Philosophy of Religion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The ontological argument is based entirely upon logic and reason and doesn’t really try to give a posteriori evidence to back it up. Anselm would claim.
Advertisements

Taylor - argument for God from contingency & necessity ~ slide 1 Richard Taylor’s argument for God from contingency & necessity 1. Basic datum - the very.
Is there a rational basis for the belief in God..
The Cosmological Argument St. Thomas Aquinas ( AD) Italian priest, philosopher.
The Cosmological argument
Is Religion Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding The ontological argument The cosmological argument The teleological argument (from design)
Is Belief in God Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding A posteriori arguments (based on experience): The teleological argument (from design) The cosmological.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Why Does Anything at all Exist? Why is there something rather than nothing? Leibniz - the principle of sufficient reason.
Philosophy of Religion What is religion? “Religion is the state of being grasped by an ultimate concern, a concern which qualifies all other concerns as.
David Hume By Richard Jones and Dan Tedham. Biographical Details Born in 1711 in Scotland. Major work: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779) Contains.
Why Does Anything at all Exist? Why is there something rather than nothing? Leibniz - the principle of sufficient reason.
1.Everything which begins to exist has a cause. 2.The Universe exists so it must have a cause. 3.You cannot have infinite regress (i.e. An infinite number.
LECTURE 19 THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT CONTINUED. THE QUANTUM MECHANICAL OBJECTION DEPENDS UPON A PARTICULAR INTERPRETATION WE MIGHT REASONABLY SUSPEND.
Taylor - argument for God from contingency & necessity ~ slide 1 Richard Taylor’s argument for God from contingency & necessity 1. Begins with story of.
Chapter 1: The cosmological argument AQA Religious Studies: Philosophy of Religion AS Level © Nelson Thornes Ltd 2008 Revision.
Religious Studies Hume: empiricism and the Fork. Religious Studies Empiricism Hume is an empiricist. This means that he thinks all knowledge comes a posteriori.
The Cosmological Argument Today’s lesson will be successful if: You have revised the ideas surrounding the cosmological argument and the arguments from.
Lesson Objective: Lesson Outcomes: Lesson Objective: Lesson Outcomes: Mr M Banner 2016 Grade 12 th May 2016 Starter: What does Cosmology mean to you? Title:
Developments in Christian thought…
Starter: Mix-Pair-Share
Arguments based on observation Arguments based on reason
KNOWLEDGE AND CERTAINTY (Part 1)
A Miracle is…….
Argumentative Essay Terminology.
The ontological argument
How do humanists decide what to believe?
Unit 2: Arguments relating to the existence of God.
c) Strengths and weaknesses of Cosmological Arguments:
Philosophy of Religion AO2 1 d, e and f evaluation questions
Evaluation Questions Whether inductive arguments for God’s existence are persuasive. The extent to which the Kalam cosmological argument is convincing.
ALL (E GRADE): Will be able to describe what is meant by ‘religious experience’ and ‘conscience’   MOST (C GRADE): Will be able to compare different interpretations.
The Ontological Argument: St. Anselm’s First Argument
Philosophy of Religion AO2 1 d, e and f evaluation questions
Cosmological Argument: Philosophical Criticisms
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Timing is everything.
Explore the use of inductive reasoning in the cosmological argument
Think pair share What type of argument is the cosmological argument?
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Explore key ideas in the ontological argument. (8 marks)
‘Assess the credibility of the design argument for the existence of God’ (12 marks) The design argument for the existence of God is largely based upon.
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
A Miracle is…….
The Argument from Miracles
Key words on beliefs about God
COPLESTON AND RUSSELL OVERVIEW
1 A The Cosmological Argument Kalam Argument
Starter: Glossary (key word) test- what do the words mean?
THE DEBATE BETWEEN COPLESTON AND RUSSELL.
Argument from Design We are learning to …
THE DEBATE BETWEEN COPLESTON AND RUSSELL.
The First Cause (Cosmological) Argument
Key words on beliefs about God
Or Can you?.
INTRODUCTION Page 20 This extract is the transcript of a radio debate between Frederick Copleston (a theist) and Bertrand Russell (an agnostic). Bertrand.
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Clarify and explain the key ideas. A’priori Deductive
Philosophy of Religion Arguments for the existence of God
Revision Beliefs about God
Science can offer us explanations of things that are within the universe, but does the universe as a whole have an explanation? Think, pair, share.
Assess the strengths of the cosmological argument. (12 marks)
Explore the key ideas of the cosmological argument. (8 marks)
Chemistry Adapted from Stephen L. Cotton
Strengths and Weaknesses of Cosmological Argument
‘Assess the credibility of the cosmological argument’ (12 marks)
Clarify the key ideas Logic Definition Premises Outline opinion Flawed
The Teleological Argument
Presentation transcript:

Philosophy of Religion Philosophy section in folder. 1/3 2 hour exam papers (33.3% of total A Level)

Philosophy of Religion Existence of God: Arguments based on observation. Philosophy of Religion

Arguments based on observation.

Principle of Sufficient Reason A posteriori arguments Key terminology ? Teleological Cosmological Natural Theology Contingent Principle of Sufficient Reason Sceptic A posteriori arguments Necessary existence A priori arguments Logical fallacy

Teleological – looking to the end results (telos) in order to draw a conclusion about what is right and wrong. Cosmological – to do with the universe. Natural Theology – drawing conclusions about the nature and activity of God by using reason and observing the world. Contingent – depending on other things. Principle of Sufficient Reason – the principle that everything must have a reason to explain it. Sceptic – someone who will not accept what others say without questioning or challenging. A posteriori arguments – arguments which draw conclusions based on observation through experience. Necessary existence – existence which does not depend on anything else. A priori arguments – arguments which draw conclusions through the use of reason. Logical fallacy – reasoning that has a flaw in its structure.

Does God exist? How might someone respond to your argument? What is your argument based on? How might someone respond to your argument?

How many arguments can you think of? Does God exist? YES NO How many arguments can you think of?

Does God exist? Does the tooth fairy exist? What are these questions different? Why might we arrive at an answer more quickly for question 2?

Does God exist? Does the tooth fairy exist? Read the information on page 57 and answer the questions in your own words… Does God exist? Does the tooth fairy exist? What are these questions different? Why might we arrive at an answer more quickly for question 2?

Issue: we don’t really know what God is/ is like… We cannot use the same methods we would use to prove whether the tooth fairy/ unicorns/ the loch ness monster are real… It is a very unique question…

Which arguments are a posteriori and which are a priori? Does God exist? YES NO A posteriori arguments – arguments which draw conclusions based on observation through experience. A priori arguments – arguments which draw conclusions through the use of reason. Which arguments are a posteriori and which are a priori?

Does the natural world provide evidence for the existence of God? Can the existence of God be demonstrated through drawing conclusions from our observations? Does the natural world provide evidence for the existence of God?

Homework… Who was Aquinas? Find one fact that tells us about who he was/ what he was like/ what he believed about the existence of God.