Finite-Source Models of the December 22, 2003 Mw6

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mid-Term Review Meeting, February 13-14, Tutzing Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media: a European network IVO OPRSAL.
Advertisements

10/09/2007CIG/SPICE/IRIS/USAF1 Broadband Ground Motion Simulations for a Mw 7.8 Southern San Andreas Earthquake: ShakeOut Robert W. Graves (URS Corporation)
Earthquake Early Warning Research and Development in California, USA Hauksson E., Boese M., Heaton T., Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of.
Prague, March 18, 2005Antonio Emolo1 Seismic Hazard Assessment for a Characteristic Earthquake Scenario: Integrating Probabilistic and Deterministic Approaches.
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Earliest approach taken to seismic hazard analysis Originated in nuclear power industry applications Still used for.
Earthquake location rohan.sdsu.edu/~kbolsen/geol600_nhe_location_groundmotion.ppt.
Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America Gail M. Atkinson, UWO David M. Boore, USGS (BSSA, 2006)
March 7, 2008NGA-East 2nd Workshop1 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN STRONG MOTION SIMULATIONS FOR CEUS Paul Somerville and Robert Graves URS Pasadena MOTIVATION:
Recall the momentum equation:  ∂ 2 u i /∂t 2 = ∂ j  ij +f i, where f i is the body force term An earthquake source is usually considered slip on a surface.
UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS Faculty of Geology and Geoenvironment Department of Geophysics and Geothermics A. Agalos (1), P. Papadimitriou (1), K. Makropoulos.
Average properties of Southern California earthquake ground motions envelopes… G. Cua, T. Heaton Caltech.
11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop1 NUMERICAL GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS: ASSUMPTIONS, VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION Earthquake Source Velocity Structure.
5: EARTHQUAKES WAVEFORM MODELING S&W SOMETIMES FIRST MOTIONS DON’T CONSTRAIN FOCAL MECHANISM Especially likely when - Few nearby stations, as.
Application to Wells Nevada Earthquake
Focal Mechanism Solutions
L Braile, 1/26/2006 (revised, Sept., 2009) What is Moment Magnitude?
Earthquake Focal Mechanisms
Brainstorm: How to assess an Earthquake: Stroked off B.C. coast? Rapid Earthquake Risk Assessment Source Parameters USGS World Shake Maps USGS Shake Aftershocks.
RAPID SOURCE PARAMETER DETERMINATION AND EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PROCESS IN INDONESIA REGION Iman Suardi Seismology Course Indonesia Final Presentation of Master.
Recipe of strong motion prediction for future earthquakes Seminar at Charles University, Prague, Czech September 5, 2003 Kojiro Irikura Disaster Prevention.
Comparison of Recorded and Simulated Ground Motions Presented by: Emel Seyhan, PhD Student University of California, Los Angeles Collaborators: Lisa M.
1 Fault Dynamics of the April 6, 2009 L'Aquila, Italy Earthquake Sequence Robert B. Herrmann Saint Louis University Luca Malagnini INGV, Roma.
26 July 2013 Símon Ólafsson, EERC
Second degree moments – a tool for the fault plane detection?
The 03/11/2011 Mw9.0 Tohoku, Japan Earthquake Educational Slides Created & Compiled by Gavin Hayes & David Wald U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake.
The kinematic representation of seismic source. The double-couple solution double-couple solution in an infinite, homogeneous isotropic medium. Radiation.
The San Simeon and Parkfield Earthquakes What the CISN did well (and could have been done better)
IDENTIFICATION OF THE FAULT PLANE AND A SIMPLE 3D VISUALIZATION TOOL Petra Adamová, Jiří Zahradník Charles University in Prague
Complex earthquake directivity during the 2009 L’ Aquila mainshock Tinti E., Scognamiglio L., Cirella A., Cocco M., and A. Piatanesi Istituto Nazionale.
Disputable non-DC components of several strong earthquakes Petra Adamová Jan Šílený.
Shiann-Jong Lee 1, Dimitri Komatitsch 2,3, Yu-Chang Chan 1, Bor-Shouh Huang 1 and Jeroen Tromp 4 1 Institute of Earth Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei,
Large Earthquake Rapid Finite Rupture Model Products Thorne Lay (UCSC) USGS/IRIS/NSF International Workshop on the Utilization of Seismographic Networks.
The January 2010 Efpalio earthquake sequence in Western Corinth Gulf: epicenter relocations, focal mechanisms, slip models The January 2010 Efpalio earthquake.
High Resolution Finite Fault Inversions for M>4.8 Earthquakes in the 2012 Brawley Swarm Shengji Wei Acknowledgement Don Helmberger (Caltech) Rob Graves.
An Assessment of the High-Gain Streckheisen STS2 Seismometer for Routine Earthquake Monitoring in the US ISSUE: Is the high-gain STS2 too sensitive to.
The seismogram U = Source * Propagation * Site.
Surface-wave Derived Focal Mechanisms in Mid-America R. B. Herrmann 1, C. J. Ammon 2 and H. M. Benz 3 1 Saint Louis University, 2 Pennsylvania State University,
HIGH FREQUENCY GROUND MOTION SCALING IN THE YUNNAN REGION W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD Robert.
Near Fault Ground Motions and Fault Rupture Directivity Pulse Norm Abrahamson Pacific Gas & Electric Company.
California Earthquake Rupture Model Satisfying Accepted Scaling Laws (SCEC 2010, 1-129) David Jackson, Yan Kagan and Qi Wang Department of Earth and Space.
California Institute of Technology
Earthquake source modelling by second degree moment tensors Petra Adamová Jan Šílený Geophysical Institute, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Shaking and Flooding by the Tohoku-Oki earthquake Shengji Wei*, Rob Graves**, Don Helmberger*, Jean-Philippe Avouac* and Junle Jiang* * Seismological Lab,
MOMENT TENSOR INVERSION OF POSSIBLY MULTIPLE EVENTS AT REGIONAL DISTANCES Petra Adamová 1, Jiří Zahradník 1, George Stavrakakis 2 1 Charles University.
Novel Approach to Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Modeling Vladimir Graizer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Erol Kalkan California Geological Survey.
Introduction to seismology Mathilde B. Sørensen and Jens Havskov.
What are Magnitude and Intensity?
EPS207 Laboratory in Observational Seismology
NGA Dataset Brian Chiou NGA Workshop #5 March 24, 2004.
Margaret Hellweg, Richard Allen, Maren Böse,
Kinematic Modeling of the Denali Earthquake
California Institute of Technology
Philip J. Maechling (SCEC) September 13, 2015
RECENT SEISMIC MONITORING RESULTS FROM THE CENTRAL
Principal Stress rotates to EW direction
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
The Utah Mine Collapse Seismology solves the case.
High-Performance Computing (HPC) IS Transforming Seismology
Faults, Earthquakes, and Simulations
Creating the Virtual Seismologist
SICHUAN EARTHQUAKE May 12, 2008
Earthquake Magnitude Ahmed Elgamal
Slip pulse and resonance of Kathmandu basin during the 2015 Mw 7
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis
Two M5 earthquakes in Corinth Gulf, January 2010
by J. Galetzka, D. Melgar, J. F. Genrich, J. Geng, S. Owen, E. O
March 21-22, University of Washington, Seattle
by Satoshi Ide, Annemarie Baltay, and Gregory C. Beroza
by Wenyuan Fan, and Peter M. Shearer
Presentation transcript:

Finite-Source Models of the December 22, 2003 Mw6 Finite-Source Models of the December 22, 2003 Mw6.5 San Simeon, CA Earthquake and Applications to ShakeMap Douglas Dreger1, Peter Lombard1, Jack Boatwright2, David Wald3 and Lind Gee1 1. Berkeley Seismological Laboratory 2. U. S. Geologic Survey Menlo Park, CA 3. U. S. Geologic Survey Golden, CO

Introduction The determination of finite-source parameters such as the orientation of the fault plane, its dimensions, the slip distribution, and a kinematic description of how the slip occurs in time may be determined in near-realtime, and provide information that can improve estimation of near-fault strong shaking in areas that do not have the appropriate type of instrumentation. Dreger and Kaverina (2000) outlined such a system and applied it to the 1999 Hector Mine earthquake. Since 1999 the Berkeley Seismological Laboratory has integrated automated finite-source analysis in its realtime analysis system, and has developed tools to assist in the review and updating of the finite-source results. This system was operating at the time of the December 22, 2003 Mw6.5 San Simeon earthquake, and the derived finite-source information was used to provide additional constraint to published ShakeMaps. This poster describes the evolution of ShakeMaps and finite-source models for the San Simeon earthquake, how finite-source information may be used to improve ShakeMaps, and uses the finite-source inversion method to investigate the source process of the earthquake and the source-related influence on recorded strong ground motion.

CISN Rapid Instrumental Intensity Map (RIIM) CISN Rapid Instrumental Intensity Map (RIIM). Instrumental intensity is computed from recorded and estimated (from attenuation relationships) peak ground acceleration and peak ground velocity (e.g. Wald et al., 1999a and 1999b). Available recording stations are shown as triangles, the epicenter is shown as the star, and the line extending from the epicenter is the length of the ruptured fault inferred from finite-source models. This map shows that the greatest shaking extends SE toward the town of Paso Robles.

Community Internet Intensity Map (CIIIM) Community Internet Intensity Map (CIIIM). This map shows the intensity plotted in zip code areas based on felt reports compiled from responses to an online questionnaire. There is good correlation between the RIIM and the CIIM to the extent that the coarse zip area mosaic allows. The maximum intensity was VIII. There was moderate to severe damage to unreinforced masonry buildings in Paso Robles.

Evolution of CISN ShakeMaps for the San Simeon earthquake To the right the progression of ShakeMap updates is illustrated. Panels A and B compare ShakeMaps prepared using ML 6.4 and MW 6.5, respectively. The closest and only station on the map is at Parkfield, approximately 60 km to the ENE. Panel C compares the ShakeMap taking the dimension of the source (from the finite-source analysis) into account, with no additional recorded motion data. Panel D shows the map with the Templeton, CA data added. Panel E adds the Cambria, CA data. Panel F is the current ShakeMap. It is noteworthy that the addition of the dimension of the ruptured fault greatly extends and increases the instrumental intensity values to the SE of the epicenter. The subsequently added Templeton data confirmed this level ground motion.

C A E F B D

Automatic Finite-Source Inversion and Near-fault strong ground motion simulation Invert the representation theorem following Hartzell and Heaton (1983) Invert broadband (0.01 – 5.0 Hz) data for line-source and planar-source models Determine fault plane Determine source kinematics Integrate source kinematics to simulate near-fault strong ground motion Combine predictions and observations to produce shakemap Dreger and Kaverina, 2000

Seismic Moment Tensor Solution Seismic moment tensor determined from 0.02-0.05 Hz, three-component, displacement seismograms. The source depth was found to be 8 km.

Automatic Line-Source Location Map NW SE Line-source models extending in both directions away from the hypocenter for both possible nodal planes were used to invert broadband displacement waveform data recorded by the BDSN. Blue triangles on the map show stations that were used. There is a good fit to the three-component broadband data (black). The line-source models both showed that the main slip was located SE of the hypocenter, however it was not possible to determine the causative rupture plane.

Reviewed Line-Source Used To Update ShakeMap The line-source model was updated by adding additional stations, and applying timing delays to adjust for velocity structure. The revised model shows that the slip extends more than 22 km from the hypocenter. The dimension of this slip model was used to adjust the distance calculation used in ShakeMap. The black line in the ShakeMap plots shows the location of the line-source model

Comparison of Final and Line-source Adjusted ShakeMaps The line-source adjustment is seen to substantially improve the ShakeMap in the near-fault region, and this map compares very favorably with the current maps with and without the adjustment.

Combined GPS and Seismic Waveform Finite-Fault Inversion Combined inversion of three-component seismograms at 9 stations (blue triangle), and 2 GPS sites (black arrows). Seismic data comes from the BDSN, NSMP, CSMIP, and TriNet. GPS data was provided by K. Hudnut. The length of the defor-mation vector at CRBT is 53.2 mm. The map view projection of the slip shows that it extends SE approx-imately 25 km with a very narrow depth range.

Composite Finite-Source Slip Model Slip in the composite model is shallower than the focus at 8km depth, and lies primarily in the 3-8 km depth range. The scalar seismic moment, average static stress drop, average slip and the peak slip are 6.4e+25 dyne cm, 25 bars, 89 and 327. The slip distribution is unusual for a shallow dip-slip event in that its lateral extent is nearly 5 times greater than the vertical extent. This model is in general agreement with Yagi’s teleseismic result where he found a scalar moment of 8.8e+25 and peak slip of 2.2 m.

The fit to the broadband (0 The fit to the broadband (0.02-5Hz), three-component data (black) with the composite model synthetics (red) is very good. The records illustrate that the source is rich in longer periods.

The slip distributions for each of the six time windows are compared The slip distributions for each of the six time windows are compared. Slip is largely contained in the first four time windows, representing a rise time variability of 1-2.5sec.

The Directivity Focusing Was Relatively Mild Source finiteness has been shown to be important in terms of the distribution of the strong ground motions. It has been suggested that directivity also played a role. Simulated PGV for the composite source model (A) is compared to simulated PGV for the same model with a vertical strike-slip fault geometry (B). The strike-slip rupture triples the simulated PGV in some areas, and the region with greater than 10 cm/s is nearly quadrupled. Thus, while directivity was an important influence to the San Simeon strong ground motions, it was a relatively mild directivity. The Directivity Focusing Was Relatively Mild

Forward Prediction of Templeton, Ca Velocity Records EW NS Z The Templeton records were not used in the source inversion due to unknown timing and site effects (NEHRP C/D). Neverthless the forward prediction of the velocity seismograms obtained by multiplying the rock synthetics by a factor of 1.62 (adjustment for 1.5 km/s to 400 m/s site correction) produces fairly good fit.

Conclusions The combined inversion of GPS and seismic waveform data for the kinematic rupture process of the San Simeon earthquake reveals an elongate rupture over a narrow, shallow depth range. The peak slip of 327 cm is unusually large for a Mw6.5 event and contributed to the strength of the ground motions. While directivity was also a factor in the strength of the ground motions comparative simulations between the dip-slip case and a hypothetical strike-slip case reveals that a Mw6.5 strike-slip event with identical slip distribution would result in about a 3-fold increase in peak PGV, and a 4-fold increase in the area experiencing greater than 10 cm/s. Considering that the 1952 Bryson event was strike-slip it is important to note that directivity in the 2003 San Simeon earthquake was relatively mild and not necessarily representative of the hazard due to Mw6.5 events in the region. The automatic finite-source ground motion estimation method of Dreger and Kaverina (2000) was shown to provide important constraints on the extent of the ruptured fault, which significantly improved ShakeMap representations of near-fault strong ground motion.

References