HL-LHC Aperture Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recap of heat loads and peak doses from HL-LHC Q1 to Q7 L.S. Esposito, F. Cerutti HL-LHC WP3 meeting, 22 May 2014.
Advertisements

R. Bruce, M. Giovannozzi, S. Redaelli With essential input from G. Arduini, R. De Maria, S. Fartoukh, M. Fitterer, R. Tomas, J. Wenninger, aperture team.
Energy deposition in Q0 Elena Wildner 19/04/07. Strategy 1. Define a TAS to protect the Q0 2. Optics:  *= 0.25m 3. Calculate, with some optimization.
24/01/08Energy deposition, LIUWG, Elena Wildner1 Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet Elena Wildner Francesco Cerutti Marco Mauri.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
Review of Quench Limits FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab 1 st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011.
Vacuum, Surfaces & Coatings Group Technology Department 22 nd January 2015 C. Garion2 Beam Line Interconnection: snapshot of present design principles.
Shielding the 140 mm option F. Cerutti, L.S. Esposito on behalf of CERN FLUKA team.
Β*-dependence on collimation R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann C. Alabau Pons, F. Burkart, M. Cauchi, D. Deboy, M. Giovannozzi, W. Herr, L. Lari, G. Muller, S. Redaelli,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Cryo back at 17:30 Beam back at 19:00 IR2 aperture until ~03:00 Since then no beam from the SPS:  Connector problem on MKD  Connector eroded, needs to.
AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Beam Screens for Inner Triplet Magnets LHC Upgrade Phase 1 Nicolaas KOS  LHC Upgrade phase 1  Inner triplet BS Requirements.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Field Quality Specifications for Triplet Quadrupoles of the LHC Lattice v.3.01 Option 4444 and Collimation Study Yunhai Cai Y. Jiao, Y. Nosochkov, M-H.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
How low can we go? Getting below β*=3.5m R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann Acknowledgment: T. Baer, W. Bartmann, C. Bracco, S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, B. Goddard,W.
R. Bruce, M. Giovannozzi, S. Redaelli With essential input from G. Arduini, R. De Maria, S. Fartoukh, M. Fitterer, R. Tomas, J. Wenninger, aperture team.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
C. Bracco, R. Bruce, B. Goddard, C. Wiesner, A. Lechner, M. Frankl
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
Francesco Cerutti, Andrea Tsinganis WP10 Energy deposition & R2E
MQXC Nb-Ti 120mm 120T/m 2m models
Beam Energy & Intensity: One bunch during full cycle
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Alignment of VSC components along LSS 1&5
A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN
Orbit correction status and update for HL-LHC
R. Kersevan, TE-VSC-VSM 30/06/2016
Cedric Garion, TE-VSC-DLM, WP12
IP, crab cavity alignment and orbit control
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
Follow-up of HL-LHC Annual meeting
Β*-reach in 2017 R. Bruce, S. Redaelli, R. De Maria, M. Giovannozzi, A. Mereghetti, D. Mirarchi Acknowledgement: collimation and optics teams, BE/ABP,
Asynchronous free ATS optics for LHC & HL-LHC S. Fartoukh, BE-ABP
Machine lay-out September 2015
Challenges for FCC-ee MDI mechanical design
DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE TAS-TRIPLET-D1 REGION
WP3 meeting Aug 21, 2015 V1.1 RECAP Francesco Cerutti.
Beam collimation for SPPC
UPDATE ON DYNAMIC APERTURE SIMULATIONS
Error and Multipole Sensitivity Study for the Ion Collider Ring
Beam-Induced Energy Deposition Studies in IR Magnets
Alternative design of the matching section for crab-cavity operation
Collision bump amplitudes for the 450 GeV run
Update on beam screen issues
Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet
HL LHC WP3 (magnets) TASK 2 ADVANCEMENT
Global aperture measurements at 450 GeV with 170 mrad crossing angle
Saturday 7th May Sat – Sun night
Collimation margins and *
PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET
Collision bump amplitudes for the 450 GeV run
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Revised estimates of heat loads and radiation damage in the IT and D1
R. De Maria, D. Gamba, F. Plassard
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Triplet corrector layout and strength specifications
A. Tsinganis, F. Cerutti (EN/STI/FDA)
Review of Quench Limits
HL-LHCV1.4 (BI) R. De Maria WP13 meeting 3/9/2018.
HL-LHCV1.4 (BI) R. De Maria WP13 meeting 3/9/2018.
L. Gentini, M. Giovannozzi, M. Gonzalez, M. Krupa, H. Mainaud Durand,
Saturday 29th October Friday during IP2 1 m squeeze test
Presentation transcript:

HL-LHC Aperture Update R. De Maria Thanks to G. Arduini, S. Fartoukh, C. Garion , M. Giovannozzi

Beam screen update C. Garion update All quantities are in diameter. The mechanical tolerances consider worst case: negative vertical shift and negative vertical shape restriction. Mech. tolerances for D2/Q4 not provided. Kept 3 mm. HV gap [mm] 45 gap [mm] Mech Tol Q1 102 99.7 3 4.76 Q2-3/D1 122 119.7 114 110.7 4.4 D2 87 86 78 77 Q4 73.8 72.8 63.8 62.8 old new Comments Triplet: Impact 5% aperture loss in Q2-3 -> 10% β* loss Q4: 45 gap is the bottleneck in certain scenarios Q4: depending on the pre-squeeze optics rectellipse may be more optimal for both flat optics

Survey-fiducialization tolerances Ground motion Fiducializaton r [mm] h v TAXS (*) 2.0 0.5 Triplets 0.6 1.0 BPMs 2.5 TAXN (*) 0.84 0.36 D1 D2/Q4/Q5 0.9 h v r Value derived from J. Jeanneret, LHC rep 1007 but to be validated by survey, WP3, WP8(*) teams

Beam tolerances and collimation apertures LHC Design 2012-6 Coll. HL-LHC Inj./Coll. Emittance [µm] (normalization only) 3.75 3.5 β-beating [%] 20 5 10/20 Orbit error [mm] 4 0.5 4/2 Spurious Disp. [%] 27.3 10 14/10 Energy error [10-3] 0.8 0.1 0.6/0.2 Target aperture with TCT (w/o TCT) [σ] 8.4 9.5(1) 9/12(17(2)) Beam tolerances have been re- defined by: taking into account LHC Run I positive experience adding safety margins based on possible unknowns. For collimation: magnet protected by TCT: ≥12 σ magnet not protect by TCT: 17 σ or possibly less pending dedicated studies (R. Bruce) . R. Bruce et al. (1) With good MKD-TCT phase advance. (2) or possibly less pending dedicated studies

Aperture and knobs effects V1.2 Coil aperture Beam1 H,V2full gaps Sep. knob Crossing Knob Crab shift Crab slope Offset [mm] TAXS Circle 60, 60 0.8 6.1 0.0 2.0 MQXFA.[AB]1 150 Octagon 99, 99 11.2 2.4 MQXFB.[AB]2 119, 119 1.2 16.7 0.2 3.6 MQXFA.[AB]3 16.6 0.4 2.8 MBXF 0.5 15.5 TAXN 85, 85 5.5 0.9 3.0 MBRD 105 84, 84 0.1 3.3 1.0 MCBRD 1.7 3.4 MCBYY 90 70.8,70.8 4.0 MQYY 3.9 TCLMB.5 RectEllipse 57.8, 48 3.7 MCBY[HV].5 70 MQY.5 3.5 TCLMC.6 45.1,35.3 2.3 MCBC[HV].6 56 2.1 MQML.6 1Either Beam screen or beam pipe; 2 Mechanical tolerances already removed. Rectellipse types are exchanges the H,V orientation depending on the polarity.

Aperture update Adding tolerances one by one in the next tables: Bare: no mechanical tolerances, perfect beam, perfect alignment Mech: mechanical tolerances in beam screen, perfect beam, perfect alignment Beam: mechanical tolerances in beam screen, imperfect beam (including triplet misalignments in orbit budget), perfect crab and perfect IP alignment Crab: mechanical tolerances in beam screen, imperfect beam (including triplet misalignments in orbit budget), crab misalignment, perfect IP alignment Offset: mechanical tolerances in beam screen, imperfect beam (including triplet misalignments in orbit budget), crab misalignment, IP misalignment

Aperture Round β=15cm Θc=±295 μrad dsep=±2 mm bare [σ] mech[σ] beam[σ] crab[σ] offset[σ] TAXS 17.9 14.4 12.4 MQXFA.[AB]1 18.0 17.5 17.3 16.4 14.7 13.8 13.6 12.8 MQXFB.[AB][23] 13.3 12.9 12.2 10.8 10.3 9.8 9.2 MBXF 14.1 13.7 13.5 11.4 10.9 11.3 10.7 10.6 10.0 TAXN 15.2 13.2 MBRD 20.4 20.0 19.4 19.1 16.2 15.9 15.4 13.0 12.7 MCBRD 22.4 22.1 21.4 21.1 17.7 17.2 16.8 14.6 14.3 MCBYY 25.9 25.4 24.6 24.1 20.5 20.1 19.0 15.0 MQYY 27.3 26.8 21.6 21.2 16.3 15.8 TCLMB.5 29.6 24.8 20.9 MCBY[HV].5 30.6 25.6 21.3 MQY.5 31.7 26.5 26.3 TCLMC.6 30.3 24.7 22.0 MCBC[HV].6 31.3 MQML.6 25.5 22.6

Aperture Flat β=30/75cm Θc=±245 μrad dsep=±0.75 mm bare [σ] mech[σ] beam[σ] crab[σ] offset[σ] TAXS 15.8 13.0 11.5 MQXFA.[AB]1 16.2 15.7 15.0 13.5 12.9 12.7 12.1 MQXFB.[AB][23] 12.6 10.8 10.4 10.0 9.7 MBXF 13.2 13.1 11.3 11.1 10.7 10.3 TAXN 14.5 12.4 12.0 10.9 MBRD 15.6 15.2 12.8 12.5 12.3 11.2 11.0 MCBRD 17.4 17.1 16.7 16.4 14.1 13.9 13.7 MCBYY 20.4 20.1 19.5 19.2 16.5 15.9 13.4 MQYY 20.9 20.6 20.0 19.7 16.9 16.6 16.1 TCLMB.5 21.1 17.6 MCBY[HV].5 22.2 18.4 18.3 15.5 MQY.5 22.5 18.8 18.6 TCLMC.6 21.4 MCBC[HV].6 18.0 MQML.6

Bare aperture 12 sigma (round) No beam and orbit tolerances included!

Bare aperture 12 sigma (flat)

Backup

HL-LHC beam screen aperture update CG, 30/11/15 Nominal values are defined by: Cold Bore: 1. The coil inner radius at 1.9 K is 74.350 mm [P. Ferracin] a. The insulated cable inner radius position at room temperature, with no stress, is 75 mm. b. The deformation due to pre-load and cool-down is 0.400 mm c. Quench heaters and insulation: 0.1 mm + 0.15 2. Gap coil/insulated cold bore at 1.9 K:1.5 mm [R. Van Weelderen] 3. Cold bore insulation: 0.2 mm [P. Ferracin] 4. Tolerance on the cold bore thickness: 0/+0.5 mm  Nominal cold bore outer radius at 1.9 K: 72.15 mm  Nominal cold bore outer radius at room temperature: 72.35 mm Nominal cold bore inner radius (thickness 4 mm for Q1 to D1) at room temperature: 68.35 mm Present specification based on a machined long circular tube: (Input’s from Manufacture de forage, tbc) Inner diameter : 136.7 mm, tolerance: 0/+0.1 Thickness: 4 mm, tolerance 0/+0.5 Straightness: 0.3 mm/m Beam screen: Gap w.r.t cold bore: 1.5 mm Shielding thickness Q1: 16mm , Q2-D1: 6 mm Beam screen wall thickness: 1mm

Shielding maximum height Summary table Cold bore Beam screen Inner diameter Thickness Nominal aperture* H(V);+/-45 ° Vertical tolerance Horizontal tolerance Cooling tube Nb * OD * thickness Shielding maximum height Shape Positioning** Q1 136.7 H8 4 0/+0.5 99.7; 99.7 +/-1.15 -1.23/0 +/-1.1 +/- 0.65 4 * 16 * 0.8 16 Q2a 119.7; 110.7 -1.05/+0.11 4 * 10 * 0.8 6 Q2b Q3 CP D1 DFXJ To be defined ~4 0/+0.5 - D2 94 3 0/+0.5 86; 77 ? * 6 * 0.8 Q4 79.8 2.6 0/+0.5 72.8; 62.8 For Q2-D1, it takes into account the 2*0.5 mm reduction in the +/- 45 planes (needed to increase the filling factor of absorbers and the strength of the extension) * Cu layer thickness, thermal contraction, self weight deformation not accounted (see slide 2) ** 1 additional support, 0.25 mm radial clearance between the support and the cold bore.