Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Impact of Dynamics on the Accuracies of Different Experimental Data-Processing Methods for Steady-State Heat Transfer Rate Measurement J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl. 2017;10(2):021008-021008-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037543 Figure Legend: Schematic of experimental setup around the DHP condenser

Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Impact of Dynamics on the Accuracies of Different Experimental Data-Processing Methods for Steady-State Heat Transfer Rate Measurement J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl. 2017;10(2):021008-021008-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037543 Figure Legend: Example plot of changes of refrigerant mass flow rates during the experiments when the compressor is changing its speed constantly

Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Impact of Dynamics on the Accuracies of Different Experimental Data-Processing Methods for Steady-State Heat Transfer Rate Measurement J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl. 2017;10(2):021008-021008-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037543 Figure Legend: Relative uncertainties of case 1 (data-processing method 1)

Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Impact of Dynamics on the Accuracies of Different Experimental Data-Processing Methods for Steady-State Heat Transfer Rate Measurement J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl. 2017;10(2):021008-021008-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037543 Figure Legend: Relative uncertainties of case 2 (data-processing method 2)

Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Impact of Dynamics on the Accuracies of Different Experimental Data-Processing Methods for Steady-State Heat Transfer Rate Measurement J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl. 2017;10(2):021008-021008-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037543 Figure Legend: Relative uncertainties of case 3 (data-processing method 3 with Δtf at 60 s)

Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Impact of Dynamics on the Accuracies of Different Experimental Data-Processing Methods for Steady-State Heat Transfer Rate Measurement J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl. 2017;10(2):021008-021008-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037543 Figure Legend: Change of expanded uncertainty of heat transfer rate and random expanded uncertainty with integration time interval in experiment 1 in Table 7

Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Impact of Dynamics on the Accuracies of Different Experimental Data-Processing Methods for Steady-State Heat Transfer Rate Measurement J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl. 2017;10(2):021008-021008-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037543 Figure Legend: Change of expanded uncertainty of heat transfer rate and random expanded uncertainty with integration time interval in experiment 2 in Table 7

Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Impact of Dynamics on the Accuracies of Different Experimental Data-Processing Methods for Steady-State Heat Transfer Rate Measurement J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl. 2017;10(2):021008-021008-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037543 Figure Legend: Change of expanded uncertainty of heat transfer rate and random expanded uncertainty with integration time interval in experiment 3 in Table 7

Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Impact of Dynamics on the Accuracies of Different Experimental Data-Processing Methods for Steady-State Heat Transfer Rate Measurement J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl. 2017;10(2):021008-021008-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037543 Figure Legend: Change of expanded uncertainty of heat transfer rate and random expanded uncertainty with integration time interval in experiment 4 in Table 7

Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Impact of Dynamics on the Accuracies of Different Experimental Data-Processing Methods for Steady-State Heat Transfer Rate Measurement J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl. 2017;10(2):021008-021008-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037543 Figure Legend: Change of difference between heat transfer rates of cases 1 and 2 with relative random expanded uncertainty in case study 1

Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Impact of Dynamics on the Accuracies of Different Experimental Data-Processing Methods for Steady-State Heat Transfer Rate Measurement J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl. 2017;10(2):021008-021008-10. doi:10.1115/1.4037543 Figure Legend: Refrigerant flow in the ductless heat pump system in the psychrometric chamber for its experiments of its heating operation