Artificial Intelligence and Robotics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Marine Response Centre SPEAKER NAME SPEAKER APPOINTMENT National Contingency Plan – Environment Group Training.
Advertisements

KEY MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES IN WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS JOHNSON C.LEE, VICTOR C.M.LUENG, KIRK H.WONG, JIANNANO CAO, HENRY C.B. CHAN Presented By Viplavi.
Problem Overview - “AS-IS” Here’s the issue: Hotel Dallas has 36,000 feet worth of banquet space. The current way of managing the AC/Heating units in.
Constructing the Future with Intelligent Agents Raju Pathmeswaran Dr Vian Ahmed Prof Ghassan Aouad.
Energy Aware Self Organized Communication in Complex Networks Jakob Salzmann, Dirk Timmermann SPP 1183 Third Colloquium Organic Computing, ,
Bastien DURAND Karen GODARY-DEJEAN – Lionel LAPIERRE Robin PASSAMA – Didier CRESTANI 27 Janvier 2011 ConecsSdf Architecture de contrôle adaptative : une.
Localization of Piled Boxes by Means of the Hough Transform Dimitrios Katsoulas Institute for Pattern Recognition and Image Processing University of Freiburg.
Introduction to Mechatronics and Mechatronics in Real Life Mariya Popovchenko 3 April 2006 JASS 2006, St. Petersburg.
Zachary Wilson Computer Science Department University of Nebraska, Omaha Advisor: Dr. Raj Dasgupta.
©Ian Sommerville 2006Software Engineering, 8th edition. Chapter 30 Slide 1 Security Engineering.
Modified Particle Swarm Algorithm for Decentralized Swarm Agent 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotic and Biomimetics Dong H. Kim Seiichi Shin.
2. Introduction to Redundancy Techniques Redundancy Implies the use of hardware, software, information, or time beyond what is needed for normal system.
An experiment on squad navigation of human and robots IARP/EURON Workshop on Robotics for Risky Interventions and Environmental Surveillance January 7th-8th,
Robotics for a better Society
Transportation Strategy SCMN 4780 Modal Analysis: Pipeline.
Introduction to Automation Chapter 4 Introduction to Automation Dr. Osama Al-Habahbah The University of Jordan Mechatronics Engineering Department.
Unit 3a Industrial Control Systems
Presented by: Chaitanya K. Sambhara Paper by: Maarten Ditzel, Caspar Lageweg, Johan Janssen, Arne Theil TNO Defence, Security and Safety, The Hague, The.
© 2006 EU-MOP Consortium Integrated EU-MOP Design System Athens, Greece 09 June 2006 Nikos Kakalis & Yiannis Ventikos University of Oxford.
© 2005 EU-MOP Consortium Athens, 9 June 06 EU-MOP OVERVIEW Elimination Units for Marine Oil Pollution (EU-MOP): The Concept Harilaos N. Psaraftis Professor,
An Introduction Table Of Context Sensor Network PreviewRouting in Sensor NetworksMobility in Sensor Networks Structure and characteristics of nodes and.
Leslie Luyt Supervisor: Dr. Karen Bradshaw 2 November 2009.
Minimal Hop Count Path Routing Algorithm for Mobile Sensor Networks Jae-Young Choi, Jun-Hui Lee, and Yeong-Jee Chung Dept. of Computer Engineering, College.
Richard Patrick Samples Ph.D. Student, ECE Department 1.
SWARM INTELLIGENCE Sumesh Kannan Roll No 18. Introduction  Swarm intelligence (SI) is an artificial intelligence technique based around the study of.
Efficient Deployment Algorithms for Prolonging Network Lifetime and Ensuring Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks Yong-hwan Kim Korea.
© 2008 EU-MOP Consortium Integrated EU-MOP System Design Madrid, Spain 24 January 2008 Yiannis Ventikos Dept. of Engineering Science University of Oxford.
Boundary Assertion in Behavior-Based Robotics Stephen Cohorn - Dept. of Math, Physics & Engineering, Tarleton State University Mentor: Dr. Mircea Agapie.
THE VISION OF AUTONOMIC COMPUTING. WHAT IS AUTONOMIC COMPUTING ? “ Autonomic Computing refers to computing infrastructure that adapts (automatically)
1 Structure of Aalborg University Welcome to Aalborg University.
Doc.: IEEE /0617r0 Submission May 2008 Tony Braskich, MotorolaSlide 1 Refining the Security Architecture Date: Authors:
Tufts Wireless Laboratory School Of Engineering Tufts University Paper Review “An Energy Efficient Multipath Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks”,
Slide 1 Security Engineering. Slide 2 Objectives l To introduce issues that must be considered in the specification and design of secure software l To.
Reconfiguring Real-time Holonic Manufacturing System
Towards the autonomous navigation of intelligent robots for risky interventions Janusz Bedkowski, Grzegorz Kowalski, Zbigniew Borkowicz, Andrzej Masłowski.
Structure-Free Data Aggregation in Sensor Networks.
IHP Im Technologiepark Frankfurt (Oder) Germany IHP Im Technologiepark Frankfurt (Oder) Germany ©
Modelling with variables. Question… Name three types of bird food you can think of. e.g. sunflower seeds, peanuts, suet balls what if this was the only.
Objective: Clean a simulated oil spill and evaluate methods. Catalyst: What steps in the Jardine filtration process might be effective in preventing oil.
Presented by: Kumar Magi. ( 2MM07EC016 ). Contents Introduction Definition Sensor & Its Evolution Sensor Principle Multi Sensor Fusion & Integration Application.
1 Algoritmos Genéticos aplicados em Machine Learning Controle de um Robo (em inglês)
OPRC Level 3 The Contingency Planning Process. OPRC Level 3.
Matt Loper / Brown University Presented for CS296-3 February 14th, 2007 On Three Layer Architectures (Erann Gat) On Three Layer Architectures (Erann Gat)
Stut 11 Robot Path Planning in Unknown Environments Using Particle Swarm Optimization Leandro dos Santos Coelho and Viviana Cocco Mariani.
PRICING DECISIONS Marketing Management Session 9 November 7, 1997.
4/22/20031/28. 4/22/20031/28 Presentation Outline  Multiple Agents – An Introduction  How to build an ant robot  Self-Organization of Multiple Agents.
Chapter 4 Introduction to Automation
COTS testing Torbjørn Skramstad.
Room A-COPA-COGECA, Rue de Tréves Brussels
Presented by: Saurav Kumar Bengani
3rd International Scientific Conference on "Energy and Climate Change"
Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks
Node Selection in Distributed Sensor Networks
Chapter 4 Introduction to Automation
Author: Ragalatha P, Manoj Challa, Sundeep Kumar. K
Security Engineering.
Department of Electrical Engineering
COTS testing Tor Stålhane.
COTS testing Tor Stålhane.
CIS 488/588 Bruce R. Maxim UM-Dearborn
Final EU-MOP project workshop EU-MOP Intelligent Design
Static Testing Static testing refers to testing that takes place without Execution - examining and reviewing it. Dynamic Testing Dynamic testing is what.
HOARD Robotics Horde of Autonomous Robotic Devices Project Overview
RECONFIGURABLE NETWORK ON CHIP ARCHITECTURE FOR AEROSPACE APPLICATIONS
“Holistic Approach to an Improved Road Safety”
Objectives Explain the purpose and give examples of embedded systems.
9/28/18 – Earthquake and Tsunami hit Indonesia
Substation Automation IT Needs
Computed Tomography (C.T)
AN INEXPENSIVE ROBOTIC KIT FOR CHILDREN EDUCATION
Presentation transcript:

Artificial Intelligence and Robotics EU-MOP Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Dennis Fritsch Fraunhofer-Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation (IPA) Athens, June 2006

Introduction The EU-MOP robots should be able to response to oil spills autonomously. Autonomously means that each unit will have an energy system and an oil skimming device as well as that the EU-MOP units will make its own decisions how to response to the oil spill. Thus, each unit needs (artificial) intelligence, which will be given to the units with the help of sensors and control systems.

Control of the EU-MOP units In order to achieve an highly robust and flexible oil response system the swarm intelligence approach has been selected as control paradigm for the EU-MOP robots. Thus, the EU-MOP swarm is a homogeneous group of robots without any hierarchies or central control system.

Control of the EU-MOP units Example: Oil spill in a harbour, several very small patches of oil have to be recovered:

Control of the EU-MOP units Strategy of each robot:

Control of the EU-MOP units 4 following robots 1 robot moving random paths oil pier

Control of the EU-MOP units obstacle occurs

Control of the EU-MOP units swarm 1: 1 following robots 1 robot moving random paths swarm 2: 2 following robots 1 robot moving random paths

Control of the EU-MOP units swarm 1 and swarm 2 merge, but the “leading” robot has a malfunction.

Control of the EU-MOP units swarm will again be split into two swarms with each 1 “leading” robot and 1 following robot. Thus, the EU-MOP system will be very flexible and fault-tolerant.

Sensors for the EU-MOP robots Nevertheless, the EU-MOP robots will need several sensors, e.g.: for the detection of oil or the measurement of the thickness of the oil spill, for absolute or relative positioning of itself, its neighbours, all other units, the mother ship, etc., for the detection of collisions with other units, shipwrecks, debris etc., for winds, currents, etc., for the internal state of the unit (malfunction, full of oil, energy low etc.) as well as a communication system for communication with other units, with the mother ship and with a human operator.

Sensors for the EU-MOP robots Sensors might increase the performance of the robots, nevertheless, sensors also have disadvantages, e.g.: increased costs increased weight and volume increased consumption of power increased amount of information that has to be processed Thus, the question is: What is the best sensor configuration for the EU-MOP robots? And related to that: What are the best strategies in order to response to the oil spill. These questions will be answered with the help of the simulation technique.

Simulation of the EU-MOP robots Architecture of the simulation

Simulation of the EU-MOP robots Oil Fate model

Simulation of the EU-MOP robots Robot / Swarm Simulation

Simulation of the EU-MOP robots Visualisation water oil slick harbour coast

Simulation of the EU-MOP robots Visualisation 1 unit

Simulation of the EU-MOP robots Visualisation

Simulation of the EU-MOP robots Visualisation

Simulation of the EU-MOP robots Visualisation

Simulation of the EU-MOP robots Visualisation

Simulation of the EU-MOP robots Visualisation

Simulation of the EU-MOP robots Comparison of two types of swarms: swarm A consists of units without oil sensor swarm B consists of units with oil sensor. type B: will be able to move intelligent type A: will not be able to move intelligent

Simulation of the EU-MOP robots Comparison of two types of swarms: Conclusion (for this scenario) The larger the swarm the better the recovery time. The better the sensor configuration the better the recovery time. Nevertheless, the swarm without oil sensors reaches for large swarm sizes more or less the same recovery time as the swarm with oil sensor. Swarm size (N) 1 2 3 4 5 10 20 Recovery time of swarm A 52627 20496 16843 14170 13207 5564 2905 Recovery time of swarm B 37293 14416 11360 9132 8134 4026 2860

Conclusion The simulation will be able to determine the recovery time, the energy consumption, the quantity of recovery oil the quantity of oil that polluted the coast, etc. These date will be the basis for an assessment of the EU-MOP units, and for a cost-benefit-analysis. Thus, this proceeding will ensure that the EU- MOP consortium will develop a highly effective, flexible and robust oil response system.