©Adam vanLangenberg - MSSS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Logical Fallacies
Advertisements

Logical Fallacies.
Critical Thinking (and Logical Fallacies) All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal. All cadets wear uniforms. Thompson wears.
How to make an Argument Toulmin Model.
Understanding Science 8. Logical Fallacies © Colin Frayn,
Capstone Seminar Mr. Dana Linton. Logical fallacies are common errors of reasoning. If an argument commits a logical fallacy, then the reasons that it.
 Read the following argument. Examine it closely. Do you think it is logically sound? Why?  [T]he acceptance of abortion does not end with the killing.
Fallacies.
 In this task you will see 16 different arguments.  You have to identify which of the 8 common fallacies is being used by the argument.
By LordZB | November 8, 2012LordZB
What is Knowledge?.
Age of the Sage Advertising, Inc. “I cannot teach anybody anything; I can only make him think.” Socrates.
Logical Fallacies A Brief Review. Argumentum ad hominem This is the error of attacking the character or motives of a person who has stated an idea, rather.
Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements.
LOGICAL FALLACIES Errors in Reasoning.
Logical Fallacies Protect yourself!. A “Fallacy” is an error in reasoning. Sometimes it’s an honest mistake, but sometimes people use fallacies to try.
What is a logical fallacy?. Logical fallacies Do you know what a “fallacy” is? Look at the word – it has “falla” in it, which could mean “fault,” “flaw,”
Logic Fallacies Debate Class Production Spain Park High School
Logical Fallacies.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Logical Fallacies When arguments go bad… Image:
LOGIC 2+2=4… right?. Logical Reasoning Statements formed from sound thinking and proof of reasoning.
Fallacies The quickest ways to lose arguments. Introduction to Logic O Argument: The assertion of a conclusion based on logical premises O Premise: Proposition.
Argumentum Ad Hominem Attacking the person’s character or personal traits rather than the argument at hand Rejecting a claim based on the person defending.
Critical Thinking Lecture 5b More Fallacies
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed If spotted one can essentially render an entire line of reasoning invalid.
Reason Pt. 2. Inductive Reasoning Induction moves from the particular to the general. As a result, it involves generalizing: moving from observable facts.
Fallacies Mistakes in reasoning or thinking.  Occurs when a speaker makes a claim that presents a range of choices.  Writers that use either/or are.
LOGICAL FALLACIES. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc “After this, therefore because of this.”
LOGICAL FALLACIES. COINCIDENTAL CORRELATION Assumption that because one thing follows another that the one thing was caused by the other. Y follows X,
Ad Hominem (Personal Attack) An attempt to discredit the argument by discrediting the character of the person advancing it.
Logical Fallacies Overview Logical fallacies are instances of “broken reasoning.” Fallacies avoid the actual argument. We want to avoid fallacies, be.
The Seven Deadly Logical Sins Ways to use logic as a shield
Rhetorical Devices and Fallacies
Logical Fallacies Introduction.
Logical Fallacies.
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
Logical Fallacies.
Common Logical Fallacies
AcDv B61 Recognizing Logical Fallacies
Defect that weakens an argument
Propaganda and Logical Fallacies
Logical Fallacies Unit 2.
Errors in reasoning that invalidate the argument
What is a logical fallacy?
Logical Fallacies
Introduction to Logic Lecture 5b More Fallacies
Logical fallacies.
More on Argument.
Logical Fallacies.
C/Maj Nicholas Schroder
Logic: The Presidential Criminals
Appeal to Force (Argumentum ad baculum)
Logical Fallacy Notes Comp. & Rhet. ENG 1010.
Writing the Argumentative Essay
A Guide to Logical Fallacies
Chapter 14: Argumentation
SCEPTICISM What is it? What do sceptics do & why?
Using Principles of Logic to Strengthen Argument Writing
More on Argument.
Logical Fallacies Introduction.
Chapter 6 Reasoning Errors
Logical Fallacies Introduction.
Logical Fallacies.
The Magic of Critical Thinking
Logical fallacies.
Logical Fallacies English III.
The Seven Deadly Logical Sins Ways to use logic as a shield
Logical Fallacies Introduction.
Presentation transcript:

©Adam vanLangenberg - MSSS Logical Fallacies 101 ©Adam vanLangenberg - MSSS

Claiming that something is true because we can’t disprove it. Ad ignorantiam Claiming that something is true because we can’t disprove it. “We don’t know what those lights in the sky are, therefore they are aliens.”

Argument from authority The idea that something must be true because it has been said by somebody with authority. “I use these magical healing crystals every day!” – Dr S. Novella, M.D.

Argument from Final Consequences Making an argument based on how good/bad the consequences are. “Aliens must exist because otherwise we would be all alone in the universe.”

Argument from Personal Incredulity Claiming that something is impossible because you personally don’t understand it. “I don’t understand how evolution works so there must be an intelligent designer.”

Argument from Antiquity Stating that something must be good because it has been used for a long time. “Of course it’s legitimate! Cave men have been doing this for millions of years!”

Argument from Popularity Stating that something must be legitimate because a lot of people believe in it. “1 million Usher fans can’t be wrong!”

Correlation vs. Causation Assuming cause and effect for two things simply because they occurred together. “I have never been attacked by a bear while wearing this tie. Bear-proof tie!”

Unexplained vs. Unexplainable Believing that because we cannot explain some phenomenon now, we will never be able to explain it. “We don’t know what the Voynich Manuscript means so it must have been written by angels!”

False Continuum Thinking that because no distinct line exists between two extremes, then those two extremes are really the same thing. “There’s a fuzzy line between religions and cults, so all religions must be cults.”

“Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.” False Dichotomy Insisting that things must either be one way or another. “Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.”

Applying criteria to one thing but not to another. Inconsistency Applying criteria to one thing but not to another. “Prescription drugs need to be strongly regulated but herbal supplements do not.”

Making a conclusion that doesn’t follow from the arguments. Non-Sequitur Making a conclusion that doesn’t follow from the arguments. “God is love. Love is blind. Ray Charles is blind. Therefore Ray Charles is God.

Post-hoc ergo propter hoc Saying that because A happened before B, A must have caused B. “A rooster crows before the sun rises so the rooster’s crowing must cause the sun to rise. Clever rooster!”

Extending an argument to an absurd conclusion. Reductio ad absurdim Extending an argument to an absurd conclusion. “If you don’t believe in aliens because you haven’t seen one, how can you believe in France? You haven’t seen it either.”

“Your argument is wrong because you’re a big fatty fat fat.” Ad hominem (My favourite) Attacking a person, rather than their claims. “Your argument is wrong because you’re a big fatty fat fat.”

Slippery slope Arguing that believing something must also involve believing in its extreme. “If you support the death penalty then you must also support genocide.”

Arbitrarily introducing something into an argument to make it work. Special pleading Arbitrarily introducing something into an argument to make it work. “My psychic powers didn’t work because of all the sceptics in the room! Also, because of magnetic interference.”

Straw man Twisting your opponent’s argument to make it easier to argue against. “I think homeopathy is stupid and should be banned.” “So you think we should ban medicines, do you?”

“Go to bed.” “Why?” “Because I said so.” Tautology The argument that A = B because A = B. “Go to bed.” “Why?” “Because I said so.”

Moving the goalpost “…and that is why your mother is fat.” After losing an argument, throwing something else into the ring which cannot yet be proven. “…and that is why your mother is fat.” “Oh yeah? Well then what is she eating right now?”

“You can’t say murder is wrong, you’re a serial killer!” Tu quoque Attacking somebody for arguing against something that they used to do. “You can’t say murder is wrong, you’re a serial killer!”

“It is McDonald’s fault that I am fat!” Begging the question Not stating something important that your argument assumes. “It is McDonald’s fault that I am fat!”