Paks II and public participation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LAPSI 2nd Public Conference New Hungarian Data Protection and Freedom of Information Authority Tamás Kovács HUNAGI.
Advertisements

EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD AND PARTNERSHIP INSTRUMENT - ENPI CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMMES.
Public Procurement in Albania in the framework of recent reforms PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY 1.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES FOR THE AWARD OF CONCESSION/PPP CONTRACTS.
Sustainable Energy Systems Overview of contractual obligations, procedures and practical matters KICK-OFF MEETING.
Current Status of Public Participation in the EIA Process in China Seoul Korea, June 2007 By Zhao Xinfeng Appraisal Center for Environment and Engineering,
1 The Regulatory Authority for electricity and gas:, The Regulatory Authority for electricity and gas: objectives, tasks, independence, accountability.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
The Treaties, Institutions and Policies of the EU
Centurio Partner Regions' Meeting 5 May AER CENTURIO CONFERENCE Centurio Partner Regions’ Meeting 5 May 2005 Azores.
EFTA Seminar on the EEA Agreement – 4 September 2014 How EU law becomes EEA law Tore Grønningæter Senior Information and Communication Officer EFTA Secretariat.
Nuclear program of Lithuania Dr. Vidas Paulikas, Radiation Protection Department VATESI Visaginas, 29 June 2009.
Energy investments in the EU and Russia
Use of Electronic Digital Signature in the Russian Federation.
1 Crisis communications: Lessons from „the learning curve” How Could We Have Done It Better? Communication of an Incident by Ágota Hanti Deputy Spokesperson.
IAEA Perspective and Lessons Learned in Shipping HEU Spent Fuel to Russia Institute of Nuclear Materials Management 48 th Annual Meeting July , 2007.
IAEA, Vienna November 2007 SOME PROSPECTS FOR IMPROVING FINANCING OF DEVELOPMENT OF NUCLEAR POWER INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNICAL WORKSHOP ON THE ISSUES FOR THE.
Thailand NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAM INFRASTRUCTURE AND STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION: Regulatory Body Prof. Dr. Chaivat TOSKULKAO Secretary General Office of Atoms.
Guidelines for the administration of axis 4 LEADER 17th July 2014, Nitra Mgr. Veronika Korčeková, MA Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of the.
Creating the global research village EU Procurement Nicola Anson, DANTE TF-MSP Meeting, 1 March 2011.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
STEPS FOR FUNDING ELI-NP March 11 st 2011 Dan Cutoiu.
Slovak Environmental Inspectorate Procedure of issuing the permits in the Slovak Republic.
Jerzy Jendrośka Energy security and legal requirements for environmental protection, public involvement and transboundary co-operation Scientific support.
Energy for the Future Belene Nuclear Power Plant Project Status.
State of implementation of the decision III/6f regarding Ukraine (MOP 2, June, , 2008, Riga, Latvia)
EU Member State experience in implementing the Espoo Convention ESTONIA 21 September 2007, Moscow.
Environmental Dialogue between of Ministry of Natural Resources of Russia and the European Commission, DG Environment Workshop on The Espoo Convention.
Access to Justice The Hungarian story Starting point: Article administrative, judicial review where access to information is refused 9.1 administrative,
© International Training Centre of the ILO Training Centre of the ILO 1 International Labour Standards (ILS) and their.
A view from the field Ir. Jan Haverkamp Greenpeace EU policy advisor dirty energy nuclear transparency.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM Vuong Huu.
Decision–making on construction of new nuclear facilities O.Melen-Zabramna Head of legal unit, EPL, Ukraine
Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (Espoo, 1991) Task Force on Public Participation in Decision-making Aarhus Convention,
Leading State Inspector Ivan Rovkach Department of Nuclear and Radiation Safety Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus(GOSATOMNADZOR)
Peter Lukáč Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic Department of Environmental Assessment.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, associated professor.
REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY Eighth Regional Public Procurement Forum May, 22-25, 2012 Tirana
Paks II and Hanhikivi-1: financing concerns András Perger Greenpeace Risks and Responsibilities in EU Nuclear Projects June , Brussels.
NUCLEAR TRANSPARENCY WATCH Prevent and anticipate through transparency and participation Nuclear energy related planning – obstacles and challenges in.
Directive 2011/70/Euratom – reality check of implementation
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
The Protection of Confidential Commercial or Industrial Information in Environmental Law: Analysis and Call for a Graded Concept of Protection Prof. Dr.
Legal System of Finland
EU Funds – Fraud and Fraud Prevention Tools
Transnational training seminar for potential Lead Partners and Partners to INTEREGG IIIB-CADSES procedures for 3° call for proposal CADSES implementation.
EU information review of the year 2011
Inclusion Europe: How we work with European Parliament and Commission Milan Šveřepa director, Inclusion Europe.
Template for country interventions (5 min)
Publicly funded nuclear lifetime extensions: story of Ukraine
János Krutzler Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority
STRESS TESTS and TAIWAN PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Back-end options for a small country with long term nuclear program
Nuclear Power in Jordan
Jerzy Jendrośka Transboundary procedures
Nick Bonvoisin Secretary to the Convention on the
Data protection in Hungary
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN EUPAN
EDUARDO SALAZAR ORTUÑO UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA (SPAIN)
Mostafa El-Asiry Nuclear Power Plants Authority (NPPA), Cairo, Egypt
Promoting transparency and financial sustainability of regional policies, state-owned enterprises and local authorities in Moldova Peter Golias, INEKO.
THE INTRODUCTION OF NUCLEAR POWER IN EGYPT AN OVERVIEW
Fuel management innovation in Hungarian nuclear power units
State of Enlargement MGSC Luxemburg March
The evaluation process
2012 Annual Call Steps of the evaluation of proposals, role of the experts TEN-T Experts Briefing, March 2013.
Martyn Pennington Head of Unit, EuropeAid
The Aarhus Clearinghouse for Environmental Democracy
Contractual and Regulatory Framework
Regulatory system in Hungary
Presentation transcript:

Paks II and public participation Márton Fabók 2nd Conference Cooperation Danube Region Nuclear-free PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN NUCLEAR PROJECTS: Opportunities and challenges St Pölten, 22 September 2017

Paks II and the Hungarian public Freedom of Information battles Contents Paks II key facts Paks II and the Hungarian public Freedom of Information battles Public participation in the permitting process

The Paks site Four VVER-440/213 reactor blocs 4*500 MW Constructed in 1982/1987 with a lifetime of 30+20 years 2003 serious incident at the spent fuel pool

Paks II overview Key facts VVER-1200 (AES-2006) reactors, 1180 MW each Intergovernmental agreement (IGA) between Russian Federation and Hungary (14 January 2014) €12.5bn turnkey contract, including €10bn intergovernmental loan Financing IGA (March 2014) Implementation agreements with Rosatom (Dec 2014) Engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) Operation and maintenance (O&M) Fuel supply and spent fuel MVM Paks II Ltd. project company Government commissioner Attila Aszódi, later Minister w/o portfolio János Süli

Paks II in the parliament March 2009: Preliminary approval of all major parties for a “preliminary, in principle approval […] to start preparations for extending the blocks on the Paks nuclear site“ Single sentence with a short justification Practically no parliamentary debate Currently no parliamentary debate

Public opinion and paks II Previously nuclear energy was seen by the public as a marginal and technical issue Putin-Orbán pact lead to the politicisation of nuclear power Concerns more and more concentrate on the waste of money, dependence from Russia, and corruption than nuclear risks

Government communication Sponsored advertisements, especially in pro-government media Public information campaigns locally and nationally (Nuclear Energy Museum, festival truck)

Unsuccessful referendum attempts Several unsuccessful attempts by opposition parties, in particular the green party LMP, and individuals to initiate collection of signatures for a referendum on Paks II The rulings of the National Election Commission repeatedly referred to the inability to hold referendums on the content of international treaties

Paks II freedom of information Numerous FOI requests by Energiaklub before and after the agreement Practices of Hungarian authorities in making FOI releases difficult: Asking for clarification Deliberate refusals: “Commercial confidentiality”, “Pre-decision material”, “Know-how” Payment for FOI data (since 2015) See you in court! Looong procedure

Publicity of the key agreements The most import information is not public yet: EPC contract with Rosatom March 2014: Legislation on the 30 years confidentiality of Paks II agreements While a Constitution Court ruling was expected…a DG ENVI decision on the unacceptability of generic confidentiality of implementation agreements January 2015: Confidentiality audit procedure started by the Hungarian National Authority for Data Protection and Freedom of Information April 2017: Gov’t announcement on publicity of agreements but without actual development

Aarhus convention Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee investigation concerning two of its pillars, access to information + public participation in decision-making June 2014: Communication (Energiaklub and Greenpeace Hungary) October 2015: Public hearing in Geneva Decision: anytime…

Permitting process in hungary: The environmental licence Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) “Legal client status” The Hungarian process: Decision of first instance (Sept 2016) – Appeal by Energiaklub and Greenpeace Decision of second instance (19 April 2017) Recent change in the responsible authorities (by scrapping independent environmental authorities) First instance: formerly South Danubia Inspectorate for Environment and Nature Protection, now Baranya County Government Office Second instance: formerly National Inspectorate for the Environment and Nature Protection, now Pest County Government Office International EIA process April 2015, Hungary submitted the EIA Report for the transboundary EIA procedure Translations and public hearings in interested countries Official language (even internationally): Hungarian NTW Summary of the public hearing in Vienna, transboundary environmental impact assessment NPP Paks II Now court battle to be continued…

Paks II STATE AID Preliminary investigation launched by EC COMP (March 2014) Preliminary decision: Paks II includes state aid, but information needed to assess compatibility with EU competition law (November 2015) Final decision: EC approves but confirms it involves state aid with three conditions (March 2017) Potential profits only to repay for the investment and to cover normal operation costs Paks II to be separated from other companies, including MVM Group and Paks I At least 30% of electricity output sold on open power exchange, the remainder through transparent and open auctions See JP press release, Energiaklub press release Full text to be published anytime… EU member states (and competitor utilities) can legally challenge the decision More details on the Joint Project fact sheet

More information See more on the http://www.pakskontroll.hu/en …and on http://energiaklub.hu/en

Thank you for your attention! Please contact me on fabok@energiaklub.hu