Preparing for the Production of Essential Climate Variables (ECVs) for Biomass from Future Spaceborne Remote Sensing Missions: Is There A Role for CEOS-Carbon?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future Directions and Initiatives in the Use of Remote Sensing for Water Quality.
Advertisements

BIOMASS: first steps from selection to reality
Makoto Kajii SIT Chair 2010 – th Annual Report on CEOS Implementation of the GEOSS Space Segment Agenda Item accomplishments and lessons.
Carbon dynamics at the hillslope and catchment scale Greg Hancock 1, Jetse Kalma 1, Jeff McDonnell 2, Cristina Martinez 1, Barry Jacobs 1, Tony Wells 1.
Operational multi-sensor design for forest carbon monitoring to support REDD+ in Kalimantan, Indonesia Stephen Hagen (Applied GeoSolutions) NASA Carbon.
Estimating forest structure in wetlands using multitemporal SAR by Philip A. Townsend Neal Simpson ES 5053 Final Project.
1 January 17, 2007 NASA IPY Interest NASA has a strong interest in IPY themes Present environmental status of the polar regions Quantify and understand.
Questions How do different methods of calculating LAI compare? Does varying Leaf mass per area (LMA) with height affect LAI estimates? LAI can be calculated.
Compton Tucker, GSFC Sassan Satchi, JPL Jeff Masek, GSFC Rama Nemani, ARC Diane Wickland, HQ Terrestrial Biomass Pilot Product: Estimating Biomass and.
Mapping Fire Scars in Global Boreal Forests Using Imaging Radar Data Written By: L.L. Bourgeau-Chavez, E.S. Kasischke, S. Brunzell, J.P. Mudd, and M. Tukman.
FLEX-US 2013 Airborne Campaign
Biomass retrieval algorithm based on P-band BioSAR experiments of boreal forest Lars Ulander 1,2, Gustaf Sandberg 2, Maciej Soja 2 1 Swedish Defence Research.
Soil Moisture Active/Passive Field Campaign 2012 (SMAPVEx): Carmen-Portage la Prairie A Partnership between Agriculture Canada, NASA, US Department of.
Mapping Forest Canopy Height with MISR We previously demonstrated a capability to obtain physically meaningful canopy structural parameters using data.
Radarkartering av skogsbiomassa med P-band Pol-InSAR Lars Ulander, Maciej Soja, Gustaf Sandberg, och Daniel Murdin.
Getting Ready for the Future Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters May 7, 2014 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting Sheraton.
VuRSAL Scoping Study. Background NASA’s 2008 ROSES Solicitation (NNH08ZDA001N-TE) called for proposals to carry out “Scoping studies to identify the scientific.
Biomass Mapping The set of field biomass training data and the MODIS observations were used to develop a regression tree model (Random Forest). Biomass.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Lola Fatoyinbo Agueh – NASA GSFC Collaboration – Interest in Large field campaigns/ ecosystem-scale experiments to validate models. – International collaboration.
Slide: 1 CEOS SDCG-3 Meeting|Sydney, Australia| 7-9 February 2013 Space Data Coordination Group Land Surface Imaging Virtual Constellation Ake Rosenqvist,
Michigan Tech Research Institute (MTRI)  Michigan Technological University 3600 Green Court, Suite 100  Ann Arbor, MI (734) – Phone 
GEO Forest Carbon Tracking Outcomes in 2010 Per-Erik Skrøvseth (NSC) Osamu Ochiai (JAXA) Frank Martin Seifert (ESA) Ake Rosenqvist (for JAXA) CEOS Plenary,
NASA Earth Science UAS Mission Requirements Don Sullivan NASA Ames Research Center
Investigating the Carbon Cycle in Terrestrial Ecosystems (ICCTE) Scott Ollinger * -PI, Jana Albrecktova †, Bobby Braswell *, Rita Freuder *, Mary Martin.
Ken Jucks and Diane Wickland Carbon Monitoring System: The NASA HQ Perspective November 13, 2014.
Terrestrial Carbon Observations TCO Previous Strategy 1- better identify the potential end users, and their requirements 2- organize and coordinate reliable.
Remote Sensing: Making Connections Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters April 22, 2015 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting.
Break-out Session II, #4: Observation Networks and Collaboration Opportunities Joanne Nightingale Michael Keller.
Disturbance Effects on Carbon Dynamics in Amazon Forest: A Synthesis from Individual Trees to Landscapes Workshop 1 – Tulane University, New Orleans, Late.
Project goals Evaluate the accuracy and precision of the CO2 DIAL system, in particular its ability to measure: –Typical atmospheric boundary layer - free.
Systematic Terrestrial Observations: a Case for Carbon René Gommes with C. He, J. Hielkema, P. Reichert and J. Tschirley FAO/SDRN.
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites Plenary Agenda Item #3 29 th CEOS Plenary Kyoto International Conference Center Kyoto, Japan 5 – 6 November 2015.
Status of ACC Activities Claus Zehner ESA VC/WG Day EUMETSAT, Darmstadt, Germany 16 th September 2015.
Goal: to understand carbon dynamics in montane forest regions by developing new methods for estimating carbon exchange at local to regional scales. Activities:
biomass TO OBSERVE FOREST BIOMASS
Ken Jucks and Diane Wickland Carbon Monitoring System: Welcome from NASA HQ November 12, 2014.
The GLOBE-Carbon Cycle project joins NASA carbon cycle science with the International GLOBE Education program to bring the most cutting edge research and.
1 - What are the local, regional, and continental-scale exchanges of carbon, nitrogen, and reactive species? What are their relationships to underlying.
Land Surface Imaging VC: Terms of Reference Julio Dalge, P.G. Diwakar, John Faundeen INPE ISRO USGS CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA March 12,
The ESA call for the 9 th Earth Explorer mission (EE9)
Using inventory data as a proxy de delimit forest degradation Joint GFOI/GOFC-GOLD Expert Workshop 2: Approaches to monitoring forest degradation for REDD+
Figure 10. Improvement in landscape resolution that the new 250-meter MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) measurement of gross primary.
The 4th Mission – The need for a global plot based biomass reference
Database management system Data analytics system:
LSI-Related Activities
Contact: Tel.: Exploring the influence of canopy structure on the link between canopy nitrogen concentration.
The ESA BIOMASS and “4th”missions: relation to GFOI
WMO Space Programme Update
EWV and Observations WG 3
Semi-arid Ecosystem Plant Functional Type and LAI from Small Footprint Waveform Lidar Nayani Ilangakoon, Nancy F. Glenn, Lucas.
Albrecht von Bargen, Chair CEOS WGCV DLR Agenda Item # 6 GSICS-EP 17
WGCV Work Plan Actions K. . Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 43
SAR-related ARD activities
Space Task Group of the IPY Sub-Committee on Observations SAR Workshop
Carbon Actions for WGCV
SnowEx: a NASA airborne campaign leading to a snow satellite mission
National REMOTE SENSING Validation Workshop
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
Recent activities of OCR-VC
LSI-VC Work Plan Updates
Sierra Nevada Research Institute UC Merced
WGCapD Perspectives of Work Plan –
WGISS Connected Data Assets Oct 24, 2018 Yonsook Enloe
SAR Subgroup Report Bruce Chapman (NASA-JPL) CEOS – WGCV Plenary #44
Recent activities of the OSVW-VC
Recent activities of the OSVW-VC
Freshwater from Space Discussion -Next Steps
WG Calibration and Validation
Forest & Biomass (inc GFOI)
Presentation transcript:

Preparing for the Production of Essential Climate Variables (ECVs) for Biomass from Future Spaceborne Remote Sensing Missions: Is There A Role for CEOS-Carbon? Hank Margolis, Eric Kasischke, NASA HQ Sassan Saatchi, Natascha Stavros, NASA JPL

There Are Several Planned Biomass Missions and All of Them Have a Common Objective Quantify the role of terrestrial biomass in the terrestrial carbon sink to constrain climate and Earth system modeling and improve understanding of changes through time. How much and where are terrestrial carbon sinks? How do forest structure and disturbance regimes at large scales affect the carbon balance and forest resilience?

Woody vegetation structure and biomass information from spaceborne remote sensing Canopy Height Lidar PolInSAR (polarimetric InSAR) Interferometric SAR (single polarization) – requires bare earth DEM 3-D Canopy Structure (stand density, canopy layers) Lidar – RH measures SAR Tomography (Bistatic SAR, Repeat pass InSAR) Biomass Correlation with SAR backscatter Correlation with Lidar RH measures Correlation with canopy height (InSAR, PolInSAR) Correlation with canopy structure (SAR tomography)

A Unique Opportunity: Eight Spaceborne Biomass Missions

Challenges for Mapping Biomass and Vegetation Structure from Space For each mission, study sites are needed across ecosystem types that have the range of biomass levels required for the development, calibration, and validation of robust algorithms Airborne and spaceborne data need to be collected over these sites Additional data are needed from these sites include: Biomass and vegetation structure data Measurement of soil and canopy moisture Tower-based microwave data

Synergistic Forest Observations NISAR: Global Coverage, sensitivity to AGB < 100 Mg/ha BIOMASS: Tropical and East Eurasia Coverage, Sensitivity to AGB > 50 Mg/ha GEDI: Sampling between 50 deg North and South, Sensitivity to AGB > 20 Mg/ha AGB (50% area) GEDI Coverage > 100 Mg/ha < 100 Mg/ha < 20 Mg/ha BIOMASS Coverage No Woody Biomass

Need to Develop Partnerships for Establishment of Cal/Val Sites for Spaceborne Biomass Missions Develop a coordinated plan to establish cal/val sites that can be used by all biomass missions This planning process was initiated at a workshop at the Smithsonian Institute in June 2016 Organize joint field campaigns for the collection of field and remote sensing data that can be used for development of biomass/vegetation structure algorithms AfriSAR (February 2016) ABoVE (Summer 2017) Semi-Arid Tropics (???) Carry out research and organize workshops to explore synergistic use of multi-sensor data for mapping biomass and vegetation structure

NASA-ESA-Smithsonian Biomass Workshop Synergism and Calibration/Validation of Upcoming Missions on Global Aboveground Forest Structure and Biomass Objective: To find synergy across the biomass communities’ objectives and develop a synthesized calibration/validation strategy for meeting these common objectives 51 participants representing biomass community: The first “mission” National Inventories Research Plots (e.g., RAINFOR) Large Plots (e.g., CTFS-ForestGEO) Airborne LiDAR Ecosystem Modelers Satellite Missions: GEDI (LiDAR) BIOMASS (p-band SAR) NISAR (l-band SAR)

Near-Term Deliverables Recommended Actions Need to identify people who have the mandate to coordinate across missions; Develop network-level agreements for data sharing rather than each mission making agreements with each individual project Meetings to check the status of cal/val as the missions progress Coordinated supersite selection and data collection using all remote sensing techniques Develop a common data portal or network of data portals to archive and distribute biomass data Near-Term Deliverables Report on the synergy of cal/val objectives across satellite missions Report on the detailed suggested approach for selecting key locations globally and what is needed at those locations Prepared by: E. Natasha Stavros (JPL, CalTech)

ABoVE Field Campaign NASA’s Terrestrial Ecology Program is working with the NISAR Science Definition Team to establish a set of biomass cal/val sites in Alaska and northwestern Canada NASA has also contacted ESA to use ABoVE for biomass algorithm activities for Biomass and SAOCOM-CS Field sites exist in the ABoVE Study Domain to provide cal/val sites across key biomass gradients Strong interest exists in the US, Canadian, and NWT Forest Services in providing cal/val sites based on existing forest inventory activities Other research sites with biomass data also exist in non-forest sites Airborne L-and P-band SAR and Lidar data will be collected in summer of 2017, and arrangements are being made to collect additional spaceborne SAR data in 2018 and 2019 Planning for this cal/val activity can be carried out by the ABoVE Science Team