HYDRAULIC FRACKING & ITS EFFECTS ON LAND COVER CHANGE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2008 NAIP Orthoimagery Update Chris Cialek MN Land Management Information Center May 7, 2008.
Advertisements

September 5, 2013 Tyler Jones Research Assistant Dept. of Geology & Geography Auburn University.
Lacy Smith Geog /13/2010. Project Sites & Background.
Leila Talebi, Anika Kuczynski, Andrew Graettinger, and Robert Pitt
Urbanization and Land Cover Change in Dakota County, Minnesota Kylee Berger and Julia Vang FR 3262 Remote Sensing Section 001/002.
Comprehensive Land Use/Land Cover Data, Analysis, and Predictive Modeling: A Partnership Approach for Michigan Soji Adelaja Hannah Distinguished Professor.
1 SWALIM Workshop June, Nairobi Monitoring Land Cover Dynamics in sub-Saharan Africa H.D. Eva, A. Brink and D. Simonetti.
Accuracy Assessment. 2 Because it is not practical to test every pixel in the classification image, a representative sample of reference points in the.
11 th Annual Z/I Camera Conference February 2007 Post Hurricane Katrina & Rita 6-inch DMC Digital Orthophotography.
Chapter 9 Accuracy assessment in remotely sensed categorical information 遥感类别信息精度评估 Jingxiong ZHANG 张景雄 Chapter 9 Accuracy assessment in remotely sensed.
Image Classification and its Applications
Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi, Scott Hayes, tom Hawkins, Jeff milliken Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management.
BlackBridge | Earth Science Conference 2014 – USA Earth Science Conference 2014 – San Francisco - USA MASS PROCESSING.
By: GeoTrek. Hunter Krenek: Remote Sensing analyst & GIS analyst Joe Dowling: Assistant Project Manager & GIS analyst Peter Vogt: Website Designer & GIS.
Ann Krogman Twin Cities Urban Lakes Project. Background Information… 100 lakes throughout the Twin Cities Metro Area Sampled in 2002 Land-use around each.
Investigating Land Cover Change In Crow Wing County Emily Smoter and Michael Palmer Remote Sensing of Natural Resources and the Environment University.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Conifer Health in Grand County, Colorado using Remotely Sensed Imagery Chris Cole.
2005 USDA Imagery Contracts May 4, 2005 NDOP Steering Committee Meeting Asheville, North Carolina W. Geoffrey Gabbott, Contracting Officer USDA, FSA, Aerial.
Team: Andrea Claassen and Thomas Bales FR 5262, 12/13/2011 Instructor: Joe Knight.
Conversion of Forestland to Agriculture in Hubbard County, Minnesota By: Henry Rodman Cory Kimball 2013.
Farm Service Agency National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) Pecora Conference November 13, 2002 Denver, Colorado Kent Williams, USDA FSA Aerial Photography.
HYDRAULIC FRACTURING (FRACKING) AND OFFSHORE DRILLING IN FLAGLER COUNTY CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP JUNE 9, 2015.
Mapping lichen in a caribou habitat of Northern Quebec, Canada, using an enhancement-classification method and spectral mixture analysis J.Théau, D.R.
Josiah Emerson, Majory Silisyene, Cynthia Ratzlaff FR 3262 Section 1.
Change Detection in the Metro Area Michelle Cummings Laura Cossette.
Remote Sensing. Vulnerability is the degree to which a system is susceptible to, or unable to cope with, adverse effects of climate change, including.
Hill Country Associates Pedernales River analysis Team: Kelly Blanton, Erica Tice, William Weldon, and Paul Starkel.
Update Cycle RFP Closed on September 24 th Image Capture Split Between 2009 and 2011 –Eastern Half of State Will Be Captured.
Land Cover Change Monitoring change over time Ned Horning Director of Applied Biodiversity Informatics
Land Use / Land Cover Change in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area Lori Krider & Melinda Kernik
Honeysuckle in the Taconics
Land Cover Characterization Program National Mapping Division EROS Data CenterU. S. Geological Survey The National Land Cover Dataset of the Multi- Resolution.
By: Katie Blake and Paul Walters.  To analyze land cover changes in the Twin Cities Metro Area from 1984 to 2005 Image difference and Thematic Change.
An Analysis of Land Use/Land Cover Changes and Population Growth in the Pedernales River Basin Kelly Blanton-Project Manager Paul Starkel-Analyst Erica.
Citation: Moskal., L. M. and D. M. Styers, Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution near infrared aerial imagery: costs and applications.
Land Cover Classification and Monitoring Case Studies: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area –Multi-temporal Landsat Image Classification and Change Analysis –Impervious.
APPLIED REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY TO ANALYZE THE LAND COVER/LAND USE CHANGE AT TISZA LAKE By Yudhi Gunawan * and Tamás János ** * Department of Land Use.
Measuring Vegetation Health NDVI Analysis of East Sacramento 1.
USDA Forest Service National Aerial Imagery Status Report Bill Belton Assistant Remote Sensing Program Manager USDA Planning Meeting December 2, 2008.
Employment of gis and remote sensing to detect land use change Class Project FR 3262/5262 Dec 2011 Peder Engstrom Chad Sigler.
By:Nick Severson Brian Trick Land Cover Change of Twin Cities Metro and Scott County ______________________________FR Fall 2013.
LAND USE/LAND COVER CHANGE IN BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS Maryia Bakhtsiyarava FNRM 5262.
Detecting Land Cover Land Use Change in Las Vegas Sarah Belcher & Grant Cooper December 8, 2014.
1 USDA-NRCS Hurricane Preparedness Data Products: Digital Soils Information (SSURGO) Services: Download SSURGO data at the following Web Site
Re-evaluating estimates of impervious cover and riparian zone condition in New England watersheds: Green infrastructure effectiveness at the watershed.
Golden Valley, Minnesota Image Analysis Heather Hegi and Kerry Ritterbusch.
Best Practices for Managing Processed Ortho Imagery Cody A. Benkelman.
Quantifying Urbanization with Landsat Imagery in Rochester, Minnesota
Statewide Rule 29 and FracFocus
Land Classification on the Kaibuskong River Subwatershed
Factsheet # 12 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution.
Department of Geography University of New Orleans, Louisiana
Built-up Extraction from RISAT Data Using Segmentation Approach
Frank Falzone Ross Meyer FR December.2012
Incorporating Ancillary Data for Classification
Feature Extraction “The identification of geographic features and their outlines in remote-sensing imagery through post-processing technology that enhances.
By Yudhi Gunawan * and Tamás János **
Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery
The GISCO task force “Remote Sensing for Statistics”
How to leverage GCI Content:
REMOTE SENSING Multispectral Image Classification
REMOTE SENSING ANALYSIS OF URBAN SPRAWL IN BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA:
Urbanization by Watersheds
Hill Country Associates Pedernales River analysis
Butte County Board of Supervisors April 21, 2015
Williston, north dakota
Dr. Jim Thomas Desert Research Institute
Remote Sensing Landscape Changes Before and After King Fire 2014
Calculating land use change in west linn from
Best Practices for Managing Processed Ortho Imagery
Presentation transcript:

HYDRAULIC FRACKING & ITS EFFECTS ON LAND COVER CHANGE Remote Sensing of Natural Resources Molly McDonald & Jessica Sweet

Background “...create and enhance subsurface fracture systems to allow gas and oil to move more freely from rock pores to production wells…” http://1bog.org/blog/how-to-become-a-fracking-insurgent-beyond-going-solar/

Objective Identify land cover changes due to hydraulic fracking activities between 2005 and 2012 near Manning, North Dakota. 6/15/2005 7/15, 7/22, & 8/02/2009 7/4/2012 8.8 X 13.2 mi

Dunn County, North Dakota City of Manning 2010 Total Population: 74

Data Sources National Agriculture Imagery Program (USDA) 2005, 1 meter resolution, RGB 2009, 1 meter resolution, RGB and IR 2012, 1 meter resolution, RGB and IR North Dakota GIS Data Portal Municipal Data for Reference FracFocus.org (Hydraulic Fracking Well Locations)

Methodology Unsupervised Classification: Data Size Limitation Training Samples Probabilities Clip “Developed” Class Unsupervised Classification Merge Results

Results 2005 - 2012 Overall Change in Classification Red areas indicate change 1.39% increase in “developed” areas 0.18% decrease in “other” areas 1.21% decrease in “water” areas

Results: Thematic Change

Results: Classification Matrix 2005 - 2009: Some pixels changed from developed to water. 2005 - 2012: Water class changed to the Other class

Challenges: Classification NAIP: low spectral variability Overlapping classes

Challenges Obtaining Data (Metadata) Study area Mosaic

Qualitative Accuracy Assessment Compare well site locations to identified areas of “Developed” 2005 2009 2012 7 wells in Dunn county 252 wells in Dunn county 642 wells in Dunn county No wells in study area 20 wells in study area, all in developed areas 61 wells in study area, all in developed areas

Bibliography North Dakota Technology Department. [National Agricultural Inventory Program aerial imagery]. Retrieved from http://www.nd.gov/gis/. United States Department of Agriculture. [National agriculture inventory program state flight path shapefiles]. Retrieved from http://www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/apfoapp?area=home&subject =prog&topic. FracFocus: Chemical Disclosure Registry. [Find a well by state]. Retrieved from http://www.fracfocusdata.org /DisclosureSearch/. United States Environmental Protection Agency. [Natural Gas Extraction - Hydraulic Fracturing]. Retrieved from http://www2.epa.gov/hydraulicfracturing.