MCBXFB Short Orbit Corrector Prototype: Status update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Superconducting Magnet Program S. Gourlay CERN March 11-12, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory IR Quad R&D Program LHC IR Upgrade Stephen A.
Advertisements

CIEMAT technological contributions to linear colliders Fernando ToralGandía, 3/12/2005.
EuCARD-HFM ESAC review of the high field dipole design, 20/01/2011, Maria Durante, 1/40 EuCARD-HFM ESAC Review of the high field dipole design Fabrication.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQS Progress Report High Field Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet Shlomo Caspi LBNL Collaboration Meeting – CM11 FNAL October 27-28, 2008.
ILC Main Linac Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole Progress Report V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
J. García, F. Toral (CIEMAT) P. Fessia (CERN) May, 26 th 2015.
LHQ Coil Fabrication Experience and Plan Miao Yu 04/08/2013.
Eucard WP 7.3 HFM Winding and tooling tests Insulation choice F.Rondeaux /01/2011 Dipole design review- II-8 Winding and tooling tests – insulation.
H. Felice - P. Ferracin – D. Cheng 09/19/2013 Update on structure CAD model.
J. García, F. Toral (CIEMAT) P. Fessia (CERN) January, 26 th 2015.
H. Felice - P. Ferracin – D. Cheng 09/11/2013 Update on structure CAD model.
Fred Nobrega. 9 Dec 2014 Model Design & Fabrication – FNAL Fred Nobrega 2 Outline Background Mechanical Design Model Magnet Features Coil Technology and.
Design Features: still to be determined and open questions P. Ferracin 4 th Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting November 17-21, 2014 KEK, Tsukuba.
SC magnet developments at CEA/Saclay Maria Durante Hélène Felice CEA Saclay DSM/DAPNIA/SACM/LEAS.
First approaches J. García, F. Toral, J. Munilla – CIEMAT.
11 T Nb3Sn Demonstrator Dipole R&D Strategy and Status
Fred Nobrega, Nikolai Andreev 21 September, 2015.
Superconducting Magnet Group Superconducting magnet development for ex-situ NMR LDRD 2003 Paolo Ferracin, Scott Bartlett 03/31/2003.
Subscale quadrupole (SQ) series Paolo Ferracin LARP DoE Review FNAL June 12-14, 2006.
D. Smekens. 2 Coil ID  CableCu DUMMY Cu DUMMY WST DUMMY RRP 54/61 DUMMY RRP 108/127 RRP 108/127 RRP 108/127 RRP 132/169.
FRESCA2 Technical Meeting 5-Validation of coil winding with Cu coils Françoise Rondeaux 09/06/ CEA-Irfu-SACM-LEAS - 5-Rondeaux- FRESCA2 Technical.
LARP Collaboration Meeting Racetrack Coil Fabrication
MQXFB design, assembly plans & tooling at CERN J.C Perez On behalf of MQXF collaboration team MQXF Workshop on Structure, Alignment and Electrical QA.
Fabrication of test coil for D1 2m model Michinaka SUGANO KEK WP3 meeting 08/10/2014.
CERN MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team.
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF D2 MECHANICAL STRUCTURE (DOUBLE COLLARING OPTION) S. Farinon, P. Fabbricatore (INFN-Sezione di Genova) Sept. 24 th 2015.
First Q4 cold mass engineering follow up meeting 16/03/2016 Q4 Status update H. Felice, M. Segreti, D. Simon and JM. Rifflet.
Dan Cheng 8/27/2015 MQXFS1 Observations and Feedback from the Assembly Processes, Part II.
EuCARD-WP7-HFM meeting 15 November 2011 Status of construction of FRESCA2 dummy coil assembly Attilio Milanese, Juan Carlos Perez.
LHQ Coil Fabrication Experience and Plan Miao Yu 04/08/2013.
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
HL-LHC Magnet components and assemblies
QXF Coil Fabrication & Tooling Reaction / Impregnation
MQXC Nb-Ti 120mm 120T/m 2m models
11 T Dipole Integration & Plans M. Karppinen
CSP 25th November 2010 Technical agreement number 3: overview
Status of the CLIC DR wiggler design and production at BINP
High Order correctors coil manufacturing
MCBXFB Short Orbit Corrector Prototyping: Presentation to 927 staff
P. Abramian, J. Calero, J. A. García Matos, J. L. Gutierrez, D
Agenda 9:00  - Welcome ASG speaker 9:10 -  Introduction -       P.Fabbricatore 9:25 - The D2   magnets in HL-LHC   -  E. Todesco.
ERMC/RMM activities May 2017
J.C. Perez on behalf of SMC collaboration team J.C. Perez
JLAB MEETING FDR – April 23-24th 2013
11 T dipole coil features and dimensions
FRESCA2 Update on the dipole design and new calculations
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
HO Corrector Magnets: decapole test and future plans
Mechanical stability and QXF coil winding
MBHSP02 test STATUS and first results
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
Analytical Cost Model (16 T dipole)
Analytical Cost Model (16 T dipole)
Introduction to the technical content The Q4 magnet (MQYY) for HL-LHC
Status of the short nested orbit corrector MCBXFB prototype
MQXF updates P. Ferracin October 9th, 2014.
Conceptual design of superconducting correctors for Hi-Lumi Project
ELENA Magnet Installation Planning
MQXF coil cross-section status
III. Correction Dipoles MDG Accessories for all Magnets V. Summary
High Precision Magnet Production for NSLSII at IHEP
P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon
HL-LHC IR Corrector Magnets Conceptual Design & Construction Activity
PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Updated concept of the CBM dipole magnet
J. García, F. Toral (CIEMAT) P. Fessia (CERN)
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
Presentation transcript:

MCBXFB Short Orbit Corrector Prototype: Status update P. Abramian, J. Calero, J. A. García Matos, P. Gómez, J.L. Gutierrez, D. Lopez, J. Munilla, F. Toral (CIEMAT) N. Bourcey, J. C. Pérez (CERN) WP3 Meeting – 11th October 2017

Index Introduction Coil fabrication: parts and tooling First winding & binding tests Next tasks Schedule Conclusions MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Magnet and cable specifications MCBXFB Technical specifications Magnet configuration Combined dipole (Operation in X-Y square) Integrated field 2.5 Tm Minimum free aperture 150 mm Nominal current < 2500 A Radiation resistance 40 MGy Physical length < 1.505 m Working temperature 1.9 K Iron geometry MQXF iron holes Field quality < 10 units (1E-4) Fringe field < 40 mT (Out of the Cryostat) Vertical dipole field (2.1 T) Horizontal dipole field Combined (Variable orientation) Cable Parameters No. of strands 18 Strand diameter 0.48 mm Cable thickness 0.845 mm Cable width 4.37 mm Key-stone angle 0.67º Cu:Sc 1.75 MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Manufacturing concept and coil fabrication remarks (I) Double pancake coils of small NbTi cable with large aperture lead to large number of turns: Unpredictable cable lay down at coil ends. Large number of wedges and endspacers are necessary. Traditional coils made with polyimide insulated cables would be too spongy: dimension control would be very challenging. Fully impregnated coils would ease the dimension accuracy. Resin should be radiation hard and have a good mechanical behaviour. CTD 422 resin was validated, but finally it was decided to switch to CTD 101K instead, due to some doubts about the mechanical resilience of 422. Cable should be insulated with glass-fibre to ease the impregnation. MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Manufacturing concept and coil fabrication remarks (II) The use of binder is necessary to hold the first layer while winding the second one. This binder must be compatible with the resin. Numerous tests using CTD binder 1.1 have been carried out on small samples, but there is no previous experience on real coils. Coil pre-stress will be provided by self-supported stainless steel collars. Iron yoke will be laminated and will not provide additional mechanical support. MCBXF are 2-in-1 magnets, given the inner/outer dipole configuration, so tooling is thought to be used in both magnets if possible, in order to reduce production costs. MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Last WP3 meeting reminder Successful short mechanical model test: Measured and calculated values were very close. Assembly procedure was easy to be followed. Some concerns for a full length coil. In summary, the nested collar configuration is validated but some further tests are still necessary. Test will be repeated with the right outer collar geometry and 180 deg dummy coils Cold tests will be carried out with Liquid N2 Next goal: Complete outer dipole test MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Index Introduction Coil fabrication: parts and tooling First winding & binding tests Next tasks Schedule Conclusions MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Coil Fabrication: Cable The first full length spool was insulated with the wrong type of glass-fiber sizing (636). It was noticed at the end of August, during the insulation of the next full length spool. Different tests have been performed at CERN&CGP. Finally, 66TEX933 fiberglass is woven around the cable, which is compatible with the resin and close to the nominal thickness of 135 micron (131 micron measured on ten-stack). We are grateful to 927 team for their fast reaction and help. MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Coil Fabrication: Wedges Each coil cross section needs 5 different wedges to provide a good field quality. They are produced by machining in parts of approximately 300 mm length. So each coil needs 30 parts. Insulation tests of full length wedge assemblies have been carried out using the minimum amount of cyanoacrylate possible, as binder was not a good solution to hold the insulating sleeves.. Smaller sleeves will be soon available to minimize the need of cyanocrilate. Ancillary holes to hold the parts during machining will be filled with headless A4 stainless steel screws. MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Coil Fabrication: End spacers Alignment groove Connection box EDM cuts Loading plate extension Stress relieving cut Support pointing holes Given the double layer and the two magnets necessary for the MCBXF, there are 58 different end spacers per magnet!! Produced by 3D printing, several improvements and add-ons have been introduced after testing the first set. Large deformations (up to +/- 2 mm): EDM cuts are introduced. MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Coil Fabrication: Quench heaters Quench simulation with CIEMAT code SQUID, based on finite difference method. Heaters are necessary only for the long MCBXF, but will be implemented in the short prototype for validation. Heaters produced by 927 team. One voltage tap per cable block and at both sides of the layer jump. MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Coil Fabrication: Winding tooling Winding machine, pay-off and brake machines have been assembled, checked and calibrated. All winding tooling has been checked. MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Coil Fabrication: Binder tooling (I) Aluminum top mould (Both layers) Heating element Mould tightening plate Distance measuring reference Outer layer spacer Inner layer pusher Outer layer pusher Last turns will drop below mid-plane during winding. It is necessary to apply the binder and take the cables to their position before applying heat (120 ºC, 12 h): Radial dimension is controlled by tightening the top tile of the mould. Cables are then pushed in place by the corresponding pusher. Mould is made of aluminium and stainless steel: careful design to avoid dangerous differential thermal elongations. Inner dipole binder tooling MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Coil Fabrication: Binder tooling (II) Inner dipole binder tooling All parts are delivered and dimensionally checked MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Coil Fabrication: Impregnation tooling Impregnation assembly table -> In production. Delivery at week 43. Impregnation mould -> Last parts will be delivered at week 43. Vacuum Chamber -> Assembled and ready. Heating control system -> It will be finished at week 42. MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Index Introduction Coil fabrication: parts and tooling First winding & binding tests Next tasks Schedule Conclusions MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Winding & binding tests (I) First winding and binding test has been carried out. All tooling work as expected. Some minor modifications are ongoing for the first coil winding. The pay-off machine will be modified to allow regulating the height of the cable exit from the spool. Tests were carried out as follows with 60 m of cable: Inner layer winding (15 turns). Inner layer binding using winding tooling (binder tooling can only be used for the complete coil). Interlayer positioning (Nomex). Outer layer winding (12 turns). Outer layer binding using winding tooling (binder tooling can only be used for the complete coil). MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Winding & binding tests (II) Inner layer winding Main surprise is the behaviour of the cables at coil ends: they are not lying down as expected. Instead, they rest almost vertical at the mandrel symmetry plane. Consequently, endspacers do not fit well but can be adapted by milling (manual). Longitudinal position is good within few tenths of mm. First cable after an endspacer is jumping, even in the first turns. Small arches have been ordered to hold the cables in position. Winding tension has been 5 kg at first turns, decreasing to 4 kgs after 10 turns. MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Winding & binding tests (III) Inner layer binding A full length additional lateral pusher is added to the winding tooling for binder application. 0.6 g per cable meter is applied, as in the ten-stack samples. The cables were heated up to 59ºC with a custom set-up during two days. The binding was not optimal, but it allowed to wind the outer layer. 120 ºC during 12 h will be used for the real coil. It was difficult to cut the glass-fibre tapes to the right height. MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Winding & binding tests (IV) Interlayer It must not be cut for assembly. Cable slides smoothly. Outer layer winding Fiberglass tape for end spacer insulation is pre-impregnated with binder and cut to 5 mm height. It behaves much better this way: no sliding, good positioning and cleaner finish. Cable behaviour at the coil ends as in the inner layer: it becomes almost vertical. Voltage taps were not included. A test was made with a ten-stack sample. Outer layer binding Same procedure and setup as in the inner layer. Slightly higher temperature (63ºC). MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Index Introduction Coil fabrication: parts and tooling First winding & binding tests Next tasks Schedule Conclusions MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Next tasks: magnet fabrication Winding of the first coil will start on Oct, 16th. We have cable only for three coils. End spacer design will not be changed till the first coil is finished. The fabrication of some tooling will be launched before the end of October: kapton pre-forming, collaring shoe bending, inner dipole assembly. The orders for the fabrication of the tooling for the outer dipole are waiting for the feedback of the inner dipole production. MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Next tasks: endplate design In order to hold the longitudinal forces, thick endplates are necessary. Design is under final review. They will be already used for the inner dipole cold test. Instrumentation on collars and end pushers will be made at CERN Mechanical Measurement Laboratory. Six collar sections and one coil of each dipole will be monitored. About six hundredth wires!! Longitudinal pusher MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Collaring and assembly tooling Next tasks: Collaring and assembly tooling Assembly procedure and tooling design ongoing Inner collaring tooling design finished Kapton pre-forming and collaring shoe bending tool under development MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Next tasks: Quality Control The structure at EDMS has been created The equipment codes for CDD storage have been created. About 500 drawings of the short mechanical model and the inner dipole tooling have been already sent to CDD team. The MTF equipment codes are also being generated. MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Magnet and cable specifications Index Magnet and cable specifications Manufacturing concept and coil fabrication remarks Last WP3 meeting reminder Coil fabrication Winding & binding tests Current developments Schedule Conclusions MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Schedule Design Fabrication April 2017 Oct 2017 Test Detailed mechanical calculations Done ID fabrication drawings Aug-17 Oct-17 OD fabrication drawings Dec-17 Fabrication Cable MCBXB H+V delivered (4 ID + 3 OD unit lengths) June-17 Winding machine ready Apr-17 Jun-17 First winding test May-17 Sept-17 First ID coil Jul-17 Nov-17 ID coils Sep-17 Jan-17 ID Collaring Feb-18 ID Magnet assembly March-18 OD coils April-18 OD Collaring Mar-18 May-18 Magnet Assembly June-18 Test ID in vertical cryostat Magnet prototype in vertical cryostat July-18 MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Conclusions Fist winding and binding tests has been successfully performed. First coil winding will start on Oct 16th. The design of the magnet is almost finished. The assembly tooling design is ongoing. The manufacturing drawings of the outer dipole tooling are waiting for feedback from the inner dipole production. Despite the limited manpower resources, we are doing our best to minimize the delays. MCBXF Status update – F. Toral – 11th October 2017

Thank you for your attention