Energistics Standards Presentation 1 : Wellbores

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Completion Object Overview June 2013 WITSML/PRODML Standards.
Advertisements

WITSML Office Aggregrator
GeoSciML borehole data exchange and applications Christian Bellier (BRGM), John Laxton (BGS)
UML – Class Diagrams.
Overview 1. 2 WITSML Special Interest Group Members A set of Data Exchange and Web Services Standards First published in 2001 Version 1.4 due in Q3 50+
1 General Well Message Operations Report Real Time Wellbore Wellbore Geometry Risk Directional Drilling Systems Tubular / Bit Record BHA Run Fluids Systems.
1 Agenda Introduction Energistics Standards Panorama / History / Participants Web Services Interoperability Standards v1.0 WITSML Version 1.x Services.
Drilling Data Management System
Geophysics SIG Work Meetings Houston, 12 March 2009 Web Conference, 26 March 2009.
HDF-EOS Workshop VII, An XML Approach to HDF-EOS5 Files Jingli Yang 1, Bob Bane 1, Muhammad Rabi 1, Zhangshi Yin 1, Richard Ullman 1, Robert McGrath.
GeoSciML cool logo. GeoSciML v3.0 – the CGI-IUGS geoscience data model I nternational U nion of G eological S ciences C ommission for the Management and.
Technical Team WITSML SIG Paris 16 May Technical Team Representatives mainly from service companies Energistics (Gary) keep a global issue list.
Technical Team WITSML SIG Houston 15 May 2008 John Shields / Gary Masters.
JCOP Workshop September 8th 1999 H.J.Burckhart 1 ATLAS DCS Organization of Detector and Controls Architecture Connection to DAQ Front-end System Practical.
Role of the Chair OGP - update by Richard Wylde Geodetic Advisor, ExxonMobil Chair OGP Geomatics Committee User needs on energy and minerals data and services.
® Sponsored by GroundWater ML 2 IE (GW2IE) GroundWater ML 2 IE (GW2IE) Progress Report 95th OGC Technical Committee Boulder, Colorado USA Bruce Simons.
Technical Team WITSML SIG Dubai - November 2008 John Shields / Gary Masters.
WITSML Meeting Houston, May 15, 2008 WITSML end to end implementation: Results and way forwards at Total Raphael Henri-Bally, Total Geosciences IT systems.
Interoperable sharing of groundwater data across international boarders is essential for the proper management of global water resources. However storage.
Shell Exploration & Production Copyright: Shell Exploration & Production Ltd. 6/5/2016 File Title Shell taking the next step with WITSML May 2008 Update.
Agenda Introduction Energistics Standards Panorama / History / Participants Web Services Interoperability Standards v1.0 WITSML Version 1.x Services /
WellPath Progress Report: Re-spudded and drilling ahead John Turvill and Paul Maton WITSML SIG, Houston TX, 9 – 11 May 2006 POSC Regional SIG, Stavanger,
Geophysical SIG Towards reduced cycle time In Geophysical Work Processes.
® Sponsored by G eo S ci ML : v4 Modularization OGC TC Crystal City March 24, 2014.
Develop Use Cases Evaluate Existing Models Develop/Extend Model Test ModelDocument 1. Commercial This use-case involves identifying the location and properties.
WITSML Technical Team Update Houston May Technical Team Responsible for technical content of WITSML standard XML Schemas XML Schemas Application.
Working with XML Schemas ©NIITeXtensible Markup Language/Lesson 3/Slide 1 of 36 Objectives In this lesson, you will learn to: * Declare attributes in an.
WIGOS Data model – standards introduction.
Versioning and Use Case Demonstration Pavel Stoev Senior Solutions Developer Links Technology Solutions.
GEO Software & Chris Jacobson
Pål Rylandsholm 16 June 2009 DRAFT DDR Phase 2 Status EPIM RUF meeting June 16th 2009.
1 Future Consideration for WITSML from Total Products should migrate to the same version of WITSML Need provisions for backup in case of system failure.
Leverage and Delegation in Developing an Information Model for Geology Simon Cox Research Scientist 14 December 2007.
® Hosted and Sponsored by ESA/ESRIN Experiments in CityGML-Based Surface and Groundwater Modelling – Can the Hydrology DWG Help? 86th OGC Technical Committee.
Tutorial 1 Description of a Weather Station using SensorML Alexandre Robin
OGC Hydro DWG Workshop 2016 – Koblenz – Supporting GML application compliant complex features in QGIS and beyond BRGM – S.Grellet.
Develop Use Cases Evaluate Existing Models Develop/Extend Model Test ModelDocument Use Cases 1. Commercial This use-case involves identifying the location.
® Hosted by IIT Bombay Department of Science & Technology Sponsored By OGC Land and Infrastructure InfraGML Proposal: OGC r1 87th OGC Technical Committee.
Developing a Comprehensive Address Data Standard for the United States U.S. Address Standard Working Group: Martha McCart Wells, GISP, Spatial Focus Inc.
Energistics Standards Presentation 2 : Geomodeling
102nd OGC Technical Committee Delft, The Netherlands
Articulating Your Practice C3 - Session #3
Course Outcomes of Object Oriented Modeling Design (17630,C604)
Object-Oriented Analysis and Design
Unified Modeling Language
GeoScience DWG Welcome
Updates on boreholes in EPOS Borehole UML model
Borehole update: simpleFeature exchange, conceptual UML model
QGIS / GDAL GML application schema support update : use case on French Groundwater Information Network (GIN) BRGM – S.Grellet OGC Hydro DWG Workshop 2017.
Abstract descriptions of systems whose requirements are being analysed
Articulating Your Practice C3 - Session #3
UML to XSD.
Updates on models exchanges in EPOS
COURSE OBJECTIVE: Both geological and mining programsGEMS modelling mine closer planning  equip the students with knowledge in general fuctionable mine.
Updates on boreholes in EPOS: architecture, BoreholeView
Setting interoperability between BIM and Geomodelling
Engineering Processes
Completion Object Overview
Using JDeveloper.
2. An overview of SDMX (What is SDMX? Part I)
Raphael Malyankar; Eivind Mong
104th OGC Technical Committee – GeoScience DWG session
An Introduction to Software Architecture
Daily Drilling Report Phase 2
GeoSciML / GWML Boreholes
Metadata The metadata contains
Club d’innovation – Forage-Puits et Monitoring
Proposal of a Geographic Metadata Profile for WISE
May 9th, 2019 IHO HSSC 11: Cape Town
QoS Metadata Status 106th OGC Technical Committee Orléans, France
Presentation transcript:

Energistics Standards Presentation 1 : Wellbores 104th OGC Technical Committee – GeoScience DWG session Southampton, United Kingdom Jean-francois RAINAUD IFP En 14th September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Open Geospatial Consortium

Energistics Standards General Presentation Energistics Standards scope WITSML PRODML Well Bore (Borehole) Static Information RESQML SEG Copyright © 2017 Open Geospatial Consortium

Energistics Standards General Presentation Energistics V2.* Standards Delivery : One common Set of XSD (Xml Schemas) containing : Main constructions including relationships & Link to external resources (hdf5) Base types CRS Coordinate reference system for Geolocalisation With a mandatory use of CRS with respect of OGC standards EPSG Code ( using GML behind) or direct USE of GML (mainly for trajectories). Property Kind Units of measure Common enumerations And, in the common enumerations, a reuse of GeosciML lithology definitions One set of XSD (XML Schema) for each standard (here Witsml) And complete documentation with UML design (XMI file)

Original WITSML Business Challenge Service/technology providers: Drilling environment consists of Many services & technical solutions Each provides a vital part of the operation Each operates under their own system, environment, corporation Operators: Operator challenge: Consistent view of services Conform to corporate standards (Security, audits, reporting, etc.) Allow: Sharing with partners Data management Integration Copyright © 2017 Open Geospatial Consortium

Copyright © 2017 Open Geospatial Consortium WITSML Scope Distinct classes of objects Reference objects – Well and Wellbore Growing objects – Log (time,depth), Trajectory, Mudlog Snapshots in time – with “report” information Communications process Simplify problem: point to point Any number of point to point steps in a larger communications chain of events Solution requires Mechanism for communicating between 2 end points Object definitions for the transfer of data Reference Well 1532-e Growing Reports Copyright © 2017 Open Geospatial Consortium

Copyright © 2017 Open Geospatial Consortium WITSML V2.9 44 Data Objects Attachment OpsReport WellboreGeology+6 BhaRun Rig WellboreMarkerSet CementJob Rig Utilization WellboreMarker CementJobEvaluation Risk WellCompletion CRS moved to common StimJob WellboreCompletion StimJobStage DownholeComponent DataAssurance: common SurveyProgram WellCMLedger And 6 part_ wrappers Trajectory DrillReport ToolErrorModel FluidsReport ToolErrorTermSet Log Tubular ChannelSet Well Channel Wellbore DepthRegImage WellboreGeometry MudLogReport Copyright © 2017 Open Geospatial Consortium

WITSML Object Organization & Identification Hierarchical with well at the top Names & UUIDs Uniqueness within context of parent (0,* relationships) Copyright © 2017 Open Geospatial Consortium

RESQML Wellbore Interpretation communication From the Driller to the Reservoir Engineer Slide 8 1. Create a permanent reference geometry: the Wellbore Frame along the Wellbore Trajectory Use a single scale: MD Make sure the origin of the log data is specified Convert to Local CRS for RESQML Choose sampling interval for each log type 2. Attach Properties to this reference geometry: Sorry dear drillers and production engineers, the truth is that for the reservoir engineer, the well is simple. It consists in a 1D line from surface to bottom, on which are « hung » geological, petro physical, and reservoir information just as Christmas hanging ornaments (individual data values) and garlands ( data valid on an interval). So we need our Christmas tree for that. Because we know that positioning is the nervous center of this process, we make sure we work on a unique positioning of the information by importing first the WITSMLTrajectory. We use the Global CRS and datum of the WITMLS data set. We know that you might use different rigs along the various data acquisition, so we make sure we convert to the same datum. Would need requires (grid purposes for example), we convert this trajectory to the local CRS of the study. The WITMSL Trajectory object ( the final driller validated one) is imported as Stations positions and vectors for dip and azimuths at these stations. The construction lets the reservoir engineer choose from different interpolation algorithms in between these stations, although we know that proper MD positioning only comes from reconstructing the path using the Minimum Curvature algorithm. Once this is created we can attach the data values: MD Properties may be on the ticks (nodes), or between ticks (intervals)

N Md Values N Values N+1 Values Slide 9 WELLBORE FRAME APPROACH Property Kind B Log Curve Value given on each INTERVAL Property Kind A Log Curve Value given on each NODE Measured Depth N Md Values Value 52.5 5.2 3.6 17.8 77.6 12 24 35 47 52.5 4.4 95.3 27.8 NODE INTERVAL We call the construction made from the WITSML Trajectory the WELLBOREFRAME. Once the path is reconstructed, we sample it the way we need the log, or other kind of well data to be positioned. The nodes are referencing the spot values and the segments are used for interval values such as geological intervals. N Values N+1 Values

N Md Values N String N+1 String Slide 10 UUID of a Strati Limit Value given as a string on each NODE UUID of a Strati Unit Value given as a string on each INTERVAL Connecting to Stratigraphy Measured Depth N Md Values FRAME MARKERS UNITS Brent Dunlin Talbert Ranoch T1 12 24 35 47 Top Dunlin Talbert Ranoch Top T1 NODE INTERVAL Similarly, we connect the Stratigraphy information , consisting of markers and Units to Nodes for the first, Segments for the second. N String N+1 String

Wellbore in the Resqml FIRP FEATURE INTERPRETATION REPRESENTATION PROPERTIES Copyright © 2017 Open Geospatial Consortium

Welbore Representation (localisation) Copyright © 2017 Open Geospatial Consortium

Detail on Continuous, Comment and Categorical Properties PROPERTY KIND QUANTITY CLASS UNIT OF MEASURE Each of these property Object correspond to one WellboreRepresentation Frame (nb of Mds and localisation) which defines the size of the numerical tables handling the property Values For Property Values : On continuous property you can store Logs ( ex: pressure) , On Comment property you can store Descriptive strings ans UUIDs, On Categorical Property you can store a list of Ids corresponding of elements in a Lookup Table Copyright © 2017 Open Geospatial Consortium

Example realised recently for Civil engeneering One example with a String look up table for Geology (litho) description String lookup 0:GL Sandstone String lookup 1:Argilite String lookup 2:HE Sandstone String lookup 3:Breccia String lookup 4:Micashist String lookup 5:Fe Sandstone String lookup 6:Quartzschist String lookup 7:Carb Sandstone String lookup 8:Schist String lookup 9:Unknown The string Look Up Tables are not part of the RESQML Standard , They can be defined by a other way (by GeoSciML by example). The the names and the definitions should in this case be refered by standard external resource; One other example with continuous properties (pressure) Copyright © 2017 Open Geospatial Consortium

Copyright © 2017 Open Geospatial Consortium Conclusion Energistics standards are more and used in the Petroleum industry When we designed these standards we tried to listen to all other existing initiative and do our best to be open (even if sometimes the petroleum people are pragmatic first). WITSML is more designed to handle the real time measurements. RESQML is more involved to handle interpretations. But both are totally compatible and integrated To prepare the future evaluations we experimented an exchange geologic and geotechnical Wellbore ( Borehole) informations. And it was sucessful. Thank you for your attention .. We are actually ready for collaboration. Copyright © 2017 Open Geospatial Consortium