INDUS RIVER SYSTEM AUTHORITY (IRSA) “Inter Provincial Water Issues − Challenges and Opportunities ”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation made at LEAD Pakistan, Islamabad on
Advertisements

Transboundary Water Resources Paula Kulis Indus River
Water Resources situation in Pakistan by murtaza zulfiqar (17)
Water for Nature in the Downstream Areas DR. BASHIR AHMAD.
COMPARISON BETWEEN BHASHA AND KALABAGH DAMS By Engr. Amjad Hussain Malik Chairman Institution of Engineers, Pakistan (IEP)
Long Term Storage Long term storage means to store water during high inflows years for the benefit of low inflows years. Long term storage means to store.
PRESENTATION ON MANGLA DAM MADE BY: SYED ALI ZULQADAR. ROLL NO: 37.MAJOR: SES 5 th.
INDUS RIVER SYSTEM AUTHORITY (IRSA) “Inter Provincial Water Distribution and the Need for Reservoirs” Rao Irshad Ali Khan Member IRSA Punjab December.
“Thousands have lived without love, no one without water.”
By: Alizar Rizvi Fatima Raza VIII-A. Mangla Dam is located on the Jhelum river. Kashmir, Pakistan. It is the 16th largest dam in the world. It was built.
Water Storage, Losses And Developing underground Water Usman Chopra Usman Chopra 2008-ag ag-1916 Agronomy 7th Agronomy 7th.
Water Scenario of PAkistan
WATER ISSUES IN THE EASTERN EUROPE:
Interprovincial Water Cooperation for Sharing Shortages
INDUS RIVER SYSTEM AUTHORITY (IRSA) “Water Apportionment Accord 1991, Indus River System Authority”
By Prof.Dr Engr.S.M.Bhutta
Prof. Dr. Engr. S.M. Bhutta.  Energy the lifeline of, industrial economic, development and quality of life.  Pakistan is the poorest of the poor as.
Flood Management Architecture In Pakistan Ashfaq Mahmood.
RIVERS OF PAKISTAN INDUS JHELUM CHENAB RAVI SUTLEJ BEAS WESTERN RIVERS EASTERN RIVERS AFGHANISTAN INDIA IRAN.
FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues.
Cowichan Lake Storage Assessment – 2015 Final Results Craig Sutherland, M.Sc., P.Eng. July 27, 2015.
Diversion of Flood Water from Ganga at Kanpur.  Introduction  Study Area  Flow Pattern of Ganga at Kanpur  Quantification of Divertible Flood  Downstream.
UZAIR KAMAL Mohsin Murad MAJID KHAN. Major Power Project Of The Country 92 miles downstream the confluence of Kabul and Indus Rivers 260 ft high structure.
Overview of Alabama Power’s Tallapoosa River Operations Martin Dam Relicensing Informational Meeting April 1, 2008 Andy Sheppard, P.E. Project Mgr. - Hydro.
WATER RESOURCES OF PAKISTAN
Martin Rule Curve Study Ashley McVicar, APC Maurice James, Water Resources Consulting LLC.
ICAP SAFA Conference 2016 South Asia: Corridor of Opportunities Lahore, January 30, 2016 Mirza Hamid Hasan.
THE INDUS BASIN – AN OVERVIEW
Negotiations and Agreements Between Ganges River Basin Riparians Khalid Khan Khalid Saifullah Muhammad Arif Goheer.
IMPACT OF FUTURE WATER USES OF AFGHANISTAN ON PAKISTAN 26 Augist 2015.
1991 Water Accord Issue— Water Sharing. 2 Provisions Of 1991 Water Accord.
PRESS BRIEFING WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY December 16, 2005 MEGA DAM PROJECTS.
Reclamation and Hoover Dam It’s All About The Water.
Naseer Ahmad Gillani FIE. Threats Glaciers Depletion Water Pollution Siltation In Mega dams Increasing Water Deficit Water Sharing Issues Climate.
CLIMATE CHANGE AND WATER RESOURCES OF PAKISTAN
KALABAGH DAM PROJECT General Reservations of Provinces on KBD Feasibility PROJECT BY RABIA RASHEED SHEHRBANO AKBAR ZIL-E-HUMA AKBAR.
TEHRI DAM & RESERVOIR River Discharge: 30 to 7500 Cumec Design Flood: 15,540 Cumec Gross Storage: 3,540 MCM Live Storage: 2,615 MCM Mean.
Reservoir Operations in Bhakra Beas River System
Jan 2016 Solar Lunar Data.
Beijing-Yichang-Wuhan, Peoples Republic of China
Precipitation, Streamflow and a Look at Little Bear River Contaminants
Irrigation Development and Financing in Nepal
INDUS BASIN CHALLENGE – THE NEED FOR A COLLECTIVE RESPONSE
Drainage Projects in Punjab
Learning objectives To understand the water balance
Rivers of Pakistan By Ayesha, Noori, Emaan.
MUHAMMAD SAQIB ag-2004 B. Sc. (Hons
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
Selection of Site for Hydrokinetic
SAFETY IS TVA’S NUMBER ONE PRIORITY
Mitigation and aquifer recharge opportunities in the Clark Fork Basin
Mississippi River at Clinton, Iowa.
Gantt Chart Enter Year Here Activities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
San Diego Water Resources
Electricity Cost and Use – FY 2016 and FY 2017
KASHMIR DISPUTE And Water Dispute
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Chapter Four RUNOFF When a storm occurs, a portion of rainfall infiltrates into the ground and some portion may evaporate. The rest flows as a thin sheet.
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Presentation transcript:

INDUS RIVER SYSTEM AUTHORITY (IRSA) “Inter Provincial Water Issues − Challenges and Opportunities ” S.N: 01 Rao Irshad Ali Khan Chairman IRSA May 26-27, 2016 Presentation to IWMI at PC Hotal, Bhurban - Pakistan

Indus Waters Treaty 1960 Water Apportionment Accord 1991 The Water Agreements S.N: 02 Indus Waters Treaty 1960 Water Apportionment Accord 1991

Inter-provincial Water Dispute S.N: 03 The Inter-provincial dispute on Water Distribution was initiated during the construction of two mega Irrigation Projects i.e. Sutlej Valley Canal Project 1932 Sukkur Barrage 1935

Committees / commissions S.N: 04 1937 Anderson Committee 1945 Rau Commission 1968 Akhtar Hussain Committee 1970 Fazal-e-Akbar Committee 1976 Indus Waters Commission (Anwar-ul-Haq Commission) 1983 Haleem Commission 1991 Water Accord

Cusec = Cubic foot per second S.N: 05 Cusec = Cubic foot per second 1 Cusec day = 1 Cusec discharge for 24 hours Acre foot = one foot height of water over one acre 1 Cusec day = 2 acre feet 1 MAF = One million acre feet 1 watering = 3 inches water over 1 acre area 6

Water Account Post Tarbela Average (1976.77 to 2014.15) (MAF) S.N: 06 Western River 138.03 Eastern River 6.54 Total Western & Eastern River 144.57 Provincial Utilization 97.05 System Losses -18.22 * D/S Kotri 29.30 * Required D/S Kotri 8.6 MAF

Western & Eastern River Post Tarbela (1976.77 to 2014.15) (MAF) S.N: 07 Rivers Indus @ Kalabagh Jhelum @ Mangla Chenab @ Marala Eastern Rivers Total Maximum 112.18 (1991-92) 32.00 (1992.93) 32.69 (1988-89) 19.98 (1978-79) 183.45 Minimum 66.81 (2001-02) 11.85 17.85 (2009-10) 0.30 99.05 Average 89.65 22.57 25.80 6.54 144.57

Comparison of Para 14 (b) vs Para 2 (MAF) S.N: 08 Province Para 14 (b) % Para 2 Difference (4-2) % Increase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Punjab 54.51 53.1 55.94 48.9 1.43 12 Sindh 43.53 42.4 48.76 42.6 5.23 45 Balochistan 1.63 1.6 3.87 3.4 2.24 19 KPK 3.06 3.0 5.78 5.1 2.72 24 Total 102.73 100 114.35 11.62

Comparison of Para 14 (b), 2 & 4 (Percentages) S.N: 09 Province Para 14 (b) Para 2 Para 4 1 2 3 4 Punjab 53.1 48.9 37 Sindh 42.4 42.6 Balochistan 1.6 3.4 12 KPK 3.0 5.1 14 Total 100.0 100

Present Distribution Mechanism of IRSA (THREE TIER FORMULA SINCE 2003) S.N: 10 Scenario I Water Availability < Actual Average System Uses 77-82 Distributed as per 14 (b) of the WAA 1991 Scenario II Water Availability > Actual Average System Uses 77-82 but < Para 2 of WAA 1991 Actual Average System Uses are protected Balance available as per Para 2 i.e. 10-daily approved by CCI Scenario III Water Availability > Para 2 of WAA 1991 Para 2 i.e. 10-daily approved by CCI are protected Balance as per Para 4 of the WAA 1991 Note: KPK & Balochistan are exempted from shortages 11

Para 6 S.N: 11 The need for storages, wherever feasible on the Indus and other rivers was admitted and recognised by the participants for planned future agricultural development. 12

Reservoir Sedimentation S.N: 12 Reservoir Designed Present Sedimentation Tarbela Level 1550.00 MAF % Live Storage 9.68 6.33 -3.35 -35 Mangla 1202.00 5.34 4.50 -0.84 -16 Chashma 649.00 0.72 0.28 -0.44 -61 Total Storage 15.74 11.11 -4.63 -29% Mangla Raising 2013 1242.00 2.90 1242.00 2.90 0.0 Total 18.64 14.01 -25

Provincial Allocations with Additional Storage (MAF) S.N: 13 Province Pre Mangla 1960-66 Post Mangla 1967-76 Post Tarbela 1977-82 Post Kalabagh Post Bhasha & Akhori Punjab 48.35 49.86 54.51 55.94 61.49 Sindh *36.12 40.67 43.53 48.76 54.31 KPK 1.67 2.43 3.06 5.78 7.88 Balochistan - 0.49 1.63 3.87 5.67 Total 86.14 93.45 102.73 114.35 129.35 * Includes Balochistan

Average Annual flow (MAF) Storage Capacity (MAF) AVERAGE ANNUAL FLOW AND STORAGE CAPACITY OF DAMS OF SOME MAJOR RIVER BASINS S.N: 14 Sr. # River Basin Average Annual flow (MAF) No. of Dams Storage Capacity (MAF) % age Storage 1 Colorado 12 3 59.62 497 2 Nile 47 132 281 Sutlej Bias India (Total) 32 750 5 4,636 11.32 245 35 33 4 Yellow River 345 7 68.95 20 Columbia 179 34 19 6 Indus & others Rivers 145 11.50 *14.12 8 10 World 20,000 - 8,000 40 Source: Wapda * After Raising of Mangla

Para 7 S.N: 15 The need for certain minimum escapage to sea, below Kotri, to check sea intrusion was recognised. Sindh held the view, that the optimum level was 10 M.A.F., which was discussed at length, while other studies indicated lower/higher figures. It was, therefore, decided that further studies would be undertaken to establish the minimal escapge needs down stream Kotri.

Recommended Escapage below Kotri S.N: 16 Kharif Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Total Cfs 5000 MAF >=0.3 1.8 +**) Rabi *) Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar cfs 0.3 1.8 Annual 3.6 +**) *) In a dry year the amount can be proportionally reduced in relation to the reductions in irrigation water supply **) A total volume of 25 MAF in any 5 years period (an annual equivalent of 5 MAF) to be released in a concentrated way as flood flow (Kharif period), to be adjusted according to the ruling storage in the reservoirs and the volume discharged in the four previous years.

WATER AVAILABILITY (MAF) POPULATION (Million) 182 Million (2015) 991 m3 2015 5650 S.N: 17

ISSUES 22 MAF being wasted D/S Kotri Escapages D/S Kotri S.N: 18 22 MAF being wasted D/S Kotri Escapages D/S Kotri Prevention/Mitigation of floods Operation of Link Canals Mangla Reservoir Filling KPK’s objection on construction of Kalabagh Dam a) Nowshera will be drowned b) Swabi will be water logged 19

THANK YOU

DRAINAGE LEVELS IN KABUL VALLEY WITH KALABAGH S.N: 19 DRAINAGE LEVELS IN KABUL VALLEY WITH KALABAGH CHARSADDA HISARA DRAIN PABBI NOWSHERA MARDAN SWABI 1000 970 LEVEL IN FEET 955 960 958 940 RESERVOIR RETENATION EL. 915 DISTANCE U/S DAM SITE IN MILES

Line diagram with distance S.N: 21 Skardu 30 MAF 267 KM INDUS RIVER Bhasha 50 MAF 314 KM Tarbela 60 MAF 200 KM Kalabagh 90 MAF 23

Kalabagh v/s Alternatives S.N: 22 Proposed Dams Kalabagh 2. Bhasha 3. Akhori 4. Munda Kalabagh is at tail of mountaineous system & harnesses maximum amount of water of Indus i.e 90 MAF on an Average. It is the most cost-effective Dam No land dispute whatsoever Total integration of the system by construction of Kalabagh-Rasul Link Canal. Major objection of Sindh Province regarding filling of Mangla Reservoir during early Kharif would be addressed Only site from where gravity flows would be available for DIKhan Infrastructure up to Dam site is fully developed; feasibility study vetted & verified by International agencies time & again Flow of Kabul river, being early riser, would be available for EK filling Nearest to National Grid 24