Night-side effects on the plasma convection in the polar ionosphere due to a Sudden Impulse (SI) of solar wind dynamic pressure Coco, I.(1,2,3); Amata,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SuperDARN is a network of HF radars (8-20 MHz) used to study the convection in the Earth's ionosphere at altitudes between 90 and 400 km and at magnetic.
Advertisements

University of Bath 4D ionisation dynamics during storms of the recent solar maximum Cathryn Mitchell, Ping Yin, Paul Spencer and Dmitriy Pokhotelov, University.
Using a DPS as a Coherent Scatter HF Radar Lindsay Magnus Lee-Anne McKinnell Hermanus Magnetic Observatory Hermanus, South Africa.
Cluster, THEMIS, & Geotail Conjunction Event on 11 July 2008 Hiroshi Hasegawa ISAS/JAXA.
E. Amata M. Candidi (1), M.F. Marcucci (1), S. Massetti (1), P. Francia (3), U. Villante (3) (1) Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario (IFSI),
IMF Bx influence on the magnetotail neutral sheet geometry and dynamics E. Gordeev, M. Amosova, V. Sergeev Saint-Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg,
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
Magnetopause flow vortices revealed during high speed solar wind streams Mona Kessel (NASA GSFC), Yaireska Collado-Vega (University of Puerto Rico), Xi.
SuperDARN interhemispheric observations of reconnection signatures: a case study. Coco, I. (1), S. Massetti (1), E. Amata (1), M. F. Marcucci (1), and.
Anti-parallel versus Component Reconnection at the Magnetopause K.J. Trattner Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center Palo Alto, CA, USA and the Polar/TIMAS,
SuperDARN Workshop May 30 – June Magnetopause reconnection rate and cold plasma density: a study using SuperDARN Mark Lester 1, Adrian Grocott 1,2,
Phase Coherence on Open Field Lines Associated with FLRs Abiyu Nedie, Frances Fenrich & Robert Rankin University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 2011.
On the relationship between polar cap flows and the IMF W.A. Bristow, R.T. Parris, J. Spaleta, T. Theurer Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska.
State Key Laboratory of Space Weather An inter-hemisphere asymmetry of the cusp region against the geomagnetic dipole tilt Jiankui Shi Center for Space.
Ionospheric Electric Field Variations during Geomagnetic Storms Simulated using CMIT W. Wang 1, A. D. Richmond 1, J. Lei 1, A. G. Burns 1, M. Wiltberger.
31 May 2011SuperDARN Workshop, 29 May - 3June 2011, Hanover, US 1 Short-period Doppler shift variations in the polar cap: ULF waves or something else?
& Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of.
Tracing Geomagnetic Conjugate Points by means of Extremely Similar Interhemispheric Auroras N. Sato (1), A. Kadokura (1), Y. Ebihara (1), H. Deguchi (1),
Magnetometer and radar study of the ionospheric convection response to sudden changes in the interplanetary magnetic field R. A. D. Fiori 1,2, D. Boteler.
Case studies of coordinated THEMIS-SuperDARN observations of field line resonances Elsayed R. Talaat The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
What DMSP Data Tell us About the Thermosphere Response to Solar Wind Forcing Delores Knipp CU Aerospace Engineering Sciences and NCAR HAO With Assistance.
Radio and Space Plasma Physics Group The formation of transpolar arcs R. C. Fear and S. E. Milan University of Leicester.
SuperDARN real time products for Space Weather Ermanno Amata INAF Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario Roma ESWW5, Bruxelles, 20 November 2008.
Generation of field-aligned currents by solar wind impulse S. Fujita Meteorological College.
Van Allen Probes, NOAA, and Ground Observations of a Pc 1 Wave Event Extending 12 Hours in MLT Mark Engebretson 1, Jennifer Posch 1, John Wygant 2, Craig.
Figure 1: show a causal chain for how Joule heating occurs in the earth’s ionosphere Figure 5: Is of the same format as figure four but the left panels.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Magnetospheric ULF wave activity monitoring based on the ULF-index OLGA KOZYREVA and N. Kleimenova Institute of the Earth Physics, RAS.
1 Cambridge 2004 Wolfgang Baumjohann IWF/ÖAW Graz, Austria With help from: R. Nakamura, A. Runov, Y. Asano & V.A. Sergeev Magnetotail Transport and Substorms.
EISCAT Svalbard Radar studies of meso-scale plasma flow channels in the polar cusp ionosphere Y. Dåbakk et al.
Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations Department of Space & Climate Physics Mullard Space Science Laboratory A. P. Walsh.
A. Kullen (1), L. Rosenqvist (1), and G. Marklund (2) (1) Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala, Sweden (2) Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm,
Ground level enhancement of the solar cosmic rays on January 20, A.V. Belov (a), E.A. Eroshenko (a), H. Mavromichalaki (b), C. Plainaki(b), V.G.
PAPER I. ENA DATA ANALYSIS RESULTS. The Imager for Magnetopause-to- Aurora Global Exploration (IMAGE) missionis the first NASA Mid-size Explorer (MIDEX)
Traveling Convection Vortices in the high-latitude ionosphere: the role of the solar wind dynamic pressure Coco, I. (1*), E. Amata (1), M. F. Marcucci.
Distributed Radar Networks Ray Greenwald JHU/APL.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © Ionosphere II: Radio Waves April 19, 2012.
Response of the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere to Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Pulse KYUNG SUN PARK 1, TATSUKI OGINO 2, and DAE-YOUNG LEE 3 1 School of Space.
Cluster observations of a reconnection site at high- latitude magnetopause Y. Khotyaintsev (1), A. Vaivads (1), Y. Ogawa (1,2), M. André(1), S. Buchert(1),
University of Saskatchewan PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING PHYSICS Spectral widths of F-region PolarDARN echoes, a statistical assessment A.V. Koustov, S. Toderian.
ESS 7 Lecture 13 October 29, 2008 Substorms. Time Series of Images of the Auroral Substorm This set of images in the ultra-violet from the Polar satellite.
CEDAR 2008 Workshop Observations at the Plasmaspheric Boundary Layer with the Mid-latitude SuperDARN radars Mike Ruohoniemi, Ray Greenwald, and Jo Baker.
Ionospheric Convection during an extended period of Northward IMF
Simultaneous in-situ observations of the feature of a typical FTE by Cluster and TC1 Zhang Qinghe Liu Ruiyuan Polar Research Institute of China
Cluster and SuperDARN observations during a positive B y period D. Ambrosino, E. Amata, M.F. Marcucci, I. Coco Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario,
Ionospheric HF radars Pasha Ponomarenko. Outline Conventional radars vs ionospheric radars Collective scatter processes Aspect angle effects HF propagation.
Space Weather in Earth’s magnetosphere MODELS  DATA  TOOLS  SYSTEMS  SERVICES  INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS Space Weather Researc h Center Masha Kuznetsova.
NASA NAG Structure and Dynamics of the Near Earth Large-Scale Electric Field During Major Geomagnetic Storms P-I John R. Wygant Assoc. Professor.
Dawn-dusk asymmetry in the intensity of the polar cap flows as seen by the SuperDARN radars A.V. Koustov, R.A.D. Fiori, Z. Abooalizadeh PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING.
Magnetic reconnection in the magnetotail: Geotail observations T. Nagai Tokyo Institute of Technology World Space Environment Forum 2005 May 4, 2005 Wednesday.
New Science Opportunities with a Mid-Latitude SuperDARN Radar Raymond A. Greenwald Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
Towards an information theory approach for monitoring the ionospheric convection dynamics Towards an information theory approach for monitoring the ionospheric.
ASEN 5335 Aerospace Environments -- Magnetospheres 1 As the magnetized solar wind flows past the Earth, the plasma interacts with Earth’s magnetic field.
1 CSSAR Center for Space science and Applied Research Chinese academy of Sciences FAC in magnetotail observed by Cluster J. K. Shi (1), Z. W. Cheng (1),
Mike Ruohoniemi 2012VT SuperDARN Remote Sensing of the Ionosphere and Earth’s Surface with HF Radar J. Michael Ruohoniemi and Joseph Baker.
SuperDARN Observations of ULF Pulsations During a Substorm Expansion Phase Onset N. A. Frissell, J. B. H. Baker, J. M. Ruohoniemi, L. B. N. Clausen, R.
Effects of January 2010 stratospheric sudden warming in the low-latitude ionosphere L. Goncharenko, A. Coster, W. Rideout, MIT Haystack Observatory, USA.
VT SuperDARN Group Joseph Baker Ground-Based Observations of the Plasmapause Boundary Layer (PBL) Region with.
SuperDARN data and ionosphere modelling perspectives at IRAP
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech
Lecture 12 The Importance of Accurate Solar Wind Measurements
Disturbance Dynamo Effects in the Low Latitude Ionosphere
M. Yamauchi1, I. Dandouras2, H. Reme2,
Evidence for Dayside Interhemispheric Field-Aligned Currents During Strong IMF By Conditions Seen by SuperDARN Radars Joseph B.H. Baker, Bharat Kunduri.
CEDAR 2013 Workshop International space weather and climate observations along the 120E/60W meridional circle and its surrounding areas Space weather observations.
High-Speed Plasma Flows Observed in the Magnetotail during Geomagemtically Quiet Times: Relationship between Magnetic Reconnection, Substorm and High-Speed.
SuperDARN and SCANDI data
Determination of the Substorm Initiation Region From a Major Conjunction Interval of THEMIS Satellites A T Y Lui, V Angelopoulos, S B Mende, O LeContel,
by Andreas Keiling, Scott Thaller, John Wygant, and John Dombeck
Determination of the Substorm Initiation Region From a Major Conjunction Interval of THEMIS Satellites A T Y Lui, V Angelopoulos, S B Mende, O LeContel,
Presentation transcript:

Night-side effects on the plasma convection in the polar ionosphere due to a Sudden Impulse (SI) of solar wind dynamic pressure Coco, I.(1,2,3); Amata, E.(2); Marcucci, M.F.(2); Villain, J.-P.(3); Hanuise, C.(3); Cerisier, J.-C.(4); St. Maurice, J.-P.(5); Sato, N.(6) Earth Science Dept., University of Siena – Italy. (2) IFSI – INAF, Rome – Italy, (3) LPCE – CNRS, Orléans – France. (4) IPSL – CETP, Saint Maur – France. (5) Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Univ. of Western Ontario, London – Canada. (6) NIPR, Tokyo – Japan. Introduction. The Sudden Impulse (SI) of solar wind dynamic pressure of 2000/02/20, 21:00 UT, is investigated by making use of data from: WIND GEOTAIL, POLAR and GOES; ground magnetometer chains (Greenland, IMAGE, CANOPUS); SuperDARN HF radars in both Northern and Southern hemispheres. This event is interesting for the following reasons: Bz and By are positive during a long period before and after the event, and the solar wind is very quiet prior to the dynamic pressure jump; in the SuperDARN data the effect of the SI is more clearly seen in the night side, where an enhancement of the anti-solar polar ionospheric convection is observed.

Fig. 2: The Kerguelen SuperDARN radar. The SuperDARN HF-radar network (1). Fig. 1 The backscattered wave of the SuperDARN signal kr, is generated when the incident radio wave from the radar encounters an ionospheric irregularity, propagating with wave vector k =  2 kr, and k  B (B is the Earth’s magnetic field). For the typical frequencies of SuperDARN this condition is reached in the E and F regions of the ionosphere. Each radar operates through an array of 16 log-periodic antennae, which permits to steer electronically the emitted signals over 16 azimuthal beams covering roughly 52°. For each azimuthal beam the radars collect echoes from 75 spatial gates (Ranges), from 180 to 3550 km from the radar. All SuperDARN radars operate sinchronously and a complete scan in range and azimuth is performed by each radar in 2 minutes. An interferometric array of 4 antennae is used at most SuperDARN radars to infer the elevation angle of the backscattered signals. Fig. 2: The Kerguelen SuperDARN radar.

The SuperDARN HF-radar network (2). SuperDARN is a network of nine HF Coherent radars in the Northern hemisphere (Fig.3) and six in the Southern hemisphere (Fig.4), which continously scan the high-latitude ionosphere in the frequency range 8 – 20 MHz. Fig. 5 shows an example of 2-min scan for the Kerguelen radar. Velocities to (from) the radar are coded in blue (red). Other physical quantities (not shown) deduced from the analysis of backscattered signals are the reflected power and the spectral width of the signal. Moreover the radars work in pairs, providing crossed fields-of-views (See Figs. 3,4) from which it is possible to reconstruct the velocity vectors of plasma convection. Fig. 5 Fig. 3: Northern Hemisphere Coverage Fig. 4: Southern Hemisphere Coverage

Fig. 6 Fig. 8. Magnetic field observed close to Earth between 21:00 and 23:00 UT. From top to bottom: GEOTAIL Bx; Polar |B|, Bx, By and Bz; GOES-8 and GOES-10 Ht. At 21:39 UT (vertical red dotted line) the effect of compression starts at GEOTAIL and Bx increases by 20 nT over 10 min. At 21:40 UT, Polar observed a sharp polarity reversal of By and Bz. The two bottom panels show the increase of the total magnetic field seen by GOES 10 (about noon MLT) and by GOES 8 (late afternoon MLT) roughly 2 min later. Courtesy of S. Kokobun (MGF - Geotail) and C. T. Russell (MFE - Polar) through CDAWEB, and courtesy of Space Physics Interactive Data Resource, NGDC – NOAA, for GOES data. GOES-8 GOES-10 Fig. 8 Fig. 7 38 min later… Fig. 7. The IMF as observed by WIND for the same event. From top to bottom: |B|, Bx, By and Bz. Courtesy of R. Lepping (MFI-WIND), and CDAWEB, GSFC, NASA. Fig. 6. WIND observations on February 20, 2000, from 20:30 to 21:30 UT. From top to bottom: ion density, GSM x component of the SW velocity, dynamic pressure. Courtesy of K. Ogilvie (SWE- WIND), and CDAWEB, GSFC, NASA. Wind GEOTAIL Polar GOES-8 GOES-10 Shock front, 21:00 UT Shock front, 21:38 UT x y Spacecraft GSM positions (RE) at 21:38 UT: WIND: X=162, Y=22, Z=11 POLAR: X=2.1, Y=2.1, Z=8.2 GEOTAIL: X=-26, Y=9.2, Z=3.4 GOES 8: 75° W GOES 10: 135° W

Fig. 10 shows selected magnetograms from the CANOPUS chain, for stations located at about 15 MLT, and between 61° and 69°L (L increases from bottom to top). At 21:39 UT the 4 lower L stations display a Preliminary Impulse (PI-), followed at about 21:40 UT by a Main Impulse (MI+) of the kind described by Araki (1994). The field then takes more than half an hour to reach the pre-pulse level. On the contrary at Resolute Bay, 83° L (top panel), at 21:38 UT one can see a positive pulse. Fig. 9 shows magnetograms from some stations located at middle and equatorial latitudes in both hemispheres (L increases from bottom to top). At 21:40 UT (vertical red line), a step-like world-wide response is noticed, which is usually attributed to the increase in the magnetopause current. Fig. 9 Fig. 11 Fig. 10 Fig. 11 shows three selected magnetograms from stations located in the morning MLT: starting at 21:37 UT, two stations (Dawson and College) notice a reverse response (consistent with the Araki (1994) picture) with respect to the stations located in the afternoon, i.e. with the same notation as above, a (PI+) at about 21:39 UT followed by a (MI-). In the early morning, the Kotel’nyy station shows a positive pulse of the H component. (Courtesy of CANOPUS staff and WDC for Geomagnetism, Kyoto).

SuperDARN: magnetic conjugacy. Fig. 12a Fig. 12a: range vs time plots for the beam 6 of Stokkseyri (upper panel), and the beam 4 of Syowa South (lower panel). Poleward moving structures are seen in the first part of the figure at both radars. At about 21:38 UT, a strong increase of the LOS speed shows up close to 70 L in both hemispheres lasting for 2 min. It seems that a large convection is added to the main convection, driving the plasma poleward. At 21:43 UT, at both radars a sharp polarity reversal of the LOS velocity is clearly seen (~ 19 MLT). Fig 12: Conjugate fields of view of the Stokkseyri (red), and Syowa South (blue) radars. The radars both operated in special mode: beam 6 for Stokkseyri and beam 4 for Syowa South acquired data at high resolution (3 s). A region where similar convective structures are observed in both hemispheres is circled in black (~ 68°-73° L (N or S), ~ 19 MLT). Fig. 12 to Sun Fig. 13a Fig. 13a: range vs time plots for the beam 10 of Thykkvibaer (upper panel), and the beam 14 of Syowa East (lower panel). The main convection points generally towards the radars in both hemispheres. Between 21:39 and 21:47 UT, in a region located at about 70 L in the late evening side, at 21:30 MLT, we observe high velocity fluxes directed away from the radar sites. The inspection of the other beams leads to think to a reconfiguration of the global convection near the Harang discontinuity. Fig. 13 to Sun Fig 13: Conjugate fields of view of the Thykkvibaer (red) and Syowa East (blue) radars. Beam 10 from Thykkvibaer (1 min resolution) and beam 14 from Syowa East (2 min resolution) appear to almost coincide. A region where similar convective structures are observed in both hemispheres is circled in black (~ 68°-73° L (N or S), ~ 22 MLT).

SuperDARN Global Convection Maps: Northern Hemisphere. Fig.14a Fig.14b SuperDARN Northern Global Convection Maps (APL RST software) for 21:40 – 21:42 UT (Fig. 14a) and 21:42 - 21:44 UT (Fig. 14b). Around 21:42 UT the morning convection cell expands towards the West across MLT midnight, while the Cross Polar Cap Potential does not vary much.

SuperDARN Global Convection Maps: Southern Hemisphere. Fig. 15 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. SuperDARN Southern Global Convection Maps obtained with the APL RST program for the time interval 21:34 UT – 21:50 UT. The southern radars operating during the period under study were: Kerguelen, Syowa East, Syowa South, SANAE and Halley Bay. However, the data actually available for generating the maps extend for about 6 hours MLT around midnight. Between 21:40 and 21:48 UT (panels 4 to 7) the tailward velocity flux increases around the local midnight. This period coincides with the Bx increase by 20 nT over 10 min at GEOTAIL.

Summary of observations Solar wind observations. Bz and By are positive during a long period before and after the event, and the solar wind is very quiet prior to the dynamic pressure jump. Magnetometers show clear signatures of vortex-like structures of the kind predicted by Araki (1994). These signatures are observed all over the world almost simultaneously: at about 21:39 UT the preliminary impulse starts, followed within two min by the main impulse. However, such structures are not evident in the SuperDARN northern hemisphere convection maps. The conjugate couple Stokkseyri-Syowa South shows: an increase of the LOS speed at 21:38 lasting for 2 min close to 70° L; a sharp polarity reversal of the LOS velocity at 21:43 UT, corresponding to 19 MLT. The conjugate couple Thykkvibaer-Syowa East shows high velocity fluxes directed away from the radar sites between 21:39 and 21:47 UT, in a region located at about 70° L in the late evening side, at 22 MLT. At 21:42 UT the global northern convection map shows a sudden expansion, close to midnight MLT, of the morning convection cell towards the afternoon side. At the same time, an enhancement of the antisolar convection is seen near 24:00 MLT in the southern hemisphere. This occurs in good agreement with the observation by GEOTAIL of a 20 nT Bx increase over 10 min.

Conclusions The SI event we have discussed yields a reconfiguration of the ionospheric convection. Two are the main features of this reconfiguration: An expansion of the morning cell to the afternoon sector (Northern Hemisp.): this could be a local effect due to the increase of the By component of the IMF around the SI time (see Fig. 7). An increase of the antisolar convection speed around midnight (both Hemisp.): the passage of the SI along the magnetotail causes a stretch of the field lines which mainly affects the Bx component, as seen by GEOTAIL at 21:41 TU (see Fig. 8). In order to maintain the neutrality in the Neutral Plasma Sheet, the dawn-to-dusk electric field in this region must increase; the projection of the electric field upon the night side ionosphere along the magnetic field lines leads to an increase of the ionospheric E x B convection velocity, in the antisunward direction. To our knowlegde, it is the first time that such an effect is reported.