Will Maryland seize the future?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
Advertisements

Measuring Up 2006: The Nation and Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Education Policy Forum Capital Breakfast Series November 15, 2006.
April Hill University of Richmond. HHMI: Call for Inclusion, Persistence, and Community  “HHMI grants have enabled colleges and universities to involve.
Arizona Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
1. 2 What is the E 3 Alliance? A catalyst for change in Central Texas and in regions across the state Building a research-based regional blueprint to.
California Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Class Size Matters August
Ohio Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
Attracting the Best and Brightest Minds to Science Geraldine Richmond University of Oregon.
Measuring Up 2004 Texas. Measuring Up: The Basics Looks at higher education for the entire state, not individual colleges and universities. Focuses on.
Achieve Data Profile: Washington January AMERICAN DIPLOMA PROJECT NETWORK The Big Picture n To be successful in today’s economy, all students.
California State University, Sacramento Increasing Opportunities for Student Success: Changing the “Rules of the Game” Nancy Shulock Institute for Higher.
Alaska Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Bob Mattila.  No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is an act that was passed in 2002 with the goal of - "An act to close the achievement gap with accountability,
Louisiana Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Indiana Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Social Context in Education By: Cheryl Cox & Dawn Longville.
Tennessee Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Impact of the Civil Rights Movement Statistics on the Changes.
Missouri Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Why AVID WVHS. How to Identify Potential AVID Students Advancement Via Individual Determination What AVID Is AVID is a program for “middle to upper middle”
EDUCATION CURRENT GENDER STATUS STEM Fields. NATIONAL EDUCATION TRENDS  About 20.1 million women have bachelor's degrees, compared to nearly 18.7 million.
Pennsylvania Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Good things that are happening for kids. Texas Students Rank #1, #2, & #3 in the nation! When comparing students by subgroups, Texas 4 th and 8 th graders.
Rhode Island Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
California State University, Sacramento Nancy Shulock Institute for Higher Education Leadership & Policy Presentation to Conference: Policy Challenges.
Texas Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
Kentucky Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
Oklahoma Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
WOODY L. HUNT, CHAIRMAN HIGHER EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE THE FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN TEXAS July 23,
SUPPORTING DATA 1 Pipeline Subcommittee June 29, 2010 DRAFT.
North Carolina Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Oregon Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Kansas Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Michigan Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
An Up-to-Date Analysis of Future Workforce Needs in Transit
Preparation for STEM jobs
Trends in Public US Education: Challenges & Opportunities
Pennsylvania has a great future in STEM jobs
Washington could have a bright future in STEM
NJ will enjoy robust STEM growth
MIAIR, November 3, 2016 Jessica Kijek & Bin Ning
Can Arizona seize the future? Enlist 2.0
The New American Dilemma
Will Alabama seize the future?
Issue Under Review: STEM
Will Nevada seize the future?
Will Tennessee seize the future?
Will Virginia seize the future?
Health of Wisconsin: Report Card 2016
Will North Dakota seize the future?
Will Rhode Island seize the future?
Can Ohio seize the future?
Will Delaware seize the future?
High-Poverty Schools in Massachusetts
STEM is our Business! Pathways to Career Readiness Symposium
Is Arkansas’s progress in degree completion at risk?
Will Louisiana seize the future?
Will Oregon seize the future?
Release of PARCC Student Results
Will Minnesota seize the future?
Can New Jersey seize the future?
Will North Carolina seize the future?
Will South Dakota seize the future?
2017 NAEP RESULTS: DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS
What’s Driving Chicago’s Educational Progress?
The Future of Higher Education in Texas
Unit 3 Economic Challenges
When we look at Massachusetts as a whole, there is much to celebrate
Presentation transcript:

Will Maryland seize the future?

Maryland could have a bright future in STEM

Maryland will enjoy robust STEM growth As in much of the country, STEM jobs in Maryland will enjoy robust growth.

STEM jobs earn more than non-STEM jobs in MD STEM employees in Maryland can earn more than double that of their non-STEM contemporaries. Maryland ranks 5th in the nation for median earnings of STEM employees.

Will Maryland have the STEM talent to meet the demand?

MD loses potential talent at each education level Though it outperforms the nation as a whole in many categories, Maryland has the potential to producing more graduates in STEM fields. MD has higher high school and 4-year college graduation rates than the nation as a whole, and the degrees graduates earn are more likely to be in STEM fields. Still, more than one in three students beginning a four-year degree fails to complete the degree in six years, and a shocking 80 percent of students who begin a two-year degree fail to finish. When STEM talent is at a premium, these completion rates represent lost opportunities for students and employers alike.

Minorities have shown small gains in computing degrees More than 40% of population… …but less than 1/3 of degrees Underrepresented minorities: Black, Latino, and American Indian/Alaska native. Though Maryland fares better than most other states on this measure, minorities are still badly underrepresented among those earning degrees and certificates in computing.

Minorities very scarce in engineering Nearly half the population… …but only 16% of degrees In absolute terms, racial and ethnic minorities are badly underrepresented among those who receive degrees and certificates from Maryland engineering programs. While they constitute 44 percent of the college-aged populations, the receive only 16 percent of degrees and certificates in the field. Maryland ranks relatively high (5th) compared to other states on this measure. That just speaks to the poor performance of the country as a whole.

More than 3x higher for men Women sparse in computing More than 3x higher for men The gap between the number of men earning computing degrees and certificates and the number of women earning them has grown tremendously over the last 15 years. In 2001, women earned roughly 36% of degrees/certificates. Now they earn roughly 24% of them. Since then, men have earned more than twice as many computing degrees as women; 47,252 versus 18,757. Only 24% for women

Women sparse in engineering Over 3x more for men Only 22% for women Though there have been increases since 2001 in the number of women earning engineering degrees and certificates, men have earned more than 3 times as many from 2001 through 2015; 32,779 versus 8,984. In 2015, women earned just 22% of MD engineering degrees and certificates.

The challenge begins early: Students have made progress in K-12, but they still have far to go

MD 4th-graders have fallen back in math after years of gains Hispanic students saw sharp declines after 2011. MD rank: White (tied for 10th); rural (9th); lower-income (tied for 44th)

MD 8th-graders’ math gains stalled after 2009 The gap between higher- and lower-income students in Maryland is wider than in most other states. MD rank: Black (tied for 9th); Hispanic (tied for 8th); lower-income (tied for 43rd)

MD 8th-graders made moderate gains since 2009 MD 8th graders as a whole fall below the proficiency mark for science. Lower-income, Black and Hispanic 8th graders in Maryland trail their higher-income and white peers in science performance, but they have improved more rapidly.

Persistent achievement gaps in math performance MD’s racial achievement gaps in math and science are among the largest in the nation. While too many Maryland students are below the proficient threshold, Black and Hispanic students lag behind their white peers. Maryland minority students trail their peers in math and science proficiency by as many as 39 percentage points. MD rank: 8th grade science: Black-white gap (tied for 45th); 8th grade math: Black-white gap (45th); 4th grade science: Black-white gap (tied for 35th)

Persistent achievement gaps in math performance Here, too, Maryland’s achievement gaps are among the largest in the nation. Maryland students eligible for free/reduced lunch trail their peers in math proficiency by up to 36 percentage points. MD rank (income gap): 8th grade science (tied for 43rd); 4th grade math (42nd); 8th grade math (tied for 41st)

Maryland can give students better opportunities to learn

Minorities have less access to supplies for science labs Maryland 8th-graders whose schools report that supplies or equipment for science labs are available “to a large extent,” by race/ethnicity, 2015 Eighth-graders in schools whose enrollments are mostly Black or Hispanic are most likely to lack this access.

Advanced classes could develop more minority talent The good news is MD has minority students with the potential to succeed on AP placement tests. The challenge is that 40 percent did not even take them. Untapped pool of STEM talent

To seize the future in STEM… Maryland should expand access to: Proven stem education opportunities for minority and lower-income students Teachers with strong STEM backgrounds and robust instructional support STEM materials and facilities for K-12 students

Contact Information Claus von Zastrow cvonzastrow@changetheequation.org 202.626.5740 www.changetheequation.org Facebook.com/changetheequation Twitter.com/changeequation