What is a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and how do I get one?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Susan Burner Bankowski, M.S., J.D. Chair, OHSU IRB
What is a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and how do I get one? Presented by Office of Human Research Protection.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Protecting the Privacy of Family Members in Survey and Pedigree Research Jeffrey R. Botkin, MD, MPH University of Utah.
Reporting Unanticipated Problems Involving Risk to Subjects or Others and Adverse Events WFUHS Policy/Procedure Effective Date 6/1/07 Wendy Murray Monitoring.
Jeopardy Rules Game show host will divide the room into two teams When you know the answer, raise your hand and wait to be called on Your answer must.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Pediatric Ethics Subcommittee of Pediatric Advisory Committee, September 10, 2004 Analysis of Research Protocols Involving Children: Combining Subparts.
Capturing and Reporting Adverse Events in Clinical Research
IRB-Investigator/ Research Coordinator Mtg. “CUMC’s New Progressive Policy For Adverse Event Reporting” April 13, 2004 George Gasparis Andrew Wit, Ph.D.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
Human Research Protection Program Training: Post-Approval Event Reporting March 26, 2008 Lisa Voss, MPH, CIP Assistant Director, QIU Human Research Protection.
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
Renewing An Approved Protocol: IRB Review Process
Defining Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRSO)
PRESENTING A PROTOCOL AN IRB INFOSHORT FEBRUARY 2013.
Continuing Review VA Requirements Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE)
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst.
April 2011 Conducting Research at SPC Approval Process and Procedures Center of Excellence for Teaching and Learning.
THE ROLE OF DSMB’s in CLINICAL RESEARCH Data and Safety Monitoring Monitoring.
 Understanding the IRB Process University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board.
Reporting Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events: A Change in Policy Mary A. Banks RN, BS, BSN Director, BUMC IRB Wednesday, November 14, 2007.
Unanticipated Problems Potentially Involving Risks to Subjects or Others Research Protections Office Serving UVM and FAHC Updated April 2012.
New Adverse Event Reporting Policy Effective September 1, 2007.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
EMORY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD VERSION Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations and Non-Compliance.
RESCUE: ACRIN 4701 Protocol Development & Regulatory Compliance (PDRC) Josephine Schloesser, ACRIN Monitor Chris Steward, ACRIN QC Auditor.
Expedited Procedures Bob Craig June Expedited problems Usually individual investigators (rather than trained coordinators) Individuals not “ active.
Risk by Richard R. Riker MD Vice-Chair, IRB Maine Medical Center.
Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.
Planning for Data and Safety Monitoring: Developing Your Study-specific DSMP OCR/GCRC Clinical Research Seminar November 15 th, 2006 Mary-Tara Roth, RN,
THE ROLE OF DSMB’s in CLINICAL RESEARCH Data and Safety Monitoring Monitoring.
Determining the Appropriate IRB Application for Your Research August 10, 2015.
Continuing Review Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP Program Analyst, COACH.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
Criteria For Approval 45 CFR CFR Minimized risks Reasonable risk/benefit ratio Equitable subject selection Informed consent process Informed.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
0 Ethics Lecture Research. ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY Disclosures  The speaker has no financial interest in the subject matter of this.
IRB BASICS BETTY WILSON, MS, CIP. CONCEPTS SUBMISSION APPROVAL RECRUITING WORKING WITH PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (PI) /SPONSOR POLICIES DEVIATIONS RECORD.
Bussara Sukpanichnant, Human Subject Protection Office, USAMD-AFRIMS Unanticipated Problems 15 th FERCAP International Conference 24 Nov 15 Nagasaki, Japan.
Instructions for New IRB Continuing Review (Progress) Report
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
Dartmouth Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Data Safety Monitoring and Reporting requirements Brown Bag Series: Noon / First Tuesday of the Month.
Conditional IRB Approval
Institutional Review Board
Brief Overview of IRB and Human Subject Protections Issues at the University of Richmond Dr. R. Kirk Jonas Chair, University of Richmond Institutional.
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
Reportable Events & Other IRB Updates February 2017
Criteria for Approval Is an IND Required? Devices
THE ROLE OF DSMB’s in CLINICAL RESEARCH
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
NIH Forms E Town Hall
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Reporting to the CPHS: Unanticipated Problems & Serious Adverse Events
Today’s Agenda: Ethics Cont. HW: Read & 1.6 (1.5 optional…)
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
Determining the Appropriate IRB Application for Your Research
Demystifying the IRB Process: An Interactive Conversation with QIP
Valdosta State University
Event Reporting in Human Subjects Research
Policy on Prompt Reporting
Protocol Approval Criteria
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

What is a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and how do I get one? Presented by Office of Human Research Protection

For a study to be approved, one of the criteria that must be met is: When appropriate, the research plan makes adequate provision for monitoring the data collected to ensure the safety of subjects.

Our IRB has interpreted “when appropriate” to mean when a study is more than minimal risk and involves an intervention. When appropriate (when study is more than minimal risk and involves an intervention), the research plan makes adequate provision for monitoring the data collected to ensure the safety of subjects.

Per our guidance, if a DSMP isn't provided in the protocol, investigators must state that a DSMP will not be used for the research and explain why one is not necessary. For a submission for initial review, this information must be provided in the Risks section of the protocol application. The Protocol Renewal Request includes a place for data safety monitoring reports in the research status section.

What is minimal risk?   Minimal risk means that the probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research are not greater in and of themselves than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests (45 CFR 46.102 and 21 CFR 56.102).* * note: studies involving prisoners have different definition of minimal risk

Who decides if the study is minimal risk?   The IRB makes the final determination. Studies that are determined to be more than minimal risk are “full board” studies and require review by the convened board. Studies in which a subject will be experimentally assigned to an investigational drug or device treatment intervention are considered to be more than minimal risk. Other studies may also be determined to be more than minimal risk.

What is data and safety monitoring?   Data and safety monitoring is the process for reviewing data from an ongoing study to monitor the progress of the research and the safety of participants. The frequency of review and the intensity of the monitoring required depend on factors such as the study risk, complexity and size.

What should be included in the plan? Describe plan to monitor data for safety. Include: Who will monitor the data for safety concerns? What data will be reviewed? How often will the monitoring occur? How often will cumulative data be reviewed?

What types of data or events will be monitored?    Considerations:  Prompt detection of unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or other  Data accuracy  Protocol compliance  Recruitment, accrual, retention Criteria for suspension or termination of study

Who will be monitoring the data/events? Considerations: Is there a Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB)/ Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) that will be monitoring the data/events? (for example, if the study is part of a multi-center clinical trial)?   Who will be monitoring and collecting the adverse events?

How will events be reported and Assessed?   Considerations:  Time frame for reporting unanticipated problems involving risks to the subjects or others to the sponsor and IRB. If study is multi-center and the local PI is the lead investigator, describe how communication will be assured among the sites If the study has DSMB/DMC, how findings will be reported to the IRB

How often will the assessments be made? Considerations:  Time based Enrollment based Procedure based Cumulative data

Contact OHRP: 218 Ross Hall 775-327-2368 www.unr.edu/ohrp Questions? Contact OHRP: 218 Ross Hall 775-327-2368 www.unr.edu/ohrp