Presentation of ACSF C tests

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
Advertisements

Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)
ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF
1 Different use cases for ACSF Prepared from the experts of OICA and CLEPA Informal Document ACSF
3rd ACSF meeting Munich, September 2-3 Industry proposals for ACSF status definition and HMI Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the experts from.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF
1 ACSF Test Procedure Draft proposal – For discussion OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
Identification of regulatory needs for ACSF Oliver Kloeckner 16-17th June nd meeting of the IG ASCF Tokyo – Jasic Office Informal Document.
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Minimum Risk Manoeuvres (MRM)
Safety Distances and Object Classifications for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
5 th ACSF meeting French views Bonn January 2016 Informal Document - ACSF Submitted by the expert of France.
CLEPA Position Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting 9 Dec UN Palais des.
ACSF - Traffic Jam Assist on all roads OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Results of the CP-Meeting
Hand-off Warning Time of LKA
Informal Document: ACSF-06-16
Discussion paper – Major Issues
Lane Change Test for ACSF
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
Informal Working Group on ACSF
Industry proposal Driver availability recognition system
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Lane change driver reaction times
Lane change driver reaction times
Timing to be activated the hazard lights
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Industry views on GRVA priorities and organization
Informal document GRRF-86-36
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
ACSF Category B1 (LKAS) Concern with “Default-on” strategy
ACSF-19, September 03-05, 2018, Paris
Submitted by the Expert of Sweden
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Informal document GRSG
ACSF C tests Prepared by JAPAN 15 November, 2017
Signalling of information and warnings
Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan
ECU Reprogramming This procedure is for Pajero Sport/Triton 2.5HP coolant loss detection and engine output restriction.
Safety Distance to the front
ACSF B1+C functional description
Reason for performance difference between LVW and GVW
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
Questions/Comments on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2019/10
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
Definition of aysmax Interpretation 1
Submitted by the Secretary
Maximum allowable Override Force
ACSF - Category C1 Definition of Sensor range and safety distances
ACSF B1+C functional description
Emergency Steering Function
Interpretation of CSF warnings #2
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
CLEPA comments on OBD II GTR 18 Draft
ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting
False reaction test Car to Car
Hands-off detection versus Start of Lane Change Manoeuvre
6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016
Status of discussion after 7th meeting
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Regulation ECE R79-03 ACSF C 2-Step HMI
Deactivation of the ALKS system: Different cases
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Presentation transcript:

Presentation of ACSF C tests Submitted by the experts of OICA and CLEPA Informal Document: ACSF-14-06 Presentation of ACSF C tests Industry input to ACSF IG 14th meeting August 2017, Köln v2

3.5.1. Lane change functional test Conditions are not met Lateral jerk and below max values All conditions are met B1 resumes Vsmax≧Vtest ≧ Vsmin Direction Indicator lamp flashing time≧ 3sec. Lane change manoeuvre ≦ 5sec. DI lamp off ≦ 5sec. Lane change procedure

3.5.2. Abort of lane change test Minimum value of Sdrear ≦[15m] A high volume series production passenger car of category M1 AA saloon vtest Center of the lane ±20cm vtest Center of the lane ±20cm Vsmax≧Vtest ≧ Vsmin The driver shall initiate the lane change by the deliberate action. The lane change procedure does not start. or The lane change procedure is canceled no later than 10 seconds after the deliberate action of the driver, if the lane change procedure has started and the manoeuver is delayed. The driver is informed that the manoeuver is delayed. Is it needed?

firmly maintain the steering in the straight direction 3.5.3. Overriding force test Applicable Paragraph 5.6.5.3 Vsmax≧Vtest ≧ Vsmin firmly maintain the steering in the straight direction Procedure Initiate lane change Before the start of the lane change manoeuvre, the driver shall firmly maintain the steering in the straight direction. Measure the steering effort

Deactivate the direction indicator 3.5.4. Deactivation test Vsmax≧Vtest ≧ Vsmin Deactivation by the driver (5.6.5.6.8.) Deactivate the direction indicator flashing time < 3sec. Procedure Initiate lane change Before the start of the lane change manoeuvre, the driver shall deactivate the direction indicator.

A high volume series production passenger car of category M1 AA saloon 3.5.5. Sensor performance test Rear sensor CAN CAN monitor ECUs A high volume series production passenger car of category M1 AA saloon Capture Trigger Vehicle system under test vtest + 10 to 50 km/h ≦6m Vsmax≧Vtest ≧ Vsmin ≦63m Measurement Capture the sensor data at the timing the rear vehicle is detected Confirm the actual distance to the rear by using GPS data of both vehicles Connection of CAN monitor system should be allowed. The test shall be repeated with a motorbike (L3), and the distance shall be set at 55m.

3.5.6. Sensor blindness test Extra-test proposed by industry Vsmax≧Vtest ≧ Vsmin The rear sensor(s) is made blind. A lane change is commanded The lane change does not start

3.5.7.3. Engine start/run cycle test (Phase 1) Vsmax≧Vtest ≧ Vsmin Procedure A new engine start/run cycle Check ACSF C is default off.

3.5.7.3. Engine start/run cycle test (Phase 2) Vsmax≧Vtest ≧ Vsmin Procedure Perform phase 1 The driver switches on ACSF C The driver commands a lane change right after ACSF C switched on  No lane change

A high volume series production passenger car of category M1 AA saloon 3.5.7.3. Engine start/run cycle test (Phase 3) Rear sensor CAN CAN monitor ECUs A high volume series production passenger car of category M1 AA saloon Capture Trigger Vehicle system under test vtest + 10 to 50 km/h ≦6m Vsmax≧Vtest ≧ Vsmin Procedure Following the completion of the test phase 2 A vehicle approaches from the rear on the adjacent lane After the rear coming vehicle entirely passed the test vehicle, the driver commands a lane change. ≦48m Test is passed if: The lane change is performed and The distance between both vehicles at the time ACSF detects the rear coming vehicle is ≧ 48m Measurement Capture the sensor data at the timing the rear vehicle is detected Confirm the actual distance to the rear by using GPS data of both vehicles Connection of CAN monitor system should be allowed.