Self-Evaluation Finding Your Voice through Self-Reflection and Peer Review Process Writing Across the Curriculum Marianna Bonanome, Mathematics Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.
Advertisements

Getting Started on Your Teaching Portfolio 2013 Future Faculty Teaching Fellows Summer Institute Julie Saam, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Education Assistant.
Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
Tenure and Promotion The Process: –Outlined in Article 15 of the FTCA. When you are granted tenure, you are also promoted to Associate (15.7.6). One application.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
Developing a Narrative and Portfolio for Personnel Review at UIS Nathan Steele Chair, Personnel Policies Committee April 2015.
Self-Evaluation Finding Your Voice through Self-Reflection and Peer Review Process Writing Across the Curriculum April 16, 2015.
Disconnect and Reconnect: Getting from High School to College in NJ.
Creating a Teaching/Professional Dossier Shea Wang, Ph.D Interim Faculty Evaluation Coordinator
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System.
The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System.
Creating a Teaching Dossier Shea Wang, Ph.D Interim Faculty Evaluation Coordinator Oct. 21, 2013.
Department Head Expectations of Faculty Guidelines for New Faculty from a Department Head Perspective.
Promotion and Tenure Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #3 June 16  Review Getting Started  Review Dossier Sections  Teaching Section Statement of Endeavors Supporting.
Developing a Teaching Portfolio for the Job Search Graduate Student Center University of Pennsylvania April 19, 2007 Kathryn K. McMahon Department of Romance.
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System.
Retention, Tenure and Promotion College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics.
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #2 June 9  Review “Who am I”, CV, External Reviewers  Levels of Review  Dossier Sections  Statement of.
College of Education Graduate Programs
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, HAYWARD Academic Affairs MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3, 1995 T0: Department Chairs FROM: Frank Martino Provost & Vice President,
SELF EVALUATION FINDING YOUR VOICE THROUGH SELF REFLECTION AND THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS Writing Across the Curriculum March 12, 2015.
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
SELF EVALUATION: FINDING YOUR VOICE THROUGH SELF REFLECTION AND THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS Writing Across the Curriculum Jake Cohen, WAC Fellow Samar ElHitti,
P&T Update: College of Medicine, Carol S. Weisman, PhD Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Distinguished Professor of Public Health Sciences.
Building Your Personnel Action Dossier
Your Teaching Narrative
Tenure and Recontracting August 29, 2017
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
Crisis Response and Information Services
Creating a Strong Teaching Philosophy
Building Your Personnel Action Dossier
Developing a Narrative and Portfolio for Personnel Review at UIS
The UIS Faculty Personnel Process
Writing Across the Curriculum Rebecca Devers and Marianna Bonanome
Self-Evaluation Finding Your Voice through Self-Reflection and Peer Review Process Writing Across the Curriculum Marianna Bonanome, Mathematics Department.
Developing Your Teaching Narrative: An Introduction
College of Liberal Arts & Sciences
College of Liberal Arts & Sciences
Your Teaching Narrative
Academic Portfolios University of Wisconsin
Introduction to the NSU Write from the Start QEP
Writing Across the Curriculum Rebecca Devers and Marianna Bonanome
Teaching for conceptual understanding through Inquiry
Janet Kistner VP Faculty Development & Advancement April 2018
NJCU College of Education
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Tenure and Recontracting February 7, 2018
Tenure and Recontracting August 27, 2018
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Tenure and Recontracting February 6, 2018
Criteria for Review Scholarship
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion
Tenure and Recontracting October 6, 2017
Department Head Expectations of Faculty
Faculty Workshop on Promotion and Tenure
They Say, I Say Chapter 1 and 12
Review Committee Training – BEST Practices
Tenure and Recontracting February 26, 2019
Crisis Response and Information Services
Providing Effective Feedback to Students
Promotion & Tenure workshop
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
Integrating Communication into the Curriculum
Tenure and Promotion: Crossing the Finish Line
Presentation transcript:

Self-Evaluation Finding Your Voice through Self-Reflection and Peer Review Process Writing Across the Curriculum Marianna Bonanome, Mathematics Department April 27, 2017

Recap of Last Workshop SE of PAR-SE – the story behind the facts The audience: Promotion meeting is with Chairs other than your own 3-page narrative not summary Overarching theme – “the thread” Something about you that plays a role in your accomplishments How your goals fit with those of the college/department Outline

City Tech's New Mission Statement

Guided Peer Review- a WAC Practice Often considered a “gate-keeping” part of academic publishing Can be useful for the development of writing at any stage of the process Incorporates written and verbal communication in a structured environment Is a type of informal writing that supports critical thinking about your formal writing

Today’s Guided Peer Review Group discussion (5 minutes) Self-reflection (10 minutes) Draft exchange (10 minutes) Discussion (20 minutes) Revision plan (5 minutes)

Group Discussion What are some characteristics of a strong cumulative self-evaluation?

Group Discussion What are some characteristics of a strong cumulative self-evaluation? Easy to read Speaks to an interdisciplinary audience Balances between professional and personal Explains the importance of highlighted achievements Last year, faculty came up with these characteristics

From the PARSE Instructions 26. Self evaluation: In preparation for the Annual Evaluation, faculty members should review the year’s activities and accomplishments in light of their overall goals. Candidates for reappointment should supply a cumulative evaluation of their work, beginning with a focus on the immediately preceding year, followed by a summary of prior years. Candidates for tenure should evaluate their work since their initial appointment. Candidates for promotion should evaluate their work since their last promotion. In a succinct but complete narrative, (normally limited to three pages or fewer, single-spaced) candidates should assess their teaching, scholarly and professional growth, and service and should explain how their activities in these areas contribute to the success of their department and New York City College of Technology. The self-evaluation provides candidates an opportunity to reflect on the values, philosophy, and intellectual interests that inform their teaching and scholarship. (See the Faculty Personnel Process Guidelines, Section I.B.4 for further guidance.)

Work with the Drafts Self-reflection (10 minutes): This step brings you back into the mental space of the work itself, and allows you to refamiliarize yourself with the details of your essay. Exchange drafts (10 minutes to read): Make reader’s notes to yourself, rather than “corrections” for the author, focusing on content rather than grammar. Discuss (20 minutes): Use your notes to respond to talking points. WAC Fellows are available to facilitate. Make a plan (5 minutes): Prepare for your next step, and schedule time to work. This will make it easier to return to the mental space of working on this project. I was working on adding structure to this slide when I realized that there is a handout that was used in 2015 that goes along with it. I had no idea it existed until now (big fail!). This is needed here, otherwise, this “guided” peer review lacks guidance!

Sharing What were some common challenges in completing this draft? What are some methods of addressing those challenges? What did you think about the peer review process?