Overview 3 2 Introduction Design Analysis Fabrication Testing

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Advertisements

Finite Element Analysis and Testing Correlation of the Mercury Laser Altimeter Craig L. Stevens Mechanical Systems Analysis & Simulation.

E80 Final Report Section 4 Team 2 Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 May 5, 2008.

Mechanical Systems Analysis Branch/Code 542 Goddard Space Flight Center Analysis of Damping Treatments Applied to the MAP Spacecraft Scott Gordon Code.

Structural Qualification Testing of the WindSat Payload Using Sine Bursts Near Structural Resonance Jim Pontius Donald Barnes.

Lunar Lander / Orbiter CubeSats Dr. Carl Vermont Technical College (Voice) Randolph Center, VT USA

System Identification of a Nanosatellite Structure Craig L. Stevens, Jana L. Schwartz, and Christopher D. Hall Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Virginia.

1 Program Managers oversee the Student Design of the satellite System Engineers report to Program Managers about the status of the satellite Each Subsystem.

1 Possibilities for Traveling to Mars Charles C. Renn.

April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR Satellite Structure Subsystem Structural and Vibrational Stress Analysis Presented By: Chris Matthews.

Spacecraft Dynamics and Control

THE OPTIMAL STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF QSAT FM (Flight Model)

Integrated Orbit and Attitude Control for a Nanosatellite with Power Constraints Bo Naasz Matthew Berry Hye-Young Kim Chris Hall 13th Annual AAS/AIAA Space.

Mobile Distributed 3D Sensing Sandia National Laboratories Intelligent Sensors and Robotics POC: Chris Lewis

1 Project Name Solar Sail Project Proposal February 7, 2007 Megan Williams (Team Lead) Eric Blake Jon Braam Raymond Haremza Michael Hiti Kory Jenkins Daniel.

Student Satellite Project University of Arizona Team Goals Design, Fabricate, and Analyze a Structure that will Support the Payload –Space Allocation of.

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Saad Al-Shammari, Ibrahim Sheerah, Mansour Al-Tubaigi ME 594 ; Design of a Micro-Satellite Structure Using ANSYS Package Supervisor.

HokieSat Introduction

1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.

NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Integration and Test Joanne Baker GSFC Code 568 August 16-17, 2005.

CubeSat for Ions, Neutrals, Electrons and Magnetic Fields PI Robert Lin, SSL Project Manager Thomas Immel, SSL Systems Engineer Jerry Kim, SSL Mechanical.

GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Section Mechanical Systems X-LAT Assy1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Mechanical.

Cyborg Beetle Michael Ampuan MIS /12/09.

Structures and Mechanisms Subsystems AERSP 401A. Introduction to Structural Estimation Primary Structure: load-bearing structure of the spacecraft Secondary.

DINO PDR 23 October 2015 DINO Systems Team Jeff Parker Anthony Lowrey.

Contractor 3. I. Launch III. Formation Alignment with Star Pictures Data downlink Stationkeeping II. Deployment IV. Deorbit.

AAE450 Spring 2009 Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold] [STRC] [1]

1 Structure (STR) Subsystem Overview Jonah White – STR Co-Lead.

CINEMA (CubeSat for Ions, Neutrals, Electrons & MAgnetic fields) Jerry Kim * David Glaser † Thomas Immel ‡ * Systems Engineer, †

1 衛星結構設計祝飛鴻 10/26/ Pre-Class Assignment: 1.What are the main functions of spacecraft structure? 2.What factors need to be considered for spacecraft.

Spacecraft Interface/Handling Ring Robert Besuner 12 August 2004.

The University Nanosatellite Program: Oculus-ASR NASA Jet Propulsion Lab Summer Intern Cubesat Symposium July 31 st, 2013 Branden Ghena

AA21301-DWG01Detail View of Isogrid AA21301-DWG02Top View of End Panel AA21301-DWG03Multiple Views of Side Panels AA21301-DWG04Front View of Side Panel.

24b - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Safety Dave Bogart Code 302 August 16-17, 2005.

1 衛星結構設計祝飛鴻 5/25/  What are the main functions of structure subsystem?  Provide support all other subsystems and attach the spacecraft to launch.

Haripriya Head, Integration Team Pratham, IIT Bombay 19 th June, 2010.

Goddard Space Flight Center Cryogenics and Fluids Branch Status of the AMS-02 Cryocooler January 2007 TIM.

Space Systems Engineering Projects and Capabilities Christopher D. Hall Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute.

CubeSat for Ions, Neutrals, Electrons and Magnetic Fields PI Robert Lin, SSL Project Manager Thomas Immel, SSL System Engineer David Curtis, SSL STEIN.

HokieSat Introduction

Advanced LIGO UK 1 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K Modal testing facility for Advanced LIGO Caroline Cantley University of Glasgow Advanced LIGO SUS Workshop,

Predicting Ionospheric Densities and Scintillation with the Communication / Navigation Outage Forecasting System (C/NOFS) Mission Chin S. Lin 1, O. de.

CubeSat for Ions, Neutrals, Electrons and Magnetic Fields PI Robert Lin, SSL Project Manager Thomas Immel, SSL Systems Engineer Chris Pasma, SSL Mechanical.

TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 Integration and Test Program Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.

5 Space Technolog y May , 2002FEMCI Workshop Nonlinear Analysis of the ST5 Magnetometer Boom Wayne Chen/Code 542 NASA/GSFC.

Space-Related Undergraduate Research Opportunities Chris Hall Randolph 224D, Chris Hall Randolph 224D,

ION-F Sensors USUSat –4 external accelerometers –8 internal thermocouples UW Dawgstar –3 external accelerometers –8 internal thermocouples VT HokieSat.

1 Space Test Program - Houston 4 Payload Overview POIWG, 26 Jul 2012.

 From SmallSat to CubeSat: Reducing Mass Size and Cost Jeremy Straub 1, Ronald Fevig 2, Todd Borzych 2, Chris Church 2, Curt Holmer 2, Martin Hynes 2,

Space Robotics Seminar On

Eric Weber (1/14)1 Configuration and Structural Design Eric Weber Tasks –Preliminary hardware research –Preliminary transmission research –Materials Research.

Utah State University - University of Washington - Virginia Tech.

FDMO Peer Review RFA Summary

Preliminary Platform Design for KuaFu-A

Analysis of the Mudd III Rockets

MSU Solar Physics NSF REU Final Presentation

The Koehler Sounding Rocket Launched Carrying Interesting Student-Developed Payloads The sixth flight of a RockSat-X education payload launched on a suborbital.

SOCEM: Sub-Orbital CubeSat Experimental Mission

ACS UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory

Spacecraft Structures

CUSat High Altitude Test (CHAT) Mission Briefing

HA1L High Altitude 1U Laboratory

StratoBuoy II Matt Voll Brian Mayernik Pat O’Hara.

Hokiesat Side Panel Analysis

HA1L High Altitude 1U Laboratory

Integration and Test Organization Chart

System Identification of a Nanosatellite Structure

Structures March 13, 2004.

Systems Integration Christopher Bessette Alexander Reich

Presentation transcript:

Overview 3 2 Introduction Design Analysis Fabrication Testing Conclusions 4 5

AFRL Multi-Satellite Deployment NASA Shuttle Hitchhiker Introduction Virginia Tech Ionospheric Scintillation Measurement Mission (VTISMM) aka HokieSat Ionospheric Observation Nanosatellite Formation (ION-F) Utah State University University of Washington Virginia Tech University Nanosatellite Program 2 stacks of 3 satellites Sponsors: AFRL, AFOSR, DARPA, NASA GSFC, SDL University Nanosatellites AFRL Multi-Satellite Deployment System (MSDS) NASA Shuttle Hitchhiker Experiment Launch System (SHELS)

Design Internal Configuration Crosslink Components Cameras Power Processing Unit Torque Coils (3) Magnetometer Camera Pulsed Plasma Thrusters (2) Camera Battery Enclosure Downlink Transmitter Electronics Enclosure Rate Gyros (3)

Fabrication Composite structure comprised of 0.23” isogrid and 0.02” skin

Static Testing Strength & stiffness test of structure without skin panels Strength & stiffness test of loading fixture

Static Testing Strength & stiffness test of structure with skin panels Experiment demonstrated a 32% gain in stiffness in the cantilever mode due to addition of skins Skins added less than 8% to the total mass

Modal (tap) Testing of Side Panels Dynamic Testing Modal (tap) Testing of Side Panels Hammer provides impulsive input Accelerometer measures accelerations used to characterize natural frequencies Tap testing with and without skins Verification of predictions of finite element analysis

Dynamic Testing Modal Testing of Side Panels (Without Skin) Mode 1 fn = 131 Hz (vs 131 Hz predicted) Mode 2 fn = 169 Hz (vs 171 Hz predicted)

Dynamic Testing Modal Testing of Side Panels (With Skin) Mode 1 fn = 213 Hz (vs 131 Hz without skin) Mode 2 fn = 453 Hz (vs 169 Hz without skin)

Dynamic Testing Modal Testing of Structure (Without Skins) Mode 1 fn = 245 Hz (vs 249 Hz predicted) Mode 2 fn = 272 Hz (vs 263 Hz predicted)

Dynamic Testing Accelerometer Placement X-axis control Y-axis control Z Accelerometer Placement X-axis control Y-axis control Z-axis control Side panel 1 Side panel 2 Zenith panel GPS (3 axis) CPU (3 axis) PPU (3 axis) Battery box (3 axis) Structure survived all tests Determined component locations to raise natural frequencies

Conclusions Aluminum isogrid increases structural performance at reduced mass Modal testing verifies accuracy of isogrid side panel finite element model within ~1% error Modal testing demonstrates 26% increase in structural stiffness of side panel by adding thin aluminum skins Analyses and experiments verify structure satisfies all Shuttle payload requirements

Acknowledgements Air Force Research Laboratory Air Force Office of Scientific Research Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency NASA Goddard Space Flight Center NASA Wallops Flight Facility Test Center University of Washington Utah State University Virginia Tech Professor A. Wicks Professor B. Love Members of ION-F

Current Status Structures: done except for safety Thermal: refining model. Thermal cycling component testing early fall. Power: boards prototyped. Bboxes fabbed. Proto pack assembled, waiting on thermal chamber for testing. Comm: testing ground station hardware. Final flight antenna fab underway. ADCS: everything fabbed and functionally tested. Writing code.