THE RATIONALE FOR CAPTIVES

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“This workforce solution was funded by a grant awarded under Workforce Innovation in Regional Economic Development (WIRED) as implemented by the U.S. Department.
Advertisements

SERIES LLC CAPTIVES Jeffrey K. Simpson Gordon Fournaris & Mammarella, P.A Lovering Avenue Wilmington, DE Tel: (302) Fax: (302)
November, 2003 Captive Primer Presented by John Yonkunas Captives – Alternative or Obstacle.
Ross/Capacity Alternative Risk Transfer Presentation.
Chapter 4: Insurance Company Operations
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 9-1 Chapter (1) An Overview Of Financial Management.
Risk Mitigation and the Role of Reinsurance John Finston Deputy Commissioner for Corporate and Regulatory Affairs California Department of Insurance ©
+ IC-DISC – U.S. Tax Incentives for the Export of Lumber Overview of Captive Insurance Appalachian Hardwood Manufacturers, Inc Annual Meeting February.
Finance 431: Property-Liability Insurance Lecture 2: Overview of Insurance Operations.
“Should Our Nonprofit Corporation Join A Self Insurance Pool” Presented by: David G. Pilkington Vice President, – Brown & Brown Insurance – WC Program.
Commercial Insurance Underwriting University of Illinois Urbana – Champaign Finance 230.
1 Alternative Risk Transfer/ (fronting) Process by which a primary insurer cedes a portion of the risk it has underwritten to a reinsurer, such as a captive.
GROUP CAPTIVES A Risk Financing Alternative May 7, 2015 David Bubb Senior Vice President Marsh Inc.
Organize Your Business Select the organizational structure for your business Sole Proprietorship PartnershipCorporation Select and register a business.
JUN 8 – 10, 2015 Segregated Accounts and Other Alternative Risk Transfer Structures 1.
1 Chapter Outline 11.1 Traditional Insurance Contracts Basis of Coverage Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions Policy Limits, Excess Policies Layering.
Captive Considerations What to know, What to avoid #[insert hashtag here]
Reinsurance Supervision The US Perspective ASSAL XIV Annual Meeting Alessandro Iuppa, Superintendent Maine Bureau of Insurance, USA.
Business Entities Dr. John Abraham Professor University of Texas Pan American.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Insurance Company Operations.
The Varied Uses of Segregated Accounts Companies and Captives June 29, 2010.
R L Captive Solutions Cost Control Presentation by Travis Lantis R L Consulting, LLC.
Maximizing Captive Value Through Teamwork. Speakers: Irena Kaler, Executive Director/CAO, RWJ Health Network Insurance Services Ken Rand, Managing Director,
CHAPTER TWO ORGANIZATION OF US BANKS. As with other businesses, banks are strongly affected by needs and interest of customers. It was until after the.
Implementing a Medicare Compliance Program. Implementation of Medicare Compliance Program Rules & procedures to reduce chance of wrongdoing High level.
Best Practices for Service Providers / Accounting & Financial Reporting Issues Facing the Industry (GAAP, SAP, IFRS) Donald B. Rousso Paul Shanbrom Travis.
Alternative Risk Financing Techniques and Basic Actuarial Loss Projections Jacqueline Friedland, Actuarial Practice Leader KPMG LLP Phone: (416) ,
GEM A Progress Report September 27, A Brief History Governmental Entities Mutual, Inc. (GEM) is a captive domiciled in Washington, DC Incorporated.
GEM A Progress Report June 29, A Brief History Governmental Entities Mutual, Inc. (GEM) is a captive domiciled in Washington, DC Incorporated 12/24/2002.
Aon Global Risk Consulting Actuarial Considerations for Captive Insurance Companies Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar September, 2007 Jessica Christensen Aon.
The Ins & Outs Of Self-Insurance Southwest Actuarial Forum December 4, 2007 Ed Costner, ACAS, MAAA Casualty Actuarial Consultants, Inc.
Introduction to company ,types
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter Fourteen Investment Banking, Insurance, and Other Sources of Fee Income.
1 Collateral/Security A Regulators Perspective Wednesday, February 8,2012 John Schrock, Administrator –State of Michigan Workers’ Compensation Agency Self-Insured.
30/05/20161 Captives How they work *Please note; This presentation is used as an information aid and interprets the essentials of captives and protected.
1 Welcome To The IEI-Sponsored Insurance Workshop MTSU June 4-6, 2007.
Overview of Insurance Operations Types of Insurers Risk Transfer Process Objectives of Insurers Constraints of Achieving Objectives Measurement of Insurer.
INSTRUCTOR'S MANUAL Chapter 3 ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS.
© 2005 Towers Perrin March 10, 2005 Ann M. Conway, FCAS, MAAA Call 3 Ratemaking for Captives & Alternative Market Vehicles.
1050 N. Lindbergh Blvd. | St. Louis, Missouri | Wall St., Ste. 280 | St. Charles, Missouri | Broadway,
University of Houston Bauer College of Business April 13, 2006 presentation by: Robert B. Hixon.
FINANCING SOURCES FOR LESSORS Access To Credit Initiative Kiev, February 21, 2006 Presented by: Richard Caproni Sponsored by USAID Access to Credit Initiative.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Insurance Company Operations.
CAS Annual Meeting EMERGING ISSUES IN MEDICAL MALPRACTICE THE ROLE OF THE ACTUARY IN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE MARKETS November 16, 2004 Richard B. Lord, FCAS.
© 2004 Towers Perrin November 2004 John Yonkunas Primer on the Structure and Ownership of Captives.
Alternative Risk Financing Vehicles. Began development in 2010 Launched first captive in 2011 Current Active Captive Portfolio ‒ Legacy health – Heterogeneous.
Casualty Actuarial Society 2004 Annual Meeting Captives Presented by: Andrew Sargeant, President USA Risk Group of Vermont, Inc.
Chapter Fourteen Investment Banking, Insurance, and Other Sources of Fee Income.
The Basics of Self Funding
Types of Business Structures
Risk Financing Achievement of the least-cost coverage of an organization's loss exposures, while ensuring post-loss financial resource availability. The.
Chapter 31: Other Organizational Forms for Small Businesses
1 The roles of actuaries & general operating environment
Financial Accountability Fully-Insured and Self-Funding September 12, 2017 Title Slide 1b - Sneak peek at an alternate accent color.
The Application of Legal Principles in Business
An Exciting New Service
Corporations and Trusts Law Chapter 3 Choosing a Business Structure
Captives – Alternative or Obstacle Business Case
Understand marketing and business management
The Basics of Self Funding
Legal Information for Creative Professionals
Welcome from the GWAFP and MAAFP
Overview of Insurance Operations
External Insurance Market Opportunities
STATE OF TENNESSEE CAPTIVE INSURANCE SECTION
Business Organization
Types of Business Organizations
A Captive Insurance Company
Data Requirements General Information Needed: RFP Membership
IASA: Captive Insurance 101 VENTURE CAPTIVE MANAGEMENT Developed By
Presentation transcript:

THE RATIONALE FOR CAPTIVES 2017 Fall Education Forum October 2, 2017 Baltimore Maryland

SPEAKERS Megan Ogden, Director Captive Management JLT Insurance Management Tim Averill, Executive Director SET SEG Property/Casualty Pool Michael Rebeleati, Finance/Operations Nevada Public Agency Insurance Pool Michael Rhyner, Executive Director Michigan Municipal Risk Management Authority

Overview of Captive Basics PART ONE Overview of Captive Basics

WHAT IS A CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY? A captive insurer is generally defined as an insurance company that is wholly owned and controlled by its insureds; its primary purpose is to insure the risks of its owners, and its insureds benefit from the captive insurer’s underwriting profits. Captive insurance is utilized by insureds that choose to put their own capital at risk by creating their own insurance company, working outside of the commercial insurance marketplace, to achieve their risk financing objectives. Captives are essentially a form of self-insurance whereby the insurer is owned wholly by the insured. They are typically established to meet the risk-management needs of the owners or members. Captive insurance companies have been in existence for over 100 years

Worldwide Number of Captives CAPTIVE STATISTICS Worldwide Number of Captives

2016 NEW CAPTIVE STATISTICS Number of Captives by Location All numbers include new cells/SBU’s

TYPES OF CAPTIVES Type Ownership Pure/Single Parent Wholly owned by one parent company Insures the risks of its parent, subsidiaries and affiliates Group Owned by multiple non-related organizations Insurers or reinsurers the risks of the group/owners Association Owned by members of a common industry or trade association Insurers or reinsurers the risks of the group or association Branch Division of an existing off-shore captive formed in the US Allows companies to access to TRIA and US employee benefit coverages that are required to be in a US domicile

TYPES OF CAPTIVES Type Ownership Risk Retention Group Owned by policy holders and members Regulated under US federal legislation, licensed in domicile, and allowed to register to operate in all 50 states Sponsored/Cell Captives Owned by 3rd party sponsor Insurers participants in the various cells Agency Captive Owned by insurance agents Allows agency to share in underwriting profits and investment income of its book of business Special Purpose Financial Captive Created for a limited purpose of entering into a SPFC contract Allows securitization transactions by a captive insurance company, transferring insurance risk to the capital markets

CAPTIVE ADVANTAGES & OPPORTUNITIES Reduce Insurance Costs: Retention of underwriting profits Claims settlements Premium advantages Risk Management Customize Coverage Claims Management Loss control and monitoring Balance Sheet Preservation Asset Protection Owner control of captive Flexible ownership structure Investment Opportunities

COMMON CAPTIVE COVERAGES Workers’ Compensation General Liability Products Liability Auto Liability Property, including wind and quake Professional Liability Product or Service Warranty Environmental D&O Liability Employment Practices Liability Construction Exposures Trade Risk Excess Liability Intellectual Property Medical Stop Loss Punitive Damages Terrorism

Increased Accessibility WHY SHOULD A POOL USE A CAPTIVE? Premium Commercial rates not competitive Combined premium is advantageous Operational Commercial coverage not available Provided coverage that the pool is statutorily unable to provide Proof of insurance needed Seeking formalized risk funding and loss control monitoring Good loss ratios and risk management protocols Investment income Desire for a potential profit center Desire for a regulated environment Protection from political risk Access to Capacity Federal Programs (TRIA) Reinsurance otherwise not accessible in commercial market Secure Profitable Regulated Increased Accessibility

CAPTIVE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Review Current Insurance Program & Risk Appetite Formal Feasibility Study Decision to Proceed Business Plan Development Captive Application, License, Incorporation & Capitalization Commence Operations

CAPTIVE FEASIBILITY STUDY Identify core objectives 2. Data collection Exposure Loss history Financial statements Policies 3. Actuarial loss analysis Project losses under various scenarios Decide how much risk to retain Determine amount of capital Groups: consider underwriting structure 4. Program design & organizational structure 5. Domicile selection 6. Regulatory, tax and legal analysis Identify Objectives Collect Data Analyze Actuarial Loss Design Program & Structure Select Domicile Analyze Regulations, Taxes & Legal Implications

DOMICILE SELECTION CRITERIA Statutory Capitalization and surplus requirements and solvency ratios Receptiveness of regulatory environment Quality of local infrastructure Availability of expertise Stability of regulatory environment CRITERIA Flexibility as respects investment portfolio Ease of doing business – in a suitably regulated environment Experience in business under consideration Efficient financial outcomes: tax, wealth, investment etc.

DOMICILE SELECTION CRITERIA Quick and efficient procedures for organizing and activating a captive Taxation Operation cost relative to other domiciles Compatibility of language, currency and customs CRITERIA Time zone convenience Strategic location Where does the owner conduct significant portion of its business?

Regulatory Requirements REGULATORY, TAX & LEGAL CONCERNS CAPTIVE STRUCTURE Type of Captive Ownership Tax Implications Underwriting Class of Stock Voting Shares Regulatory Requirements

NEXT STEPS FOR CAPTIVE FORMATION Internal client meeting to review feasibility study results Approve captive formation Finalize structure/coverages/corporate governance Engage captive manager to manage the captive and prepare the application Engage attorney to form company Meet with the domicile insurance department Captive manager to file application to domicile insurance department Capitalize captive Commence business

CAPTIVE APPLICATION PROCESS Captive Owner Meeting with DOI Service providers Board of Directors Biographical affidavits Start up fees LICENSE Attorney Name reservation Article of Incorporation Bylaws FEIN Corporate Agreements Captive Manager Captive Application Business Plan Application assembly Task manager Domicile Insurance Department Actuary Loss/Funding Projections Financial Forecasts

OPERATING A CAPTIVE Board of Directors oversees the captive, typically parent company management and/or a mix of professionals Board of Directors appoints local service providers for banking, management, auditing, and captive management Captive management company performs the operational functions on behalf, including insurance and financial expertise

Department of Insurance OPERATING A CAPTIVE – SERVICE TEAM Client Actuary Banker Insurance Brokers Department of Insurance Captive Manager Auditor Claims Administrators Tax Advisors Legal Counsel InvestmentAdvisors 20

COST OF A CAPTIVE Costs: Formation & feasibility Ongoing operations Capitalization Costs depend on the complexity of the structure and insurance program Pure captives are often less expensive to form and operate than Group captives or Risk Retention Group Captives with several lines of coverage are often more expensive to operate than smaller programs Premium taxes are based on the amount of premium written Capitalization requirements vary by domicile and type of captive

ESTIMATED COST OF PURE OR ASSOCIATED CAPTIVES Formation & Feasibility - $35k to $55k Includes actuary study, legal fees for formation, fees for application preparation & domicile fees Ongoing Operations - $100k to $150k Includes captive management, actuary, audit, legal, travel & meetings, premium taxes & license fees Capitalization – $250k to $500k (minimum) In the form of cash, marketable securities or irrevocable letter of credit

PART TWO Captive Case Studies

Tim Averill, Executive Director MASB-SEG PROPERTY/CASUALTY POOL Tim Averill, Executive Director

MASB-SEG PROPERTY/CASUALTY POOL Created in 1985 514 Members Michigan Public Schools Intermediate School Districts Community Colleges Property and Liability Auto liability Auto physical Damage Cyber Liability Educators Legal Liability General Liability Property

MASB-SEG REINSURANCE LIMITED Association Captive Wholly owned and controlled by MASB-SEG Property/Casualty Pool Domiciled in Cayman Islands $5.0 million capitalization Interlocking boards Officially licensed – May 1981

PRIMARY REASONS TO FORM THE CAPTIVE Comply with statutory aggregate excess requirements Strengthen our negotiation position with reinsurance partners Offer protection from increasing regulation Ensure greater stability by providing an alternative to the commercial market Broaden our offerings outside the scope of the Pool’s primary coverage Potential to turn Pool reinsurance expense into future member surplus

EVOLUTION OF RISK MASB-SEG REINSURANCE LIMITED 1985 Aggregate Excess 2007 Annual Aggregate Property Deductible 2010 Employee Dishonesty Bonds 2011 Auto Liability, General Liability, Educators Legal Liability, Property 2013 Property & Liability Quota Share Future Growth: Medical Stop Loss, Cyber Liability

MASB-SEG REINSURANCE LIMITED Current Programs and Coverages: Statutory Aggregate Excess Coverage Property and Liability Excess Coverage Employee Dishonesty Bonds Participation in the Pools Quota Share Property and Liability Reinsurance Programs Future Programs and Coverages: Cyber Liability Medical Stop Loss

Mike Rebeleati, Operations Manager NEVADA PUBLIC AGENCY INSURANCE POOL Mike Rebeleati, Operations Manager

WHY THE NEVADA POOL/PACT FORMED TWO PURE CAPTIVES Flexibility in coverage design, scope and retentions for underlying pools Flow of capital to captives supported access to reinsurance and higher retentions Investment income opportunities are not as restricted as for public agencies and helps reduce costs over time Nevada Premium tax savings 3.5% plus Surplus lines fees 0.4% vs. reinsurance tax 0.25% Open Meeting Law and Public Records Laws do not apply to captives, but do to pools

PUBLIC RISK MUTUAL Formed and Capitalized by Nevada Public Agency Insurance Pool (POOL) A non-profit pure captive mutual insurance company Granted Certificate of Authority from Insurance Division on July 25, 2004 Capitalized with $1,000,000

PUBLIC COMPENSATION MUTUAL Formed by Members of Public Agency Compensation Trust (PACT) A non-profit association captive mutual insurance company Granted Certificate of Authority from Insurance Division on July 1, 2007 Initial Capitalization $5,000,000

RELATIONSHIPS OF NPAIP/PACT Nevada Public Agency Insurance Pool (POOL) Public Agency Compensation Trust (PACT) Insurance Captive Public Compensation Mutual (PCM) Public Risk Mutual (PRM) Administration & Governance Public Agency Compensation Trust (PACT)

NPAIP – LLOYD’S 2017-2018 PROPERTY STRUCTURE

NPAIP 2017-2018 LIABILITY STRUCTURE GRAPH UE’s participation decreased to 75% and PRM’s participation increased to 25% GEM 35% Brit 40% PRM 25% $10M PRM 25% Schools PRM 25% Schools UE 75% Schools CRL 70% Municipalities PRM 30% Municipalities $3M $500K NPAIP $500,000 SIR

Michael Rhyner, Executive Director MICHIGAN MUNICIPAL RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY Michael Rhyner, Executive Director

MICHIGAN MUNICIPAL RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY Created in 1980 400 members Cities Counties Townships Special districts Community colleges Property and Liability Only Auto Liability Auto Physical Damage General Liability Law Enforcement Liability Public Officials Liability Property

PRIMARY REASONS TO FORM THE CAPTIVE Provided coverages where MMRMA lacks statutory authority Expand product offerings which are not part of MMRMA’s core coverage Provide an alternative to commercial reinsurance for long-term predictability and stability Provide a traditional vehicle for direct partnerships and alliances with other insurance companies Create a “profit center” to benefit members Manage regulations and potential interference

DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Feasibility Study 2013-2014 Decision to Proceed 2015 Selection of Domicile Business Plan & Application Preparation 2016 Application Approved, License Issued, Incorporation & Capitalization Commence Operations 2016

Association Captive Wholly Owned and Controlled by MMRMA Domiciled in Michigan $10 Million Capitalization Interlocking Boards Board of Managers Appointed August 2016 Officially Licensed – December 2016

Programs and Coverages: Tax Collection Bonds for Michigan Counties Statutory Aggregate Excess Coverage for Pools Participation in MMRMA’s Quota Share Casualty Reinsurance Program General Liability Coverage for Other Pools Workers’ Compensation Excess Coverage for Self-Insureds

THE RATIONALE FOR CAPTIVES 2017 Fall Education Forum October 2, 2017 Baltimore Maryland