Quantum Opportunities in Gravitational Wave Detectors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
G v1Squeezed Light Interferometry1 Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection July 6, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Advertisements

Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
Jan 29, 2007 LIGO Excomm, G R 1 Goal: Experimental Demonstration of a Squeezing-Enhanced Laser-Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detector in.
1 Experimental Demonstration of a Squeezing-Enhanced Laser-Interferometric Gravitational-Wave Detector Keisuke Goda Quantum Measurement Group, LIGO Massachusetts.
TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.
Ponderomotive Squeezing & Opto-mechanics Adam Libson and Thomas Corbitt GWADW 2015 G
Recent Developments toward Sub-Quantum-Noise-Limited Gravitational-wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005 LIGO-G R.
Quantum Noise Measurements at the ANU Sheon Chua, Michael Stefszky, Conor Mow-Lowry, Sheila Dwyer, Ben Buchler, Ping Koy Lam, Daniel Shaddock, and David.
Interferometer Topologies and Prepared States of Light – Quantum Noise and Squeezing Convenor: Roman Schnabel.
Experiments towards beating quantum limits Stefan Goßler for the experimental team of The ANU Centre of Gravitational Physics.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Enhanced LIGO with squeezing: Lessons Learned for Advanced LIGO and beyond.
Eighth Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves Sheon Chua, Michael Stefszky, Conor Mow-Lowry, Daniel Shaddock, Ben Buchler, Kirk McKenzie, Sheila.
Frequency Dependent Squeezing Roadmap toward 10dB
LIGO-G R Quantum Noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala PAC 12, MIT June 2002 Present status and future plans.
Opto-mechanics with a 50 ng membrane Henning Kaufer, A. Sawadsky, R. Moghadas Nia, D.Friedrich, T. Westphal, K. Yamamoto and R. Schnabel GWADW 2012,
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Optomechanics Experiments
Quantum mechanics on giant scales
The search for those elusive gravitational waves
Lisa Barsotti LIGO/MIT
H1 Squeezing Experiment: the path to an Advanced Squeezer
Lisa Barsotti (LIGO-MIT)
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
Squeezing in Gravitational Wave Detectors
Quantum noise reduction using squeezed states in LIGO
Quantum mechanics on giant scales
New directions for terrestrial detectors
Overview of quantum noise suppression techniques
The Quantum Limit and Beyond in Gravitational Wave Detectors
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
MIT Corbitt, Goda, Innerhofer, Mikhailov, Ottaway, Pelc, Wipf Caltech
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects
Enhancing the astrophysical reach of LIGO with squeezed light
Nergis Mavalvala (age 47)
Quantum mechanics on giant scales
Optical Cooling and Trapping of Macro-scale Objects
Quantum Noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers
Quantum Noise in Gravitational-wave Detectors
Quantum mechanics on giant scales
Quantum effects in Gravitational-wave Interferometers
Quantum States of Light and Giants
Ponderomotive Squeezing Quantum Measurement Group
Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detectors: Giant Quantum Machines
Advanced LIGO Quantum noise everywhere
Quantum Optics and Macroscopic Quantum Measurement
Quantum studies in LIGO Lab
Gravitational wave detection and the quantum limit
Quantum mechanics on giant scales
Quantum mechanics on giant scales
Quantum studies in LIGO Lab
Quantum mechanics on giant scales
Optical Squeezing For Next Generation Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detectors Michael Stefszky, Sheon Chua, Conor Mow-Lowry, Ben Buchler, Kirk McKenzie,
LIGO Quantum Schemes NSF Review, Oct
Nergis Mavalvala MIT December 2004
The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory
Laser interferometric gravitational wave detectors
Detection of Gravitational Waves with Interferometers
Squeezed Input Interferometer
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL
Advanced Optical Sensing
Progress toward the quantum regime in giant oscillators
Radiation pressure induced dynamics in a suspended Fabry-Perot cavity
Measurement of radiation pressure induced dynamics
Presentation transcript:

Quantum Opportunities in Gravitational Wave Detectors Quantum nature of light Quantum states of mirrors Nergis Mavalvala, MIT @ APS, April 2011

Two revolutions Direct observation of gravitational waves should open a new window into the Universe Gravitational wave detectors are the most sensitive position meters ever constructed The quantum limit in gravitational wave detectors opens up a whole new field of study Quantum opportunities in gravitational wave detectors Applications of quantum optics techniques New tools for quantum measurement on truly macroscopic (human) scales

Gravitational waves (GWs) Prediction of Einstein’s General Relativity (1916) Indirect detection led to Nobel prize in 1993 Ripples of the space-time fabric GWs stretch and squeeze the space transverse to direction of propagation Emitted by accelerating massive objects Cosmic explosions Compact stars orbiting each other Stars gobbling up stars “Mountains” on stellar crusts 

GW detector at a glance Mirrors hang as pendulums Quasi-free particles Respond to passing GW Filter external force noise 4 km 20 kW Optical cavities Mirrors facing each other Builds up light power Lots of laser power P Signal α P Noise α 10 W

Global network of detectors GEO VIRGO LIGO LCGT AIGO LIGO LISA

Phases of LIGO (~2000 to 2020) Seismic noise Thermal noise Shot noise Displacement noise (m/rtHz) Shot noise Advanced LIGO

Quantum noise in Advanced LIGO Displacement noise (m/rtHz) Shot noise More laser power  stronger measurement Radiation pressure noise Stronger measurement  larger backaction

Origin of the Quantum Noise Vacuum fluctuations

Quantum Noise in an Interferometer Caves, Phys. Rev. D (1981) Slusher et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. (1985) Xiao et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. (1987) McKenzie et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. (2002) Vahlbruch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. (2005) Goda et al., Nature Physics (2008) Radiation pressure noise Quantum fluctuations exert fluctuating force  mirror displacement X1 X2 Laser X1 X2 Shot noise limited  (number of photons)1/2 Arbitrarily below shot noise X1 X2 X1 X2 Vacuum fluctuations Squeezed vacuum

Quantum Optics & Squeezed State Injection

How to squeeze photon states? Need to simultaneously amplify one quadrature and de-ampilify the other Create correlations between the quadratures Simple idea  nonlinear optical material where refractive index depends on intensity of light illumination

Squeezing injection Prototype GW detector Laser Homodyne Detector SHG Faraday isolator The squeeze source drawn is an OPO squeezer, but it could be any other squeeze source, e.g. ponderomotive squeezer. OPO Homodyne Detector Squeeze Source Diff. mode signal

Squeezing Enhancement K. Goda, O. Miyakawa, E. E. Mikhailov, S. Saraf, R. Adhikari, K.McKenzie, R. Ward, S. Vass, A. J. Weinstein, and N. Mavalvala, Nature Physics 4, 472 (2008) 2.9 dB or 1.4x GEO preliminary (Courtesy R. Schnabel) LIGO Sensitivity LIGO is nearly factor of 100 more sensitive at 150Hz. Shot Noise Squeezed Noise advanced LIGO Frequency (Hz) 13

Squeezer at LIGO Hanford ANU, AEI, MIT, LIGO collaboration Electronics Lab in corner station Optics Table Optical Parametric Oscillator Sheila (MIT) Alexander (AEI) 14

H1 Squeeze Test Noise Power (dBm/rtHz) Frequency (Hz) S. Dwyer, et al. (Mar. 2011)

Advanced LIGO with squeeze injection Radiation pressure Shot noise

Optomechanics & Radiation Pressure

Optomechanical coupling The radiation pressure force couples the light field to mirror motion Alters the dynamics of the mirror Spring-like forces  optical trapping Viscous forces  optical damping Tune the frequency response of the GW detector Manipulate the quantum noise Quantum radiation pressure noise and the standard quantum limit Produce quantum states of the mirrors Classical Tuning frequency response is used to manipulating the signal. Improved sensitivity at optical spring resonant frequency. Squeezing manipulates the noise Quantum

Classical radiation pressure forces Detune optical field from cavity resonance Change in mirror position changes intracavity power  radiation pressure exerts force on mirror Time delay in cavity results in cavity response doing work on mechanics

Experimental cavity setup 10% 90% 5 W Optical fibers 1 gram mirror Coil/magnet pairs for actuation (x5)‏

Trapping and cooling Optical trap response Optical cooling Stiff! Stable! T. Corbitt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 98, 150802 (2007)

Quantum Radiation Pressure Effects

The experiment grows

That elusive quantum regime Thermal noise Radiation pressure noise goal (5 W input) C. Wipf, T. Bodiya, et al. (Feb. 2011)

Quantumness in Initial LIGO

Cooling the kilogram-scale mirrors of Initial LIGO LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Optomechanics takes off Toroidal microcavity  10-11 g NEMS  10-12 g WG-WGM  10-11 g AFM cantilevers  10-8 g Micromirrors  10-7 g SiN3 membrane  10-8 g NEMs capacitively coupled to SET (Schwab group, Maryland (now Cornell) Kippenberg group (Munich) Whispering gallery mode resonator couples through optical force to optical waveguide. Painter group (Caltech) Harris group (Yale) Bouwmeester group (UCSB) Aspelmeyer group (Vienna) LIGO-MIT group LIGO LIGO  103 g Minimirror  1 g

Quantum optomechanics Techniques for improving gravitational wave detector sensitivity Tools for quantum information science Opportunities to study quantum effects in macroscopic systems Observation of quantum radiation pressure Generation of squeezed states of light Entanglement of mirror and light quantum states Quantum states of mirrors

Amazing cast of characters MIT Keisuke Goda Thomas Corbitt Christopher Wipf Timothy Bodiya Sheila Dwyer Lisa Barsotti Nicolas Smith-Lefevbre Eric Oelker Rich Mittleman MIT LIGO Laboratory Collaborators Yanbei Chen & group David McClelland & group Roman Schnabel & group Stan Whitcomb Daniel Sigg Caltech 40m Lab team Caltech LIGO Lab Garrett Cole of Aspelmeyer group (Vienna) LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Capturing elusive wave… Tests of general relativity Directly observe ripples of space-time Astrophysics Directly observe the Black Holes, the Big Bang, and objects beyond our current imagination Directly observe quantum mechanics in human scale objects STAY TUNED 40 kg

Squeezing injection in Advanced LIGO Laser GW Detector SHG Faraday isolator Squeezing source The squeeze source drawn is an OPO squeezer, but it could be any other squeeze source, e.g. ponderomotive squeezer. OPO DC Readout Squeeze Source GW Signal

Path to the quantum regime For mode of oscillation of the mirror Thermodynamics STIFF OPTICAL SPRING HIGH MECHANICAL Q