CRIME AND PUNISHMENT I: THE SYSTEM

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
North Carolina’s Judicial Branch. Types of Crimes Misdemeanors: Less serious crimes. In NC misdemeanors carry less than 2 years in jail. Misdemeanors:
Advertisements

NC Court System.
1. 2 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act First state in the nation to end felony sentencing for simple drug possession and low-level petty theft First.
Poli 103A California Politics Crime and Punishment II: Race and Crime.
Poli 103A California Politics Crime and Punishment I: The System.
California Politics, Summer 2002 [Click to advance] The Structure of California Government Legislative Branch Legislative Branch Executive Branch Executive.
Georgia Studies Unit 8 – Judicial Branch in Georgia
Judges and Courts Article V of the Texas Constitution describes the judiciary. This branch makes up the state’s court system. The Texas courts decide.
The Judicial Branch November 10, 2014 Standard: SS8CG4
Texas and United States Governments
Chapter 28.2 “The Judicial Branch of Texas”. The Judicial Branch is made up of courts and judges throughout the state.
Unit 8 –Government Lessons 2, 3, and 4: Three Branches of Government Study Presentation Georgia Studies.
Unit 4– Judicial Branch in Georgia
State Government.
Chapter 12.4 The State Judicial Branch. Lower State Courts The state court system handles most of the nation’s legal matters. State courts interpret and.
Chapter 28-2: Texas Judicial Branch and Courts Systems
Georgia’s General Assembly  Meets each year for a 40 day session that starts the 2 nd Monday in January.  Can pass legislation on taxes, education, contracts,
Judicial Branch Responsible for interpreting the laws of the state and making decisions or judgments on those interpretations.
North Carolina Judicial Branch Chapter 13 Section 3.
POLI 103A CALIFORNIA POLITICS CRIME AND PUNISHMENT II: RACE AND CRIME.
Chapter 28-2: Texas Courts Systems Guided Notes. Texas Judicial System A. Consists of : 1)Courts 2)Judges 3)Law enforcement agencies B. Serves the purposes.
Democracy and Constitutions The Texas System of Justice p
The Judicial Branch – Oregon Court Systems. Definitions Jurisdiction Jurisdiction The area in which a court has authority The area in which a court has.
GEORGIA HISTORY 12/2/21012  INTRODUCTION TO: THE STATE LEVEL OF GEORGIA’S GOVERNMENT /CHAPTER 15 1) EXECUTIVE BRANCH 2) LEGISLATIVE BRANCH 3) JUDICIAL.
Texas Executive Branch Essential Questions: –Compare the principles and concepts of the Texas Constitution and U.S. Constitution –Describe the structure.
GEORGIA STUDIES GMAS REVIEW To assist you with key concepts and vocabulary.
The State Judicial Branch.
Missouri Constitution!!!
Government.
The Court System in Texas
Government Governments are created to provide safety, order, and to serve the people. They depend on citizens taking active, responsible roles.
North Carolina State Government
NORTH CAROLINA COURTS.
State government notes
Georgia Studies Unit 8 – Judicial Branch in Georgia
The Federal Court System
Section 8.4: The State Judicial Branch.
HSA Review: Branches, Levels, & Powers
State & Local Government
Legislative Branch Legislative Branch Senate House of Representatives
The Judicial Branch of Georgia’s Government
1. What position is the Chief Executive of the State Executive Branch?
Legislative Branch Legislative Branch Senate House of Representatives
The Judicial Branch.
Section 13.4: The State Judicial Branch.
The nc court system.
Texas Executive Branch
State Government North Carolina.
The Judicial Branch of Georgia’s Government
The Judicial Branch November 10, 2014 Standard: SS8CG4
The Judicial Branch of Georgia’s Government
The State Judicial Branch
Government in Georgia.
Georgia Studies Unit 8 – Judicial Branch in Georgia
State and Local Government
North Carolina State Government
NC Government The 3 branches.
Take out your notes and a plain sheet of paper numbered 1 through 5.
Write name, date, and period on a blank sheet of paper.
Lessons 2, 3, and 4: Three Branches of Government
Georgia Judicial System
Civil Pretrial Practice
Texas Executive Branch
Texas Judicial System Consists of : Courts Judges
SOL 7A State Government.
The United States Constitution
Georgia Studies Unit 8 – Judicial Branch in Georgia
Georgia’s Judicial System
Lessons 2, 3, and 4: Three Branches of Government
Section 13.2: The State Legislative Branch Section.
Presentation transcript:

CRIME AND PUNISHMENT I: THE SYSTEM Chief Justice Ron George

Crime and Punishment I: The System How Criminal Justice Policy is Made Legislation by anecdote Initiatives lock in decisions How Justice Policy is Enforced Pyramid of courts Politics and the judicial branch Effects of the Tough on Crime Wave

Crime in California

Prisons in California California’s Youth and Adult Corrections budget has grown from 3.3% of general fund spending in 1976-1977 to a proposed 9.4% in 2012-13. Fastest growing area. Higher Education dropped from 18.0% to 10.5% over this period

How Criminal Justice Policy is Made Legislation by Anecdote. Key events that drive the news cycle often drive policy. 1993 murder of Polly Klaas by two-time kidnapping convict Richard Allen Davis led to California’s “Three Strikes” law. Many gun control bills have been passed in the wake of mass shootings (Stockton playground led to assault rifle ban, Columbine led to gun-a-month).

How Criminal Justice Policy is Made In March, 1994, Assembly Bill 971 (Bill Jones and Jim Costa) passed 29-7 in the Senate and 63-9 in the Assembly. If a defendant has two prior convictions of violent or serious felonies, a third conviction of any felony automatically leads to a sentence of 25 years to life. A second conviction doubles your sentence. Predicted cost $2.8 billion for incarceration by 2003 and $21.3 billion in construction.

How Criminal Justice Policy is Made Locking in Decisions This legislative victory was locked in by the passage of Proposition 184 in the 1994 general election. It passed with 72% of the vote. Marc Klaas, Polly’s father, famously changed his position on the law when he learned of its scope. Bills to require that the third strike be serious or violent have failed.

How Justice Policy is Enforced Pyramid of Courts California Supreme Court – 7 Justices, 5,000 filings Courts of Appeal – 101 Justices, 20,000 filings Superior Courts – 789 Judges, 1 million filings Municipal Courts – 616 Judges, 16 million filings The People’s Court

How Justice Policy is Enforced Pyramid of Courts Municipal Courts hear misdemeanors and <$25,000 civil cases Misdemeanor convicts go to county jails for less than a year Superior Courts can hear felony cases and <$25,000 civil case Felony convicts go to state prisons for a year or more

How Justice Policy is Enforced Pyramid of Courts Appeals Courts and the Supreme Court do not hear the facts of the case, leaving this to the “trial courts,” and instead correct errors of law. Death penalty cases go straight to the Supreme Court on appeal. The Supreme Court also resolves open questions of law.

How Justice Policy is Enforced Politics and the Judicial Branch Appeals Court and Supreme Court justices are picked by the governor. Their selection must be confirmed by the Commission on Judicial Appointments, which has only rejected one (in 1940). When the justice’s term expires, voters in the state or appellate district have the chance to vote yes or no on the justice. Only three justices have ever lost.

How Justice Policy is Enforced Politics and the Judicial Branch Superior and Municipal Court judges either win an “open seat” (the old judge left when term expired) or are appointed by the governor (for a mid-term vacancy). In either case, there is an election at the end of the six year term. Any lawyer can run to fill the next term.

Effects of the Tough on Crime Wave #1. Transfer of discretion. Judges used to have broad discretion in making the punishment fit the crime. Under Three Strikes, district attorneys have the real discretion by deciding whether to charge a crime as a strike. Bowers (NYU Law Review) shows that San Francisco doesn’t charge nonviolent felonies as strikes, but San Diego leads the state in Three Strikes convictions.

Effects of the Tough on Crime Wave #2. There was a dramatic decrease in the crime rate during the 1990s. Advocates of Three Strikes point to deterrence and incarceration effects. Reduction may also result from drops in unemployment and the population proportion of 14-24 year old males. Drop in counties like San Francisco equals drops in those like San Diego.

Effects of the Tough on Crime Wave #3. By 1999, 40,000 Californians were in prison on second strike charges, 5,000 for third strikes. This is 30% of the prison population, but not as large as expected. “Crimes against person” accounted for only 20% of second strike sentences and 40% of third strike cases. Primarily drug and property crimes.

Effects of the Tough on Crime Wave #4. Backlash against the sentence enhancements of early 90s. Proposition 215 (56%, 1996), the Medical Marijuana Act, allowed cultivation and possession of pot if doctor- recommended. Proposition 36 (61%, support 2000) mandated parole and drug treatment, but not incarceration, for those convicted of use or possession. Proposition 36 (69% support in 2012) required a Third Strike to be serious or violent to lead to 25-to-life, except for heinous 1st and 2nd strikers. Leading to resentencing now.

Discussion Questions Should we make policy by anecdote? If rejection of justices by the Commission on Judicial Appointment or by voters is so rare, do these apparent obstacles make a difference? What are the benefits and drawbacks of electing trial judges?