Lecture 3: Functional Phrases

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Syntax Lecture 2: Categories and Subcategorisation.
Advertisements

Lecture 4: The Complementiser System
Specifiers! The notion of subject. Specifier = Subject u By creating DP, we got rid of our only example of a specifier. u So do we need the notion specifier?
Chapter 4 Syntax.
Syntax Lecture 10: Auxiliaries. Types of auxiliary verb Modal auxiliaries belong to the category of inflection – They are in complementary distribution.
Dr. Abdullah S. Al-Dobaian1 Ch. 2: Phrase Structure Syntactic Structure (basic concepts) Syntactic Structure (basic concepts)  A tree diagram marks constituents.
Syntax Lecture 9: Verb Types 2.
Syntax Lecture 13: Revision. Lecture 1: X-bar Theory X-bar rules for introducing: – Complement (X 1  X 0 Y 2 ) – Specifier (X 2  Y 2 X 1 ) – Adjunct.
Linguistic Theory Lecture 7 About Nothing. Nothing in grammar Language often contains irregular paradigms where one or more expected forms are absent.
Syntax Lecture 12: Adjectival Phrases. Introduction Adjectives, like any other word, must conform to X-bar principles We expect them – to be heads – to.
MORPHOLOGY - morphemes are the building blocks that make up words.
Lecture 6: Verbs with Clausal Arguments
1 LIN 1310B Introduction to Linguistics Prof: Nikolay Slavkov TA: Qinghua Tang CLASS 18, March 13, 2007.
Linguistic Theory Lecture 8 Meaning and Grammar. A brief history In classical and traditional grammar not much distinction was made between grammar and.
1 Introduction to Computational Linguistics Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Fall 2005-Lecture 2.
1 CSC 594 Topics in AI – Applied Natural Language Processing Fall 2009/ Outline of English Syntax.
Syntax Lecture 3: The Subject. The Basic Structure of the Clause Recall that our theory of structure says that all structures follow this pattern: It.
Today  What is syntax?  Grammaticality  Ambiguity  Phrase structure Readings: 6.1 – 6.2.
The students will be able to know:
Embedded Clauses in TAG
1 LIN 1310B Introduction to Linguistics Prof: Nikolay Slavkov TA: Qinghua Tang CLASS 14, Feb 27, 2007.
Extending X-bar Theory DPs, TPs, and CPs. The Puzzle of Determiners  Specifier RuleXP  (YP) X’ – requires the specifier to be phrasal – *That the book.
Syntax Lecture 8: Verb Types 1. Introduction We have seen: – The subject starts off close to the verb, but moves to specifier of IP – The verb starts.
Lecture 9: The Gerund.  The English gerund is an intriguing structure which causes a particular problem for X-bar theory  [His constantly complaining.
IV. SYNTAX. 1.1 What is syntax? Syntax is the study of how sentences are structured, or in other words, it tries to state what words can be combined with.
Syntax Lecture 5: More On Wh-movement. Review Wh-movement: – Moves interrogative ‘wh’-phrase – from various positions inside the IP – to the specifier.
1 LIN 1310B Introduction to Linguistics Prof: Nikolay Slavkov TA: Qinghua Tang CLASS 13, Feb 16, 2007.
October 15, 2007 Non-finite clauses and control : Grammars and Lexicons Lori Levin.
King Abdulaziz University Department of European Languages & Literature Syntax (LANE-334) Chapter 3 Functions Dr. Abdulrahman Alqurashi Dr. Abdulrahman.
Clause Types A descriptive tangent into the types of clauses Note: much of this discussion is based on Radford, Andrew (1989) Transformational Grammar.
1 LIN 1310B Introduction to Linguistics Prof: Nikolay Slavkov TA: Qinghua Tang CLASS 12, Feb 13, 2007.
Syntax III November 19, Sentences The basic phrase types include: NP, VP, AP, PP A basic sentence is an “inflectional phrase” (IP). The head of.
Revision.  Movements leave behind a phonologically null trace in all their extraction sites.
A noun is a person, a place, thing, or idea. Ex. Jimmy read a book in the park. Jimmy is a noun because it is a person’s name. Book is a noun because.
Syntax Lecture 6: Missing Subjects of Non-finite Clauses.
SYNTAX.
Lecture 1: Trace Theory.  We have seen that things move :  Arguments move out of the VP into subject position  Wh-phrases move out of IP into CP 
1 Some English Constructions Transformational Framework October 2, 2012 Lecture 7.
Basic Syntactic Structures of English CSCI-GA.2590 – Lecture 2B Ralph Grishman NYU.
1 Principles & Parameters Approach in Linguistics II Bibhuti Bhusan Mahapatra.
3.3 A More Detailed Look At Transformations Inversion (revised): Move Infl to C. Do Insertion: Insert interrogative do into an empty.
THE NOMINATIVE CASE By Corey Keating at Its Syntactical Classification.
Syntactic Functions of Adjectives
X-Bar Theory. The part of the grammar regulating the structure of phrases has come to be known as X'-theory (X’-bar theory'). X-bar theory brings out.
SYNTAX.
Chapter 4 Syntax a branch of linguistics that studies how words are combined to form sentences and the rules that govern the formation of sentences.
King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 1 King Faisal University.
Lecture 6: More On Wh-movement
Lecture 2: Categories and Subcategorisation
Lecture 4: The Complementiser System
Beginning Syntax Linda Thomas
Lecture 3 Krisztina Szécsényi
Syntax Lecture 9: Verb Types 1.
Lecture 7: Missing Subjects of Non-finite Clauses
Lecture 12: Summary and Exam
Verbs, tense, aspect, and mood
Lecture 9 Krisztina Szécsényi
Part I: Basics and Constituency
Syntax.
Lecture 8: Verb Positions
: 2018.
Introduction to Linguistics
Syntax Lecture 11: More on the DP.
:.
Principles and Parameters (I)
Complementation.
Syntax.
Structure of a Lexicon Debasri Chakrabarti 13-May-19.
Syntax Lecture 12: Extended VP.
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 3: Functional Phrases Syntax Lecture 3: Functional Phrases

The independence of syntax and semantics Two famous sentences: Colourless green ideas sleep furiously The child seems sleeping The first is grammatical, but ill formed semantically The second has a well formed meaning, but is ungrammatical

What is semantically important is not necessarily syntactically important Q: Is a VP a VERB phrase because the verb carries the important meaning?: ‘flew to Paris’ is more about ‘flying’ than it is about ‘Paris’ or ‘to’ A: No!: ‘is tall’ ‘tall’ is more important than ‘is’ But this is still a VP

Syntax determines syntactic phenomena A VP is a VERB phrase, because the verb is the syntactic head (not necessarily semantic head) The King flew to Paris, allegedly The King is tall, allegedly

The Nominal Phrase What is the head of the phrase: ‘that table’? The usual reaction is: ‘table’ But Only because ‘table’ carries more meaning than ‘that’ This is not a good reason

Pronouns are determiners Recall Most determiners can be used as pronouns That table is white – that is white Some tables are green – some are green Some pronouns can be used as determiners We humanitarians But pronouns replace nominal phrases They have the same distribution as them: My friend is rich – he is rich Everyone likes my friend – Everyone likes him So pronouns are nominal phrases = a one word phrase containing just a head

The one word phrase The head determines the nature of the phrase

If a pronoun is a determiner, then this phrase is a DP

If this is a DP, then all nominal phrases are DPs The Determiner is the head The NP is the complement Headed by the Noun

DPs without determiners Expressions like John and people have the same distribution as pronouns: John likes Mary – he likes Mary We spoke to people – we spoke to them So they are also DPs But they don’t contain determiners But they have properties that determiners provide: A man / the man = indefinite / definite people / John = indefinite / definite There is a man / * the man in the room There are people / is John in the room

Phonologically empty Ds

Sentences What is the head of a sentence? The gardener will mow the lawn Only sentences distribute like sentences There are no one word sentences So it is difficult to identify a single word as the head on these grounds There may be other ways to do it

Types of sentences Some sentences are finite: They can contain a tense or a modal auxiliary: The gardener mowed the lawn The gardener may mow the lawn They have nominative pronoun subjects: He mowed/may mow the lawn * Him mowed/may mow the lawn They may or may not be embedded I think the gardener mowed the lawn

Types of sentences Some sentences are non-finite: * They contain to: (I expect) The gardener to mow the lawn They have accusative pronoun subjects: I expect him to mow the lawn * I expect he to mow the lawn They must be embedded I expect the gardener to mow the lawn *

Types of sentences Sentences contain one: Tense, or Modal, or Infinitival ‘to’ They cannot have combinations of these: * the gardener will mows the lawn * the gardener will to mow the lawn * the gardener to mowed the lawn These things are in complementary distribution So they belong to the same category We call the category Inflection (I) This is the functional verbal category [+F, -N, +V]

The type of sentence is determined by what Inflection it contains The gardener will mow the lawn The gardener mowed the lawn The gardener to mow the lawn The head determines the nature of the phrase So this is evidence that the Inflection is the head of the clause Finite Non-finite

Clauses are IPs The head is the Inflection So the clause is IP The specifier is the subject The complement is the VP

Comparing DP and IP

What about the specifier of the DP? A phrase which precedes a noun is the possessor: [DP The gardener’s] lawnmower The possessor is related to the subject: The police observed the criminals The police’s observation of the criminals This suggests that the possessor is the specifier of the DP

A DP with a specifier

Final comparison