Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prediction of Short Term Soil Losses P.I.A. KinnellUniversity of Canberra.
Advertisements

Soil Erosion Estimation TSM 352 Land and Water Management Systems.
Flood and Runoff estimation methods
Transport of nitrogen and phosphorus from Rhode River watersheds during storm events David Correll, Thomas Jordan, and Donald Weller Water Resources Research,
©2003 Institute of Water Research, all rights reserved Water Quality Modeling for Ecological Services under Cropping and Grazing Systems Da Ouyang Jon.
An open source version of the Nonpoint-Source Pollution and Erosion Comparison Tool Climate Tools Café Webinar Dave Eslinger, Ph.D. 3 May, 2012.
Developing a GIS-Based Soil Erosion Potential Model for the Jemez Watershed – Using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) Josh Page CE 547 –
Module 2: Erosion Fundamentals. n Identify different types of water erosion n Identify different types of water pollution n Understand soil susceptibility.
Bringing Marginal Land Into Production Don Day Extension Associate - Energy.
1 Determining Peak Flows. 2 Several Methods Statistical Analysis of Streamflow Records Transfer Methods (using gaged data to estimate an ungaged location)
CHARACTERISTICS OF RUNOFF
Runoff Processes Daene C. McKinney
Soil Conservation Service Runoff Equation
DETERMINING LAND DEVELOPMENT EFFECT ON SURFACE RUNOFF USING GIS.
NUTRIENT RUNOFF EFFECTS ON JORDAN LAKE Brianna Young, Jennifer Jackson and Emily Nurminen.
Runoff Estimation, and Surface Erosion and Control Ali Fares, PhD NREM 600, Evaluation of Natural Resources Management.
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Department Hydrology 101 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering.
Erosion Control Short Course Monday, April 23, 2012 San Luis Obispo City/County Library Ron Harben, Project Director California Association of Resource.
Excess Rainfall Reading for today’s material: Sections Slides prepared by V.M. Merwade Quote for today (contributed by Tyler Jantzen) "How many.
Infiltration Infiltration is the process by which water penetrates from ground surface into the soil. Infiltration rate is governed by: rainfall rate hydraulic.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Rainfall-runoff modeling ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Erosion and sediment transport ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Surface Drainage CE 453 Lecture 25.
Factors that Influence Erosion
What makes the The Universal Soil Loss Equation Go ?
Soil Erosion: Causes, Control & Estimation AGME Fundamentals of Agricultural Systems Technology Photos courtesy of NRCS of USDA.
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
RAINFALL AND RUNOFF IN RELATION TO EROSION Introduction Rainfall & runoff relationships relevant for design of: terraces water harvesting interception.
Bacteria Loadings Watershed Model Copano Bay watershed Copano Bay watershed Copano Bay Carrie Gibson CE 394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology Spring Semester.
NATHAN FOSTER WARM SEASON WORKSHOP 5/2/12 The Flash Flood Potential Index (FFPI) Project at BTV.
1 Universal Soil Loss Equation Environmental Applications of GIS
Sediment Retention model
Level IB: Advanced Fundamentals Seminar
Urban Storm Drain Design: Rainfall-Runoff relations.
PREDICTION OF SOIL LOSSES. EMPIRICAL WATER EROSION FORMULAS A= k s 0,75 L 1,5 I 1,5 (Kornev,1937) A= k s 1,49 L 1,6 (Zingg,1940) A= k s 0,8 p I 1,2 (Neal,1938)
Modeling experience of non- point pollution: CREAMS (R. Tumas) EPIC (A. Povilaitis and R.Tumas SWRRBWQ (A. Dumbrauskas and R. Tumas) AGNPS (Sileika and.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Implementation of the U.S. Geological Survey’s StreamStats Program in Kansas— A Web Application.
CE 513. Erosion in the Fall Creek Watershed Rick Faber.
Universal Soil Loss Equation
Lab 13 - Predicting Discharge and Soil Erosion Estimating Runoff Depth using the Curve Number method –Land use or cover type –Hydrologic condition –Soil.
Lab 13 - Predicting Discharge and Soil Erosion Estimating Runoff Depth using the Curve Number method –Land use or cover type –Hydrologic condition –Soil.
Surface hydrology The primary purpose of the WEPP surface hydrology component is to provide the erosion component with the duration of rainfall excess,
Using GIS and the PSIAC Method to Predict Watershed Sediment Yield Rates Eric Berntsen.
Introduction to Spatial Calculation Estimation of Areas Susceptible to Flood and Soil Loss.
Watershed Experiments Lab 3. Watersheds Several different designs –Single watershed (data for modeling) –Nested (evaluate accumulated effects) –Paired.
What is Erosion and Sedimentation ? Bill Laflamme CPESC, Office of the Commissioner MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Protecting Maine’s Air,
Surface Water Surface runoff - Precipitation or snowmelt which moves across the land surface ultimately channelizing into streams or rivers or discharging.
HYDROGRAPH is a graph showing the rate of flow (discharge) versus time past a specific point in a river, or other channel or conduit carrying flow. It.
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 4
SOIL EROSION ASSESSMENT Measurement of Water Erosion Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) - predict annual soil loss by water – Wischmeier and Mannering,
Excess Rainfall and Direct Runoff
HYDROLOGY Lecture 10 Unit Hydrograph
Estimating Annual Sediment Yield and a Sediment Delivery Ratio for Red Creek, Utah and Wyoming Paul Grams Department of Geography and Earth Resources.
Potential Pollutants Sediment Chemical N, P, Pesticides, Oil & Grease
Construction Analysis Hydrographs
Infiltration and unsaturated flow (Mays p )
What is water Erosion..
Basic Hydrology: Rainfall-runoff based methods – II
Cristina Nelson, Term Project, CEE 6440, Fall 2007
Infiltration and unsaturated flow (Mays p )
Nutrient Runoff Effects on Jordan Lake
Soil Loss Estimation. USLE – Universal Soil Loss Equation SLEMSA – Soil Loss Estimation Model for Southern Africa.
Infiltration Indexes 1-6-Infiltration-2
Where Does Storm Water Go?
GIS Aspect We used GIS to extract the watershed basin we were going to focus on so that we could obtain the NLCD landcover data for the catchments the.
Storm Water Runoff Storm Water Runoff
Determining Peak Flows
Preciptation.
WRE-1 BY MOHD ABDUL AQUIL CIVIL ENGINEERING.
Presentation transcript:

http://seamless.usgs.gov/ http://nhd.usgs.gov/

Terrain Preprocessing (Arc Hydro) Surface Analysis (Spatial Analyst)

Terrain Analysis (TauDEM) Terrain Preprocessing (Arc Hydro)

Problems Fire Snowmelt Large Rainstorms

http://www.utahfireinfo.gov/firephotos/index.htm

Roads

Roads Sediment is the number one pollutant in U.S. waterways.

Roads in Farmington Canyon

Past Debris Flows Sources: Http://www.geohazards.cr.usgs.gov/factsheets/html_files/debrisflow/fs176.97.html Http:/www.ugs.state.ut.us/online/pi-70/debrisflow.htm

PSIAC Method Pacific Southwest Inter Agency Committee (1968) Annual Yield = .0833 e ^ (.0359 * FR) FR = Sediment Rating Factor = sum of (9) different factors.

Ys=a*[Q*qp]β*K*LS*CP*S MUSLE Equation Ys=a*[Q*qp]β*K*LS*CP*S

Ys – Total Tons per Event Q – Storm Runoff (acre-ft) qp – peak runoff (cfs)

a,β – storm factors Typical Rain Storm a=95 β=.56 Snow Melt Flood β=.3

K – Soil Erodibility Factor LS – Slope Factor (length and steepness) CP – Cover and Management Practice Factor SDR – Sediment Delivery Ratio

gs=a[Q*qp]^b*K*LS*CP*SDR Q = Storm Runoff (acre-ft) qp= Peak runoff (cfs) a = 95 b= .56

Q=CIA Q=Runoff C=Runoff Coefficient I=Intensity of rainfall (assume 1 in/hr) A=Area of Catchment

C=.17

C=.3

q= Accumulation of Catchment Accumulation of Basin * Peak Flow

Accumulation of Each Catchment

Peak Flow For Farmington Canyon

K Factor

K Factor http://www.iwr.msu.edu/rusle/kfactor.htm K factor is soil erodibility factor which represents both susceptibility of soil to erosion and the rate of runoff, as measured under the standard unit plot condition. Soils high in clay have low K values, about 0.05 to 0.15, because they resistant to detachment. Coarse textured soils, such as sandy soils, have low K values, about 0.05 to 0.2, because of low runoff even though these soils are easily detached. Medium textured soils, such as the silt loam soils, have a moderate K values, about 0.25 to 0.4, because they are moderately susceptible to detachment and they produce moderate runoff. Soils having a high silt content are most erodible of all soils. They are easily detached; tend to crust and produce high rates of runoff. Values of K for these soils tend to be greater than 0.4. http://www.iwr.msu.edu/rusle/kfactor.htm

SSURGO No Data Found

STATSGO No Data Found

Soil Distribution

Soil Distribution (cont.)

Soil Distribution (cont.)

Soil Distribution (cont.)

Calculated K Factor Sample # 1 2 3 4 5 K(chart) 0.08 0.09 Sample # 6 7 %<.1 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.7 .1>%>2 59.4 62.1 44.2 41.4 60.3 %OM Structure Permeability K(chart) 0.08 0.09 Sample # 6 7 8 9 10 %<.1 0.7 1.0 2.4 0.9 .1>%>2 51.1 41.5 63.2 53.2 94.6 %OM 4 2 Structure 3 Permeability K(chart) .08 0.09 0.08 0.15 0.06 Sample # 11 12 13 14 15 %<.1 1.1 0.8 0.6 1.3 0.9 .1>%>2 76.7 77.0 65.1 60.6 26.2 %OM 4 Structure 3 Permeability 2 K(chart) 0.07 0.08

The Value of Cp

http://landcover.usgs.gov/classes.asp Land Cover Classes - Units in Square Miles 11 Water 12 Perennial Ice Snow 21 Low Intensity Residential 22 Hi Intensity Residential 23 Commercial/Industrial/Transportation 31 Bare Rock 32 Quarries/ Mines 33 Transitional 41 Deciduous Forest 42 Evergreen Forest 43 Mixed Forest 51 Shrub land 61 Orchards/ Vineyard 71 Grasslands/Herbaceous 81 Pasture/Hay 82 Row Crops 83 Small Grains 84 Fallow 85 Urban/Recreational Grasses 91 Woody Wetlands 92 Emergent/Herbaceous Wetlands State/Region Total http://landcover.usgs.gov/classes.asp

http://seamless.usgs.gov/ Spatial Analyst (reclassify)

Spatial Annalist (Zonal Statistics) Exporting the Data

http://landcover.usgs.gov/classes.asp Land Cover Classes - Units in Square Miles 11 Water 12 Perennial Ice Snow 21 Low Intensity Residential 22 Hi Intensity Residential 23 Commercial/Industrial/Transportation 31 Bare Rock 32 Quarries/ Mines 33 Transitional 41 Deciduous Forest 42 Evergreen Forest 43 Mixed Forest 51 Shrub land 61 Orchards/ Vineyard 71 Grasslands/Herbaceous 81 Pasture/Hay 82 Row Crops 83 Small Grains 84 Fallow 85 Urban/Recreational Grasses 91 Woody Wetlands 92 Emergent/Herbaceous Wetlands State/Region Total http://landcover.usgs.gov/classes.asp

http://moose.cee.usu.edu/giswr/archive99/termp/grams/tp.html

Sample of Excel Data GRIDID SHAPE_LENG SHAPE_AREA Area (acres) MAJORITY Type of land cover Cp Value 17 8669.994368 2187672.4 540.583454 51 Shrubland 0.06 18 8849.996172 1827676.07 451.6267805 34 5400.002074 794251.8245 196.2631126 35 6239.987362 962325.7698 237.7949223 36 4679.994859 562951.7855 139.1078576 39 4439.986671 395773.3481 97.79733175 40 3269.992293 411073.2211 101.5779975 41 5010.021296 605251.029 149.5601863 42 Evergreen Forest 0.004 43 2280.017067 171898.8484 42.47696007 44 6960.011926 928349.7853 229.3993074 21 Low Intensity Residential 0.24 45 5849.989236 488700.6879 120.7600854 Mixed Forest 47 2189.998817 88197.95131 21.79410096 49 5969.984656 857024.57 211.7745336

Canyon Vegetation

Wattles and sediment diversion and filtration techniques

Vegetation in Farmington Canyon

Catchment GridID

Cross Section Found Using 3-D Analyst

Accounts for length and Steepness of the Slopes LS Factor Accounts for length and Steepness of the Slopes

Slope of Watershed

Mean Slope of Catchments Using zonal Statistics

LS Factor LS=(l/72.6)m((430sin2θ+30sinθ+0.43)/6.613)) Where m =.5 Slope >5% l = slope length (ft) θ = slope Angle Degree

LS Factor Maximum = 185.7 Mean = 94.8 Minimum = 13.7 St. Deviation= 39.8

SDR Factor Sediment Delivery Ratio For low slope watersheds SDR=(0.001/A)0.2 Farmington Canyon is not low Slope Assumed to be 1 because all the sediment is removed from the canyon.

Assumptions for MUSLE SDR is Equal to 1 Rainfall Event 1inch rainstorm over a 6-hr period. q=1.5Q Snowmelt Flood Used Peak Flow from Flood of 1983

Assumptions Continued Collected K values represented entire watershed. LP was based on average slope that was uniform. The majority land cover represented the CP value for entire catchment.

Example Spreadsheet for MUSLE Calculation Snowmelt Flood Rainfall Event LS K CP Q q Total Sediment (acre-ft) (cfs) (tons/event) 124.5 0.09 0.06 46.06 15.23 576.19 13.51 40.88 2192.95 74.3 38.48 12.72 308.68 11.29 34.15 1069.99 143.5 0.08 16.72 5.53 321.25 4.91 14.84 722.01

Rain Event Yield

Snowmelt Flood Yield

Final Numbers Sediment yield for Snowmelt Flood 10373 tons Sediment yield for 1-inch rainstorm over 6 hour interval 8539 tons