Lay summary Question/Rationale What did you do? Picture 2 Picture 3

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Advertisements

Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS. TRI-COUNCIL POLICY The University has adopted the Tri-Council Policy Statement on the Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.
Developing information for participants in your research – getting started This presentation contains some exercises to help you get started. You can do.
ETHICS AND RESEARCH SHARON BESSELL RESEARCH METHODS POGO 8196
University of Nebraska – Lincoln Office of Research Responsibility Institutional Review Board (IRB) May 11, 2010 Office of Research Responsibility –
Ethics in Research.
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Pre-randomisation consent (Zelen’s method)
Prescreening ä To optimize safety ä To permit the development of a sound and effective exercise prescription.
Ethics in research involving human subjects
Risky Business: You and Your Volunteers OLA – February 5, 2005 Greg Kelner Toronto Public Library
Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of the Critical Congenital Heart Defect Screening Program Emily Reddy, OTR New England Genetics Collaborative (NEGC)
1 A Dynamic Roadmap: Navigating Evolving Documentation Standards for LD & ADHD Under the ADAAA.
Hannah Dale, Gozde Ozakinci, Pauline Adair & Gerry Humphris PhD Student, School of Medicine, University of St. Andrews Health Psychologist NHS Fife
Ethics and ethical research
Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Research Ethics.
Using the ICF as a framework to explore mental health users' experiences of activities, participation and environment: An international study Elizabeth.
Science Fair Research Plan
Pilot Study: Re-screening Adolescent and Young Adult Women for Chlamydia Infection Alison Muse NYSDOH Bureau of STD Control Region II IPP meeting November.
Deception in Human Research Learning Objectives Define Deception and Incomplete Disclosure Understand when Deception or Incomplete Disclosure are allowable.
Program Evaluation DR. MAJED WADI. Objectives  Design necessary parameters used for program evaluation  Accept different views of program evaluation.
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
The Impact of Obtaining Documented Informed Consent on MS/MS Screening L.A. Faulkner 1, L.B. Feuchtbaum 2, M. Hanlon 1, F.W. Lorey 2, K. Velazquez 2, and.
Life Knowledge ® The Importance of Professional Ethics How to I begin to grow? Stage One of Development ME HS 33.
Ethical Issues Carolyn R. Fallahi, Ph. D.. Ethical treatment of children Laws: All U.S. states have laws regulating contact between psychologists and.
Translational Cancer Research Unit Exploring information-seeking preferences of patients with cancer and their primary support person Dr Sylvie Lambert.
Information you obtain from a subjective report, an observation, or some kind of example that may or may not be reliable. It is not scientifically valid.
THE TUSKEGEE SYPHILIS STUDY EFFECT ON CURRENT RESEARCH.
Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research: Does Your Research Need One? Merle Rosenzweig Michael Unsworth.
Ethics in Research Each research study involves a careful risk/benefit analysis prior to beginning data collection. The question each researcher must ask.
Lesson #11: Ethics. What are ethics as they pertain to experiments??? O Is it ethical to conduct animal testing? O Is it ethical to distribute placebo.
BSHS 332 Week 4 DQ 1 In assessing risk to benefit, on what basis do you make the ultimate determination of how much risk is acceptable and how much benefit.
“I Can Keep My Memories:”
Conditional IRB Approval
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Provide instruction.
Instructions for New Revision & Deviation/Exception Forms
The Clinical Trial Volunteer’s Bill of Rights
World Health Organization
Within Trial Decisions: Unblinding and Termination
Ethics in Research.
Research Ethics: a short guide for Staff 2017/18
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
Lay summary Question/Rationale What did you do? Method step 1 here…
Affiliation CNWL-Milton Keynes Lay summary
Affiliation SRH /Newcastle Uni Lay summary
LawWorks Clinic Round Table
Ethical Principles of Research
Name Jodi Allen & Laura Sinnott
Research Ethics George Masterton.
Investigator Responsibilities: What should we expect from researchers?
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Lay summary Question/Rationale What did you do?
ICTMS Communicating Trial Results to participants
Rieke van der Graaf PhD UMC Utrecht, Julius Center
Analysis of Questionnaires (qualitative and quantitative)
Advertised the study day, including an agenda.
Lay summary Question/Rationale What did you do? Picture 3
Affiliation Sandwell NHS Lay summary
Wrote literature review and beginning to develop research proposal
Revised Common Rule: Informed Consent Changes
Human Participants Research
Participants, Measurement & Study Design
How to lay out your Questionnaire Page
Why we need ethical guidelines
References and Resources
Frequently Asked Questions About Psychology
NatSIP-CRIDE Feasibility Study
Interviewer Research Ethics
Presentation transcript:

Lay summary Question/Rationale What did you do? Picture 2 Picture 3 Alison Mullen Newcastle University Lay summary Pulse oximetry may augment clinical dysphagia assessment, but minimal research has been conducted which included adults with learning disabilities. This study was designed to determine if a larger scale study was feasible. A number of barriers were met in the process of setting up and conducting this low risk study Question/Rationale Exploring the use of pulse oximetry in dysphagia assessment for adults with learning disability (LD): A feasibility study What did you do? Conducted mealtime assessment with pulse oximeter attached Asked people to rate acceptability of pulse oximeter Screened people for dysphagia using questionnaire Picture 2 Picture 3 What did you find out? A larger scale study is not feasible. There are major barriers to research participation for adults with learning disabilities. This included difficulties designing accessible research documents, gaining ethical approval, recruitment and gaining consent. Next steps: Development of guidelines for accessible research documentation Raising profile of LD research locally Implications: Findings from research with other client groups may not be generalisable to adults with LD. It is unethical to exclude adults with LD from clinical research that could benefit them.