John R. Dickel et al AJ doi: / /140/5/1511 Information:

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Figure 4 from The Hubble Space Telescope Cluster Supernova Survey. II. The Type Ia Supernova Rate in High-redshift Galaxy Clusters (Image 1 of 3) K. Barbary.

Advertisements

Figure 7 from Effects of Circumnuclear Disk Gas Evolution on the Spin of Central Black Holes (Image 1 of 7) Umberto Maio et al ApJ doi: / X/767/1/37.

Figure 14 from MUSCLE W49: A Multi-Scale Continuum and Line Exploration of the Most Luminous Star Formation Region in the Milky Way. I. Data and the Mass.

Figure 4 from Power Spectrum Analysis of Polarized Emission from the Canadian Galactic Plane Survey (Image 1 of 6) R. A. Stutz et al ApJ doi: / X/787/1/34.

Figure 14 from The Compositional Diversity of Extrasolar Terrestrial Planets. I. In Situ Simulations (Image 1 of 4) Jade C. Bond et al ApJ

Figure 4 from The Australia Telescope Compact Array H I Survey of the Galactic Center (Image 1 of 9) N. M. McClure-Griffiths et al ApJS doi: / /199/1/12.

Figure 15 from Star Formation in the Central 400 pc of the Milky Way: Evidence for a Population of Massive Young Stellar Objects (Image 1 of 2) F. Yusef-Zadeh.

Figure 5 from The Australia Telescope Compact Array H I Survey of the Galactic Center (Image 1 of 5) N. M. McClure-Griffiths et al ApJS doi: / /199/1/12.

Figure 3 from Multiple Component Outflows in an Active Region Observed with the EUV Imaging Spectrometer on Hinode (Image 1 of 11) P. Bryans et al

K. Decker French et al ApJ doi: / X/801/1/1 Information:

Figure 15 from Cloud–Cloud Collision as a Trigger of the High-mass Star Formation: a Molecular Line Study in RCW120 (Image 1 of 5) K. Torii et al

Figure 7 from The Evolution of Dwarf Galaxy Satellites with Different Dark Matter Density Profiles in the ErisMod Simulations. I. The Early Infalls Mihai.

Figure 9 from A Direct Measurement of the Forward Shock Speed in Supernova Remnant : Constraints on the Age, Ambient Density, Shock Compression.

Figure 2 from The Role of Active Region Loop Geometry. II

Figure 5 from The ACS LCID Project. II

Qing-Wen Tang et al ApJ doi: / X/806/2/194 Information:

Figure 8 from Dust Reddened Quasars in FIRST and UKIDSS: Beyond the Tip of the Iceberg (Image 1 of 5) Eilat Glikman et al ApJ doi: / X/778/2/127.

Figure 27 from Embedded Protostars in the Dust, Ice, and Gas In Time (DIGIT) Herschel Key Program: Continuum SEDs, and an Inventory of Characteristic Far-infrared.

Y. Q. Xue et al ApJS doi: / /195/1/10 Information:

A. A. Abdo et al ApJ doi: / X/722/1/520 Information:

Figure 1 from A Hidden Population of Massive Stars with Circumstellar Shells Discovered with the Spitzer Space Telescope (Image 1 of 16) Stefanie Wachter.

Figure 22 from Stellar Disks of Collisional Ring Galaxies. I

Figure 1 from Characterizing the Cool KOIs. VI

Gregory D. Fleishman et al ApJ doi: / X/802/2/122 Information:

Figure 5 from The Cool Component and the Dichotomy, Lateral Expansion, and Axial Rotation of Solar X-Ray Jets (Image 1 of 2) Ronald L. Moore et al

Figure 3 from The Cool Component and the Dichotomy, Lateral Expansion, and Axial Rotation of Solar X-Ray Jets (Image 1 of 2) Ronald L. Moore et al

Figure 2 from New Constraints on Cosmic Polarization Rotation from B-Mode Polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background Sperello di Serego Alighieri.

Figure 1 from Ab Initio Free Energy Calculations of the Solubility of Silica in Metallic Hydrogen and Application to Giant Planet Cores F. González-Cataldo.

Figure 2 from Ab Initio Free Energy Calculations of the Solubility of Silica in Metallic Hydrogen and Application to Giant Planet Cores F. González-Cataldo.

Figure 3 from Ab Initio Free Energy Calculations of the Solubility of Silica in Metallic Hydrogen and Application to Giant Planet Cores F. González-Cataldo.

Figure 2. from GLOBAL EXPLICIT PARTICLE-IN-CELL SIMULATIONS OF THE NONSTATIONARY BOW SHOCK AND MAGNETOSPHERE null 2016 APJS doi: / /225/1/13.

Figure 1 from Direct Evidence for Ammonium Ion Formation in Ice through Ultraviolet-induced Acid-Base Reaction of NH3 with H3O+ Eui-Seong Moon et al

Figure 6 from Classification and Ranking of Fermi LAT Gamma-ray Sources from the 3FGL Catalog using Machine Learning Techniques P. M. Saz Parkinson et.

Figure 3 from Spectral Line Survey toward the Young Massive Protostar NGC 2264 CMM3 in the 4 mm, 3 mm, and 0.8 mm Bands (Image 1 of 12) Yoshimasa Watanabe.

Figure 1 from Toward Precision Photometry for the ELT Era: The Double Subgiant Branch of NGC 1851 Observed with the Gemini/GeMS MCAO System P. Turri et.

Figure 8 from Lateral Offset of the Coronal Mass Ejections from the X-flare of 2006 December 13 and Its Two Precursor Eruptions Alphonse C. Sterling et.

Figure 3 from The ACS Nearby Galaxy Survey Treasury. VIII

Figure 3 from On the Formation of Silacyclopropenylidene (c-SiC2H2) and its Role in the Organosilicon Chemistry in the Interstellar Medium Dorian S. N.

Figure 4 from Characterization of CoRoT Target Fields With Berlin Exoplanet Search Telescope. II. Identification of Periodic Variable Stars in the LRc2.

Figure 3.1 from Witnessing the Differential Evolution of Disk Galaxies in Luminosity and Size via Gravitational Lensing (Image 1 of 5) Kaushala Bandara.

Figure 2 from An X-ray Imaging Survey of Quasar Jets: Testing the Inverse Compton Model (Image 1 of 4) H. L. Marshall et al ApJS doi: / /193/1/15.

Figure 4 from Spectroscopic Properties of Star-forming Host Galaxies and Type Ia Supernova Hubble Residuals in a nearly Unbiased Sample Chris B. D'Andrea.

Figure 1 from Spectroscopic Properties of Star-forming Host Galaxies and Type Ia Supernova Hubble Residuals in a nearly Unbiased Sample Chris B. D'Andrea.

Figure 9 from The Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II: Photometry and Supernova IA Light Curves from the 2005 Data (Image 1 of 10) Jon A. Holtzman et al

P. M. Fry et al AJ doi: / /143/6/150 Information:

Figure 3 from On the Incorporation of Metallicity Data into Measurements of Star Formation History from Resolved Stellar Populations Andrew E. Dolphin.

Figure 1 from European Southern Observatory Very Large Telescope Optical Spectroscopy of BL Lacertae Objects. III. An Extension of the Sample (Image 1.

Figure 5 from Circumstellar 12C/13C Isotope Ratios from Millimeter Observations of CN and CO: Mixing in Carbon- and Oxygen-Rich Stars (Image 1 of 18) S.

Danielle A. Berg et al ApJ doi: / X/754/2/98 Information:

Figure 2 from A Statistical Survey of Peculiar L and T Dwarfs in SDSS, 2MASS, and WISE (Image 1 of 5) Kendra Kellogg et al AJ doi: / /aa83b0.

Catherine Walsh et al ApJ doi: / X/722/2/1607 Information:

Figure 15 from The Carnegie-Irvine Galaxy Survey. II

Figure 3 from Spectral Line Survey toward the Spiral Arm of M51 in the 3 and 2 mm Bands (Image 1 of 6) Yoshimasa Watanabe et al ApJ doi: / X/788/1/4.

Figure 1 from Hubble Space Telescope Combined Strong and Weak Lensing Analysis of the CLASH Sample: Mass and Magnification Models and Systematic Uncertainties.

Figure 2 from Large-scale Kinematics, Astrochemistry, and Magnetic Field Studies of Massive Star-forming Regions through HC3N, HNC, and C2H Mappings (Image.

Figure 7 from The Hubble Space Telescope/Advanced Camera for Surveys Atlas of Protoplanetary Disks in the Great Orion Nebula (Image 1 of 4) L. Ricci et.

Figure 3 from Ultraviolet Light Curves of Supernovae with the Swift Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope (Image 1 of 25) Peter J. Brown et al AJ

Figure 2 from Search for Interstellar Methoxyacetonitrile and Cyanoethanol: Insights Into Coupling of Cyano- to Methanol and Ammonia Chemistry (Image 1.

Figure 2 from High-Resolution Submillimeter Multiline Observations of G19.61 – 0.23: Small-Scale Chemistry (Image 1 of 2) Sheng-Li Qin et al ApJ.

Figure 17 from The SCUBA-2 Cosmology Legacy Survey: Multiwavelength Counterparts to 103 Submillimeter Galaxies in the UKIDSS-UDS Field (Image 1 of 7) Chian-Chou.

Figure 2 from Thermodynamics of the Solar Corona and Evolution of the Solar Magnetic Field as Inferred from the Total Solar Eclipse Observations of 2010.

Figure from Validating Time-Distance Helioseismology with Realistic Quiet-Sun Simulations (Image 1 of 9) K. DeGrave et al ApJ doi: / X/788/2/127.

Figure 8 from A New Tool for Image Analysis Based on Chebyshev Rational Functions: CHEF Functions (Image 1 of 2) Y. Jiménez-Teja and N. Benítez 2012 ApJ.

Figure 1 from The EMPIRE Survey: Systematic Variations in the Dense Gas Fraction and Star Formation Efficiency from Full-disk Mapping of M51 Frank Bigiel.

Figure 6 from Detailed Compositional Analysis of the Heavily Polluted DBZ White Dwarf SDSS J : A Window on Planet Formation? (Image 1.

Tomoharu Oka et al ApJS doi: / /201/2/14 Information:

Figure 2 from The Physical Characterization of the Potentially Hazardous Asteroid 2004 BL86: A Fragment of a Differentiated Asteroid Vishnu Reddy et al.

Figure 2 from Mid-Infrared Properties of OH Megamaser Host Galaxies. I

Figure 11 from The Galactic O-Star Spectroscopic Survey (GOSSS). II

Figure 2. from INTERACTION CROSS SECTIONS AND SURVIVAL RATES FOR PROPOSED SOLAR SYSTEM MEMBER PLANET NINE null 2016 APJL 823 L3 doi: / /823/1/L3.

Presentation transcript:

Figure 3 from A 4.8 and 8.6 GHz Survey of the Small Magellanic Cloud: The Images (Image 1 of 9) John R. Dickel et al. 2010 AJ 140 1511 doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1511 Information: Thank you for downloading this PowerPoint slide from The Astronomical Journal. This slide was designed to be edited; you can: - Remove components (including this text box!) - Resize components - Apply a style or theme - Please remember to include the original article citation information.

Figure 3 from A 4.8 and 8.6 GHz Survey of the Small Magellanic Cloud: The Images (Image 2 of 9) John R. Dickel et al. 2010 AJ 140 1511 doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1511 Information: Thank you for downloading this PowerPoint slide from The Astronomical Journal. This slide was designed to be edited; you can: - Remove components (including this text box!) - Resize components - Apply a style or theme - Please remember to include the original article citation information.

Figure 3 from A 4.8 and 8.6 GHz Survey of the Small Magellanic Cloud: The Images (Image 3 of 9) John R. Dickel et al. 2010 AJ 140 1511 doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1511 Information: Thank you for downloading this PowerPoint slide from The Astronomical Journal. This slide was designed to be edited; you can: - Remove components (including this text box!) - Resize components - Apply a style or theme - Please remember to include the original article citation information.

Figure 3 from A 4.8 and 8.6 GHz Survey of the Small Magellanic Cloud: The Images (Image 4 of 9) John R. Dickel et al. 2010 AJ 140 1511 doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1511 Information: Thank you for downloading this PowerPoint slide from The Astronomical Journal. This slide was designed to be edited; you can: - Remove components (including this text box!) - Resize components - Apply a style or theme - Please remember to include the original article citation information.

Figure 3 from A 4.8 and 8.6 GHz Survey of the Small Magellanic Cloud: The Images (Image 5 of 9) John R. Dickel et al. 2010 AJ 140 1511 doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1511 Information: Thank you for downloading this PowerPoint slide from The Astronomical Journal. This slide was designed to be edited; you can: - Remove components (including this text box!) - Resize components - Apply a style or theme - Please remember to include the original article citation information.

Figure 3 from A 4.8 and 8.6 GHz Survey of the Small Magellanic Cloud: The Images (Image 6 of 9) John R. Dickel et al. 2010 AJ 140 1511 doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1511 Information: Thank you for downloading this PowerPoint slide from The Astronomical Journal. This slide was designed to be edited; you can: - Remove components (including this text box!) - Resize components - Apply a style or theme - Please remember to include the original article citation information.

Figure 3 from A 4.8 and 8.6 GHz Survey of the Small Magellanic Cloud: The Images (Image 7 of 9) John R. Dickel et al. 2010 AJ 140 1511 doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1511 Information: Thank you for downloading this PowerPoint slide from The Astronomical Journal. This slide was designed to be edited; you can: - Remove components (including this text box!) - Resize components - Apply a style or theme - Please remember to include the original article citation information.

Figure 3 from A 4.8 and 8.6 GHz Survey of the Small Magellanic Cloud: The Images (Image 8 of 9) John R. Dickel et al. 2010 AJ 140 1511 doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1511 Information: Thank you for downloading this PowerPoint slide from The Astronomical Journal. This slide was designed to be edited; you can: - Remove components (including this text box!) - Resize components - Apply a style or theme - Please remember to include the original article citation information.

Figure 3 from A 4.8 and 8.6 GHz Survey of the Small Magellanic Cloud: The Images (Image 9 of 9) John R. Dickel et al. 2010 AJ 140 1511 doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1511 Information: Thank you for downloading this PowerPoint slide from The Astronomical Journal. This slide was designed to be edited; you can: - Remove components (including this text box!) - Resize components - Apply a style or theme - Please remember to include the original article citation information.