Report of Achieving the Dream COOPERATIVE LEARNING

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numbers 1-20.
Advertisements

Sixteen Squared. 256 One Squared 1 Three Cubed.
Multiplication Facts 9 through x 5= 50 Number One.
We count one, two, three….
HundredsTensOnes 111 HundredsTensOnes 152 HundredsTensOnes =143.
Numbers in English By: Miss Hortencia Tijerina
Student Success Initiatives Supplemental Instruction Leaders Learning Communities Success in College and Life Course Fall 2007.
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team November 14, 2007.
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team October 10, 2007.
The Cardinal Numbers Study target
Complete College OCCC OCCC Course Success Overview Fall 2013 Highlights Office of Institutional Effectiveness February 12, 2014 Presentation By: Matt Eastwood.
An Analysis of Successful Online Behaviors Across Disciplines Catherine Finnegan, University System of Georgia Libby V. Morris, University of Georgia Kangjoo.
Numbers ZERO 0 ONE 1 TWO 2 THREE 3 FOUR 4 FIVE 5.
Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why study operations management? Operations management deals with the logistics, techniques, and methods needed to achieve management.
Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why study finance? Finance prepares students for financial management careers in business, banking, insurance, and securities.
Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why study accounting? Demand for Professional Accounting graduates remains high across the United States. The accounting major.
Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why study human resource management? Because an organization’s strength lies in its people, human resource management is a vital.
Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why study finance? Finance prepares students for financial management careers in business, banking, insurance, and securities.
Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why study operations management? Operations management deals with the logistics, techniques, and methods needed to achieve management.
Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why study International Business? The International Business major is for students with career objectives in the management of.
Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why study Business and Marketing Education? This degree leads to a Washington State teaching license in secondary education.
Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why study operations management? Operations management deals with the logistics, techniques, and methods needed to achieve management.
Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why study management information systems? Information systems support business operations and decision making. Today, driven.
Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why study finance? Finance prepares students for financial management careers in business, banking, insurance, and securities.
Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why Study Chemistry? Students majoring in chemistry have the opportunity to engage in research projects with department faculty.
Haverford Online Course Guide
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team
Major Academic Plan (MAP)
Major Academic Plan (MAP)
Major Academic Plan (MAP)
Major Academic Plan (MAP)
Place Value II By Monica Yuskaitis.
1 - one 2 - two 3 - three 4 - four 5 - five 6 - six 7 - seven
Numbers Let's recap !.
Major Academic Plan (MAP)
Place Value II.
What time is it? or What’s the time?.
We count one, two, three….
7B Unit 1 Grammar B Cardinal numbers(基数词)
Major Academic Plan (MAP)
Major Academic Plan (MAP)
Look at the clock. Thirteen One Fourteen Two Fifteen Three Sixteen
May 25, Week Thirty-Two May 18, Week Thirty-One.
Counting Chart: Numbers 1 to 100
1 ONE 2 TWO.
Eustis High School Course Progression and Sequencing
Major Academic Plan (MAP)
Major Academic Plan (MAP)
twenty-eight hundredths? Who has one hundred five and four tenths?
Major Academic Plan (MAP)
Thirty-six eighty thirty fifteen ten seventeen Forty-seven Forty-one
Numbers
September 14, Week Two September 7, Week One.
Numbers and Number Names 0-20
Major Academic Plan (MAP)
Look at the clock. Thirteen One Fourteen Two Fifteen Three Sixteen
Advanced Academics Parent information meeting
HOW OLD ARE THEY? LET’S PLAY.
Eustis High School Course Progression and Sequencing
STRIKE THE NUMBER! PLAY.
MATHS TIME! nine ten eleven fifteen eight
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team
Department of Biological Sciences.
September 14, Week Two September 7, Week One.
AtD Cooperative Learning Initiative Student and Faculty Survey Results
HOW OLD ARE THEY? LET’S PLAY.
Odd and Even Numbers.
Presentation transcript:

Report of Achieving the Dream COOPERATIVE LEARNING April 20, 2011

Cooperative Learning Cadres ** Planned Workshops & Projected Numbers

Total Number of Cooperative Learning Instructors * Planned & Projected Participant Numbers

AtD Cooperative Learning – Fall 2010 Twenty-nine faculty used cooperative learning in one or more courses and 115 sections during Fall 2010. This is slightly more than 5% of the total sections. 2,347 students in fifty courses participated in a cooperative learning environment, which is approximately 16% of our Fall 2010 headcount. Forty-five faculty are currently using cooperative learning in 140 sections of Spring 2011

AtD Cooperative Learning - Courses Arts and Humanities ART Multimedia COM Effective Reading ENGL Multicultural English Comp I English Composition I Multicultural English Comp II Report Writing HUM Comparative Religion History of Science Advocates of Peace JB 1133 News Writing I

AtD Cooperative Learning - Courses Arts and Humanities LS College Writing I / II Study Skills College Reading I / II PHIL Introduction to Logic SCL 1001 Success in College and Life TA Shakespeare In Production Introduction to Theatre Acting I

AtD Cooperative Learning - Courses Business AOT 2443 Administrative Office Procedure Automated Records Management BUS Business Statistics Business Communications ECON Principles of Macroeconomics / Microeconomics

AtD Cooperative Learning - Courses Information Technology CAT Evolution of Video Game Technique Principles of Animation CS Beginning Programming Multimedia Web Animation Network Security

AtD Cooperative Learning - Courses Science and Math BIO Microbiology CHEM 1123 Principles of Chemistry MATH College Prep Math I / II / III College Algebra Pre-Cal/Analytic Geometry Calc & Analytic Geometry Intro to Ord Diff Equ

AtD Cooperative Learning - Courses Social Sciences GEOG 2603 World Regional Geography HIST U.S. History to the Civil War U.S. History Since the Civil War Survey American Families/Communities Historical Research, Methods/Writing POLSC Introduction to Law PSY Developmental Psychology

AtD Cooperative Learning – Fall 2010 Course Success by Instructor Comparing courses that were taught using cooperative learning in Fall 2010 to courses taught by the same instructor in Fall 2009 not using cooperative learning: Six courses did not have previous same course data for the instructor Three of the comparisons used a Spring 2010 course for comparison since Fall 2010 did not contain same course data for the instructor

AtD Cooperative Learning – Fall 2010 Course Success by Instructor Eight of the twenty-one courses with comparative data showed an increase when taught with cooperative learning Six showed a 5 percentage point or higher increase Thirteen of the twenty-one did not show an improvement Nine showed a five percentage point or more decrease

AtD Cooperative Learning Course Success Comparing sections that were taught in Fall 2010 using cooperative learning to sections within the same course that did not use it, the following findings were noted: Seventeen of the courses did not have any previous data with which to compare. Twenty-one of the remaining thirty-three courses that did have comparison sections showed an increase in course success Sixteen of these showed a five percentage point or higher increase

AtD Cooperative Learning Course Success Twelve of the thirty-three courses showed a decrease in course success Nine of these showed a five percentage point or more decrease

AtD Cooperative Learning Course Success

AtD Cooperative Learning Persistence Rate Persistence rates of students attending Fall 2010 sections that used the cooperative learning compared to persistence rates of students attending sections of the same course that did not use cooperative learning: Seventeen courses had no comparison data In nineteen of the thirty-three courses, students persisted at a higher rate in the cooperative learning sections In eleven courses, there was a gap of five percentage points or more

AtD Cooperative Learning Persistence Rate In fourteen of the thirty-three courses, students persisted at a lower rate in the cooperative learning sections In nine courses, there was a gap of five percentage points or more Overall, students attending Fall 2010 sections that used cooperative learning persisted at two percentage points higher than those students attending sections of the same courses that did not use cooperative learning 70.8% vs 68.8%

Student Survey Survey instrument used a sample of the Johnson brothers questions. Number Responding Semester Fall 2009 Spring 2010 Fall 2010 # Responding 82 625 701 % Responding 22% 55% 30% Roughly 380 students total 19 classes x 20 students per class

Student Survey 21 questions Scale 5 Completely true 4 True much of the time 3 Sometimes true and sometimes false 2 False much of the time 1 Completely false Results are divided into three components Top five responses Bottom five responses Three items had low ratings but were positive

Student Survey Top Five Rated Items 5 Completely true, 4 True much of the time, 3 Sometimes true and sometimes false, 2 False much of the time, 1 Completely false

Student Survey Bottom Five Rated Items 5 Completely true, 4 True much of the time, 3 Sometimes true and sometimes false, 2 False much of the time, 1 Completely false

Student Survey Low Rated But Positive Three questions require low ratings to be positive including the following: 5 Completely true, 4 True much of the time, 3 Sometimes true and sometimes false, 2 False much of the time, 1 Completely false

Faculty Survey 47 questions divided into 15 sections. General rating scale of 1 to 5 5 Almost always 3 Sometimes 1 Almost never

Faculty Survey – Overall Satisfaction

Faculty Survey – Group Sizes

Faculty Survey – Time on Cooperative Learning

Faculty Survey – Top 6 Based on Point Difference 5 Almost Always, 3 Sometimes and 1 Almost Never

Faculty Survey – Bottom 6 Based on Point Difference 5 Almost Always, 3 Sometimes and 1 Almost Never

Faculty Survey – Expected Low Ratings As an instructor, I assigned students of the same ability to a group. 1.88 in Fall 2009 compared to 1.31 in Fall 2010 Norm-referenced evaluation system where individual students’ performance was compared to the performance of other students. 1.13 in Fall 2009 compared to 1.21 in Fall 2010 Students competed within the group to do the most work. 1.06 in both Fall 2009 and Fall 2010 Students made little attempt to reach consensus and turned in separate answers. 2.25 in Fall 2009 and 1.67 in Fall 2010. Class did not allow time for groups to process. 2.18 in Fall 2009 and 3.21 in Fall 2010. 5 Almost always, 3 Sometimes, 1 Almost never

Summary Student Survey Faculty Survey Students believed that their teachers wanted them to succeed. Students appear to need a better understanding of the benefits of group work. Faculty Survey Although faculty are spending less time in the classroom devoted to cooperative learning, their level of satisfaction is high. Social skills received a greater emphasis in the most recent class.