Strawman A Status Report

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
Advertisements

Beam-plug under M2 and HCAL shielding studies Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt October 9,
1 Geometry layout studies of the RICH detector in the CBM experiment Elena Belolaptikova Dr. Claudia Hoehne Moscow State Institute of Radioengineering,
1 CMS Tracker Alignment and Implications for Physics Performance Nhan Tran Johns Hopkins University CMS Collaboration SPLIT
Performance of ATLAS & CMS Silicon Tracker Alessia Tricomi University and INFN Catania International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics EPS.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
Si VTX Workshop Y. Akiba. Agenda and goals Goal A PAC Proposal 9:00 - 9:30Physics with vtx, PAC+DOE proposal overviews, what needs to go in,
SLHC Pixel Layout Studies S. Dardin, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman LBNL November 4, 2008.
Simulation issue Y. Akiba. Main goals stated in LOI Measurement of charm and beauty using DCA in barrel –c  e + X –D  K , K , etc –b  e + X –B 
CMS Upgrade Workshop, November 2008 H. W. K. Cheung (FNAL) 1 Simulation WG Summary There was no actual separate Simulation Working Group/sessions.
SLHC SG: ATLAS Pixel G. Darbo - INFN / Genova SLHC SG, July 2004 ATLAS Pixel at SLHC G. Darbo - INFN / Genova Talk overview: A table with different High.
Pixel Upgrade Workshop Grindelwald, August 29 th 2012 PERFORMANCE AND PHYSICS RESULTS FOR PHASE1 UPGRADE Alessia Tricomi (University and INFN Catania)
CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 1 The CMS Simulation Validation Suite V. Daniel Elvira (Fermilab) for the CMS Collaboration.
ACFA-7; Taipei, Nov 2004 H.Weerts status Si licon D etector Status H.Weerts Fermilab/Michigan State Univ. (Progress on Si-tracker layout)
Operation of the CMS Tracker at the Large Hadron Collider
Simulation of the 4 Layer Pixel Upgrade System (Fermilab) (For the Tracker Upgrade Simulations Group) Simulation of the 4 Layer Pixel Upgrade System Harry.
Thin Silicon R&D for LC applications D. Bortoletto Purdue University Status report Hybrid Pixel Detectors for LC.
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
Overview of a Plan for Simulating a Tracking Trigger (Fermilab) Overview of a Plan for Simulating a Tracking Trigger Harry Cheung (Fermilab)
ATLAS Trigger Development
Plans to study the Readout design in the forward region June 12 th 2007 Hans Wenzel  Currently: one big sensitive silicon disks: we record the Geant 4.
Upgrade Software University and INFN Catania Upgrade Software Alessia Tricomi University and INFN Catania CMS Trigger Workshop CERN, 23 July 2009.
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
Software Tools for Layout Optimization (Fermilab) Software Tools for Layout Optimization Harry Cheung (Fermilab) For the Tracker Upgrade Simulations Working.
Ideas for Super LHC tracking upgrades 3/11/04 Marc Weber We have been thinking and meeting to discuss SLHC tracking R&D for a while… Agenda  Introduction:
CMS Upgrade Workshop - Fermilab Trigger Studies Using Stacked Pixel Layers Mark Pesaresi
The SLHC CMS L1 Pixel Trigger & Detector Layout Wu, Jinyuan Fermilab April 2006.
Leonardo Rossi INFN Genova - UTOPIA #12 0 What we have learned from UTOPIA so far? Defined a set of gauge histos to compare layouts Exercised on barrel-part.
8/12/2010Dominik Dannheim, Lucie Linssen1 Conceptual layout drawings of the CLIC vertex detector and First engineering studies of a pixel access/insertion.
RD program on hybrids & Interconnects Background & motivation At sLHC the luminosity will increase by a factor 10 The physics requirement on the tracker.
CMS Tracker Upgrade programme Thanks to many CMS Tracker collaborators, past and present, too numerous to acknowledge individually Tracker web pages
CMS TRACKER VISUALISATION TOOLS M.S. MENNEA, a G. ZITO, a A. REGANO a AND I. OSBORNE b a Dipartimento Interateneo di fisica di Bari & INFN sezione di Bari,
Eunil Won/Korea U1 A study of configuration for silicon based Intermediate Trackers (IT) July Eunil Won Korea University.
RD07, June Firenze Alignment Strategy for the CMS Silicon Tracker Marco Rovere 1 for the CMS Collaboration 1 Università di Milano-Bicocca & INFN.
Goals and requirements 1 st flexible geometry version Next geometry version development Conclusions and outlook A realistic and flexible VTX geometry in.
Pixel Phase 1 Physics/Simulations (Fermilab) for the Tracker Upgrade Simulations Group Pixel Phase 1 Physics/Simulations Harry Cheung (Fermilab) for the.
Pixel Phase 1 Upgrade Simulation: Technical Status and Plans (Fermilab) (For the Tracker Upgrade Simulations Group) Pixel Phase 1 Upgrade Simulation: Technical.
Ftksim at high luminosity Monthly meeting September 22, 2008 Anton Kapliy.
Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC
Material Budget Plots and Debugging Tools
CMS Phase 2 Tracker R&D R. Lipton 2/27/2014
Mike Hildreth – XC Meeting
Alignment of the CMS Tracker
Tracking detectors/2 F.Riggi.
Scope R&D Participants/Infrastructure
Alpine, very forward, EOS…
L2 Muon Trigger Study Status Report
Some input to the discussion for the design requirements of the GridPixel Tracker and L1thack trigger. Here are some thoughts about possible detector layout.
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Tracker Upgrade Simulation Task List Harry Cheung (Fermilab), Alessia Tricomi (Catania)
Tracker Upgrade Simulations Software Harry Cheung (Fermilab)
ICHEP02 Chris Parkes ALICE m2 Pixels+Drift+Strips LHCb m2
First Level Trigger using Associative Memories for CMS at Super-LHC
Electronics system overview from TKlayout
Upgrade Tracker Simulation Studies
Studies for Phase-II Muon Detector (|η| = ) – Plans
for the transition region on behalf of the RPC upgrade group
Status of Full Simulation for Muon Trigger at SLHC
IDEA Detector Simulation Status
TPC status - Offline Q&A
SIT AND FTD DESIGN FOR ILD
CMS Tracker Alignment with Cosmic Data and Strategy at the Startup
Design and fabrication of Endcap prototype sensors (petalet)
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
The LHC collider in Geneva
Radiation Backgrounds in the ATLAS New Small Wheel
Measuring plane efficiencies
Low Level HLT Reconstruction Software for the CMS SST
Performance of ATLAS & CMS Silicon Tracker
TIB contribution for the X5 - May 2003 Test Beam
Presentation transcript:

Strawman A Status Report Strawman A realistic geometry Tests on Strawman A Comments on Task list C. Civinini INFN – Firenze A. Tricomi, M. Galanti Universita’ and INFN - Catania

SLHC Simulation Meeting Strawman A Strawman A is now ‘partially’ on CVS: for instructions https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/ExampleStrawmanA (thanks to Harry) This can be considered as a production version for SLHC studies  no crashes reported so far Implemented on CMSSW_1_8_4 Digi configurability (thanks Mike) Not only xml geometry files but also modifications to the code to make it compatible with the new layout Caveat: It is a starting point A family of strawmen A can be produced varying some parameters Strawman A geometry is quite redundant it can be reduced eliminating some layers  realistic Strawman 07/10/2008 C. Civinini SLHC Simulation Meeting

Strawman A (R-Phi view) 6 ministrip layers 2 trigger doublets 4 pixel layers 07/10/2008 C. Civinini SLHC Simulation Meeting

SLHC Simulation Meeting Strawman A (R-Z view) 07/10/2008 C. Civinini SLHC Simulation Meeting

Towards a realistic ‘strawman A’ Strawman A has a number of channels (mainly pixels from trigger layers) which is too high to be considered affordable Tables from SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Geometry/test/trackerModuleInfo_StrawmanA.cfg Strawman A Active Surface [cm2] # ROCs # channels # modules Barrel - Pixels (PXB) 251522.3 79552 330936320 24240 Endcap - Pixels (PXF) 2834.4 4320 17971200 672 Barrel - Strips (TIB + TOB) 616886.2 85968 11003904 18132 Endcap - Strips (TID + TEC) 902046.7 34624 4431872 7216 x 7 x 2.2 Original Geometry Active Surface [cm2] # ROCs # channels # modules Barrel - Pixels (PXB) 7558.26 11520 47923200 768 Endcap - Pixels (PXF) 2834.36 4320 17971200 672 Barrel - Strips (TIB + TOB) 1103896.7 38160 4884480 7932 Endcap - Strips (TID + TEC) 902046.7 34624 4431872 7216 07/10/2008 C. Civinini SLHC Simulation Meeting

Layout modifications - Steps Reduce trigger doublets radii: (done) 1-2: 30cm  25cm 3-4: 70cm  55cm Reduce mini-strip layers: 64: (done) One less in the TIB region (TIB3) One less in the TOB region (TOB4) Remove outer trigger doublet: (done) No more strixel 3 and 4 Insert (again) TOB stereo layers: (done) TOB 1 and 2 with standard strip length (no mini-strip) Introduce material budget reduction in the pixel system: (to be done) Already done without volume changes (material reweigthing) for phase 1 studies Mini-strips in TOB stereo layers (to be done) Add a third Pixel disk (to be done) Each step will have its own geometry set saved in CVS 07/10/2008 C. Civinini SLHC Simulation Meeting

Step 1: doublets at minimum radii Saves 10% of pixel channels (pitches unchanged) Big saves if Strixels longitudinal size is reduced. This configuration can also be used to study the effect of doublets radius on Trigger. 07/10/2008 C. Civinini SLHC Simulation Meeting

Step 2: TIB3 and TOB4 removed Working version But can be used to study the effect of strip Layers reduction on tracking performance 07/10/2008 C. Civinini SLHC Simulation Meeting

Step 3: strixel 3 and 4 removed Working version: Same comment as before 07/10/2008 C. Civinini SLHC Simulation Meeting

Step 4: TOB1 and TOB2 reinserted Stereo TOB layers build with long strips (no mini-strips) -50% pixel ch. -20% strip ch. with respect to Strawman A 07/10/2008 C. Civinini SLHC Simulation Meeting

SLHC Simulation Meeting StrawmanA Vs Step 4 Full geometry table in: http://hep.fi.infn.it/CIVININI/slhc/GeometryTable.xls Strawman A Active Surface [cm2] # ROCs # channels # modules Barrel - Pixels (PXB) 251522.3 79552 330936320 24240 Endcap - Pixels (PXF) 2834.4 4320 17971200 672 Barrel - Strips (TIB + TOB) 616886.2 85968 11003904 18132 Endcap - Strips (TID + TEC) 902046.7 34624 4431872 7216 Realistic Strawman A Active Surface [cm2] # ROCs # channels # modules Barrel - Pixels (PXB) 58030.73 41408 172257280 5680 Endcap - Pixels (PXF) 2834.36 4320 17971200 672 Barrel - Strips (TIB + TOB) 829242.6 72288 9252864 14712 Endcap - Strips (TID + TEC) 902046.7 34624 4431872 7216 07/10/2008 C. Civinini SLHC Simulation Meeting

SLHC Simulation Meeting Next steps Reduce the inner pixel material budget CO2 cooling Part of the read-out electronics moved at high h Third forward pixel disk Stereo TOB layers with mini-strips 07/10/2008 C. Civinini SLHC Simulation Meeting

Layout proposed by Geoff Longer barrel layers to match PT layers, at present locations Remaining end caps with present locations Stereo layers Stereo rings PT layers to cover full h range h = 2.5 Pixels: 4 barrel layers + increased size Endcap could be 3 disks/endcap? G. Hall 07/10/2008 C. Civinini SLHC Simulation Meeting July 2008 G Hall 13

Studies using Strawman A geometry Tracking performances with pileup (standard multitrack validator): Fast simulation done (L up to 1035 cm-2 s-1 easy to run)  results not too much significant, performance quite independent on pileup and geometries Fast sim + digi + std reco to be done faster than full sim Full sim + digi + std reco to be done (L as high as possible, limitations expected from CPU time and memory problems), needs one pileup set for each different geometry; performance for single particle tracking not significant Occupancy: Fast and Full simulation to be done  comparison and high luminosity estimations – intermediate results of previous points 07/10/2008 C. Civinini SLHC Simulation Meeting

Comments on the Task list Point 1 (trigger studies) Strawman A can be used Doublets parameters can be changed (strixel dimensions, doublets radii, doublets Dr) One or two doublets Point 2 (4th pixel layer) Strawman A (modified) 4 pix + 2 strix (present strawman A) 3 pix + 2 closer strix (step 1) 5 pix and no strip (not implemented) Point 3 (Strawman A tracking performance) Realistic strawman A Occupancy and tracking performance (see previous slide) 07/10/2008 C. Civinini SLHC Simulation Meeting