FAIR Metadata RDA 10 Luiz Olavo Bonino – luiz.bonino@dtls.nl - September 21, 2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Putting the Pieces Together Grace Agnew Slide User Description Rights Holder Authentication Rights Video Object Permission Administration.
Advertisements

CNRIS CNRIS 2.0 Challenges for a new generation of Research Information Systems.
Recommendations Adopting Standards and Specifications for Educational Content.
Future of MDR - ISO/IEC Metadata Registries (MDR) Larry Fitzwater, SC 32 WG 2 Convener Computer Scientist U.S. Environmental Protection Agency May.
Data on the Web Life Cycle Bernadette Farias Lóscio March, 2014.
Using the Open Metadata Registry (openMDR) to create Data Sharing Interfaces October 14 th, 2010 David Ervin & Rakesh Dhaval, Center for IT Innovations.
A Perspective on Preservation of Linked Data Richard Cyganiak DERI, NUI Galway.
TWC Adoption of RDA DTR and PID in Deep Carbon Observatory Data Portal Stephan Zednik, Xiaogang Ma, John Erickson, Patrick West, Peter Fox, & DCO-Data.
Dataset Metadata Distribution Data Extrinsic Metadata Intrinsic Metadata Vocabulary Access Metadata Provenance Metadata Usage Metadata Quality Metadata.
4 way comparison of Data Citation Principles: Amsterdam Manifesto, CoData, Data Cite, Digital Curation Center FORCE11 Data Citation Synthesis Group Should.
4 way comparison of Data Citation Principles: Amsterdam Manifesto, CoData, Data Cite, Digital Curation Center FORCE11 Data Citation Synthesis Group.
Describing resources II: Dublin Core CERN-UNESCO School on Digital Libraries Rabat, Nov 22-26, 2010 Annette Holtkamp CERN.
Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (Overview) The Data Citation Synthesis Group Joint Declaration.
DOMAIN DRIVEN DESIGN Dave 12 May WHAT IS DDD? Set of principles to aid in building complex systems Enables us to focus on core problem domain NOT.
1 The Metadata Groups - Keith G Jeffery. 2 Positioning  Raise profile of metadata  Data first  Also software, resources, users  Achieve outputs/outcomes.
Course on persistent identifiers, Madrid (Spain) Information architecture and the benefits of persistent identifiers Greg Riccardi Director Institute for.
Geospatial metadata Prof. Wenwen Li School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning 5644 Coor Hall
PRACE user authentication and vetting Vincent RIBAILLIER, 29 th EUGridPMA meeting, Bucharest, September 9 th, 2013.
The Purpose of XML Namespaces
Data Foundations And Terminology (DFT) IG
Data Publication (in H2020)
Automatically Calculating the Adherence to License Requirements
Stuart J. Chalk, Department of Chemistry University of North Florida
國立臺北科技大學 課程:資料庫系統 Chapter 2 Database Environment.
The Metadata Groups Unpacking the Elements- Keith G Jeffery
FAIR Data in Trustworthy Data Repositories:
2nd DPHEP Collaboration Workshop
DSA and FAIR: a perfect couple
GEOSS Interoperability Workshop
Libraries as Data-Centers for the Arts and Humanities
FAIR Sample and Data Access
An Overview of Data-PASS Shared Catalog
Donatella Castelli CNR-ISTI
Ways to upgrade the FAIRness of your data repository.
Document, Index, Discover, Access
ACS 2016 Moving research forward with persistent identifiers
FAIR Metrics RDA 10 Luiz Bonino – - September 21, 2017.
Xiaogang Ma, John Erickson, Patrick West, Stephan Zednik, Peter Fox,
Attribution, Licensing and Metadata
Fitness for use: Users of the U. S
knowledge organization for a food secure world
Toward FAIR Semantic Resources
FAIR Data Management, Trustworthy Digital Repositories and Business Continuity / Disaster Preparedness
Identifiers Answer Questions
Making Annotations FAIR
Access  Discovery  Compliance  Identification  Preservation
FAIR Sample and Data Access
DMP Reviewing Exercise
OPEN DATA – F.A.I.R. PRINCIPLES
Nikhef RDM Policy – first experiences
Metadata for research outputs management Part 2
INFRAEOSC 5c call Proposal summary
EUDAT B2FIND A Cross-Discipline Metadata Service and Discovery Portal
WG/IG Collaboration Meeting June Göteborg METADATA GROUPS PERSPECTIVE Keith G Jeffery & Rebecca Koskela.
Darja Fišer CLARIN ERIC Director of User Involvement
AN EUDAT-based FAIR Data Approach for Data Interoperability
Register Federation Registration process
An EUDAT-based FAIR Data Approach for Data Interoperability
Data types and persistent identifiers in
Mission DataCite was founded in 2009 as an international organization which aims to: establish easier access to research data increase acceptance of research.
Interoperability – GO FAIR - RDA
How to Implement the FAIR Data Principles? Elly Dijk
From FAIRy tale to FAIR enough
Chapter 2 Database Environment Pearson Education © 2014.
W3C Recommendation 17 December 2013 徐江
Automatic evaluation of fairness
eScience - FAIR Science
A Research Data Catalogue supporting Blue Growth: the BlueBRIDGE case
IDRP: The first distributed data management infrastructure for nanoscience Rossella Aversa Karlsruhe Institute for Technology (KIT) – Steinbuch Center.
Supporting Open Research
Presentation transcript:

FAIR Metadata RDA 10 Luiz Olavo Bonino – luiz.bonino@dtls.nl - September 21, 2017

Fair data principles Findable: Accessible: Interoperable: Reusable: https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201618 Findable: F1. (meta)data are assigned a globally unique and persistent identifier; F2. data are described with rich metadata; F3. metadata clearly and explicitly include the identifier of the data it describes; F4. (meta)data are registered or indexed in a searchable resource; Accessible: A1. (meta)data are retrievable by their identifier using a standardized communications protocol; A1.1 the protocol is open, free, and universally implementable; A1.2. the protocol allows for an authentication and authorization procedure, where necessary; A2. metadata are accessible, even when the data are no longer available; Interoperable: I1. (meta)data use a formal, accessible, shared, and broadly applicable language for knowledge representation. I2. (meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles; I3. (meta)data include qualified references to other (meta)data; Reusable: R1. meta(data) are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attributes; R1.1. (meta)data are released with a clear and accessible data usage license; R1.2. (meta)data are associated with detailed provenance; R1.3. (meta)data meet domain-relevant community standards;

Fair data principles - metadata Findable: F1. metadata are assigned a globally unique and persistent identifier; F2. data are described with rich metadata; F3. metadata clearly and explicitly include the identifier of the data it describes; F4. metadata are registered or indexed in a searchable resource; Accessible: A1. metadata are retrievable by their identifier using a standardized communications protocol; A1.1 the protocol is open, free, and universally implementable; A1.2. the protocol allows for an authentication and authorization procedure, where necessary; A2. metadata are accessible, even when the data are no longer available; Interoperable: I1. metadata use a formal, accessible, shared, and broadly applicable language for knowledge representation. I2. metadata use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles; I3. metadata include qualified references to other (meta)data; Reusable: R1. metadata are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attributes; R1.1. metadata are released with a clear and accessible data usage license; R1.2. metadata are associated with detailed provenance; R1.3. metadata meet domain-relevant community standards;

Fair data principles - data Findable: F1. data are assigned a globally unique and persistent identifier; F2. data are described with rich metadata; F3. metadata clearly and explicitly include the identifier of the data it describes; F4. data are registered or indexed in a searchable resource; Accessible: A1. data are retrievable by their identifier using a standardized communications protocol; A1.1 the protocol is open, free, and universally implementable; A1.2. the protocol allows for an authentication and authorization procedure, where necessary; A2. metadata are accessible, even when the data are no longer available; Interoperable: I1. data use a formal, accessible, shared, and broadly applicable language for knowledge representation. I2. data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles; I3. data include qualified references to other (meta)data; Reusable: R1. data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attributes; R1.1. data are released with a clear and accessible data usage license; R1.2. data are associated with detailed provenance; R1.3. data meet domain-relevant community standards;

Fair data principles – supporting infrastructure Findable: F1. (meta)data are assigned a globally unique and persistent identifier; F2. data are described with rich metadata; F3. metadata clearly and explicitly include the identifier of the data it describes; F4. (meta)data are registered or indexed in a searchable resource; Accessible: A1. (meta)data are retrievable by their identifier using a standardized communications protocol; A1.1 the protocol is open, free, and universally implementable; A1.2. the protocol allows for an authentication and authorization procedure, where necessary; A2. metadata are accessible, even when the data are no longer available; Interoperable: I1. (meta)data use a formal, accessible, shared, and broadly applicable language for knowledge representation. I2. (meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles; I3. (meta)data include qualified references to other (meta)data; Reusable: R1. meta(data) are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attributes; R1.1. (meta)data are released with a clear and accessible data usage license; R1.2. (meta)data are associated with detailed provenance; R1.3. (meta)data meet domain-relevant community standards;

”Rigor on metadata maximizes power of data” John Graybeal RDA10 – Sept 20th 2017

Metadata layers Data Repository (FDP)

DCAT/HCLS Metadata layers Data Repository (FDP) (Dataset) Catalog(s) Distribution

DCAT/HCLS RML Metadata layers Data Repository (FDP) (Dataset) Catalog(s) Dataset DCAT/HCLS Distribution RML Data Record

Extending the Metadata layers - vocabularies Data Repository (FDP) (Dataset) Catalog(s) Dataset Distribution Data Record

Extending the metadata layers - vocabularies DCAT dcat:publisher biosch:organization "@context": "http://schema.org",   "@type": "NGO",   "address": {     "@type": "PostalAddress",     "addressLocality": "Utrecht, The Netherlands",     "postalCode": “3511 GC",     "streetAddress": “Catharijnesingel 54"   },   "email": “info(at)dtls.nl",   "@type": “Organization”, “@type”: “not-for-profit”,   "name": “Dutch Techncentre for Life Sciences",   "telephone": "( 31) 85 30 30 711"

Extending the metadata layers – extended model Data Repository (FDP) DatA Tag Suite (DATS) (Dataset) Catalog(s) Dataset PROV Distribution PROV-O Data Record

Model extension example foaf:Agent dct:publisher dct:title dcat:Dataset dcat:landingPage dct:identifier

Model extension example foaf:Agent dct:publisher dct:title dcat:Dataset dcat:landingPage dct:identifier ENOUGH?

Model extension example foaf:Agent dats:Publication dats:citations dct:publisher dcat:Dataset dats:Dataset provo:Entity dct:title provo:wasAttributedTo dcat:landingPage provo:Agent provo:generatedAtTime dct:identifier provo:used provo:Activity

DatA Tag Suite (DATS) Dataset Publication citations primaryPublications Publication

Q&A/contact info Luiz Bonino E-mail: luiz.bonino@dtls.nl Skype: luizolavobonino