Neil Millar Clinical Director

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Timetabling Platform Project Update January 2009.
Advertisements

Grundtvig Learning Partnership Empower: Lone parents building confidence and accessing learning Glasgow 29 th – 30 th October 2009.
Copyright © Healthcare Quality Quest, Proposed standards for a national clinical audit — How we got involved and what we have learned.
SMI Stakeholder Event, 7 th March, 2013 SMI Education and Training start and finish group: SMI workforce development: Service innovation and transformation.
PROJECT OVERVIEW. Grundtvig Learning Partnership Through this Learning Partnership, participating organizations have agreed to address the following subjects:
From Partnership to Leadership: collaborative improvement of student teacher placements Tricia Young & David Owen.
Improving Selection to the Foundation Programmewww.isfp.org.uk Improving Selection to the Foundation Programme Briefing slides June
The role of the Secretary at Academic Approval and Periodic Review events Quality Assurance Services February 2015.
Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland Psychology Dementia Workstream Dr Susan Conaghan Programme Director – Psychology & Psychological Interventions.
Year 1 First Placement University of Hull BA Primary Teaching Year 1 Mentors’ Meeting June 2014.
Enhancing the quality of clinical placement for students throughout Southern NSWLHD Gay Woodhouse Cathy New June 2013.
1 Developing the role of the science subject mentor in enhancing trainee’s pedagogic subject knowledge Adrian Warhurst EXPECT TO ACHIEVE.
Pilot and Feasibility Studies NIHR Research Design Service Sam Norton, Liz Steed, Lauren Bell.
CoBa-IT Working Groups Methodology and next actions.
How did we get to this point Reviewed the BDA (2008) Curriculum Framework Hosted a number of consultation events in 2010 with placement providers Developed.
Developing Learning Environments Dr Barry Lewis Director GP Education.
Sharing good practice in Foundation Programme training Miss Stacey Forde and Dr Clare Van Hamel UKFPO.
Healthier Together Joint Committee Wednesday 15 th June 2016.
The Quality Surveillance Team / Programme

2016/17 Staff Performance Appraisals
** Please put your microphone on mute! **
Gathering the Evidence (all levels)
** Your microphone will remain on mute throughout the webinar **
Final Year Project Guidelines
Qualification Verification 2017/18
Using survey data for continuous improvement
Health Education Kent Surrey Sussex
Evaluation training NHS NEW Devon CCG Transforming Community Services
Recognising and approving trainers: a GMC consultation
Pilot Pre-Registration Trainee Pharmacy Technician Programme
External Quality Assurance 2017 – New Approach and New Opportunities
Washington 21st CCLC Data Collection Webinar Samantha Sniegowski
TUI Education Conference 24th February, 2018
Overview of the PAT Implementation Process Materials Developed by The IRIS Center at the University of Maryland.
Menus of Best Practices and Strategies
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Preparation of Y4 medical students for GP placements
Potential Milestones A timeline to finish in one year
Consumer Satisfaction Data Collection for Information Dissemination
NATA Foundation Building Blocks Process
Idendification of and Consultation with Census Data Users
Item 10 – Conclusions of the meeting
Four Function of the new system
Current Practice and Plans for the Future
PoPP aims To improve outcomes for children with significant levels of early-onset disruptive behaviour problems To increase workforce capacity around evidence-based.
Assessment Needs Analysis
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
WP4 Proposed Structure of the Outcome “Tool Kit and Recommendations”
GMC visits: How to deal with them
Education and Training Statistics Working Group – 2-3 June 2016
School of Paediatrics Day
2003 Annual NSDL PI Survey A Collaborative Formative Evaluation
Please note: For the purposes of the following presentation, any reference to “All Levels or “From National 3 to Advanced Higher” does not include National.
New Employee Orientation
Pilot River Basin Water Framework Directive.
Xoserve IX Refresh Customer Update 05/03/2019.
Doctorate in Clinical Psychology Supervisor Training Workshops 2019
Xoserve IX Refresh Customer Update 04/04/2019.
RBWM SCITT Mentor Meetings 2017.
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
NatSIP-CRIDE Feasibility Study
Today’s Briefing Welcome and Introductions
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics (KhNUE)
Presented by Planning & Research
The Web and Using the VTAC Analysis Tool
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Doctorate in Clinical Psychology Supervisor Training Workshops 2019
Role of the Internal Verifier
Presentation transcript:

Neil Millar Clinical Director Enhancing quality assurance through a NES Psychology trainee survey -Stages to the process Neil Millar Clinical Director

Overview of stages 1a: Pre-pilot - Review of evidence base & Delphi process 1b: Pre-pilot - dissemination of pre-pilot survey to trainees, supervisors, HOS, Programme staff 2: pilot survey (mandatory) – dissemination of pilot survey via Questback and data analysed using factor analysis to generate factor structure for final survey.

Stage 1a: pre-pilot – developing the quality indicators & question items   This stage involves identifying quality indicators and item generation based on: A review of previous survey tools used across applied psychology training courses and standardised tools developed A brainstorming session with the working group to further identify quality indicators and as a credibility check of items generated Working group to review preliminary quality indicators and develop operational definitions and further question items relevant to each indicator

Stage 1b: Pre-pilot – trainees to be sent pre-pilot survey An initial pre-pilot survey tool developed. This tool would include a larger number of items than would be required in the final survey tool This would then be sent to trainees, HOS, Programme staff & supervisors to comment on the suitability (clarity & relevance) of questions asked and also to add or comment on further items to be included Responses used to form the pilot survey

Stage 2: Piloting of survey Pilot stage – this involves the larger pilot set of items being set up on Questback for dissemination to trainees across all 4 courses for completion about their placement and supervision experiences This also includes larger number of questions than will be included in final survey Likert type scale responses completed by trainees The outcome from this process would be to then subject the data to both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis Develop the factor structure for the final survey to be used The data generated from this pilot survey would only be used to generate the final survey tool and NOT used for quality assurance/feedback purposes

Timeline Pre-pilot (1a) = February – May 2016 Pre-pilot (1b) = June – July 2016 Pilot survey (2) = August – October 2016 Aim to have final survey developed = November/December 2016