Prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in OHSS patients

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Hakan ÖZÖRNEK EUROFERTIL Reproductive Health Center
Advertisements

GnRH agonist instead of hCG to trigger ovulation in GnRH antagonist cycles Dec 10, 2004.
Luteal Phase Support in ART Cycles
 OHSS is a serious, potentially life- threatening, iatrogenic complication of “controlled” ovarian stimulation.  To optimize the ovarian response without.
ART-IVF: the Long and Short of it Professor Ernest Hung Yu NG Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology The University of Hong Kong.
Elonva in poor responders
Prevention of OHSS Shahar Kol, IVF Unit Rambam Health Care Campus, and Macabbi Health Services, Haifa, Israel. February 2012.
Minimal Monitoring of Ovulation Induction (OI) Is It Safe? Mustafa Uğur Zekai Tahir Burak Women’s Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
OHSS PREVENTION: YES, WE CAN! Shahar Kol, IVF Unit Rambam Health Care Campus, and Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, February,
Does GnRHa triggering completely abolish OHSS? Dec 3 rd, 2010.
Prediction and prevention of OHSS - an evidence-based approach Hassan N. Sallam, MD, FRCOG, PhD (London) Professor in Obstetrics and Gynaecology The University.
RECOMBINANT LH, RECOMBINANT HCG AND GNRH AGONIST TO TRIGGER OVULATION IN ANTAGONIST CYCLES: A CRITICAL EVALUATION SHAHAR KOL AUGUST 2014.
Triggers and Luteal Support What, Why and How?
INDIVIDUALIZED IVF TREATMENT
The Women’s Clinic 婦產科中心 New Concept of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in IVF Dr. Milton Leong MDCM DSc (McGill) Director, IVF Center, HKSH Specialist.
Role of Anti-Mullerian hormone in prediction of Assisted Reproductive Technology outcomes Leili Safdarian M.D. Khadigeh Khosravi M.D. Marzieh Agha Hosseini.
IVM is ready as a treatment for PCOS patients
Discontinuation of rLH two days before hCG may increase the number of oocytes retrieved in IVF Jessica B Spencer 1*, Aimee S Browne 1, Susannah D Copland.
Prof.Dr.Tayfun BAĞIŞ 15/05/2013 TJOD. TerminologyAimMethodology Natural cycle IVFSingle oocyteNo medication No luteal support Modified NC IVFSingle.
The uses of antagonist in IVF/ICSI cycle Prof. Dr. Mohamed Said Elmahaishi Lamis IVF Centre Misurata/ Libya 5 th International Congress In Infertility.
Safety and efficacy of FSH drugs in ART for polycystic ovarian disease M. Aboulghar Cairo, Egypt.
Planning of GnRH antagonist cycles
Levent M. SENTURK, M.D., Professor in Ob&Gyn Istanbul University Cerrahpasa School of Medicine Dept. of Ob&Gyn, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology,
Dr. Milton Leong Director
Embryo development Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6.
GNRH-A TRIGGER AND INDIVIDUALIZED LUTEAL PHASE HCG SUPPORT WILL AVOID OHSS IN PCOS PATIENTS. Shahar Kol, IVF Unit Rambam Health Care Campus, and Faculty.
GnRH-a to trigger ovulation should be used in all PCOS patients to prevent OHSS Dr. Shahar Kol.
SL ‘00 Antagonists in patients with previous poor ovarian response Antagonists in patients with previous poor ovarian response Geoffrey H Trew Consultant.
Agonist vs Antagonist Dr. Milton Leong.
How to schedule GnRH antagonist cycles?
Recommended Dosage of GnRH Antagonist is Too High Presented by Dr. Milton Leong, MD DSc(McGill) Director, IVF Centre.
Aline de Cássia Azevedo (a,b) ; Fernanda Coimbra Miyasato (b) ; Litsuko S. Fujihara (b), Maria Cecília R.M. Albuquerque (b), Ticiana V. Oliveira (b), Luiz.
ART FOR PCOS-DIFFICULTIES AND SOLUTIONS Dr. Bulent Urman American Hospital, ISTANBUL Assisted Reproduction Unit Koç University, Faculty of Medicine Department.
Dr. Hakan Özörnek EUROFERTIL IVF Center
A review on the luteal phase P Devroey MD PhD Centre for Reproductive Medicine Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University Brussels - Belgium.
NEW STRATEGIES FOR OHSS PREVENTION Ali Rüştü Ergür, M.D., Assoc.Prof. GATA Haydarpaşa Hospital The 2nd Congress of Current Opinion in Reproductive Medicine.
Luteal coasting post GnRH agonist trigger
© Fertility Centers of Illinois1 Freeze-All Policy: Fresh vs. Frozen- Thawed embryo transfer in PCOS patients Jane Nani, M.D. November 17, 2015.
Georg Griesinger UK-SH, Campus Luebeck Germany. We have a problem…
(Miz Medi Hospital) Jung-Hyun Cho, M.D. (Miz Medi Hospital) Minimal Ovarian Stimulation.
PKOS’unda GnRH anolog vs. antagonist Dr.Engin Oral İ.Ü. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Anabilim Dalı Reprodüktif Endokrinoloji Bilim.
IVF TROUBLESHOOTING ( Clinical Perspective) Malvin Emeraldi M. Luky, Dianing ASR,Muchsin J Family Fertility Center, RSIA Family Fatmawaty Hospital Jakarta,
Patient scheduling & Luteal phase support Konstantin Y. Boyarsky MD, PhD IVF Clinics “GENESIS” Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State Pediatric.
The Endometrium and Frozen Embryo Transfer
UOG Journal Club: February 2016
ART’de Aşırı Cevabın Yönetimi
The timeline shows the day of menstrual cycle for a typical patient
How IVF Protocols Work to Enhance the Success of IVF: Agonist vs Antagonist Dr Dimitrios Dovas MD Newlife IVF Greece.
Facilitator: Pawin Puapornpong
Ovarian Hyper Stimulation Syndrome (OHSS)
UOG Journal Club: October 2016
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Dissertation defense meeting Resident of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Use of GnRH antagonists for IVF
Mohamed Elmahdy MD. Lecturer Obs. Gyn. Alexandria University Egypt
The approach to the PCOS patient undergoing IVF
Dealing with ART failure – what should be the stimulation we offer
به نام خدا Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
Hormonal profile of the same oocyte donors stimulated with either GnRH antagonist or agonist compared with natural cycles.
Figure 1 Flow chart showing the selection of publications identified in the literature search. From: GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF:
Oocyte Donation; Factors Influencing The Outcome
The effect of the duration of stimulation on ART outcomes
Reducing implantation failure: novel approach to luteal phase support
UOG Journal Club: December 2016
No association between endogenous LH and pregnancy in a GnRH antagonist protocol: part II, recombinant FSH  George Griesinger, Daniel B. Shapiro, Efstratios.
Ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF: is more better than less?
How to do a study? Prof. P. Devroey.
Shahar Kol, IVF Unit, Elisha Hospital, Haifa, Israel
novel approach to luteal phase support
Lower levels of inhibin A and pro-αC during the luteal phase after triggering oocyte maturation with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus human.
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome prevention by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in a gonadotropin-releasing.
Presentation transcript:

Prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in OHSS patients Georg Griesinger University Clinic of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology VVOG Post-Universitaire Studiedag Zemst, 13 Nov 2008

What is the OHSS incidence in your center?

German IVF registry, 2006

Number of OHSS cases per year in Germany? 0,41 (incidence DIR) x ~40.000 IVF cycles with ovarian stimulation per year = 164 OHSS cases

= 1.080 OHSS III cases per year in Germany Hum Reprod. 2006 Dec;21(12):3235-40

OHSS III° incidence: 2,1% 95% CI: 1.6 – 2.8 Fertility and Sterility Vol. 85, No. 1, 2006

........................ OHSS [MeSH] AND fatality [MeSH] death of a 31-year-old woman …who developed a fatal adult respiratory distress syndrome Fineschi et al., 2006 autopsy case of severe OHSS …..28-year-old Japanese female…… who died of rapid respiratory insufficiency Semba et al., 2000 21 year old woman ……cerebral infarction….complete persistent hemiplegia Hwang et al., 1998 ........................

Clinically relevant OHSS OHSS that requires hospitalisation WHO grade III Golan,1989 grade IV-V ‚severe‘ ‚critical‘ Navot,1992 Rizk, 1999 grade B,C

Prediction Prevention Treatment

primary prevention: intended to decrease the overall risk in the general population secondary prevention: detection of patients at risk and preventive measure only in those patients tertiary prevention: prophylaxis of further damage in patients with a disease

Can we reliably predict OHSS?

Long GnRH-agonist protocol De Angelo et al., 2004 E2 = 3,354 pg/ml Sens + Spec = 85% GnRH-antagonist protocol Papanicolaou et al., 2006 18 follicles >10 mm or E2 > 5,000 pg/l Sens = 83% Spec = 84% 5/53 CASES OF SEVERE OHSS STILL MISSED WITH THESE CRITERIA I d like to show you graphs from two recent studies which are likely to be more representative of what is we are doing nowadays in terms of ovarian stimulation.

No reliable test to identify all OHSS risk patients develop ovarian stimulation routines that are associated with a per se decreased risk of OHSS (primary prevention) develop measures of OHSS prevention for individual risk patients, which are safe and efficacious, and can therefore be liberally utilized (secondary prevention) develop better treatment regimen for patients with onset of OHSS to avoid further complications (tertiary prevention)

Reduction of follicles Trigger of final oocyte maturation: OHSS Prevention Ovarian stimulation Reduction of follicles Trigger of final oocyte maturation: Luteal phase GnRH-antagonist instead of GnRH-agonist long Delayed FSH start Natural cycle IVF Cycle cancellation In vitro Maturation Coasting early aspiration of small follicles unilateral follicular aspiration GnRH-agonist instead of hCG Reduced dose hCG Recombinant LH instead of hCG hCG free luteal phase support Elective cryopreservation of embryos Luteal phase GnRH-antagonist administration

Ovarian stimulation OHSS incidence reduction Natural cycle IVF √ In vitro Maturation √ Cycle cancellation √ efficacy ? ---

Number-needed-to-treat-to-harm with a GnRH-agonist long protocol for OHSS III Kolibianakis et al., Hum Reprod Update 2006 Outcome: severe OHSS associated with hospital admission EXPECTED OHSS III° INCIDENCE: 3.5% RR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.27–0.82, P = 0.01 NNT TO HARM = 53 (39 - 159) 3,46%

GnRH-antagonist vs GnRH-agonist long OHSS III Crude incidence of OHSS = 1.5%

A mild treatment strategy for in-vitro fertilisation: a randomised non-inferiority trial Mild stimulation: reduction OHSS, but also not the final solution Incidence of OHSS = 1.4% Heijnen et al.,Lancet 2007; 369: 743–49

Coasting OHSS II-III in 3-10% Delvigne & Rozenberg, HRupdate, 2002 Still high OHSS incidence, efficacy not clear (especially when coasting >3 days) Delvigne & Rozenberg, HRupdate, 2002

GnRH -antagonists

Novel concepts in Coasting E2 < 3000 pg/ml ? 4 follicles ≥ 16mm? Hyper response? hCG FSH FSH GnRH-agonist daily GnRH-antagonist daily Case control study of gustofson n= 85, coasting ~ 1.5 days Ongoing pregnancy rate: ~ 60 % Severe OHSS: 1.5 - 7.5 % Gustofson et al., Hum Reprod 2006 Gustofson et al., Fertil Steril 2006

Conventional coasting Novel concepts in Coasting RCT: 192 patients Antagonist coasting Conventional coasting Days of coasting 1.74 ± 0.91 2.82 ± 0.97 No of oocytes 16.5 ± 7.6 14.06 ± 5.2 No of embryos 2.87 ± 1.2 2.21 ± 1.1 Clinical pregnancy (N.S.) 55.32% 47.92% No OHSS in both study groups I think that for those who already use coasting as an OHSS preventive measure, trying antagonist coasting certainly appeas worthwhile Aboulghar et al., RBMonline 2007

Coasting in Antagonist protocols Bahceci et al., 2006; Farhi et al., 2008

Ovarian stimulation Ovarian stimulation GnRH-antagonist instead of GnRH-agonist long Delayed FSH start (“mild”) Natural cycle IVF Cycle cancellation In vitro Maturation Coasting Reduces OHSS incidence, but is not the final solution idem Efficacy questionable Efficacy zero ?

Reduction of follicles Trigger of final oocyte maturation: OHSS Prevention Ovarian stimulation Reduction of follicles Trigger of final oocyte maturation: Luteal phase GnRH-antagonist instead of GnRH-agonist long Delayed FSH start Natural cycle IVF Cycle cancellation In vitro Maturation Coasting early aspiration of small follicles unilateral follicular aspiration GnRH-agonist instead of hCG Reduced dose hCG Recombinant LH instead of hCG hCG free luteal phase support Elective cryopreservation of embryos Luteal phase GnRH-antagonist administration

The final solution to OHSS prevention….. Abolish hCG as a triggering agent!?

GnRH-agonist trigger Gonen et al., 1990

Luteal phase after agonist trigger? Progesterone serum values with NO luteal phase supplementation Day of administration of GnRH-a or hCG Beckers et al., 2003

Drastic luteolysis… Will it prevent OHSS? Kol S, Fertil Steril 2004

Trigger of final oocyte maturation Does GnRH-agonist triggering prevent OHSS? ? RCT hCG agonist Observational study OHSS risk population General population Oocyte donors Trigger of final oocyte maturation RCT

OHSS I-II: RR with 95% confidence intervals (heterogeneity p = 0.57) Evidence from RCTs Mantel-Haenszel Update of: Griesinger et al., Hum Reprod update 2005

Evidence from observational, uncontrolled trials 16 publications total n= 1,091 OHSS risk patients  a single case reported: late-onset OHSS in a pregnant woman Full publication: Itskovitz-Eldor, 2000; Kol and Muchtar, 2005; Engmann, 2006; Orvieto, 2006; Griesinger, 2007; Abstract: Bracero, 2001; Meltzer, 2002; Bankowski, 2004; Carone, 2005; Chun, 2005; Erden, 2005; Shapiro, 2005; Bukulmez, 2005; Bar-Hava, 2005; Körösi, 2006; Bodri, 2006 Update of: Griesinger et al., RBMonline 2006

0.2 triptorelin or 0.5 mg buserelin and hCG No difference between 0.2 triptorelin or 0.5 mg buserelin and hCG no. of oocytes no. of MII oocytes fertilisationrate embryo Score BUT: ongoing PR drastically reduced Human Reproduction Update, 2006

GnRH-antagonist stimulation OHSS risk? GnRH-agonist trigger Elective 2PN freezing Cryo-ET Griesinger et al., Hum Reprod 2007

Cryopreservation slow cooling vitrification - 50.000°C/min 2 sec.

Update of Griesinger et al., Hum Reprod 2007 Patients with GnRH-agonist triggering, n =40 Patients with 2 PN oocytes frozen, n = 39 Patients with at least one embryo transfer, n = 39 Number of (cryo) embryo transfers, n = 81 Update of Griesinger et al., Hum Reprod 2007

Cumulative live birth rate (95% confidence interval) 32.5% (13/40) 21.7 – 45.5% Live birth rate per embryo transfer 16.0% (13/81) 10.4 – 23.9% Live birth rate per first embryo transfer 17.9% (7/39) 10.0 – 30.1 OHSS incidence: 0% (0.0 – 6.2) Update of Griesinger et al., Hum Reprod 2007

Mean number of embryos transferred Mean number of ETs: 2.1 Mean number of embryos transferred Mean time-to-conception 21 weeks Cumulative incidence positive hCG test leading to live birth

Reduced hCG dose? RCT, n= 80 PCOS GnRH-antagonist protocol 10,000 IU Fertilisation rate 52.8% 65.4% 55.6% Ongoing pregnancy rate 26.9% (7 of 26), 30.8% (8 of 26) 34.8% (8 of 23), OHSS III° 3.5% (1 of 28) 3.8% (1 of 26) 0% Kolibianakis et al., 2007

low dose hCG & OHSS? Retrospective study, n=94 cycles > 2,500 - 4,000 pg/mL  5000 IU >4000  3300 IU 5,000 IU (n=47) 3,300 IU (n = 47) Ongoing pregnancy rate 50.0% 43.5% Moderate OHSS 2.1% 10.6% Severe OHSS 0% 4.2% Schmidt et al., 2007

Half dose/low dose hCG & OHSS? Observational pilot study 2.500 vs. 5.000 IU hCG n = 21 OHSS high-risk patients 62% ongoing pregnancy rate 0 % OHSS Nargund et al., 2007 Craft, 2007

Reduction of follicles Trigger of final oocyte maturation: OHSS Prevention Ovarian stimulation Reduction of follicles Trigger of final oocyte maturation: Luteal phase GnRH-antagonist instead of GnRH-agonist long Delayed FSH start Natural cycle IVF Cycle cancellation In vitro Maturation Coasting early aspiration of small follicles unilateral follicular aspiration GnRH-agonist instead of hCG Reduced dose hCG Recombinant LH instead of hCG hCG free luteal phase support Luteal phase GnRH-antagonist administration Elective cryopreservation of embryos

Clinical pregnancy rate per ET Griesinger, GebFra 2006

Novel concept: Luteal phase antagonist hCG 3 days later…. early OHSS GnRH-antagonist daily GnRH-antagonist daily FSH Works only for early onset OHSS Report on 3 cases with early-onset OHSS Lainas et al., RBMonline 2007

Novel concepts: cabergoline VEGF

Novel concepts in treatment: Cabergolin Background: Vascular fluid leakage VEGF VEGF R1 Cabergoline Dopamine R agonist Alvarez et al, JCEM 2007

RCT: placebo-controlled Intervention: Cab 0.5 mg, day hCG  hCG+8 Patients: oocyte donors Inclusion: > 20 oocytes retrieved cabergoline n=37 7 (20%) OHSS II: OHSS III: 4 (11.4%) placebo n=32 OHSS II: 14 (43.5%) OHSS III: 6 (18.8%) OHSS is statistically significant, whereas OHSS III is not. Ongoing-term pregnany rate: 39 and 42% So it appears as if Cabergoline is able to significantly alleviate the symptoms of OHSS. As Cabergoline is considered a safe drug, even when administered in pregnancy, I think that Cabergoline deserves testing in further trials. Alvarez et al, JCEM 2007 & Alvarez, Hum Reprod 2007

GnRH-antagonist coasting Reduced dose of hCG Luteal phase antagonist OHSS prevention Agonist trigger ± freezing GnRH-antagonist coasting Reduced dose of hCG Luteal phase antagonist +freezing cabergoline