Measurement and Analysis for Protocols Proposed Research Group (maprg) Berlin, July 18, 2016 co-chairs <maprg-chairs@ietf.org>: Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CONEX BoF. Welcome to CONEX! Chairs: –Leslie Daigle –Philip Eardley Scribe Note well MORE INFO: -ECN.
Advertisements

Russ Housley IETF Chair 23 July 2012 Introduction to the IETF Standards Process.
SDN Research Group IETF 92 Chairs Dave Meyer Daniel King In memory of Ping Pan.
Internet Research Task Force Crypto Forum Research Group IETF 89 March 3, 2014 London List: Chairs:
Audio/Video Transport Extensions (AVTEXT). Administrivia Notetakers? Jabber scribe? Jabber Chat Room
CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at: Data tracker:
DIME WG IETF 82 Dime WG Agenda & Status THURSDAY, November 17, 2011 Jouni Korhonen & Lionel Morand.
Dnssd WG Chairs: Tim Chown Ralph Droms IETF 89, London, 3 rd March 2014.
RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques (rmcat) Chairs: Lars Eggert, Mirja Kuehlewind.
TechSpec BoF Session chair: Leslie Daigle IETF64, Vancouver November 9, 2005.
IRTF Open Meeting Lars Eggert IRTF Chair IETF-91, Honolulu, HI, USA.
ForCES WG Status Forwarding and Control Element Separation (IETF88 Vancouver, CA 2013) Chair: Jamal Hadi Salim Damascene.
NCRG Network Complexity Research Group Chairs: Michael Behringer, David Meyer 4 Mar 2014, London
CONEX BoF. Welcome to CONEX! Chairs: –Leslie Daigle –Philip Eardley Scribe Note well.
Delay-tolerant Networking Research Group (DTNRG) 85 th IETF – Atlanta 8 November 2012 Jabber room: Mailing list:
DetNet WG 1 ST Meeting Chairs: Lou Berger Pat Thaler Secretary: Jouni Korhonen.
PAWS Protocol to Access White Space DB IETF 88, Vancouver Gabor Bajko, Brian Rosen.
RADEXT WG IETF 89 Agenda March 4, Please join the Jabber room:
Introduction and IETF 86 – Orlando, FL 11 March 2013 Brian Adamson – NRL Victor Firoiu – BAE Systems.
IRTF Open Meeting Lars Eggert IRTF Chair IETF-84, Vancouver, Canada.
Mon 23 Mar 2015SIDR IETF 92 Dallas, TX, US1 SIDR Working Group IETF 92 Dallas, TX, US Monday, 23 Mar 2015.
Chairs: Pascal Thubert Thomas Watteyne Etherpad for minutes: IPv6 over the TSCH mode.
IETF-95 (Buenos Aires) Proposed NMLRG Meetings (Network Machine Learning) Thursday Morning session I, 10:00-12:30 Buen Ayre A Proposed NMLRG Last update:
Fri 24 Jul 2015SIDR IETF 93 Prague, CZ1 SIDR Working Group IETF 93 Prague, CZ Friday, 24 Jul 2015.
Agenda Wednesday, July 29, :00 – 15:00 Congresshall B Please join the Jabber room: LEDBAT WG IETF 75.
Thu 30 July 2009SIDR IETF 75 Stockholm, SE1 SIDR Working Group IETF 75 Stockholm, SE THURSDAY, July 30, 2009.
Chairs Daniel King Kohei Shiomoto Secretary Will Liushucheng
28 October 2016 Webex IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE e
IETF AQM WG Active Queue Management and Packet Scheduling
LMAP WG IETF 97 – Seoul, SK November 17, 2016 Dan Romascanu Jason Weil
IETF-86 RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques
SFC Working Group Session 97th IETF Seoul, South Korea Chairs overview
SIPPING Working Group IETF 69
SDN Research Group IETF 93 - Prague
NOTE WELL Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
Dirk Kutscher, Sarah Banks
Gunter Van de Velde Kiran Kumar Chitimaneni Warren Kumari
IETF 86 Orlando MBONED.
Working Group Chairs Forum Lunch
PAWS Protocol to Access White Space DB
Wednesday, 9:30-11:00, Grand Ballroom 3, Morning session I
CONEX BoF.
IETF 84 Vancouver, BC, CA Wednesday, 1 Aug 2012
TEAS Working Group IETF 99 - Prague Online Agenda and Slide:
Wednesday, 9:30-12:00 Morning session I, Van Horne
45th NMRG Meeting - IETF 100 Session 2
Tuesday , 9:30-12:00 Morning session I, Buckingham
TEAS Working Group IETF 97 Seoul Online Agenda and Slide:
Kathleen Moriarty, Trusted Execution Environment Provisioning (TEEP) BoF IETF-100 November 2017 Chairs: Nancy Cam-Winget,
SPRING IETF-98 Tuesday, March 28.
Common Operations and Management on network Slices (coms) BoF
16th November 2016 Gorry Fairhurst (via webrtc) David Black WG chairs
Agenda IETF 82 Taipei November 14, 2011
Multiple Interfaces (MIF) WG
TEAS Working Group IETF 102
IETF 103 Bangkok, Thailand - November 2018
IETF DTN Working Group July 17th, 2017 Chairs:
Transport Services (TAPS) Working Group
TEAS Working Group IETF Prague
Tuesday (July 23rd, 2019) Two sessions ( minutes)
54th NMRG Meeting IETF 105, Montreal Session 1
50th NMRG Meeting - IETF 103 Bangkok, Thailand
SIPREC WG, Interim virtual meeting , GMT
Agenda Wednesday, March 30, :00 – 11:30 AM
SIPBRANDY Chair Slides
Multiple Interfaces (MIF) WG
51st NMRG Meeting - IETF 104 Session 1
Homomorphic Encryption Standards: Governance Proposal
Scott Bradner & Martin Thomson
Audio/Video Transport Extensions (avtext) Working Group
Presentation transcript:

Measurement and Analysis for Protocols Proposed Research Group (maprg) Berlin, July 18, 2016 co-chairs <maprg-chairs@ietf.org>: Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch> Dave Plonka <plonka@akamai.com>

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) The IRTF follows the IETF Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure rules. This is a summary of these rules as they relate to IRTF research group discussions, mailing lists and Internet Drafts: • If you include your own or your employer’s IPR in a contribution to an IRTF research group, then you must file an IPR disclosure with the IETF. • If you recognize your own or your employer’s IPR in someone else’s contribution and you are participating in the discussions in the research group relating to that contribution, then you must file an IPR disclosure with the IETF. Even if you are not participating in the discussion, the IRTF still requests that you file an IPR disclosure with the IETF. • Finally, the IRTF requests that you file an IPR disclosure with the IETF if you recognize IPR owned by others in any IRTF contribution. The IRTF expects that you file IPR disclosures in a timely manner, i.e., in a period measured in days or weeks, not months. The IRTF prefers that the most liberal licensing terms possible are available for IRTF Stream documents, see RFC 5743. You may file an IPR disclosure here: http://www.ietf.org/ipr/file-disclosure See RFC 3979 (BCP 79) for definitions of “IPR” and “contribution” and for the detailed rules (substituting “IRTF” for “IETF”).

Administrivia Proposed Charter: https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/maprg/charter/ Mailing List: maprg@ietf.org Subscriptions: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/maprg Today’s slides: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/96/session/maprg/ Remote participation Audio: http://ietf96streaming.dnsalias.net/ietf/ietf965.m3u Meetecho: http://www.meetecho.com/ietf96/maprg Jabber: xmpp:maprg@jabber.ietf.org?join

Agenda (i) Introduction & Overview – Dave Plonka and Mirja Kühlewind, 5m NOMA: Network Operator Measurement Activity – Leslie Daigle, 10m Beyond Counting: New Perspectives on the Active IPv4 Address Space – Philipp Richter, 15m Measurement and Analysis for Internet of Things – Dave Plonka, 15m Anycast vs. DDoS: Evaluating the November 2015 Root DNS Event – Giovane C. M. Moura, 15m

Agenda (ii) Callstat.io: WebRTC Measurements– Varun Singh, 15m Temporal and Efficient Analysis of Services Availability – Johannes Klick, 15m A View Through Happy Eyeballs: Client-Side IPv6 Metrics – Tommy Pauly, 10m DSCP and the Evil Bit – Runa Barik, 15m Open Discussion – ~5m?

Our Proposed Charter Premise: The deployment and operation of Internet protocols is clearly sometimes hindered by Internet conditions either unforeseen or otherwise unaccounted-for during development and standardization. Protocol deployment, operation, and ongoing [re]design can benefit from insight provided by measurements that discover those current Internet conditions. Likewise, the measurement community’s studies are significantly relevant (to the IETF community) confronting obstacles that today’s Internet conditions presents to existing IETF-defined protocols.

Our Proposed Charter The Measurement and Analysis for Protocols Research Group (maprg) will focus on two topics: Discussion of measurements and techniques that would inform the development, deployment, and/or operation of existing IETF-defined protocols. Presentation of measurement results that inform same. Presentations and work items must be obviously or explicitly “mapped” to those aspects of IETF-defined protocols, existing or works-in-progress.

Our Proposed Charter Our research group is meant to foster introductions of prospective collaborators, their resulting collaborations, and the sharing of the measurement techniques and their results. Membership is open to all interested parties. While maprg is an IRTF research group rather than an IETF working group, it will work in loose cooperation with working groups.

Recent Related Works Applied Network Research Workshop (ANRW) 2016, https://irtf.org/anrw/2016/program, selected measurement works: Measuring the Effects of Happy Eyeballs (Bajpai & Schönwälder) PATHspider: A tool for active measurement of path transparency (Learmonth et al.) Diurnal and Weekly Cycles in IPv6 Traffic (Strowes) How to say that you’re special: Can we use bits in the IPv4 header? (Barik et al.) Towards an Observatory for Network Transparency Research (Nehaus et al.) On the Cost of Using Happy Eyeballs for Transport Protocol Selection (Papastergiou et al.)

Recent Related Works A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements (Roland van Rijswijk-Deij) – call for collaboration, next slide

OpenINTEL: large-scale active measurements of the DNS We operate a large-scale active measurement platform that measures over 65%* of the global DNS name space once every 24 hours *.com, .net, .org, .info, .mobi, .pro, most new gTLDs, .ca, .nl, .se., .nu (over 180 million names, 2.2 billion records per day) Researchers with an interest in using this kind of data: ping me (r.m.vanrijswijk@utwente.nl) Do you operate a (cc)TLD? We want your data :-)=) for more information, see:
 http://bit.ly/jsac-openintel (paper)
 http://www.openintel.nl/