Evaluating students' perceptions of active learning pedagogies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peer Review: A Conduit for Developing Graduate Attributes? Judy Pate & Sheena Bell – The Business School Helen Purchase & John Hamer – Computing Science.
Advertisements

A Masters in Education in eLearning The University of Hull.
Year Two Year Three Year One Research methods teaching in the social sciences: An integrated approach to inquiry- based learning.
Quality Enhancement and Communications The development and delivery of a research active curriculum will be promoted as a core and high quality activity.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Key features of the University of Manchester Professor Cathy Cassell Deputy Director (Academic) Sarah Featherstone Head of Undergraduate Services Original.
The Principles of Learning and Teaching P-12 Training Program
Pedagogy for the 21 st Century LSS Retreat, November, 2010.
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
Preparing Future Teachers for 21 st Century Learning Partnerships that enhance the capacity of pre-service education 2008 Deakin University Faculty of.
PRESENTATION AT THE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITIES QUALITY FRAMEWORK Professor Sarah Moore, Chair, National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning.
Taking Learning Development outside of the university Catherine McConnell, University of Brighton.
Developing a Work Based Portfolio
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Monitor and Revise Teaching. ObjectivesObjectives Describe how to monitor teaching List ways to contribute to broader evaluations Explain how to review.
How to evaluate the impact of CPD? 28 th April 2016.
Course Work 2: Critical Reflection GERALDINE DORAN B
Learning Gain in Active Citizenship Funded by the Higher Education Academy (HEA) Dr. Mary Deane, Senior Lecturer in Education Oxford Brookes University.
Developed by the Southern Alberta Professional Development Consortium (SAPDC) as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation of.
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results
Presentation by Glenn Duckworth, Learning Technologist, FBL
Anthony Williams, Maria Northcote, Jason Morton and John Seddon
SCEL Framework for Educational Leadership
Continuing professional development: Designing an interprofessional program for allied health placement educators My name is Kate Thomson. I’m from Sydney.
Evaluating students' perceptions of active learning pedagogies.
Higher Education Pedagogy Student-centered learning
Freshmen to PhD, Empowering with Research
What is HEA Fellowship? What’s the UK PSF?
Training for Master Trainers: Learning Engagement & Motivation
Support for English, maths and ESOL Module 12d: Developing functional mathematics with vocational learners - training the trainers.
Innovative Teaching at Faughanvale P.S.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Module 2: Introduction to Using OER for Math Instruction
COIS40894 PROFESSIONAL AND ACADEMIC SKILLS FOR APPLIED IT I
Initial Findings about Graduate Teaching Assistants’ Training Needs to Foster Active Learning in Statistics Kristen E. Roland and Jennifer J. Kaplan.
How can Blackboard assist in Assessment and Facilitation of Knowledge Exchange? Anne Nortcliffe.
School Self-Evaluation 
ELT. General Supervision
Vision Facilitation Template
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 5 – Effective Group Work
Action learning Session Two
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 5 – Effective Group Work
European TRAINING FOUNDATION
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
The Call for Action: Coaching and Supporting Mathematics Instruction
This presentation will include:
Research methods pedagogy in the digital era
Why some schools succeed ?
Emma Senior & Mark Telford.
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Presentation by Glenn Duckworth, Learning Technologist, FBL
Scaling-up Active Collaborative Learning for Student Success
Staff-Student Partnerships in Learning Development
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Making learning active
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
Quality assurance and curriculum development
Applying for UTS Vice-Chancellor’s Learning and Teaching grants 2017
The Heart of Student Success
A Community of Education Technology Professionals
McNeese State University Professional Development Opportunity
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
Cape Peninsula University of Technology
ERASMUS+ Teachex: Teaching excellence in Israel
Finalization of the Action Plans and Development of Syllabus
FLIPPED CLASSROOM PRESENTED BY Dr.R.JEYANTHI Asst.Professor,
Seminar on the Evaluation of AUT STEM Programme
Workshop Set-Up: The aim is that at each table we have a variety of disciplines / subjects represented by (ideally) four participants. Ensure a mixture.
High quality CPD for Early Career Teachers
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating students' perceptions of active learning pedagogies. Helen Kay (LEAD), Tim Parker (ACES), Dave Greenfield (ACES), Oliver Lewis (ACES) & Anne Nortcliffe (ACES) Introduce our selves - Tim to lead the introduction

Evaluating students' perceptions of active learning pedagogies. In this presentation we are going to consider the implementation and evaluation of 'Scale-up' including: Why 'Scale-up' was adopted; What 'Scale-up' is; How 'Scale-up' worked in practice; What the students said about 'Scale-up'; What were the students perceptions of active learning; Was there any correlation with performance. Tim to introduce: SCALE UP adopted to develop teaching from didactic delivery to flipped lectures and TEAL (Technology Enabled Active Learning) type active learning approaches that promote student engagement. SCALE UP - “Student-Centered Active Learning Environment with Upside-down Pedagogies.” originally developed by Robert Beichner Professor of Physics at North Carolina State University (NCSU). Basic principles (Beichner et al 2007). : An active mode of learning where students learn through solving problems, sharing ideas, giving and receiving feedback, and teaching each other. Attempts to dissolved barriers between theory and practice by improving students’ conceptual understanding more effectively than separate lectures and seminars/labs. Physical classroom environment can work in tandem with active learning pedagogies to promote engagement and deep learning: Round tables of 9 students working in 3s, sharing laptops and work sharing facility to display student work with wider class. SCALE-UP, lectures are replaced by problem-solving and enquiry-based activities carried out in strategically-assigned groups. Attempts to foster collaborative learning, Physical aspects are supported by a threefold ‘upside-down pedagogy’ comprising: ‘Backwards design’—the curriculum is designed ‘backwards’ from the learning outcomes; ‘Students as teachers’; and 'Flipped learning', where ‘content’ may be encountered outside class and sessions are devoted to applying ideas. The shift away from lectures frees up class time for students to focus on difficult aspects of the material, to work at their own pace, and to receive on-the-spot feedback on their work from peers and the tutor. Generally student feedback surprisingly positive. Prince and Others who suggest resistance to active learning.

Why Scale-up for Engineering Undergraduates? Didactic teaching doesn't promote the development of problem-solving skills; Students may lack key employability skills; Scale-up allows the inclusion of hands-on activities, problem-based scenarios and independent research in teaching and learning sessions. Oliver Engineering teaching tends to be didactic - focus on lecturer imparting knowledge. This approach does not equip graduates with the ability to apply knowledge in different scenarios and solve industrial problems. Scale-up has permitted the development of learning experiences in which students engage in hands-on activities, scenario-based problem solving, online research and group work - all essential skills for graduate engineers. Students work in groups of 3, tables of 9 or even class discussion, promoting peer support, a sense of learning community and shared development.

Scale-up in action! Oliver Video

Module Learning Outcomes Level 4 Aerospace Materials and Manufacturing 1. To develop and apply an understanding of engineering materials in respect to material structure and how manufacture processes can change the structure and properties of materials. 2. To develop and apply an understanding of the processing routes appropriate to specific materials and have the ability to make an informed choice of manufacturing processes with respect to capabilities and the cost build-up of those processes. 3 To apply knowledge of materials and manufacturing appropriately to applications relevant to the aerospace industry in accordance with industry standards and regulations Oliver

Module Learning Outcomes Level 5 Professional Practice 1. Develop higher levels of professional and ethical conduct with respect to engineering organisations and the general public domestically and internationally. 2. Promote better understanding of role of engineers in business and sustainable development. 3. Develop comprehension of the role that engineering plays at strategic and operational level in support of an organisation. 4. To identify, develop and reflect on your personal, professional skills, future employability and career planning. Tim Interesting mix of good and bad. Note this was taken from 'other comments' made in questionnaire and have been corrected for negative association.

How we set about implementing & evaluating Scale-up A collaboration between the Department of Engineering and Maths and LEAD This involved and continues to involve: teaching enhancement grant (ACES); pedagogic support on implementation; support to develop the team's skills and confidence in PedRes; literature review; the creation of a questionnaire based on previous research & deployment at the end of S2 (240 students); analysis of quantitative and qualitative data..... Tim: Anne and I both applied separately for TEG funding to run research projects on the use of SCALE-UP to evaluate impact on the engagement of students in our respective modules. Ethically we could not complete the research as we were involved in delivery so we enlisted assistance from the LEAD team and both Andrew Middleton and Hellen Kay have been hugely supportive of the project. We arranged, recruited and managed student researches to work with Helen Kay to complete the survey we developed as a group. This was based on previous pedagogic/andragogic research in this area. Methodologically we needed to use both qualitative and quantitative research methods to complete the research: I will do a short bit on the qualitative and then Helen will outline the initial results of the quantitative aspects.

What student said! Question - Use three (3) words or phrases to describe your reaction to the active learning in the scale-up classes. Tim: This came from a question asking the students to describe their experience of active learning: Just to be clear we checked and corrected for use of antonyms such as un-interesting or not interesting etc. Clearly a mixed picture with lots of positive but some negative (as we would expect).

Students' 'value and positivity' (green) towards active learning and their 'participation' (orange). mean scores mean scores Helen Graph when the scores for questions a, d, e, g and m are reversed. The orange bars are the participation questions and the green the positivity and values questions. Factor analysis (PCA) used to identify the 'factors / components. Nguyen identified 3 components!

Students' 'value and positivity' towards active learning Helen

Students' experience of tutors' 'active learning' teaching/facilitation strategies Helen h. students struggled to get through the material prepared - the teams needed to reflect and reduce the content..... f. facilitation

Students' views on - What is learning? Helen

Development of skills and capabilities To what extent do you think the scale-up sessions have helped you to improve your ability to:

Students' assessment performance The correlations between the overall assessment mark and the factors identified are weak and only contribute a small amount of the total variance......

Summary Overall SCALE-UP generally well received but Need for further study: Staff involvement and academic dimension. Opportunity for longitudinal study Impact of level 4 experience on future study. Need for further work: Training and development of staff to support SCALE-UP activity: Constructive alignment of delivery and assessment Recognition of issues with delivery and preparation of material. Cost benefit analysis for future use of SCALE-UP.

Any Questions Contacts Helen Kay (LEAD): helen.kay@shu.ac.uk Tim Parker (ACES): acestp3@exchange.shu.ac.uk Dave Greenfield (ACES): mridg@exchange.shu.ac.uk Oliver Lewis (ACES): acesol@exchange.shu.ac.uk Anne Nortcliffe (ACES): engano@exchange.shu.ac.uk