1) 19.2 5.3 22.2 14.6 Total N (g kg-1) 1.90 0.47 1.80 1.23 C:N mole ratio 11.9 13.3 14.5 Active Fe (g kg-1) 12.3 3.6 15.6 12.6 Active Mn (g kg-1) 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.68

Inter-Site Variation in AWD Implementation Criteria used: Minimum soil flood water level Total number of non-flooded days (ponding water less than 0 cm) from seeding to final drainage Ratio of number of non-flooded days to total crop duration (seeding to final drainage) Average water level 𝑆𝐹= 1.088∗∗ −0.0103𝑁𝑁𝐹∗∗+0.0038𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑊𝐿∗ Some criteria were used to show the inter-site variability in AWD implementation Stepwise selection for Multiple regression analysis: First 2 variables significantly explained the variability (41%) in CH4 emissions

Inter-Site Variation in AWD Implementation Criteria Water Mgt Hue Jakenan Prachin Buri Muñoz DS WS Minimum water level (cm) AWD -18.3 (-25 to -8) -23.1 (-46 to -11) -12.5 (-15 to -4) -13.9 (-15 to -13) -9.5 (-12 to -6) AWDS -13.0 (-20 to -6) -32.1 (-64 to -19) (-15 to -6) -133 (-19 to -7) -8.6 (-9 to -8) No. of non-flooded days 30.2 (22 to 39) 30.7 (20 to 41) 24.3 (20 to 27) 34 (24 to 45) 10.5 (4 to 17) 29.3 (14 to 36) 27.2 (14 to 44) 13.3 (8 to 17) 31.7 (12 to 50) 6.0 (4 to 8) Drainability 0.94 ±0.28 1.85 ±0.28 0.78 ±0.29 0.67 ±0.24

Analyses of variance Source of Variation CH4 N2O GWP Grain yield Yield-scaled GWP Water use Site (S) *** Dry or Wet (DW) ** ns Water mgmt (WM) S × DW WM × S * † WM × DW WM×DW×S

Changes under AWD relative to CF Site Season Hue Jakenan Prachin Buri Muñoz CH4 (%) DS -25.8 -36.7 -31.2 -32.1 WS -23.8 -36.8 - 14.1 GWP (kg CO2 eq ha-1) -30.8 -36.3 -11.5 -11.4 -24.8 -35.9 14.0 Water Use (m3 ha-1) -14.4 -6.4 -29.8 -47.1 -14.9 -5.7 -17.0 Water Productivity (kg grain m-3 30.1 4.6 17.6 69.0 25.6 3.3 22.2

CH4 Emission Factors and Scaling Factors for AWD Bootstrapping, a computational nonparametric technique for" re-sampling," enables  researchers to draw a conclusion about the characteristics of a population strictly from the  existing sample rather than by making parametric assumptions about the estimator. Bootstrap as an alternative to the parametric estimation of moderation effects in the presence of skewed dependent variables.  Weighted means +/- bootstrapped confidence intervals Weighted means +/- bootstrapped confidence intervals

N2O Emission Factors EF was calculated by subtracting the mean background N2O emission from Akiyama et al., 2005

Inter-annual variation in soil carbon contents Soil depth: 0-20 cm Error bars: std deviation

Highlights CH4 emissions varied significantly (P<0.05) among sites, seasons and water management. N2O emissions were not significantly (P<0.05) affected by water management but considerable increases under AWD relative to CF were observed in Muñoz, and Prachin Buri during the DS. AWD successfully reduced the seasonal CH4 emission and GWP at varying levels: 25 and 28 % in Hue, 37 and 36 % in Jakenan, 31 and 11 % in Prachin Buri DS, and 32 and 11 % in Muñoz DS.

Highlights AWD was not effective in the clayey soils of Muñoz and Prachin Buri during WS due to the frequent rainfall & the slow water percolation; but it was effective during WS and DS in Hue and Jakenan, both of which had loamy soils and relatively faster percolation rates. The acid sulfate soil primarily contributed to low CH4 emissions in Prachin Buri High soil Mn content may have contributed to the low CH4 emissions during DS in Muñoz

Highlights AWD effectively reduced water use compared to continuous flooding (CF) but did not significantly (P < 0.05) reduce rice grain yield (even with the more drastic AWD in Hue and Jakenan) and soil carbon content in the top soil in all sites. The reduction in water use through AWD relative to CF was remarkably higher in the clayey soils of Muñoz during DS (47%) and Prachin Buri DS (30%) than in the loamy soils of Hue (15%) and Jakenan (6%). High water savings through AWD do not always translate to high CH4 emission reduction due to a greater influence of soil properties.

Highlights The weighted mean CH4-EF for CF and AWD in Hue and Jakenan were significantly higher than those in Muñoz DS and Prachin Buri. The weighted-mean CH4-EF under CF across sites and seasons including Muñoz WS (2.46 ± 0.56 kg ha-1 d-1) was higher although not significantly different from the IPCC’s default EF for flooded rice (1.30 kg ha-1 d-1) partly because they were obtained under site-specific management practices e.g. incorporation of FYM in Jakenan.

Highlights The ratio of seasonal cumulative N2O-N emission to the inorganic fertilizer N applied across sites was 0.42% under CF and 0.49% under AWD, comparable to those reported by Akiyama et al. (0.38 ± 0.41% under CF and 0.67 ± 0.22% under midseason drainage). The AWD SF obtained for CH4 did not significantly differ among sites, with a weighted mean of 0.69 ranging from 0.57 to 0.84 (excluding Muñoz WS). This was slightly higher but not significantly different from the IPCC’s default SF for multiple aeration of 0.52

Highlights Using data from Hue and Jakenan, multiple regression analysis with stepwise selection showed that Minimum Water Level (MinWL) and Number of Non-flooded Days (NNFD) significantly influenced the variability in AWD SFs accounting for 41% of total variability. Based on predicted SFs, a 30% reduction (SF=0.70) in CH4 emission can be achieved with NNFD ≥ 32 when the MinWL = -15 cm for the loamy soils of Hue and Jakenan.

Thank you very much for your attention !!!