East Tennessee State University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Indianapolis Discovery Network for Dementia Comparative Effectiveness Research Trial of Alzheimers Disease Drug: COMET-AD.
Advertisements

Regulatory Clinical Trials Clinical Trials. Clinical Trials Definition: research studies to find ways to improve health Definition: research studies to.
MEDICAL HOME 1/2009 Mary Goldman, D.O., President of MAOFP.
Asthma: Shared Medical Appointments
Practice Support Program in COPD: South Okanagan Project COPD CARE Algorithm South Okanagan, Interior Health Patricia Rattee RRT, CRE Shannon Walker MD,
Training Module 2: Respondent Eligibility Criteria.
Indianapolis Discovery Network for Dementia Comparative Effectiveness Research Trial of Alzheimer’s Disease Drugs: COMET-AD.
® From Bad to Worse: Comorbidities and Chronic Lower Back Pain Margaret Cecere JD, Richard Young MD, Sandra Burge PhD The University of Texas Health Science.
“The Effect of Patient Complexity on Treatment Outcomes for Patients Enrolled in an Integrated Depression Treatment Program- a Pilot Study” Ryan Miller,
Lung-2015 Baltimore, USA July , 2015 Suhaj A.
COPD Diagnosis & Management Anil Ramineni Specialist Respiratory Physiotherapist Community Respiratory Team.
THE 6 TH NATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON HIV/AIDS Yield and impact of repeated screening for tuberculosis and isoniazid preventive therapy among patients.
Following the Yellow Brick Road to the Emerald City of Patient Care Coordination On a Budget Cortney McDuff, RN Cindy McHenry, RN BSN.
1. Identify patients in our practice with a diagnosis of asthma or presumed asthma who have not had formal pulmonary function testing or in house spirometry.
An Inter-Professional Collaboration between a Family Medicine Center and a School of Nursing Maritza De La Rosa, MD New Jersey Family Practice Center Rutgers,
A New Model for Assessing Teaching Quality Improvement to Family Medicine Residents Does It Work? Fred Tudiver, Ivy Click, Jeri Ann Basden Department of.
Incorporating Formal Interdisciplinary Case Discussions Into the Family Medicine Residency Geriatric Rotation University of Alabama, College of Community.
Chapter 7: Epidemiology of Chronic Diseases. “The Change You Like to See….” (1 of 3) Chronic diseases result from prolongation of acute illness. – With.
A Perspective on Family Medicine and End-of-Life and Palliative Care Peter Selwyn, M.D., M.P.H. Professor and Chairman Department of Family & Social Medicine.
Spirometry tests were carried out by a Respiratory Clinical Nurse Specialist (Respiratory CNS) Participants were referred to see their General Practitioner.
Establishment of An Economically Viable Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Anticoagulation Program In An Academic-Based Residency Lilika White MD, Andrew.
Antibiotics in Addition to Systemic Corticosteroids for Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Johannes M.A. Daniels; Dominic snijders;
Use of Mentored Residency Teams to Enhance Addiction Medicine Education Maureen Strohm, MD, Ken Saffier, MD, Julie Nyquist, PhD, Steve Eickelberg, MD MERF.
CLINICAL TRIALS.
Northwestern Family Medicine Residency & Erie Family Health Center
Wales Primary Care COPD Audit
Ralf Habermann, MD, CMD (Co-PI) Sumi Misra, MD, MPH, CMD (PI)
Presenter: Sarah Z. Cole, DO, FAAFP A Work in Progress (15 minutes)
How To Design a Clinical Trial
Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Scott Bragg, PharmD Kristen Hood Watson, MD Alexander Chessman, MD
Home Health Remote Patient Monitoring For Heart Failure
Patient Centered Medical Home
Electronic Health Records (EHR)
Research Questions Does integration of behavioral health and primary care services, compared to simple co-location, improve patient-centered outcomes in.
IFSP Aligned with the Early Intervention Data System
Manual Musculoskeletal Medicine Elective for Allopathic Residents
Trends in Use of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Among Older Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Anita C. Mercado, Shawn P. Nishi, Wei Zhang, Yong-Fang.
COPD Report 5 Coles Lane, Oakington, Cambridge, CB24 3BA.
Re-Defining a Paradigm of Care: Transforming Payment Models to Better Match With Physician Time and Effort Grant M. Greenberg, M.D., M.A., M.H.S.A. Joel.
Influenza Information Needs of Primary Care Physicians
South Texas Psychiatric PBRN
Champion Teams: An Implementation Strategy for Building Interprofessional Practice in Residency Clinics Jodi Polaha, PhD; Thomas Bishop, PsyD; Leigh Johnson,
Medicines Management – COPD update for LPC Jyoti Saini Hema Patel
Classification of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) severity according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD):
Comparison of the study findings: Male & female
Protective Factors Screening
Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment
Health Status in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Measuring the Minimal Clinically Important Difference over Different Periods of Time H.J. Alma,
Patterns of asthma medications prescriptions among adult patients in the chest and accident and emergency units of a tertiary health care facility in Uganda.
Polypharmacy In Adults: Small Test of Change
Assessing COPD in Primary Care
NHLBI Perspective Yves Rosenberg, M.D, M.P.H.
Changing the Game for Sjögren's Patients
Dr. Muhammad Ajmal Zahid Chairman, Department of Psychiatry,
Rhematoid Rthritis Respiratory disorders
Primary data collection versus use of retrospective claims data: methodology lessons learned from a linked database study in chronic obstructive pulmonary.
Primary Care Milestone 15
Implementing Health Coaching
Exam Room Health Center Health Center Front Desk Waiting Room
Consent Training Module
MRA Member Summary, Open Conditions & Clinical Inference
Optum’s Role in Mycare Ohio
Health Care Systems Research Network Conference 2019, Portland, OR
Implementing Health Coaching
Site Visits and Clerkship Coordinators – Defining a Best Practice
The Heart Truth Delaware Background
Risk Stratification for Care Management
The Efficacy of the Teach-Back Method of Education on Readmission Rates in Heart Failure Patients Catherine Lynch Abstract Teach-Back Method The teach-back.
Khai Hoan Tram, Jane O’Halloran, Rachel Presti, Jeffrey Atkinson
Presentation transcript:

East Tennessee State University Relationship of patient self-administered COPD Assessment Test (CAT) to physician standard assessment of COPD in a family medicine residency training program Leigh Johnson, MD; Jessica Burchette, PharmD; Ivy Click, EdD; Alicia Williams, MA East Tennessee State University

Disclosures The authors have nothing to disclose. 

Objectives Identify the wide variety of COPD symptoms that may impact a patient’s daily life. Recognize the need for improved competency in COPD assessment among family medicine residents. Evaluate areas for COPD assessment improvement within clinical practice.

Background 2007: U.S. ranked 2nd in world for COPD mortality1 2010: COPD ranked 3rd leading cause of death in U.S.2  COPD accounts for more lost productivity days than any other chronic condition3

Significance Frequent diagnosis in primary care High prevalence in TN How do we assess COPD? CAT vs mMRC? (not the same: http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/33/5/1025) Level of airflow obstruction does not correlate to health-related quality of life 2007: U.S. ranked 2nd in world for COPD mortality1  2010: COPD ranked 3rd leading cause of death in U.S.2  COPD accounts for more lost productivity days than any other chronic condition3

Purpose of Study To compare a patient’s self-assessment of COPD impact on daily life to a physician’s standard assessment

Study Criteria Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria Patients Patients ≥ 18 years of age Diagnosed with COPD Scheduled clinic visit Physicians All clinic physicians Exclusion Criteria Patients Acute COPD exacerbation within two weeks of scheduled clinic visit Physicians N/A

COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Introduced in 2009 by GlaxoSmithKline Validated measure of disease impact Score range 0 – 40 < 10 = Low impact 10 – 20 = Medium impact 21 – 30 = High impact > 30 = Very high impact Minimum clinically important difference = 2 points The CAT is a simple, patient administered assessment of impact of COPD on quality of life.  The assessment correlates very well to the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire – which is a much longer, more complex clinician administered assessment.   This assessment was introduced in 2009 and was driven by GlaxoSmithKline.  The group involved pulmonary specialists, PCPs, patient bodies and experts in the development of patient reported outcomes.  The assessment was validated in prospective studies conducted in the US,  Europe, and China.   When assessing symptoms and QOL –current treatment guidelines support the use of mMRC and CAT for symptom assessment.  mMRC only measures breathlessness while CAT measures more comprehensive symptoms of COPD.  The CCQ  (Clinical COPD Questionnaire)is also available as a patient administered COPD assessment.  Some limitation include 1)not focused primarily on impact,  this one is more about disease control  and 2) this assessment has not yet been incorporated into the COPD assessment algorithm (ABCD).  Also, when we started this project this assessment was not as well known or prevalent in guidelines, a minimum clinically important difference had not been validated,  and scoring is much more complex  than with the CAT. COPD Assessment Test: The User Guide for Healthcare Professionals. Available at: http://catestonline.org. Accessed April 20, 2017

COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Possible benefits Open dialogue between patients and providers Provide consistency in measuring disease impact Identify more obscure symptoms of COPD Monitor disease progress over time Validated in multiple languages Current issues Not currently universally available in the US GSK ownership → CAT Governance Board The CAT is currently "unavailable"  in the US for routine clinical use.  This is a function of general concerns regarding a disease assessment tool being owned primarily by a drug company without oversight from global disease treatment development groups.  In response to this, the Governance Board for the COPD Assessment Test.  This Board is comprised of representatives from the European Respiratory Society  (ERS),  GSK,  The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease(GOLD),  and the COPD Foundation.  The goal is to make the CAT widely available and used to ensure patients and providers have a tool to help assess and discuss COPD.  Governance Board for COPD Assessment Test Press Release. Available at: http://www.gsk.com/en-gb/media/press-releases/gsk-gold-and-the-copd-foundation-announce-formation-of-a-new-external-expert-governance-board-for-the-copd-assessment-test-cat/. Accessed April 20, 2017.

Patient Demographic Form Physician Assessment Form On the left you will find the patient demographic form.  This form was attached to the back of the COPD Assessment Test given to the patient to complete.  On the right you will find the Physician Assessment form.  The provider was asked to rate the patient immediately after the office encounter and to provide basic demographic information for year in rank and gender.  The language of the question regarding the rating of impact is important because this is the same language used in the directions of the CAT

Patient Demographic Form Physician Assessment Form On the left you will find the patient demographic form.  This form was attached to the back of the COPD Assessment Test given to the patient to complete.  On the right you will find the Physician Assessment form.  The provider was asked to rate the patient immediately after the office encounter and to provide basic demographic information for year in rank and gender.  The language of the question regarding the rating of impact is important because this is the same language used in the directions of the CAT

Nurses notified of eligible patients daily Daily Clinic Flow Nurses notified of eligible patients daily Physician completes office visit Physician completes COPD assessment form Patients consented in private office Patient completes CAT

Methods Institutional Review Board approved – December 2016 Project presentation to faculty and staff Physician consent obtained Weekly list of scheduled patients with COPD obtained from EHR List reviewed for inclusion and exclusion criteria Physician assessment and CAT coded for matched comparison Nurses notified daily of scheduled eligible patients Nurse rooms the patient and places physician rating form in exam room door. Matching coded CAT given to social health specialist

Methods Cont. Physician completes the office visit for the scheduled problem and completes the assessment of impact of COPD on the patient’s daily life Patients who are willing to participate escorted to a private office Patient’s consent obtained Patient completes the CAT Coded physician assessment and matching coded CAT paired together CAT scored Goal: 50 patient/physician pairs OR three months

Comparison of Physician Assessment vs Patient CAT Self-Assessment

Patient Smoking Status and Physician Assessment Outcome

Physician Gender and Assessment Outcome

Limitations Small sample size (convenience sample) Impossible to eliminate all physician bias once study began Unable to assess familiarity of physician with patient Categorical assessment for physicians vs continuous data assessment for patients

Conclusions Discrepancy in physician and patient ratings of the impact COPD has on patients’ daily lives  Highlight the need for a more formalized patient self-assessment process Patient assessment can create discussion between providers and patients Curricular implications include the need for additional COPD assessment training as well as integration of the CAT into resident training.

References 1. National Hearth Lung and Blood Institute. Morbidity and Mortality: Chart Book on Cardiovascular, Lung, and Blood Disease. 2009. 2. Centers for Disease and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics Report. “Deaths: Final Data for 2010.” May 2013; 61(04). 3.“Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Social Security Disability.” Disability Benefits Help.

Please evaluate this presentation using the conference mobile app Please evaluate this presentation using the conference mobile app! Simply click on the "clipboard" icon on the presentation page.