Sanna Sorvari, Finnish Meteorological Institute

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Importance for Africa ipBes side event at AMCEN. May 28th 2009,
Advertisements

Capacity Building Mandate We, the participants…recognize the need to support: …A coordinated effort to involve and assist developing countries in improving.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO GFCS Governance proposal Process of development.
Future Earth: Research for global sustainability in Asia
OECD GLOBAL SCIENCE FORUM SCIENTIFIC ADVICE FOR POLICYMAKING AND CONSEQUENCES FOR THE ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITY OF SCIENTISTS PRELIMINARY FINDINGS Tateo.
(The Global Programme of Research On Climate Change Vulnerability, Impacts and Adaptation) Adaptation Knowledge Day V: Climate Change Adaptation Gaps BONN,
Richard Lane, Natural History Museum, London Scientific Collections International (SciColl) An international coordinating mechanism OECD GSF Krakow Oct.
BELMONT FORUM E-INFRASTRUCTURES AND DATA MANAGEMENT PROJECT Updates and Next Steps to Deliver the final Community Strategy and Implementation Plan Maria.
The SEEAW in the context of Integrated Water Resource Management and the MDGs Roberto Lenton Chair, Technical Committee Global Water Partnership.
Global Action Plan and its implementation in other regions Meeting for Discussion of the draft Plan for the Implementation of the Global Strategy to Improve.
Richard Lane, Natural History Museum, London Science Collections International An international coordinating mechanism OECD Global Science Forum, April.
Seventh framework programme CAPACITIES specific programme Activities of international cooperation Coordination Support Action - Grant agreement no.:
MULTILATERAL COOPERATION KEY PERFORMANCE AREAS SA engagement with the UN Implementation of major summits and international conventions relevant to S&T.
April_2010 Partnering initiatives at country level Proposed partnering process to build a national stop tuberculosis (TB) partnership.
Promotion of an ICT dialogue between Europe and Latin America Horizon 2020 Dr. Margaretha Mazura, EMF Project Angels Webinar, 13 December 2012.
Visioning: Towards a new initiative on Earth system research for global sustainability research Prof. Deliang CHEN, ICSU Executive Director.
SCIENTIFIC ADVICE FOR POLICY-MAKING The role and responsibility of expert bodies and individual scientists.
FAO Turkey Partnership Programme (FTPP) FAO Final Evaluation of the FTPP Summary for FTPP Programming Meeting, 14 December
Public health, innovation and intellectual property 1 |1 | The Global Strategy on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property Technical Briefing.
ICSU- Strengthening international science for the benefit of society Carthage Smith Deputy Executive Director.
Future Earth research for global sustainability: The governance structure mechanisms Rik Leemans & Peter Liss Transition Team Members photos:
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
Global Water Information Interest Group meeting RDA 7 th Plenary, 1 st March 2016, Tokyo Global Water Information Interest Group Welcome to the inaugural.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
UNGGIM – PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK. AGENDA > OVERVIEW OF PRIVATE SECTOR >PURPOSE AND VISION OF PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK > STRUCTURE AND TERMS OF REFERENCE.
LIVING LAB OF GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH
Monitoring Forest Resources for SFM in the UNECE Region
Priorities for International Development of e-Infrastructure and Data Management in Global Change Research Presentation by Robert Gurney, University of.
Tom Warburton Head of Regional Strategy One NorthEast
Equality and Human Rights Exchange Network
Certification of Trusted Repositories
Session 2: Institutional arrangements for energy statistics
Investment Logic Mapping – An Evaluative Tool with Zing
Local Government in Jamaica
Regional preparatory process for Rio+20
Capacity Building Enhance the coordination of efforts to strengthen individual, institutional and infrastructure capacities, particularly in developing.
Roadmap to Enhanced Technical Regulations of WMO
Draft Career Development Services Policy: Building an effective and integrated Career Development Services System for South Africa Mr FY Patel Deputy.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Guidance on Natura 2000 and Forests – Scoping Document
EOSC Governance Development Forum
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
Overview of global initiatives and their relevance for the EU context
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Follow us: June 15-16, 2017 Steering Committee Meeting Summary of Conclusions and Action Items Follow.
Scanning the environment: The global perspective on the integration of non-traditional data sources, administrative data and geospatial information Sub-regional.
Introduction to the training
Building Knowledge about ESD Indicators
…and still actual for a post-2010 strategy!
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
National Reporting and Dissemination Platforms
IPET-OPSLS/CCl-17 relevant issues before EC-70
Common Solutions to Common Problems
A Funders Perspective Maria Uhle Co-Chair, Belmont Forum Directorates for Geosciences, US National Science Foundation.
Considerations in Development of the SBSTA Five Year Programme of Work on Adaptation Thank Mr. Chairman. Canada appreciates this opportunity to share.
Integrated River Basin Management
GCOS Strategy: advocate-coordinate-communicate
ASTRONET Coordinating strategic planning for European Astronomy
UNDMTP Presentation, Session V: Early Warning Symposium 24 May 2006
EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.
Juan Gonzalez eGovernment & CIP operations
CEOS Response to IPWG on Draft GEO Strategy
Bird of Feather Session
A World that Counts: Mobilising the Data Revolution for Sustainable Development Enrico Giovannini, Co-Chair of the Independent Expert Advisory Group.
FINANCING NATURA 2000 Agenda item 2.1 CGBN Co-ordination Group
A Framework for the Governance of Infrastructure - Getting Infrastructure Right - Jungmin Park, OECD Budgeting & Public Expenditures Division 2019 Annual.
Being a Local University: Towards New Assessment Tools and Indicators Dr John H Smith Senior Adviser, European University Association (EUA) Brussels Member,
Interoperability and data for open science
eContentplus 2007 Work Programme
Presentation transcript:

International Coordination of Data infrastructures for open Science – RDA P10 BOF Sanna Sorvari, Finnish Meteorological Institute (@sannasorvari) Andrew Treloar, Australian National Data Service (@atreloar) NB Title change from cyber-infrastructure to Data infrastructure for Open Science

Outline 0-5: Welcome, overview 5-15: Quick assessment of who is in the meeting, and what they want to get out of the session 15-30: High-level summary of activity leading up to report 30-60: Presentation of the main recommendations in the report 60-80: Questions/discussion 80-90: Next steps

Context - Problem “The emergence of ‘data driven science’ reflects the increasing value of a range of observational, sensor, streaming and experimental data in every field of science. Information and communication technology infrastructures for scientific data are emerging world-wide, however, often these cannot be shared nor are interoperable across countries and disciplines; moreover, they are unsustainable due to lack of commonly agreed governance, legal frameworks and funding models.” 1. Extract from the Draft report from the G8+05 Global Research Infrastructure Sub Group on Data (OCT 2011)........

Context - Need “The ability of scientific inquiry to address complex, multi-scale, multi- dimensional, multidisciplinary questions means that there is a greater dependency on large, complex, widely distributed and often heterogeneous data sets at all stages of the scientific process including observation, theory, and validation. To ensure that the appropriate data are available for this type of research, it is essential to take a global approach to promote shared usage, interoperability and discoverability of scientific information resources.” - OECD proposal for funding of this activity

Overall aim of project Establish principles and policy actions regarding the governance and underpinning services that can accelerate the establishment of open and sustainable global science data infrastructures.

The GSF/WDS Expert Group Co chairs: Sanna Sorvari (Finland) Andrew Treloar (Australia) 20 members, representing 14 countries Natural and social sciences backgrounds Developed and emerging economies This is a joint activity with the World Data System

The Study Design Case study of 31 international networks from different domains Initial broad survey with Expert Group members providing written information on networks that they are familiar with 2nd round of in-depth interviews with 10 selected networks on key issues Analysis by Expert Group Multi-stakeholder workshop to consider preliminary outcomes (March 2017)

Criteria for networks as case studies Data networks and data for Open Science are main focus Networks must have international remit but can be concentrated on one country or region (integration of national solutions into global networks is an important theme) Focus on ‘good examples’ that others can learn from Can be at different levels and scales Disciplinary, domain specific or inter-disciplinary Journal publishing is not a major focus but might be included when associated with data

Depth question groupings Implications, advantages and operational challenges of being an international network Steering the network: funders and researchers’ community Limits and challenges related to openness Governance-related issues Sustainability and private sector involvement

Initial candidates for depth questions GBIF, Biodiversity GEO/GEOSS, Earth Observations ICSU-WDS, Environmental and Space + multiple disciplines ADNI, Alzheimer's Disease IVOA, Astronomy WDCM-GCM, Microorganisms EMBL-EBI, Genetics and molecular biology DARIAH, Arts and Humanities H3ABioNet, Bioinformatics and Africa IUGONET, Upper Atmosphere

From interviews to report Results of interviews used to derive draft recommendations Recommendations tested with funders at workshop in Brussels in March 2017 Output of workshop taken by Mark Parsons and pulled together into final report with input from Expert Group Draft report being presented to GSF meeting in Rome in October Final report published late this year

Network User/Provider community Body Informs Action Data and Service Interoperability Function Supports International Research Infrastructure International Organisation Funders Supports Network Invests Advises Coordinates Complies with Participates Research Infrastructure Planning Legal and Ethical Frameworks Contributes Does Determines National Authority

Draft Recommendations Recommendation 1 Responsible national authorities should be identified and work toward common definitions of, and agreements on, open data. Recommendation 2 Governments need to work toward commonly agreed and enforced legal and ethical frameworks for the sharing of different types of public research data.

Draft Recommendations… Recommendation 3 All stakeholders need to recognize international research data networks as a critical part of the generic infrastructure for open science. Recommendation 4 Responsible national and international authorities must include data networks in long-term strategic planning and support processes for research infrastructure.

Draft Recommendations… In establishing, developing, operating, and supporting international data networks the following 'organisational' aspects should be taken into account: Networks should have a clearly defined user and data provider community Networks should have a clear understanding of how they relate to other networks Need to define clearly what is to be governed and to involve the data users and providers; Roles and responsibilities across a network must be clearly defined The necessary level of standardization needs to be clearly defined Objective and transparent mechanisms for network assessment should be based on standard quality management frameworks and certification Consideration needs to be given to regional differences in capacity

Draft Recommendations… Recommendation 6 Funders and host institutions should view internationally coordinated data networks as a long-term strategic investment and support them and engage with them accordingly. Recommendation 7 Networks should have clear business models, including value propositions and measures of success that are relevant to their different stakeholders and these measures should be monitored.

Draft Recommendations… Recommendation 8 Funders should actively participate in relevant international discussions and forums to improve long-term functioning, support and coordination of data networks

Thank you! Andrew Treloar Sanna Sorvari @atreloar andrew.treloar@ands.org.au Sanna Sorvari @sannasorvari sanna.sorvari@fmi.fi