Arguments and Conclusions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argument vs. Assertion.
Advertisements

1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
PHILOSOPHICAL ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD Arguments for the Justification of Theism: Cosmological, Moral, Design (Teleological) and Ontological.
The God Stuff II. Background What makes this a table? Material Causes: The table is made of wood. Efficient Causes: The carpenter made it a table. Formal.
Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.
BASIC CONCEPTS OF ARGUMENTS
L ECTURE 17: T HE T ELEOLOGICAL A RGUMENT AND C AUSALITY.
And what do these phrases from Aquinas’ argument mean? Things lacking cognition The governance of things Tend toward a goal The way things are controlled,
Aquinas’ Proofs The five ways.
The Teleological Proof A Posteriori Argument: A argument in which a key premise can only be known through experience of the actual world. Principle of.
LECTURE 19 THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT CONTINUED. THE QUANTUM MECHANICAL OBJECTION DEPENDS UPON A PARTICULAR INTERPRETATION WE MIGHT REASONABLY SUSPEND.
Anselm’s “1st” ontological argument Something than which nothing greater can be thought of cannot exist only as an idea in the mind because, in addition.
What is an argument? An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition." Huh? Three.
Anselm & Aquinas. Anselm of Canterbury ( AD) The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God (Text, pp )
Chapter 4: Logic as The Art of Arts By Kasey Fitzpatrick.
The Design or Teleological Argument for the Existence of God.
1 Lesson 7: Arguments SOCI Thinking Critically about Social Issues Spring 2012.
Proof of God’s existence. Aim To have an understanding of the different ways people try to prove that God exists.
The Design or Teleological Argument for the Existence of God.
Thomas Aquinas and the Existence of God * The Five Ways (or Proofs) of St. Thomas Aquinas. * We can come to know God through reason. * Consistent with.
Aquinas’ Proofs The five ways. Thomas Aquinas ( ) Joined Dominican order against the wishes of his family; led peripatetic existence thereafter.
Introduction to Philosophy
Religious language: cognitive or non-cognitive?
Arguments based on observation Arguments based on reason
ASPECTS OF GOD OMNIPOTENCE.
Logical Fallacies.
The ontological argument
Critical Thinking and Arguments
Identifying/ Reconstructing Arguments
Critical Thinking Lecture 1 What is Critical Thinking?
Challenges to the OAs The different versions of OA are challenged by:
Types of essays.
Bias, Persuasion, and Propaganda
AO1 Comparison questions
Errors in Reasoning.
Basic Logic Definitions
St. Thomas Aquinas. Contents  1. Biography  II. Philosophy and Theology  III. Proofs of God’s Existence  IV. Knowledge of God’s Nature  V. Creation.
Errors in Reasoning.
The Cosmological Argument Kalam Argument
The analogy of the Arrow
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
Explore key ideas in the ontological argument. (8 marks)
Anselm & Aquinas December 23, 2005.
Building Argument and Integrating Evidence
The Teleological Argument for the existence of God
1 A The Cosmological Argument Kalam Argument
THE DEBATE BETWEEN COPLESTON AND RUSSELL.
Types of essays.
Teleological Argument
What is an ARGUMENT? An argument is a reasoned, logical way of demonstrating that the writer’s position, belief, or conclusion is valid. Arguments seek.
Critical Thinking.
Introduction to Logic Lecture 1 What is Critical Reasoning?
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2)
Keys to Convincing Others That You Are Right.
Conclusion.
II. Analyzing Arguments
What conclusions could we draw from each of these photos
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1b What is Philosophy? (part 2)
Arguments, arguments, and more arguments
Formalizing arguments
Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments
Elements of an Argument
Argumentation and Persuasion
Logical Fallacies English III.
Living in the Media Age (Fallacies)
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Identifying & Ordering
The Teleological Argument
Presentation transcript:

Arguments and Conclusions Stage One

Initial Definitions Statement: a sentence which can be either true or false. Argument: a set of statements where some of those statements (the premises) aim to establish the truth of another (the conclusion).

Non-Arguments Reports: a statement (or a set of statements), where none of those statements is intended to be evidence for another. Non-Argumentative Persuasion: an attempting to get you to believe something that is not based on reasons (e.g., appealing to your emotions).

Conclusion Key Words Look for the following key words, that might indicate the conclusion: Thus Therefore Accordingly As a result Implies that Indicates that Proves that Shows that Hence Test: can you substitute in “therefore” for the word?

Example of an Argument "The fifth way [of proving that God exists] is taken from the governance of the world. We see that things which lack knowledge, such as natural bodies, act for an end, and this is evident from their acting always, or nearly always, in the same way, so as to obtain the best result. Hence, it is plain that they achieve their end, not fortuitously, but designedly. Now whatever lacks knowledge cannot move towards an end, unless it be directed by some being endowed with knowledge and intelligence; as the arrow is directed by the archer. Therefore some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are directed to their end; and this being we call God" (Aquinas, "Summa Theologica").

Example of a Report “New Jersey farmers believed that cast iron poisoned the land and that it stimulated the growth of weeds, and so they rejected the first successful cast-iron plow, which was invented in the United States in 1797” Try the replacement test: “New Jersey farmers believed that cast iron poisoned the land and that it stimulated the growth of weeds, therefore they rejected the first successful cast-iron plow, which was invented in the United States in 1797” But that does not work! The author is telling you about a sequence of events, not that the first is a reason to believe the latter.