September 2002 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Comparison of S-V Channel Model to Empirical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /402 SG3a Submission Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC) September 2002 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /403 SG3a Submission Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC) September 2002 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE /383 SG3a Submission Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC) September 2002 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE /492r0 Submission November 2002 Time Domain Corporation - Marcus Pendergrass Submission Title: [Comparison of RMS Delay Spread Variation.
Doc.: IEEE /327 Submission July 2002 Intel Research and Development Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Rick Roberts, XtremeSpectrum
March 2001 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Upcoming IEEE Conferences] Date Submitted:
September 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Propagation Pathloss Model Comparison.
Submission Title: [Add name of submission]
<month year> doc: IEEE a April 2005
Submission Title: Sydney e/ Liaison Report.
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Jul 12, /12/10 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Coexistence Brainstorming Date.
Oct 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suggested Modification to TSV Model Parameters]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution To The FCC Part
November 18 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG4d Closing Report for Hawaii July 2007.
25 August 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Channel Model Matlab Flowchart]
March 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Toumaz response to TG6 Call for Applications]
<May,2009> doc.: IEEE <doc .....> <July 2009>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE <xyz> January 2001
<month year> doc: IEEE a April 2005
August, 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Enhancing reliability of data transmission.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
July 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Relevant eye safety standards Date Submitted:
February 19 May 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: LECIM-IG Closing Report for Beijing.
May 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution To The FCC Part
<month year> doc.: IEEE <030158r0> September 2003
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE <xyz> November 2000
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 June 2009
November 2002 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Time variance for UWB wireless channels.
Submission Title: [Frame and packet structure in ]
November 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Simplified geometry for the usage model.
<month year>20 Jan 2006
<month year> doc.: IEEE <030158r0> January 2004
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Preamble structures for 4a]
September 2000 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG3 Rank Order Voting Process Description.
April 19 July 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: WNG Closing Report for San Diego.
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE <030158r0> <March 2003>
<author>, <company>
November 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Project Plan] Date Submitted: [15.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
September 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suggested TG3c PAR Changes] Date Submitted:
May 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution To The FCC Part
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
Submission Title: [Consolidation of Ranging Results]
August, 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Improve the latency between GTS request.
Doc.: IEEE Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary.
January 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Channel bandwidth observations] Date Submitted:
July 2003 doc.: IEEE <03/242> July 2003
Jul 12, /12/10 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Dependable Interest Group Closing.
Submission Title: TG9ma Agenda for September Meeting
Jul 12, /12/10 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Specialty Networks (WSN) Submission Title: TG4z EIR Agenda for September 2019 Date.
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: MLME-SOUNDING and MLME-CALIBRATE comment.
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: MLME-SOUNDING and MLME-CALIBRATE comment.
Jan 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TeraHertz Closing Report Date Submitted: January.
May 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Source identification Date Submitted: May, 2015.
Jul 12, /12/10 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Specialty Networks (WSN) Submission Title: TG4z EIR Agenda for November 2019 Date.
12/15/2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [AWGN Simulation Results] Date Submitted:
Presentation transcript:

September 2002 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Comparison of S-V Channel Model to Empirical Data Date Submitted: 08 September, 2002 Source: Marcus Pendergrass, Time Domain Corporation 7057 Old Madison Pike, Huntsville, AL 35806 Voice:256-428-6344 FAX: [256-922-0387], E-Mail: Marcus.Pendergrass@timedomain.com Re: Ultra-wideband Channel Models IEEE P802.15-02/208r0-SG3a, 17 April, 2002, Abstract: Channel realizations generated by the S-V model are compared to measured channels. We show that the S-V model is able to accurately reproduce population means for 3 channel parameters: RMS delay spread, mean excess delay, and number of significant paths. In addition, a hueristic channel classification scheme is proposed, and we show that the S-V model is able to produce exemplars of each channel class except for one. We recommend that SG3a adopt a channel model consisting of a defined set of channel realizations generated by the S-V model, augmented with additional channel realizations necessary to capture the wide variety of channels that occur in typical WPAN application scenarios. Purpose: The information provided in this document is for consideration in the selection of a UWB channel model to be used for evaluating the performance of a high rate UWB PHY for WPANs. Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

September 2002 Summary S-V Model can match measured channels in terms of the population means of Mean Excess Delay, RMS Delay Spread, and Number of Significant Paths for three scenarios: NLOS, 0 to 4 meters, office LOS, 0 to 4 meters, office NLOS, 4 to 6 meters, office Variation of measured channels is very wide, even within a single scenario. A heuristic channel taxonomy is proposed. Single set of S-V parameters for each scenario is probably not sufficient to capture the wide variation among channels from a given category. Recommendations channel model should consist of a defined set of channel impulse response realizations make sure all channel types within a given scenario are represented multiple S-V parameter sets per scenario Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

S-V Model Can Match Population Means of Data September 2002 S-V Model Can Match Population Means of Data Measurements 1 2 3 Case: Population means Mean excess delay RMS delay spread Number of Paths (85 % energy capture) 10.38 8.03 36.1 5.05 5.28 24.0 14.18 14.28 61.54 S-V Model Population means* 10.04 8.33 35.88 5.50 24.39 15.16 15.07 61.77 Channel Parameter *data provided by Jeff Foerster Case 1: Case 2: Case 3: NLOS, 0-4 meters, office LOS, 0-4 meters, office NLOS, 4-10 meters, office Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

Heuristic Channel Taxonomy September 2002 Heuristic Channel Taxonomy Measurements S-V model Case: Case: Channel Type 1 2 3 1 2 3 Freespace ü ? Freespace + diffuse multipath ü ü ü ü Closely spaced dominant paths ü ü ü ? ü ü Closely spaced dominant paths + strong late arriving cluster ü ü LOS path not dominant, little diffuse multipath ü ü LOS path not dominant + diffuse multipath ü ü ? ü Strong late arriving cluster, little diffuse multipath ü ü ü ü ü ü Strong late arriving cluster + diffuse multipath ü ü ü ? ? ü Diffuse multipath, no single dominant path ü ü ? ? Case 1: Case 2: Case 3: NLOS, 0-4 meters, office LOS, 0-4 meters, office NLOS, 4-10 meters, office Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

September 2002 A Channel Menagerie The next several slides give visual depictions of selected channels from each Channel Type described on the previous slide. Where possible, we show both measured and simulated channels for each Channel Type. Purpose: illustrate the variety of channels in the measurement data indicate the ability of the S-V model to provide a reasonable facsimile to these channels Measured channels have RED titles Simulated channels have GREEN titles Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

Freespace DSO Scan CIR September 2002 Measured data spectrum Reconstructed Scan Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

Freespace + diffuse multipath September 2002 Freespace + diffuse multipath Measured data spectrum DSO Scan CIR Reconstructed Scan Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

Freespace + diffuse multipath September 2002 Freespace + diffuse multipath S-V CIR S-V reconstructed waveform 95% energy capture 85% energy capture Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

Closely spaced dominant paths September 2002 Closely spaced dominant paths Measured data spectrum DSO Scan CIR Reconstructed Scan Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

Closely spaced dominant paths September 2002 Closely spaced dominant paths S-V CIR S-V reconstructed waveform 95% energy capture 85% energy capture Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

Closely spaced dominant paths, strong late-arriving cluster September 2002 Closely spaced dominant paths, strong late-arriving cluster Measured data spectrum DSO Scan CIR Reconstructed Scan Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

Closely spaced dominant paths, strong late-arriving cluster September 2002 Closely spaced dominant paths, strong late-arriving cluster S-V CIR S-V reconstructed waveform 95% energy capture 85% energy capture Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

LOS path not dominant, little diffuse multipath September 2002 LOS path not dominant, little diffuse multipath Measured data spectrum DSO Scan CIR Reconstructed Scan Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

LOS path not dominant, little diffuse multipath September 2002 LOS path not dominant, little diffuse multipath S-V CIR S-V reconstructed waveform 95% energy capture 85% energy capture Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

LOS path not dominant + diffuse multipath September 2002 LOS path not dominant + diffuse multipath Measured data spectrum DSO Scan CIR Reconstructed Scan Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

LOS path not dominant + diffuse multipath September 2002 LOS path not dominant + diffuse multipath S-V CIR S-V reconstructed waveform 95% energy capture 85% energy capture Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

Strong late-arriving cluster, little diffuse multipath September 2002 Strong late-arriving cluster, little diffuse multipath Measured data spectrum DSO Scan CIR Reconstructed Scan Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

Strong late-arriving cluster, little diffuse multipath September 2002 Strong late-arriving cluster, little diffuse multipath S-V CIR S-V reconstructed waveform 95% energy capture 85% energy capture Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

Strong late-arriving cluster + diffuse multipath September 2002 Strong late-arriving cluster + diffuse multipath Measured data spectrum DSO Scan CIR Reconstructed Scan Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

Strong late-arriving cluster + diffuse multipath September 2002 Strong late-arriving cluster + diffuse multipath S-V CIR S-V reconstructed waveform 95% energy capture 85% energy capture Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

Diffuse multipath, no single dominant path September 2002 Diffuse multipath, no single dominant path Measured data spectrum DSO Scan CIR Reconstructed Scan Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)

September 2002 Recommendations Channel model should consist of a defined set of at least 50 channel impulse response realizations for each of the following 6 scenarios. Channel realizations should include all types of channels found in the measured data for each scenario (see channel taxonomy, slide 3). Current parameter sets cover all channel categories except one (very diffuse multipath), for the “office” scenarios. Generate additional channel realizations to cover remaining scenarios and channel categories: Preferred method: find S-V parameters to fill in the holes in the current set of realizations. Alternate method: supplement S-V channel realizations with realizations taken from measured data. NLOS, 0 to 4 meters, office LOS, 0 to 4 meters, office NLOS, 4 to 10 meters, office NLOS, 0 to 4 meters, residential LOS, 0 to 4 meters, residential NLOS, 4 to 10 meters, residential Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC)