Harry Talbot Beyond the Bell Branch

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Advertisements

STANDARDS-BASED PROMOTION Grades Elementary Schools Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G.
FY05 School Year Academic Support Preliminary Data Results (FY05 Fall & Winter Sessions) FY05 School Year Academic Support Preliminary Data Results (FY05.
A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.
1 Cold Water Elementary English Language Arts Standard Status: Approaching (2010) MAP Performance Index Status Targets (2011)
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Identification of Gifted/Talented Learners Within the LAUSD Sharon Curry, Assistant Superintendent Los Angeles Unified School District Student Integration.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
September 13, 2011 Data Profile of United for Success School Prepared by: Urban Strategies Council
Evaluation 101: After School Programs February 1, 2007 Region 3 After School Technical Assistance Center Conference.
CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION State Board of Education Update on Student Performance First Analysis of Smarter Balanced Results September.
College and Career Preparation 1 College and Career Preparation Lodi Unified School District September 2, 2008 Prepared by the Assessment,
Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY
Student Achievement Gains and Gaps in Saint Paul Public Schools Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation and Assessment Saint Paul Public Schools May.
Henry T. Gage Middle School: Reclassification Data
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts English Language Arts Grades 3, 4, and 5 Total Public.
English Language Arts (ELA) & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public In grades 5-8, the percentage of students meeting the ELA Learning.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
2011 Achievement Gaps By Various Subgroups: Reading and Math EOG Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools Board of Education October 11, 2011.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 21, 2013.
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Longwood University Professional Education Unit Annual Report 2011.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
College Readiness as a Graduation Requirement An Assessment of San Diego’s Challenges Julian Betts (PPIC Bren Fellow and UCSD)
Student Data Toolkit Example August 2006.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
CAASPP Baseline Results New Standards and Tests: Challenging for Schools to Teach and Students to Learn “California is raising the bar for good.
California Standards Test (CST) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Results, Oakland Unified School District Division of Student Achievement.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Supplemental Packet.
Progress Report for English Language Learners Narrowing the Gap October 2006.
091 Equity Initiative Status Indicators_March Lodi Unified School District Equity Initiative Status Indicators Prepared by the Assessment, Research,
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 Supplemental Packet.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
BERRY SCHOOL CST RESULTS. BERRY English Language Arts 2012/2013 CST Comparison Percent Proficient – All Students.
The Impact of After-School Programs (ASPs) on Elementary School English Learners Steven Frankel Research Support Services In Partnership With Beyond the.
Reclassification of English Learners and Monitoring of RFEP Students Elementary Title III Master Plan Institute Language Acquisition Branch.
Spring ABOUT THE CHKS  SPONSOR California Department of Education  Anonymous, voluntary, confidential student self- report, comprehensive health.
Derby High School Connecticut Academic Performance Test Derby High School 2011 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Disaggregated Data Analysis.
Kentucky Board of Education OCTOBER 9, 2012 College/Career Readiness, Proficiency and Achievement Gap Update.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
May Moving from Good to Great Ready for Kindergarten (R4K) Readiness Matters To better prepare students for the more-demanding 21st century and.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
76% African American 14% Latino 9% Asian 1% White 51% Low-Income
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Urban Charter Schools in California March 2015
National Conference on Student Assessment June 2016
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in New York March 2015
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education
Joe Sampson MPUSD EL/Intervention Coordinator
Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report
CELDT MOVEMENT BY LEVELS
SSC Meeting November 12th, 2016
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Central City Elementary School
Enrollees by URM and Non-URM Status in U. S

The RFEP Process RFEP: Redesignated Fluent English Proficient

Enrollees by URM and Non-URM Status in U. S
PARENT INFORMATIONAL MEETING
Presentation transcript:

The Impact of After-School Programs (ASPs) on Middle School English Learners Harry Talbot Beyond the Bell Branch Los Angeles Unified School District In Partnership With Research Support Services A Presentation at the American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting (October, 2013)

After School Participants Non-Participants Middle Schools 2011-2012 Distribution of Students by Grade Level 40% 37% 34% 35% 34% 29% 31% 30% 20% 10% 0% 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade Grades sum to 100% across participants and across non-participants After School Participants Non-Participants Figure 1.2. October 10, 2013 © Research Support Services and Beyond the Bell Branch LAUSD

5% 5% Figure 1.3. Figure 1.4. Middle Schools 2011-2012 100% 80% 75% 76% 60% 40% 20% 0% 12% 7% 4% 5% 8% 3% 5% 5% Hispanic Black White Asian Other Ca tegory col umns s um to 100% a cross participants a nd across non-participants After School Participants Non-Participants Figure 1.3. Students by Socioeconomic Status (Free/Reduced Price Meal Program Eligibility) 85.5% 81.8% 80% 60% 40% 14.5% 18.2% 20% 0% Meal Eligible Not Meal Eligible Ca tegory col umns s um to 100% a cross participants a nd across non-participants After School Participants Non-Participants Figure 1.4. October 10, 2013 © Research Support Services and Beyond the Bell Branch LAUSD

Students by English Learner Status Middle Schools 2011-2012 Students by English Learner Status Beginning of school year 50% 47% 45% 40% 34% 32% 30% 21% 21% 20% 10% 0% Limited English Proficient (LEP) Redesignated English Proficient (RFEP) English Only (EO) & Initially English Proficient (IFEP) Ca tegory col umns s um to 100% a cross participants a nd across non-participants After School Participants Non-Participants Figure 1.5. October 10, 2013 © Research Support Services and Beyond the Bell Branch LAUSD

Students by Proficiency in English Language Arts Middle Schools 2011-2012 Students by Proficiency in English Language Arts (Baseline/Prior Year CST Proficiency Level) 40% 31% 33% 30% 23% 22% 20% 19% 20% 17% 14% 12% 9% 10% 0% Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced After School Participants Non-Participants Figure 1.7. Students by Proficiency in Mathematics (Baseline/Prior Year CST Proficiency Level) 50% 42% 39% 40% 30% 30% 28% 20% 16% 13% 14% 11% 10% 5% 3% 0% Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced After School Participants Non-Participants Figure 1.8. October 10, 2013 © Research Support Services and Beyond the Bell Branch LAUSD

Average Weekly Participation by Gender and Overall Middle Schools 2011-2012 Total Days of Participation by Gender and Overall 23% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 20% 19% 21% 18% 18% 18% 16% 16%16% 17% 6% 14% 15% 1 13% 15% 12% 13% Male Female Overall Attendance columns sum to 100% within each student category 10-19 days 20-29 days 30-49 days 50-79 days 80-119 days 120+ days Figure 2.1. Average Weekly Participation by Gender and Overall 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 25% 26% 25% 25% 24% 23% 24% 25% 22% 23% 23% 21% 5% 5% 5% Male Female Overall Attendance columns sum to 100% within each student category 1 day/wk 2 days/wk 3 days/wk 4 days/wk 5 days/wk Figure 2.2. October 10, 2013 © Research Support Services and Beyond the Bell Branch LAUSD

Total Days of Participation by Grade Level Middle Schools 2011-2012 . Total Days of Participation by Grade Level 30% 20% 10% 0% 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade Attendance columns sum to 100% within each grade 10-19 days 20-29 days 30-49 days 50-79 days 80-119 days 120+ days Figure 2.3. Average Weekly Participation by Grade Level 40% 1 day/wk 2 days/wk 3 days/wk 4 days/wk Figure 2.4. 5 days/wk October 10, 2013 © Research Support Services and Beyond the Bell Branch LAUSD

Total Days of Participation by Race/Ethnicity Middle Schools 2011-2012 Total Days of Participation by Race/Ethnicity 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Hispanic Black White Asian Other Attendance columns sum to 100% within each student category 10-19 days 20-29 days 30-49 days 50-79 days 80-119 days 120+ days Figure 2.5. Average Weekly Participation by Race/Ethnicity 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Hispanic Black White Asian Other 1 day/wk 2 days/wk 3 days/wk 4 days/wk 5 days/wk Figure 2.6. October 10, 2013 © Research Support Services and Beyond the Bell Branch LAUSD

Total Days of Participation by Socioeconomic Status Middle Schools 2011-2012 Total Days of Participation by Socioeconomic Status (Meal Eligibility) 30% 20% 10% 0% Meal Eligible Not Meal Eligible Attendance columns sum to 100% within each student category 10-19 days 20-29 days 30-49 days 50-79 days 80-119 days 120+ days Figure 2.7. Average Weekly Participation by Socioeconomic Status 25% 15% 5% 1 day/wk 2 days/wk 3 days/wk 4 days/wk 5 days/wk Figure 2.8. October 10, 2013 © Research Support Services and Beyond the Bell Branch LAUSD 10

Total Days of Participation by Baseline English Learner Status Middle Schools 2011-2012 Total Days of Participation by Baseline English Learner Status 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Limited English Proficient (LEP) Redesignated English Proficient (RFEP) English Only (EO) & Initially English Proficient (IFEP) Attendance columns sum to 100% within each student category 20-29 days 30-49 days 50-79 days 80-119 days 120+ days 10-19 days Figure 2.9. Average Weekly Participation by Baseline English Learner Status 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Limited English Proficient (LEP) Redesignated English Proficient (RFEP) English Only (EO) & Initially English Proficient (IFEP) Attendance columns sum to 100% within each student category 1 day/wk 2 days/wk 3 days/wk 4 days/wk 5 days/wk Figure 2.10. October 10, 2013 © Research Support Services and Beyond the Bell Branch LAUSD

Average Weekly Participation by English Language Development Level Middle Schools 2011-2012 Average Weekly Participation by English Language Development Level for English Learners 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% ELD 1 ELD 2 ELD 3 ELD 4 ELD 5 Attendance columns sum to 100% within each student category 1 day/wk 2 days/wk 3 days/wk 4 days/wk 5 days/wk Figure 2.11. Average Weekly Participation by English Language Development Level for English Learners 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% ELD 1 ELD 2 ELD 3 ELD 4 ELD 5 Attendance columns sum to 100% within each student category 1 day/wk 2 days/wk 3 days/wk 4 days/wk 5 days/wk Figure 2.12. October 10, 2013 © Research Support Services and Beyond the Bell Branch LAUSD

Figure 2.13. Figure 2.14. Middle Schools 2011-2012 Total Days of Participation by Proficiency in English Language Arts (Baseline/Prior Year CST Proficiency Level) 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced Attendance columns sum to 100% within each student category 10-19 days 20-29 days 30-49 days 50-79 days 80-119 days 120+ days Figure 2.13. Average Weekly Participation by Profiency in English Language Arts (Baseline/Prior Year CST Profiency Level) 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced Attendance columns sum to 100% within each student category 1 day/wk 2 days/wk 3 days/wk 4 days/wk 5 days/wk Figure 2.14. October 10, 2013 © Research Support Services and Beyond the Bell Branch LAUSD

Total Days of Participation by Proficiency in Mathematics Middle Schools 2011-2012 Figure 2.15. Total Days of Participation by Proficiency in Mathematics (Baseline/Prior Year CST Proficiency Level) 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced Attendance columns sum to 100% within each student category 10-19 days 20-29 days 30-49 days 50-79 days 80-119 days 120+ days Figure 2.16. Average Weekly Participation by Profiency in Mathematics (Basline/Prior Year CST Profiency Level) 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced Attendance columns sum to 100% within each student category 1 day/wk 2 days/wk 3 days/wk 4 days/wk 5 days/wk October 10, 2013 © Research Support Services and Beyond the Bell Branch LAUSD

High participation: 80+ days Medium participation: 30-79 days Middle Schools 2011-2012 English Learner Redesignation Rate by After School Participation Level 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 16.4% 17.0% 15.8% 12.1% Percent of Entering LEP Students Low Participation High Participation Medium Participation Matched Controls Figure 3.1. Participation Groups High participation: 80+ days Medium participation: 30-79 days Low participation: 10-29 days October 10, 2013 © Research Support Services and Beyond the Bell Branch LAUSD

High participation: 80+ days Medium participation: 30-79 days Middle Schools 2011-2012 Participation Groups High participation: 80+ days Medium participation: 30-79 days Low participation: 10-29 days October 10, 2013 © Research Support Services and Beyond the Bell Branch LAUSD

For further information, or copies of publications, please contact: Middle Schools 2011-2012 For further information, or copies of publications, please contact: Harry Talbot, Administrative Coordinator Beyond the Bell Branch Los Angeles Unified School District 213-241-1391 harry.talbot@lausd.net Glenn Daley, President Daley Research 310-863-1519 glenn@daleyresearch.com Steven Frankel, President Research Support Services 310-827-9665 steve_rss@me.com October 10, 2013 © Research Support Services and Beyond the Bell Branch LAUSD