Hilbert’s Hotel 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ...

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 3 Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof.
Advertisements

3.3 Divisibility Definition If n and d are integers, then n is divisible by d if, and only if, n = dk for some integer k. d | n  There exists an integer.
Whiteboardmaths.com © 2004 All rights reserved
1 Diagonalization Fact: Many books exist. Fact: Some books contain the titles of other books within them. Fact: Some books contain their own titles within.
Induction and recursion
Courtesy Costas Busch - RPI1 More Applications of the Pumping Lemma.
The Pigeonhole Principle
Recursive Definitions Rosen, 3.4. Recursive (or inductive) Definitions Sometimes easier to define an object in terms of itself. This process is called.
1 More Applications of the Pumping Lemma. 2 The Pumping Lemma: Given a infinite regular language there exists an integer for any string with length we.
Fall 2006Costas Busch - RPI1 More Applications of the Pumping Lemma.
A Very Practical Series 1 What if we also save a fixed amount (d) every year?
Prof. Busch - LSU1 More Applications of the Pumping Lemma.
Methods of Proof Lecture 4: Sep 16 (chapter 3 of the book)
Induction and recursion
BIRKDALE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT
Discrete Mathematics, 1st Edition Kevin Ferland
Mathematical Induction. F(1) = 1; F(n+1) = F(n) + (2n+1) for n≥ F(n) n F(n) =n 2 for all n ≥ 1 Prove it!
1 Introduction to Abstract Mathematics Chapter 4: Sequences and Mathematical Induction Instructor: Hayk Melikya 4.1- Sequences. 4.2,
Methods of Proof. This Lecture Now we have learnt the basics in logic. We are going to apply the logical rules in proving mathematical theorems. Direct.
SWBAT to use divisibility rules for 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10
5 Minute Check Find the prime factorization for each number
1 Section 1.1 A Proof Primer A proof is a demonstration that some statement is true. We normally demonstrate proofs by writing English sentences mixed.
Today we will divide with decimals. Divide= Divide means to break a number of items into groups that have the same amount.
Methods of Proof Lecture 3: Sep 9. This Lecture Now we have learnt the basics in logic. We are going to apply the logical rules in proving mathematical.
Computational Number Theory - traditional number theory Prime Numbers Factors Counting Factors D- functions.
Data Structures in Scheme Building data structures: Java class Circle { private double center_x, center_y, radius; Circle(double x, double y, double r)
CompSci 102 Discrete Math for Computer Science March 1, 2012 Prof. Rodger Slides modified from Rosen.
Stupid questions? Are there more integers than even integers?
5.6 Inequalities in 2 Triangles
Year 9 Proof Dr J Frost Last modified: 19 th February 2015 Objectives: Understand what is meant by a proof, and examples.
Mathematical Induction
Can a and b both be whole numbers? similar triangles so.
Chapter 5. Section 5.1 Climbing an Infinite Ladder Suppose we have an infinite ladder: 1.We can reach the first rung of the ladder. 2.If we can reach.
5-5 Indirect Proof. Indirect Reasoning: all possibilities are considered and then all but one are proved false. The remaining possibility must be true.
The Pigeonhole Principle. Pigeonhole principle The pigeonhole principle : If k is a positive integer and k+1 or more objects are placed into k boxes,
Section 5.1. Climbing an Infinite Ladder Suppose we have an infinite ladder: 1.We can reach the first rung of the ladder. 2.If we can reach a particular.
EXAMPLE 3 Write an indirect proof Write an indirect proof that an odd number is not divisible by 4. GIVEN : x is an odd number. PROVE : x is not divisible.
Methods of Proof Lecture 4: Sep 20 (chapter 3 of the book, except 3.5 and 3.8)
Unit 9: Sequences and Series. Sequences A sequence is a list of #s in a particular order If the sequence of numbers does not end, then it is called an.
Decomposing a Number into Prime Factors. Learning Goals We will use our divisibility rules so that we can decompose numbers into prime factors. We’ll.
3.3 Mathematical Induction 1 Follow me for a walk through...
Chapter 5 1. Chapter Summary  Mathematical Induction  Strong Induction  Recursive Definitions  Structural Induction  Recursive Algorithms.
PowerPointmaths.com © 2004 all rights reserved
Data Structures in Scheme
Theory of Computability
Indices.
Prime and Composite.
Students will solve two step equations (12-4).
Theory of Computability
Induction and recursion
Cardinality of Sets Section 2.5.
5.3 Arithmetic Series (1/5) In an arithmetic series each term increases by a constant amount (d) This means the difference between consecutive terms is.
Induction and recursion
Number Patterns.
Follow me for a walk through...
GCD and LCM relationship
Rational Numbers.
Section 2.1 Proof Techniques Introduce proof techniques:   o        Exhaustive Proof: to prove all possible cases, Only if it is about a.
4n + 2 1st term = 4 × = 6 2nd term = 4 × = 10 3rd term
Elementary Number Theory & Proofs
More Applications of the Pumping Lemma
Theory of Computability
Follow me for a walk through...
Induction Chapter
5.5 Geometric Series (1/7) In an geometric series each term increases by a constant multiplier (r) This means the difference between consecutive terms.
Mathematical Induction
Cardinality Definition: The cardinality of a set A is equal to the cardinality of a set B, denoted |A| = |B|, if and only if there is a one-to-one correspondence.
Follow me for a walk through...
5.6 Inequalities in Two Triangles and Indirect Proof
THE WELL ORDERING PROPERTY
Presentation transcript:

Hilbert’s Hotel 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ...

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ...

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... n n+1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ...

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... n 2n

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... n 2n

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ...

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... n 2n

There is no biggest prime. (i.e. the set of all primes is infinite)

There is no biggest prime. (i.e. the set of all primes is infinite) Proof by reduction ad absurdum:

There is no biggest prime. (i.e. the set of all primes is infinite) Proof by reduction ad absurdum: Suppose the opposite. i.e. that there is a natural number which is a prime and is bigger than any other prime. Call it p.

There is no biggest prime. (i.e. the set of all primes is infinite) Proof by reduction ad absurdum: Suppose the opposite. i.e. that there is a natural number which is a prime and is bigger than any other prime. Call it p. Let p1, p2, ..., pn be all the primes smaller than p.

There is no biggest prime. (i.e. the set of all primes is infinite) Proof by reduction ad absurdum: Suppose the opposite. i.e. that there is a natural number which is a prime and is bigger than any other prime. Call it p. Let p1, p2, ..., pn be all the primes smaller than p. Consider the number q = p1 p2  ...  pn + 1

There is no biggest prime. (i.e. the set of all primes is infinite) Proof by reduction ad absurdum: Suppose the opposite. i.e. that there is a natural number which is a prime and is bigger than any other prime. Call it p. Let p1, p2, ..., pn be all the primes smaller than p. Consider the number q = p1 p2  ...  pn + 1 q is not divisible by any natural number except 1 and q itself. Therefore, q is a prime.

There is no biggest prime. (i.e. the set of all primes is infinite) Proof by reduction ad absurdum: Suppose the opposite. i.e. that there is a natural number which is a prime and is bigger than any other prime. Call it p. Let p1, p2, ..., pn be all the primes smaller than p. Consider the number q = p1 p2  ...  pn + 1 q is not divisible by any natural number except 1 and q itself. Therefore, q is a prime. q is also bigger than p.

There is no biggest prime. (i.e. the set of all primes is infinite) Proof by reduction ad absurdum: Suppose the opposite. i.e. that there is a natural number which is a prime and is bigger than any other prime. Call it p. Let p1, p2, ..., pn be all the primes smaller than p. Consider the number q = p1 p2  ...  pn + 1 q is not divisible by any natural number except 1 and q itself. Therefore, q is a prime. q is also bigger than p. Therefore, q is a prime bigger than p, which contradicts our assumption that p is the biggest prime.

There is no biggest prime. (i.e. the set of all primes is infinite) Proof by reduction ad absurdum: Suppose the opposite. i.e. that there is a natural number which is a prime and is bigger than any other prime. Call it p. Let p1, p2, ..., pn be all the primes smaller than p. Consider the number q = p1 p2  ...  pn + 1 q is not divisible by any natural number except 1 and q itself. Therefore, q is a prime. q is also bigger than p. Therefore, q is a prime bigger than p, which contradicts our assumption that p is the biggest prime. Conclusion: There is no biggest prime. QED

1st bus: passenger n goes to the room 3n 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 1st bus: passenger n goes to the room 3n

1st bus: passenger n goes to the room 3n 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... b1p1 b1p2 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... b1p3 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ... 1st bus: passenger n goes to the room 3n

2nd bus: passenger n goes to the room 5n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... b1p1 b2p1 b1p2 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... b1p3 b2p2 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ... 2nd bus: passenger n goes to the room 5n

3rd bus: passenger n goes to the room 7n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... b1p1 b2p1 b3p1 b1p2 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... b1p3 b2p2 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ... 3rd bus: passenger n goes to the room 7n

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... b1p1 b2p1 b3p1 b1p2 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... b1p3 b2p2 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ... Bus 4 11 Bus 7 19 Bus 10 31 Bus 5 13 Bus 8 23 Bus 11 37 Bus 6 17 Bus 9 29 Bus 12 41

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ... 15 35 21 39 33 45

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ... 15 = 3  5 35 = 5  7 21 = 3  7 39 = 3  11 33 = 3  11 45 = 9  5 = 32  5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ... 3n  5m 3n  13m 3n  7m 3n  17m 3n  11m

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ... 5n  7m 5n  11m 5n  13m 3n  5m 3n  13m 3n  7m 3n  17m 3n  11m

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ... 3n  5m  7p 3n  5m  7p 19q  43t 5n  7m 5n  11m 5n  13m 3n  5m 3n  13m 3n  7m 3n  17m 3n  11m

 5, if the nth digit of rn  5 the nth digit of r0 =   6, if the nth digit of rn  5

r0 0.  5, if the nth digit of rn  5 the nth digit of r0 = 