Standard III Faculty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by: Jerry Legge Associate Provost for Academic Planning (Interim), and Professor of Public Administration and Policy (SPIA) Provost Advisory.
Advertisements

1 Whats All This Fuss About Promotion & Tenure? Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine.
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Faculty Affairs presents:. PPCs  Consist of 3 or 5 members  Are selected based on Program Personnel Standards (i.e. one per program or one per faculty.
ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Assessment, data analysis and evaluation of findings as essential components of the self study for determining if objectives.
Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant
AdvanceVT Mentoring. Let’s Benchmark: Who Does Mentoring Well? 2008 Faculty Worklife Survey, 700 tenure- track faculty responses (53% RR); College RRs.
NWCCU Standard 2 - Educational Program and Its Effectiveness Bea Babbitt & Francisco Menendez October 29, 2008 SU 219 Bea Babbitt & Francisco Menendez.
Developing a Narrative and Portfolio for Personnel Review at UIS Nathan Steele Chair, Personnel Policies Committee April 2015.
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
Standard Four: Faculty Michael Connolly, D.M.A. University of Portland Michael Connolly, D.M.A. University of Portland.
Cathy Jordan, PhD Associate Professor of Pediatrics Director, Children, Youth and Family Consortium University of Minnesota Member, Community Campus Partnerships.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
2015 UTIA P&T Workshop. UTK Faculty Handbook….  Section Faculty Review & Evaluation p 18  Section Probationary Period p 21 UTK Manual.
OCTOBER 4, 2012 Tenure and Promotion Workshop. Today’s Agenda Execution of Mission, Vision and Goals Criteria for Tenure and Promotion FAQ’s E-Faculty.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL ATTENDINGS Rhonda Dick, M.D. Tim Martin, M.D.
Chapter 2 Educating for Social Work. History of Social Work Education 1800s – Mostly apprenticeship model Early 1900s – Development of formal social work.
Leading Change. THE ROLE OF POLICY IN CHANGE Leading Change – The Role of Policy Drift to Quantitative Compliance- Behavior will focus on whatever is.
Tenure and Promotion at Public PUI’s and R-1’s Cutting Edge 2007 Jean M. BahrJean M. Bahr and Kurt C. Friehauf.
Gerard L. Hanley, Ph.D. Executive Director, MERLOT Senior Director, California State University Using MERLOT To Support Retention, Tenure, and Promotion.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Proposals drafted by the Faculty Status and Promotion & Tenure Committees of the Faculty Senate Senior II Promotion Level Professor of Practice.
October 27, 2011 MUSC Faculty Senate Promotion and Tenure Workshop.
Presented by the Faculty Affairs Office September 2013.
ARE STUDENTS LEARNING WHAT WE SAY THEY ARE? THE IMPORTANCE AND PROCESS FOR CONDUCTING EFFECTIVE PROGRAM REVIEWS IN THE BUSINESS CURRICULUM Presented by:
Academic Advancement for Clinician-Educators: Secrets from the Dean’s Office 2/26/13 Renee Binder, M.D. Elena Fuentes-Afflick, M.D., M.P.H. SOM Academic.
North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES DEPARTMENTAL RPT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP September 26 and September.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
Working Personnel Action File Sections Colleen Mullery Sr. Associate Vice President, Faculty Affairs & Human Resources.
Faculty Ensuring competency and integrity. Faculty The university employs competent faculty qualified to accomplish the mission and goals of the institution.
Associate Professor to Professor Associate Professor to Professor Robert T. Burns, PhD. PE Assistant Dean & Professor University of Tennessee UTIA Promotion.
Faculty Affairs presents:. PPCs  Consist of 3 or 5 members  Are selected based on Program Personnel Standards (i.e. one per program or one per faculty.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Conspicuous Excellence: Embracing Accountability, Documenting Impact & Building Trust Nita A. Paris, PhD, Associate.
Promotion and Ten ure October 2015 Alyssa Panitch Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs PURDUE FACULTY.
What Matters in Tenure Decisions in the College: Unofficial Advice Michael Knapp & a Cast of Thousands April 10, 2015.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Managing Promotion Timelines Anita L. Allen, JD, PhD Vice Provost for Faculty Henry R. Silverman Professor of Law and Philosophy.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #3 June 17, 2014  CV and Summary Statements (feedback)  Review Teaching Statement of Endeavors and Supporting.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
RETENTION, TENURE, PROMOTION WORKSHOP Presented by the Faculty Affairs Office September 2012.
Patricia Linton, Ph.D. Professor of English Senior Associate Dean for Academics College of Arts and Sciences Faculty Evaluation.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
Tenure and Promotion Workshop November 1, Workshop Logistics Overview of SUNY tenure and promotion criteria Overview of SUNY tenure and promotion.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
3A – The organization’s goals for student learning outcomes are clearly stated for each educational program and make effective assessment possible 3B --
Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.
Canadian Business Ethics Research Network – PhD Cluster Professional Development Workshop Pursuing a Successful Academic Career Sheila A. Brown PhD, May.
Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, & Students 1. Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students (#82) INTENT STATEMENTS 4.1.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
Administration, Finances, and Resources
Building Your Personnel Action Dossier
Reappointment, Tenure and Promotion (RTP) Processes and Procedures
First-Year Experience Seminars: A Benchmark Study of Targeted Courses for Developmental Education Students.
Standard I Systematic Planning.
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Using MERLOT To Support Retention, Tenure, and Promotion Reviews
Standard II Curriculum.
Associate Professor to Professor
Standard IV Students.
FROM A PROVOST’S PERSPECTIVE
UTIA P&T Workshop Overview of P&T Process June 19, 2018.
Associate Professor to Professor
Tenure and Promotion: Article 6
PRESENTATION TITLE Faculty Enhancement and Instructional Development (FEID) Proposal Support Sharon Seidman, Ph.D. (HHD) and Erica Bowers, Ed.D. (Director,
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
UTIA P&T Workshop Overview of P&T Process April 29, 2019.
Presentation Name and Description Name, Position
Non-Tenure Track Promotion Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Standard III Faculty

III.1 Faculty is capable of meeting program objectives Not only this… But also this, for example… List of faculty with rank and areas of specialization Appendix providing current CVs of full-time and adjunct faculty Table that shows relationships between faculty, their expertise, and student learning outcomes III.1 Faculty is capable of meeting program objectives

III.2 High priority for teaching, research and service Not only this… But also this, for example… Appendix with current CVs of faculty. Access to university policies for tenure and promotion Description of institutional resources to support teaching and research Descriptions of institutional incentives and/or rewards for teaching, research and service. Description of faculty review process related to teaching, research and service III.2 High priority for teaching, research and service

III.3 Polices support recruiting and retaining diverse faculty Not only this… But also this, for example… List of faculty identifying racial and ethnic group representation Access to university policies for faculty recruitment Description of institutional resources for faculty retention Description of program initiatives to recruit and retain diverse faculty III.3 Polices support recruiting and retaining diverse faculty

Not only this… But also this , for example… List of institutional resources to support faculty expertise in pedagogy and technology List of faculty engagement in activities to enhance expertise in pedagogy and technology Table demonstrating faculty activities within relevant professional organizations Table showing faculty scores in student evaluation criteria related to relevant pedagogy and technology III.4 Faculty qualified in designated areas, technology, and pedagogy; active in relevant organizations.

III.5 Sustained records of scholarship/research Not only this… But also this, for example… Appendix with current faculty CVs Table showing quantity of faculty scholarly/professional works classified as peer-review journals, book chapters, peer-review presentations, editorial works, reviews, etc. over the program review cycle. III.5 Sustained records of scholarship/research

Not only this… But also this, for example… Appendix of current faculty CVs Table showing institutions granting faculty degrees, type of terminal degree (e.g.., PhD, JD, EdD), area of study emphasis III.6 Advanced degrees from various institutions; diversity of backgrounds

III.7 Faculty assignments match program needs and competencies Not only this… But also this, for example… List of faculty areas of expertise Matrix showing areas of faculty expertise aligned with teaching assignments III.7 Faculty assignments match program needs and competencies

III.8 Systematic faculty evaluation Not only this… But also this, for example… Access to institutional policies regarding faculty review Description of program-level faculty including, who is reviewed (e.g., full-time/part-time, tenured/non-tenured, etc.) and by whom (e.g., students, peers, program head), and how often III.8 Systematic faculty evaluation

III.9 Data to substantiate evaluation of faculty Not only this… But also this, for example… Reference to institutional policies and procedures Timeline showing faculty evaluation schedules indicating completion of formal faculty evaluations over the review cycle List of tenure/promotion decisions over review cycle III.9 Data to substantiate evaluation of faculty

III.10 Results of faculty evaluation used to improve program and plan Not only this… But also this, for example… Summaries of faculty accomplishments in teaching, research and service List of program improvements supported through evaluation of faculty, e.g., additional support (time or funds) for research, changes to teaching assignments, decisions related to adjunct faculty assignments, etc. III.10 Results of faculty evaluation used to improve program and plan

Suggestions for Standard III documentation Use graphics to represent process Give concrete examples Use tables to organize information Use timelines to illustrate process Suggestions for Standard III documentation