Low Level Radioactive Waste Forum, Fall 2014 Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_1 Preferred Alternative Recommended by Core Team Environmental Impact Statement.
Advertisements

1 Transuranic Waste Processing Center Karen Deacon, Deputy Federal Project Director Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management.
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
1 Status of DOE Cleanup in Idaho Presentation to the “LINE Commission” By Rick Provencher Manager, DOE Idaho Operations Office April 7, 2012 Idaho Falls,
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
Our Vision – Healthier Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
U.S. DOE Preparation for Shipping of Transuranic Radioactive Waste Cross Country – The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) O.W. “Lynn” Eaton, Manager External.
October In May 2000, Walkerton’s drinking water system became contaminated with deadly bacteria, primarily Escherichia coli O157:H7.1 Seven people.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” EMERGENCY PLANNING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Safety  performance  cleanup  closure M E Environmental Management National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program Role in DOE’s Transformation Barb Beller, Project.
1 Waste Management David Nickless Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office March 3, 2015.
TRU Waste Processing Center Culture and Successful Implementation of an ISO Certified Environmental Management System Presented at the DOE ISM Conference.
MODULE “STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT”
Setting the Stage: Review of 2013 IEPR Nuclear Recommendations Danielle Osborn Mills Former Senior Nuclear Policy Advisor to the California Energy Commission.
Performance Metrics for EMS Self Assessment & Management Review 30 th Environmental and Energy Symposium & Exhibition April 5 – 8, 2004.
EM - TRANSPORTATION. EM Office of Transportation - Organization & Responsibilities Basis of Organization & Responsibilities Basis of Organization & Responsibilities.
International Atomic Energy Agency Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources Training Course on Technical Requirements to Fulfill.
Scott Surovchak Rocky Flats Site Manager U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) Cleanup and Remedy Implementation at the Rocky.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” RADIATION PROTECTION SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
Presented by Steven P. Feltman Food Safety and Quality Specialist.
Government of Western Australia Department of Mines and Petroleum Please read this before using presentation This presentation is based on content presented.
Waste Management Working Group CTMA Point Clear, AL W. T. (Sonny) Goldston EnergySolutions Working Group Chair July 6 - 9, 2015.
1 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office TRU Sites and Transportation Division James Mason Institutional Affairs Manager Carlsbad.
1 Resuming Operations at WIPP Frank Marcinowski Acting Associate Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for The Office of Environmental.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
National Cleanup Workshop Managing Large Capital Projects Ken Picha Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tank Waste and Nuclear Material.
U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office Legacy Cleanup Completion Project DOE National Cleanup Workshop September 29,
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
C O N T R A C T O R I N F O R M A T I O N E X C H A N G E LashCIE Presentation 1/98 1 Recent Accomplishments and Future Directions Dan Giessing U.S. Department.
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Program Status National Governors’ Association Meeting May 17, 2002 Alton D. Harris, III.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
Developing a Security Program. Exercise Plan Develop/Update Plan Review/Revisit Plan.
1 ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS Module “DECOMMISSIONING PROCESS” Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Program “Leonardo da Vinci”
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP BIOTA PROTECTION Stephen L. Domotor (202)
Intervention – 2004 Nanisivik Reclamation and Closure Plan Arctic Bay June 3-4, 2004 Nunavut Water Board Public Hearing.
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. LEHR Site Annual Soil Management Plan Training Sue Fields, Environmental Health & Safety Sept,
WIPP National TRU Program
 closure E M Environmental Management  cleanup  performance safety STRATEGY MEETING NATIONAL SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL PROGRAM Bringing Innovation to Spent.
1 EM Update Presented to the National Governors Association Federal Facilities Task Force Dr. Inés Triay Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental.
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP OVERVIEW OF ORDER Larry Stirling
WIPP Integrated Performance Measurement Baseline Workshop
1 Ventilation Systems Capital Asset Projects Safety Significant Confinement Ventilation System (15-D-411) Exhaust Shaft (15-D-412) Ronald.
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and 1989 (RCRA) Alex Chenault Period 4.
Infection Control Risk Assessment
EFCOG STARTUP AND COMMISSIONING TASK TEAM INTRODUCTION
Decontamination Preparedness and Assessment Strategy
Remediated Nitrate Salt (RNS) Remediation and Other WIPP Activities
LLRW Forum April 2015.
Update on EPA Regulatory and Guidance Activities
Department of Energy Office of Waste Management Status Update
Shipping to WIPP Travis R. Myers 5/24/17 GV ppt.
The Path Forward for WIPP: A State and Local Perspective
Department of Energy Office of Waste Management Update
South Carolina Perspective on Part 61 Proposed Revisions
Overview of Waste Disposition Activities Fall 2017 LLW Forum Meeting
Waste Management’s Role in Safely Consolidating, Accelerating, and Delivering the Idaho Cleanup Project Core Mission Bruno Zovi, AMWTP LLW/MLLW Program.
Nuclear Waste Storage Current Status and Plans
NRC Cyber Security Regulatory Overview
Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management Update
Construction Management & Inspection
Emergency Planning Steps
Moving Forward From Fukushima Near-Term Task Force EP Recommendations
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum Fall 2017 Meeting – Alexandria, VA
Environmental Management Systems The ISO Approach Initial Environmental Review & Gap Analysis Presented by: NC Division of Pollution Prevention.
Radioactive waste management - status
Radioactive Materials Section Update
Presentation transcript:

Low Level Radioactive Waste Forum, Fall 2014 Meeting Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: The Path Forward for Addressing TRU Waste Across the Complex Frank Marcinowski Deputy Assistant Secretary for Waste Management Office of Environmental Management Low Level Radioactive Waste Forum, Fall 2014 Meeting October 30, 2014

Recap of the Incidents at WIPP February 5th Truck Fire: All operations at the repository ceased following salt haul truck fire in the WIPP underground. An investigation team was deployed to determine the cause of the fire. Report released March 13th. February 14th Radiological Incident: A continuous air monitor detected airborne radiation in the underground. WIPP’s ventilation system automatically switched to high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration mode when airborne radiation was detected underground and the WIPP mine remains in filtration mode at this time. Extensive sampling and monitoring conducted by DOE, New Mexico, and Carlsbad Environmental Monitoring Research Center Monitoring. EPA and the NMED also performed sampling. Efforts by the DOE and Nuclear Waste Partnership are ensuring workers are fully protected during recovery and restart. Town hall meetings are utilized to keep the community informed; to stay apprised go to: http://www.wipp.energy.gov Live streaming of the meetings can be viewed at: http://new.livestream.com/rrv/

Recap of the Incidents: Layout of the WIPP Underground www.wipp.energy.gov

February 5 Underground Fire February 14 Radiological Release Incidents at WIPP February 5 Underground Fire February 14 Radiological Release Accident Investigation Board Report Completed Accident Investigation Board Report Phase I completed Phase II – in progress

Room 7, Panel 7

Project REACH The AIB retains control of Panel 7. Until further evaluation of Room 7 is completed, Phase 2 investigation cannot be closed. At AIB request, WIPP has procured enhanced capability to investigate the full inventory of Room 7.

Key Recovery Steps toward Resumption of Operations Nuclear Safety Document Revisions (continuing) Safety Management Program Revitalization (continuing) Underground restoration (initiated) Radiological Roll-back, Re-Establish Safety Systems, Cleanup, Habitability, Fire Protection, Maintenance and Ground Control Expedited Panel 6 and Room 7, Panel 7 Closure Interim Ventilation Modifications (procurement underway) Expedite mine stability (resume bolting) Supplemental Ventilation Modifications (initiated) Readiness Activities Limited Operations On-site waste Off-site waste generators

Recovery Status We have a comprehensive recovery plan that puts safety first We have begun recovery and are making good progress Extensive underground radiological rollback Mine structure evaluation ongoing Panel 6 and Panel 7, Room 7 closure preparations We need all of our current workforce All functions working on the critical path Disruptions will produce significant morale problems We will continue to communicate often and transparently throughout this process

Mine Stability and Underground Habitability

Decontamination Anticipated Approach: Contamination will be fixed or sealed to the mine surface. Anticipated use of water spray for most areas of low contamination. Will create a crust on salt surfaces. Higher activity areas will utilize a spray-on fixative application. After application, floors will be covered with a brattice cloth barrier and ~ 4 inches of mined salt.

Ventilation Current Status Recovery Actions Ventilation in Filtration Mode 60,000 cfm of filtered air Note: WIPP’s standard (unfiltered) operational airflow is 425,000 cfm WIPP Permit requires 260,000 cfm Recovery Actions Phase I – HEPA skid and fan unit 114,000 cfm of airflow Phase II – Reconfiguring mine circuits and additional fans 180,000 cfm airflow Phase III – Design and construct a new (permanent) ventilation system Capable to provide 420,000 cfm

Managing Waste Streams Waste on-site at WIPP 144 waste containers (129 cubic meters) safely stored above ground at WIPP None of this aboveground waste is part of the nitrate salt stream Waste staged at Waste Control Specialists Waste from same waste stream as breached container at WIPP staged in modular concrete canisters The balance of the inventory (i.e., waste containers that do not contain unremediated nitrate salts) is safely stored within an enclosed storage facility

National TRU Program Status The TRU waste-generating sites continue to characterize and certify TRU waste for eventual shipment to WIPP. EM is carefully evaluating the impacts to other DOE TRU waste-generating sites including impacts on commitments with state regulators. Impact to the TRU waste-generator sites will depend on the length of the shutdown and available funding. Sites are actively working to implement strategies to minimize impacts Workshop held in September 2014 to share experiences and lessons We are working closely with these sites to identify storage requirements and funding needs beyond those provided in the DOE FY 2015 budget request. These efforts will ensure that adequate storage is available for certified waste until such time shipments to WIPP resume.

TRU Path Forward EM has initiated a HQs-led TRU Waste Management Assessment to evaluate the generator site programs for treatment and characterization of TRU waste to ensure no unidentified vulnerabilities exist – similar to those associated with the breached drum Implementing broad corrective actions Approve, implement and share the WIPP Recovery Plan WIPP will reopen with the highest levels of safety Sequence of future shipments will be determined as recovery progresses and consider compliance, risk and other factors