Type of safety standards

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Know Risk…Design Safety™ Industrial Machinery Safety Risk Assessment and Design Standards 18-May-11 © Compliance InSight Consulting Inc.
Advertisements

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
before and after rehabilitation
Table 1. Empirical MSE to estimate the CP distribution parameter λ
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Figure 3. Comparison of class performance
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Tensile Strength (MPa)
osteoporosis among the studied working women (n= 365)
Research, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 4, doi: /ajnr-5-4-6
Compatibility between XBee ZB and WiFi
SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
intervals from six months to one year
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Teachers Response (N= 11)
Management Philosophy
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 8. Unit Key Performance Indicators
Table 2. Levels of youth Involvement in Community Development Programs
Table 6. Control sample industry distribution
Table 1. The radial spheroidal functions
Year range Rainfall (mm) ∆s in rainfall Temp (°C) ∆s in temp RH (mm)
Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Rating of Water Quality
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Rice yield in MT (Source-USDA, Foreign Agricultural Service)
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
Table 1. Diagnostic methods for systemic fungal infection (n=70)
Table 2. Modal parameters estimated by Pulse Reflex®
Table 7. Status of CF in Nepal as of 2009
Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.
Table 1. nRF24L01p specifications
Simulation Frequency(Hz)
Financial Development
Number of questionnaires sent out
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Use of productivity-enhancing technologies in farming
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Nigeria under-five mortality level and trends ( )
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
and Applications, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 2, doi: /jcsa-4-2-2
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. SUMMARIZED OBSERVATIONS FROM MODEL ANALYSIS
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Measurements of LEDs
Cumulative Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Table 3. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at the Supervisory level
Table 1. Project Control Factors and their hierarchy
Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant
Dielectric strength(kV)
Table 4. Value creation (Y2)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 6. Twisting moment of counter shaft at different torques
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Average Execution Time in seconds
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Evaluating questionnaires
Education, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, doi: /wjce-4-1-4
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Presentation transcript:

Type of safety standards Table 1. Present status of safety standards for robots in Europe and North America Type of safety standards Europe North America Robot safety standard ISO 10218-1:2011 (robot) ISO 10218-2:2011 (robot systems and integration) ANSI/RIA R15.06 / ANSI/RIA/ISO 10218 / RIA TR R15.206 CAN/CSA-Z434-03 (R2013) (robots and robot systems) Machinery safety standard ISO 12100:2010 (risk assessment) ISO 13849-1:2006 (functional safety) IEC 62061:2005 (functional safety) CSA-Z432-04 (R2009) ANSI B11.0-2011 Marek Vagaš et al. Safety as a Key Issue for Deployment of Automated and Robotized Systems. Journal of Automation and Control, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 2, 43-46. doi:10.12691/automation-4-2-8 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.