General Meeting cern, 10-12/10/2017 CREATIONS Demonstrators

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PREPARATORY ACTIVITIES Training Unit 6.1 Preparatory activities before the placement.
Advertisements

Analyzing Student Work
Science PCK Workshop March 24, 2013 Dr. Martina Nieswandt UMass Amherst
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Research Methodology Lecture 1.
The 5 E Instructional Model
CYCO Professional Development Packages (PDPs) Teacher Responsiveness to Student Scientific Inquiry 1.
TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION & INSTRUCTION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY LEARNER JUNE 15-17, 2009 HOPE BROWN, HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE, ST. EDMOND, FORT DODGE VALERIE JERGENS,
Contribution of a Professional Development Program for Teachers’ Learning Mónica Baptista; Ana Maria Freire
Foundations of Educating Healthcare Providers
© L.A.C.E. Research Group, 2003 University of Cadiz Eudoxos Project Teaching Science with a Robotic Telescope EVALUATION OF THE EUDOXOS PROJECT The evaluation.
EEA 2012 – Middle School STEM Day 1, PM Content Session.
Practical Approaches to Stretch and Challenge
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Educator Effectiveness Academy STEM Follow-Up Webinar December 2011.
Lecture 3 THE KEY SKILLS TESTED IN A DISSERTATION.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
DIDACTICTS IS THE ART AND SCIENCE OF TEACHING  The word is derived from the greek: didaskein (to teach) tekne (art)  The concept is both a science.
Educator Effectiveness Academy Day 2, Session 1. Find Someone Who…. The purpose of this activity is to review concepts presented during day 1.
Science Department Draft of Goals, Objectives and Concerns 2010.
 Presented by:  Dr.Cherry Steffen  Kennesaw State University.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
Module 5: Questioning, Inquiry and Problem Based Learning Introduction and Module Overview Standards Knowledge and skills Assignments.
Coding Connections at the Interface of Algebra I and Physical World Concepts Improving Teacher Quality Grant Program Summer 2016.
Introduction Leslie A. Barreras EDU 620 Instructor Melissa Phillips 13 October, 2015.
Praha, 1. – ročník mezinárodní konference k profesnímu rozvoji pedagogických pracovníků Profesní rozvoj pedagogů.
Board on science education
Outcome: Participants will be able to identify and apply teacher behaviors that support a learner-centered environment. Indicator: Participants will explore.
NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK IN SERBIA
Making meaningful connections
Work of Vilnius Pedagogical University in WP6
Oleh: Beni Setiawan, Wahyu Budi Sabtiawan
IdeMatch – a digital tool for innovative,
Informing Science + IT Education Conferences
The Sense of Leadership Among University Students
Teaching and Learning with Technology
CASE STUDY BY: JESSICA PATRON.
Cyprus Pedagogical Institute Ministry of Education and Culture
Introduction to the CEYS project (use dependent on context)
AP computer science PRINCIPLES
EDU 695 STUDY Lessons in Excellence-- edu695study.com.
Unit 4 Introducing the Study.
Identifying Gifted Potential in Underrepresented Populations
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
5E Inquiry learning cycle
Exploring the Personal and Social Capability for Primary schools
TOP 10 INNOVATIVE PEDAGOGIES
WP4. Development of Evaluation framework
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
:Let’s Bring Schools to XXI Century!
Step 1 – Define Competences
Choi Wai Kit (Gavin) St. Margaret’s Girls’ College, Hong Kong
FP7 SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
Information session SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-WATER-INNO-DEMO "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 24/06/2013.
Common Solutions to Common Problems
Problem/Project-based Learning
WP7 – COMBINING BIG DATA - STATISTICAL DOMAINS
ICCE WORKSHOPS.
NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS and PROJECT LEAD THE WAY
Competitiveness of the regional market, importance of statistics and innovations THE ROLE OF RESEARCH CENTERS IN PROMOTING OF RESEARCH Sarajevo, 8th.
Features of a Good Research Study
GOSCIENCE TRAINING: ENHANCING COMPREHENSION IN SCIENCE EDUCATION
ROLE OF «electronic virtual enhanced research-engaged student teams» WEB PORTAL IN SOLUTION OF PROBLEM OF COLLABORATION INTERNATIONAL TEAMS INSIDE ONE.
Energy Management and Planning MSJ0210
Project-Based Learning Integrating 21st Century Skills
Educational Technology Lab, National Kapodistrian
Preparing for a Job Interview
Presentation transcript:

General Meeting cern, 10-12/10/2017 CREATIONS Demonstrators WP 3 CREATIONS Demonstrators Menelaos Sotiriou (NKUA)

Summary of Existing Demonstrators CREATIONS 5th Meeting – CERN October 10-12, 2017

Issues to be solved Up to now, 50% of the target seems that has been achieved BUT Most of the Demonstrators are not developed according to the instructions and the template. So We have to develop ~40 more Demonstrators AND We have to correct / update the already existing drafts CREATIONS 5th Meeting – CERN October 10-12, 2017

General Comments for the Demonstrators (only the sections that have some important issues to cope with) 1.2 Type of Activity   All the demonstrators have to follow the basic principles of the Project (According to the DoW also). The type of activity includes: Educational Activities based on Creativity- enriched Inquiry Based Approaches (school based). Educational Activities that promote school- research center collaboration. Educators Preparation and Professional Development Programs. local, national or international activity. Not all the demonstrators have followed this categorization. CREATIONS 5th Meeting – CERN October 10-12, 2017

General Comments for the Demonstrators (only the sections that have some important issues to cope with) 1.5 Effective Learning Environment Art based is the most important Effective Learning Environment as it is the main objective of the project. It has to be mentioned on all demonstrators. Also the collaboration with research centers or infrastructures In many demonstrators it seems that we have deviated from the main aim of CREATIONS Project. From the DoW: The CREATIONS coordination action aims to demonstrate innovative approaches and activities that involve teachers and students in Scientific Research through creative ways that are based on Art and focus on the development of effective links and synergies between schools and research infrastructures in order to spark young people’s interest in science and in following scientific careers. CREATIONS 5th Meeting – CERN October 10-12, 2017

General Comments for the Demonstrators (only the sections that have some important issues to cope with) 2.1 Challenge   Most of the demonstrators have not described effectively what problems and difficulties the education system faces nowadays. Pedagogical challenge has to do with the difficulties that students face during the learning process. A categorization of different types of challenges is recommended: a. the lack of motivation is the main challenge of the project (it is also connected with the evaluation process), so it has to be described. b. a challenge about modern didactics techniques, such as a difficulty in the negotiation of scientific notions, notions that are not included in the national curricula. c. pedagogical challenges, such as the need of special skills in the 21st century, such as problem solving, experimentation, argumentation etc. d. the need of career opportunities etc. The challenge has not be described in detail for the most demonstrators and to be supported by evidence (reports, references etc.) CREATIONS 5th Meeting – CERN October 10-12, 2017

General Comments for the Demonstrators (only the sections that have some important issues to cope with) 2.2 Added Value Most of the demonstrators do not have Added Value section. This section refers to the skills that students will acquire. Therefore: 1. the added value has to be relevant to the challenge. Most of the demonstrators did not follow that principle. 2. the added value has to be justified according to new pedagogical approaches, new educational approaches and international references. The majority of demonstrators have not described effectively the added value. 3. the added value has to be relevant to IBSE approach. That has not be described effectively. CREATIONS 5th Meeting – CERN October 10-12, 2017

General Comments for the Demonstrators (only the sections that have some important issues to cope with) 3.1 Domain Specific objectives   These domains have to be in accordance to challenge. As main difficulties and problems have been described above, now these aims are going to find solutions to these problems. Aims can be categorized on the following categories: a. cognitive aims of low expectance, such as students will fill something, express something etc. b. cognitive aims of high expectance, such as students will compare, represent, evaluate etc. c. aims related to the IBSE features, such as connect, analyze, make experiments, d. aims related to the communication of scientific results e. aims related to the collaboration between students and other factors etc. f. aims related to RRI aspects Most of the demonstrators focus only on cognitive development or students’ collaboration. CREATIONS 5th Meeting – CERN October 10-12, 2017

General Comments for the Demonstrators (only the sections that have some important issues to cope with) 4.1 Aim of the Demonstrator   The aim of each demonstrator should not be general aim of an educational process, but it has to be focused on each demonstrator’s challenge. The aim has to be in accordance to the main challenge. There are some demonstrators that their aims are not relevant to the challenge described. 5. Learning Activities & Effective Learning Environments 1. The recommended activities are not described analytically on the most demonstrators, step by step. 2. As far students and teachers concerned: a. some demonstrators focused on the teacher’s involvement and not on the students’ participation. , b. some activities were also described on other demonstrators, too (seems to be copy paste, no connection with the challenge and the needs) 3. As far Potential Arts Activity concerned, the main problem is that most of the demonstrators have not focused on the combination of Art and Science and the collaboration between school and science infrastructures, by bringing science to school. These are two of the basics characteristics of CREATIONS project. 4. All the features of CREATIONS project, IBSE approach, Creativity principles and RRI aspects have to be presented in the template. For example, on Phase 5. CONNECT students connect explanations to scientific knowledge using communities, portals etc. and trying to collaborate to other students. There was little adequate facts given from the demonstrators to these directions. CREATIONS 5th Meeting – CERN October 10-12, 2017

General Comments for the Demonstrators (only the sections that have some important issues to cope with) 6. Assessment   The main Assessment bases on the CREATIONS tools in order to assess the activities (Students’ Questionnaires, Teacher Questionnaires). Many demonstrators do not include the CREATIONS methodology or they just refer to WP6 deliverables. Any additional assessment can be used, but it has to be described analytically. Some demonstrators included additional assessment (for examples teachers’ diaries and notes, students’ answers, rubrics) but these additional assessment- tools are not described analytically. Examples of other questionnaires or rubrics were not given. 7. Possible Extension In this section, the demonstrators describe any ideas for further development and elaboration, including more activities, or collaborate with other CREATION Demonstrator or/ and other educational activities. Although some demonstrators have filled this section, only in few of them there is a collaboration with other demonstrators or other educational activities. 8. References References can support the logic of the demonstrators. In some sections, such as Challenge play an important role, because they offer a theoretical framework about the issues/needs that the school community face and provide scientific explanations about the pedagogical framework. The last one is important as the demonstrators suggest solutions according to international, modern changes and finding in the field of Science and Didactics. Not all the demonstrators provided adequate references and they did not support scientifically all the sections. CREATIONS 5th Meeting – CERN October 10-12, 2017