Status of ACVE-3/pre-validation recommendationss 21. 6

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCILOV-10 Validation of SCIAMACHY nadir operational NO 2 product F. Azam, A. Richter, M. Weber, H. Bovensmann and J. P. Burrows ESA/ESRIN, Frascati, Italy.
Advertisements

Algorithm improvements for Dutch OMI NO2 retrievals (towards v3.0)
SCILOV-10 Validation of SCIAMACHY limb operational BrO product F. Azam, K. Weigel, A. Rozanov, M. Weber, H. Bovensmann and J. P. Burrows ESA/ESRIN, Frascati,
Just how good is a L1 spectrum? An overview of SCIAMACHY calibration quality Ralph Snel, SSAG Calibration Subgroup and SQWG SADDU meeting June 16/17, 2008.
Software Quality Assurance Inspection by Ross Simmerman Software developers follow a method of software quality assurance and try to eliminate bugs prior.
Tangent height offsets estimated by correlation analysis of ground-based data with O 3 limb profiles J.A.E. van Gijsel Y.J. Meijer.
Report from the 2 nd ACVE Workshop Frascati, Italy, 3-7 May 2004 Yasmine Calisesi International Space Science Institute.
KNMI, The Netherlands * SCIAMACHY validation workshop, Bremen, 6 Dec ‘04 Large scale validation of SCIAMACHY nadir reflectance Gijs van.
SCIAMACHY Limb pointing: Geolocation and Intensities on the Level 1b product Sander Slijkhuis, Remote Sensing Technology Institute.
DOAS Retrievals of Stratospheric O 3 and NO 2 from Odin / OSIRIS Limb-Radiance Measurements Samuel Brohede Craig S. Haley and the Odin team Chalmers University.
Software Quality Assurance
Mathematical Modeling What is it? (and how do you spell it?)
WP 3: Absorbing Aerosol Index (AAI) WP 10: Level-1 validation L.G. Tilstra 1, I. Aben 2, and P. Stammes 1 1 Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.
Blue: Histogram of normalised deviation from “true” value; Red: Gaussian fit to histogram Presented at ESA Hyperspectral Workshop 2010, March 16-19, Frascati,
Page 1 Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Validation of ENVISAT trace gas data products by comparison.
® Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011 QUAlity aware VIsualisation for the Global Earth Observation system of systems GEOVIQUA workshop February, the.
Page 1 Validation Workshop, , IfE Bremen, G. Lichtenberg:Calibration status National Institute for Space Research SCIAMACHY Calibration status November.
Page 1 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, SCIAMACHY scient. prod. 12/12/2002 Envisat Validation Workshop Atmospheric Chemistry Validation Team Ground-Based.
1 st post launch SCIAMACHY calibration & Verification Meeting L1b Astrium Friedrichshafen – Germany 24 July 2002 First level 1b Sun mean reference (SMR)
Validation workshop, Frascati, 13 December 2002Page 1 SCIAMACHY products quality and recommendations Based on presentations and discussions during this.
Data Release Requirements, decisions and plans. What we need New machine Implement (and test) all proposed changes from current Provide data quality summary,
Test and Review chapter State the differences between archive and back-up data. Answer: Archive data is a copy of data which is no longer in regular.
SCIAMACHY long-term validation M. Weber, S. Mieruch, A. Rozanov, C. von Savigny, W. Chehade, R. Bauer, and H. Bovensmann Institut für Umweltphysik, Universität.
Process Refactoring Michael L. Collard, Ph.D.. Real World Often ad hoc with no process Different levels of developers knowledge, experience, and capabilities.
Sentinel-5 precursor: TROPOMI Cloud slicing retrieval: Program development and testing with SCIAMACHY/GOME-2 WFDOAS data Kai-Uwe Eichmann, Mark Weber,
Institut für Umweltphysik/Fernerkundung Physik/Elektrotechnik Fachbereich 1 Overview about new processor baseline H. Bovensmann, G. Lichtenberg, R. Snel,
IASI CH 4 Operational Retrieval Feasibility - Optimal Estimation Method Task 1+3: Updates Richard Siddans, Jane Hurley PM2, webex 10 October 2014.
Some thoughts on error handling for FTIR retrievals Prepared by Stephen Wood and Brian Connor, NIWA with input and ideas from others...
C. Lerot 1, M. Koukouli 2, T. Danckaert 1, D. Balis 2, and M. Van Roozendael 1 1 BIRA-IASB, Belgium 2 LAP/AUTH, Greece S5P L2 Verification Meeting – 19-20/05/2015.
LIGO-G E1 Reviewer Report for the S2 Time-Domain Pulsar Search Teviet Creighton, Andri Gretarsson, Fred Raab, B. Sathyaprakash, Peter Shawhan.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: Study Overview R.Siddans.
S5P tropical tropospheric ozone product based on convective cloud differential method Klaus-Peter Heue, Pieter Valks, Diego Loyola, Deutsches Zentrum für.
Ozone PEATE 2/20/20161 OMPS LP Release 2 - Status Matt DeLand (for the PEATE team) SSAI 5 December 2013.
1 st post launch SCIAMACHY calibration & Verification Meeting L1b Astrium Friedrichshafen – Germany 24 July 2002 First level 1b Leakage current analysis.
HYMN 2nd annual meeting FTIR Introduction/Overview A.K. Petersen, J. Notholt, T. Warneke Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets.
March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference over clouds Differences correlate with snow/ice.
Institut für Umweltphysik/Fernerkundung Physik/Elektrotechnik Fachbereich 1 Status of SQWG activities H. Bovensmann, G. Lichtenberg, R. Snel, C. Lerot,
Roger W. Brode U.S. EPA/OAQPS/AQAD Air Quality Modeling Group AERMAP Training NESCAUM Permit Modeling Committee Annual Meeting New London, Connecticut.
Atmosphere Clouds Aerosols Ozone GHG Issues and remarks (synthesis after presentations and discussion)
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC.
Temperature dependency of ACC data TUD provides all available GPS-derived linear accelerations to VZLU End of January – end of May To be used for validation.
Iodine Monoxide (IO) Nadir Scientific Data Product
New PoLArization ALgorithm
Inter-calibration using DCCs and seasonality
S. Noël SCIAMACHY Quality Working Group
Validation status overivew
DOAS workshop 2015, Brussels, July 2015
Validation status overivew
Dehn(1), F. Niro(1), A. von Bargen(2), T. Fehr(3)
ASPOC Presentation for the CAA Operations Review-1 Klaus Torkar and Harald Jeszenszky IWF/OAW Graz ESTEC, May 2006.
VIRTIS flyby of Steins M-IR Spectral analysis
Chapter 18 Maintaining Information Systems
H. Rème, I.Dandouras and A. Barthe IRAP, Toulouse, France
Meteorological Satellite Center Japan Meteorological Agency
Delta Reprocessing SCIAMACHY QWG-3 Meeting # November 2015
Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC Height-resolved aerosol R.Siddans.
ISCCP and GSICS NOAA/NCEI Ken Knapp (& ISCCP Team)
“Brief” update on ACE water vapour
Sensitivity ANALYSIS Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with
STIS Status Report Kailash C. Sahu Apr 18, 2002 TIPS.
Dorothee Coppens.
Status of the EUMETSAT GSICS DCC product
PEHRPP Error Metrics WG Summary
Progress toward DCC Demo product
MIPAS-2D water database and its validation
Theoretical systematics Integrating efficiency fitting
M. Kezunovic (P.I.) S. S. Luo D. Ristanovic Texas A&M University
SCIAMACHY Processors Development
TEMPO Instrument Update
FEMAS Development - Progress
Presentation transcript:

Status of ACVE-3/pre-validation recommendationss 21. 6 Status of ACVE-3/pre-validation recommendationss 21.6.2007 SCIAVALIG, Bremen

Status of ACVE-3/pre-validation recommendations prepared by G Status of ACVE-3/pre-validation recommendations prepared by G. Lichtenberg, A. von Bargen, H. Bovensmann, SQWG T. Fehr, ESA

Contents Issues considered crucial before re-processing Level 0-1 issues Level 1b-2 issues Issues important but not crucial Other updates in 3.01 Summary

Level 0-1 issues - Crucial Origin of differences between ASM spectra L1b/L0 (R11) Two ASM spectra were provided: ‘A1’ was specially prepared by J. Frerick on user request and does not contain all calibration improvements of version 6. It is not updated. ‘A0’ is daily updated and contains all calibrations except the radiometric correction. Erroneous results when using A0 spectra was caused by inconsistent data used in the test: The A0 spectrum was applied on Earth shine spectra that were differently calibrated. Conclusion: Processing of SMR data is correct, using a consistent set of data leads to the expected result. Deviation of leakage correction (R12): Reason was faulty implementation in IPF 6.02. Bug is fixed in IPF 6.03.

Level 1b-2 issues - Crucial (I) Implemented (v.3.01)/Answered recommendations : AAI and cloud data will be provided for all records by setting all records where no calculation is done to the value of the shortest integration time. Previously, those parameters were set to zero (R3,19). Cloud quality flag is corrected. It was filled with wrong values. The meaning of the value will be documented (R4). Reference height O3: Shift to higher altitudes will increase noise, details in TN (R6). Apparent inconsistency of VMR: It is not possible to calculate the VMR using pressure p of the product, since p is only an ad hoc profile (tabulated value from climatology). (R7) Offset NO2 SCD: This is fixed in version 3.01 except for the beginning of 2003 (R10): Based on a limited data set from early 2003 an offset was introduced in the processing. An analysis of a larger dataset showed that the offset is specific for the begin of 2003 and not present in other data, thus it will be removed for version 3.01. The deviation of early 2003 is under investigation.

Level 1b-2 issues – Crucial (II) (p,T) inter-change in measurement grid structure in Limb profile MDS fixed (R13) .

Level 1b-2 issues - Crucial (III) The following issues are under investigation: Peaks in O3 Column differences (R1). No systematic dependence on cloud parameters found, re-investigated on a larger data set after re-processing. Remaining altitude shift in O3 profiles (R5). It is expected that the new sensor – platform alignment parameters used in version 6.03 L0-1b processing will improve the situation. Different behaviour profile difference year 2003 (R8) will be re-investigated by SQWG after re-processing (better pointing). Different behaviour profile difference near the Arctic (R9).

Issues important, but not crucial CTH and Impact on VCDs (R14, R15) CTH algorithm improved, ISCCP no longer in user, re-investigated on large data set after reprocessing CTH retrieval error of 250 m (R16): Error estimate based on verification/validation will be put into disclaimer for version 3.0/3.01. Changes for version >3.01 to be decided by ESA. Further validation of CTH necessary! Reflectance Correction Factor for CTH (R 17) No correction factor used as reflectance calibration sinve level 1 v6 is ok Cause of the difference between OL and scientific retrieval of COT (R18). Reason was a difference in input data for SACURA, not a difference of algorithms. TN for a-priori profile extraction from Limb MDS available (R20, 21, 28) Error bars on NO2 Limb profile retrievals are corrected, a scaling factor was erroneously applied (R22). SciaL1C tool ported in addition to Solaris and Linux to HP-UX and DEC-Alpha environments. Further changes in product/tools under consideration by ESA (R26,27) R14,15,17,23?

Issues important, but not crucial O3 VCDs vs. scientific retrievals (R24) Investigated during verification w.r.t. SDOAS re-investigated on large data set after reprocessing NO2 SCDs vs. scientific retrievals (R25) R14,15,17,23?

Other changes in L1b-2 3.01 Integration of new SACURA version (2.1), will be used down to 5% cloud coverage. User recommendation of switch to 4 Limb profiles implemented. O3 SCD after molecular ring correction is now provided

Summary All crucial L0-1 issues are solved Most crucial L1b-2 issues are solved. Verification of OL v. 3.01 is nearly finished. A document with more detailed answers to all recommendations from ACVE-3 is in preparation.