IRB Reporting: Protocol Deviations, Adverse Events, IND Safety Reports

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

How To Impact Your Research: An Overview of Research Support Services Quincy J. Byrdsong, Terri Hagan, and Alice Owens-Gatlin Research Services Consultants.
SOP Melody Lin, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office for Human Research Protections Director, International Activities Santiago, Chile August.
The Institutional Review Board. What is an IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
A Blueprint For Clinical Research: Standard Operating Procedures
Sherry Davis, Manager Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Human Research Protection Program AAHRPP As A Self-Assessment Tool May, 2008.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
Human Subjects Protection: Creation and Maintenance of an IRB Regulatory Requirements & Recommendations 45 CFR part 46 Freda E. Yoder Office for Human.
GCP compliance for GenISIS  This presentation is intended for clinical staff involved in recruiting patients to the GenISIS (Genetics of Influenza Susceptibility.
Pharmacists Responsibilities in Clinical Studies Mike R Sather, PhD Crystal L Harris, PharmD February 26, 2004.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
Good Clinical Practice GCP
Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCPs)
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
International Human Subject Research Legal and Ethical Considerations for Investigators Theresa J. Colecchia, Esq. Associate General Counsel May 8, 2006.
Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs (AAHRPP) Presentation/Discussion for IRB Members.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
Questions: AAHRPP Evaluation Instrument for Use with Final Revised Accreditation Standards Presented by: C. Karen Jeans, MSN, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst,
+ National and Institutional Guidelines on Conflict of Interest in Physician-Industry Relationships.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
The NCI Central IRB Initiative Third Annual Medical Research Summit Washington, D.C. March 2003.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
Welcome New IRB Members! Today we will discuss: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
Module C FDA Regulations Regulatory Documents Patricia E. Koziol 1Module C Final Version 10-apr-2010.
AAHRPP ACCREDITATION (Association for the Accreditation of Human Protection Programs)
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Challenges of 21st Century Clinical Research from an Independent IRB’s View Chesapeake Research Review, Inc. Paul Goebel, CIP Vice President Matthew Whalen,
SACHRP PANEL: HOLDING EXTERNAL IRBS ACCOUNTABLE David L. Wynes, Ph.D. Vice President for Research Administration Emory University July 21, 2009.
The NCI Central IRB Initiative Jacquelyn L. Goldberg, J.D. VA IRB Chair Training April 8, 2004.
Welcome New IRB Member! This brief presentation covers: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
Emerging SACHRP Issues K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Director, PRIDE Office of Research & Development Department of.
Marianne M. Elliott Office of Research Integrity and Ethics Bureau of Medicine and Surgery U. S Navy.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
HRPP METRICS Cynthia Monahan, MBA, CIP IRB Director Boston University Charles River Campus IRB.
Dare to be different-but check with the customer first! (Great Creativity is based on Strategy) Key Take Away This webinar will enable you on how to get.
Analytical Method Validation Under Good Laboratory Practices (GLPs) Webinar Details Date : September 02 nd Friday 2016 Time : 01:00PM ET / 10:00AM PT Duration:
Cancer Clinical Trials Office Clinical Trials & Research Training Oct2014.
Effective Management and Oversight of the Custody Rule for Financial Firms Key Take Away This webinar will analyze best practices for the financial services.
Project Management Essentials: The 8 Keys To Bring Every Project In On Time and On Budget. Key Take Away This webinar will enable you to understand the.
Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Monitoring Practices
Onboard, Not Overboard! Tips to Drive New Hire Commitment.
FDA's Two New Draft Guidance on Software and Device
Lisa Hoebelheinrich, JD, CHRC Associate Vice Chancellor, Compliance
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
Dartmouth Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Data Safety Monitoring and Reporting requirements Brown Bag Series: Noon / First Tuesday of the Month.
Research Compliance and Institutional Review Boards
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
Patricia M. Alt, Ph.D. Dept. of Health Science Towson University
Healthcare Revenue Trifecta – Coding, Billing, Documentation.
REGISTER Final Blacklisting Rule Is Here: Are You Ready? Key Take Away
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S SITE FILE
Beverley Alberola, CIP Associate Director, Research Protections
Alyssa Speier, MS, CIP November 13, 2013
Preventing Medical Device Recalls
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
Brown Bag Series First Tuesday of each month (except July)
Gluten – Free Labelling with a Special Focus on Fermented, Hydrolyzed or Distilled Foods: How to Prove & Display It Correctly Webinar Details Date : September.
Roles and Responsibilities of the Clinical Research Team
AAHRPP Accreditation Welcome to the University of Georgia’s presentation for accreditation of the human research protection program (HRPP). This presentation.
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
George Alter ICPSR Institute for Social Research
Good Clinical Practice in Research
Everything You Wanted to Know about UOPX IRB
American National Standards Institute
IRB Harmonization 2016 Review
Event Reporting in Human Subjects Research
Research with Human Subjects
Research Compliance: Protections for Research Subjects
Presentation transcript:

IRB Reporting: Protocol Deviations, Adverse Events, IND Safety Reports Webinar Details Date : October 20th Thursday 2016 Time : 01:00PM ET / 10:00AM PT REGISTER Duration: 60 Minutes Speaker : Lynn Meyer., President ,IntegReview IRB Key Take Away This webinar will cite specific regulations regarding federal reporting requirements and discuss how some of these regulations have been misinterpreted resulting in increased burden on sites as well as IRBs and give recommendations on how you can initiate change. Overview Over FDA regulation reporting of adverse events and IND safety reports results in a loss of valuable resources, which include staff time and money. Standard Operating Procedures created by sponsors, CRO’s, IRBs and sites typically go above and beyond what is required by federal regulation. Thus, creating misconstruction in the research industry about what is required by federal regulation. Specific issues to be presented include: Protocol deviations, violations, exceptions and waivers Adverse event reporting IND Safety reporting Unanticipated problem reporting Tools for determining if an adverse event is an unanticipated problem Reasons for over-reporting Identity practical solutions Cost of over-reporting Results of a CTTI survey of expedited safety reporting to IND investigators will be presented. Why Should You Attend How often have you heard, “This is the way we have always done it.”? We often create Standard Operating Procedures that go above and beyond what is required by federal regulations. Concern of not doing enough or when we feel uncertain, we may feel pressure to do more than is expected. By attending this webinar, you will achieve an understandingof the difference between regulations and what has become the standard of practice in our industry over the years. You should gain a clear understanding of the regulations that result in the enhancement of your knowledge putting to rest fears of non-compliance. Your working knowledge of the regulations will result in increased confidence performing research related tasks as well as making you more confident in knowing what to report to the IRB.

Areas Covered In This Webinar By revising internal policies that require reporting of events not required by regulation, staff time and money can be put to better use. During inspections by FDA, OHRP, sponsors and CROs you should feel confident in your knowledge of the regulations to support findings that are not based on regulations. Upon completion of this webinar you should feel no hesitation asking the sponsor to change the protocol when it requires reporting to the IRB of events that are not required by federal regulations. Areas Covered In This Webinar Areas covered in this session will consist of a review of federal reporting requirements as described in the Code of Federal Regulations for FDA sponsored research as well as OHRP funded research. Additionally, ICH Guidelines, adopted by FDA will be discussed. Specifically, reviewed will be regulations associated with adverse events, IND safety reporting in clinical trials, unanticipated problems, and protocol deviations/violations/exceptions. We will review the federal regulations pertaining to sponsors, principal investigators and IRBs. Federal regulations to be reviewed include, Title 21 CFR Part 56, Institutional Review Boards, Title 21 CFR Part 312, Investigational New Drug Application, and International Conference on Harmonisation, Efficacy Guidelines, E6 Good Clinical Practices. Attendees will learn to whom the Principal Investigator is required to report serious adverse events that are not determined to be an unanticipated problem. Five reasons for over-reporting will be examined. Guidance documents related to this topic provided by federal agencies as well as ICH will also be reviewed. A tool for determining if an adverse event is an unanticipated problem will be provided and described. The webinar will describe the three criteria required to be met for an adverse event to be considered an unanticipated problem. Several examples of unanticipated problems will be discussed. Practical solutions for identifying change will be presented as well as statistics that demonstrate the amount of time and money that could be saved by eliminating over-reporting. The webinar will provide recommendations for improved efficiency and reduction of burden on staff members allowing them more time for other duties. The results of a recent online survey on expedited safety reporting to IND investigators, conducted by Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) will be presented, which demonstrates the reason for reporting as well as the estimated staff time involved in processing and reporting. The survey will also reflect the cost involved with over-reporting. Learning Objectives Possess ability to differentiate federal regulations versus industry standard practice Acquire knowledge regarding reporting requirements Ability to determine when an adverse event is an unanticipated problem Discover process improvements Who Will Benefit Principal Investigators Research Nurses/ Staff Pharmaceutical Sponsors Project Managers Project Assistants Clinical Research Associates IRB Staff and Committee Members Speakers Profile Lynn Meyer

accredited business by the Better Business Bureau. Lynn Meyer founded IntegReview IRB, an Independent Ethical Review Board, and a woman-owned business, in 1999. As its current president and managing partner, she provides guidance and support to the firm as well as business development and client relations. Under her leadership, the IRB has grown to include six boards that now serve clients in the United States, Canada and Latin America as well as a wide breadth of high-profile industry research sites and sponsors. In 2007, through her guidance and direction, IntegReview achieved full accreditation by the Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs (AAHRPP), which continues to be sustained. As a woman-owned business, IntegReview IRB is certified by the Women’s Business Enterprise (WBE) and is an accredited business by the Better Business Bureau. Her career in medical research began in 1986 at one of the country's premier CROs in Austin, Texas, where she advanced from various administrative positions to an 11-year term as manager of its affiliated Institutional Review Board. During this time, she had the advantage of expanding her knowledge of managing all the nuances of a growing company while also being mentored by knowledgably regulatory affairs personnel. In an effort to advance her career, she transferred to the Quality Assurance Department. During her training period, while reviewing approved informed consent documents that were missing basic elements of consent, she realized just how much she missed the IRB world. Her passion for protecting human research subjects encouraged her to pursue the creation of IntegReview IRB. Lynn has been active in the Consortium of Independent Review Boards (CIRB) since its 1993 inception and currently serves as the Chair. Additionally, she represents IntegReview as a Global Impact Partner with the Society of Clinical Research Sites (SCRS). During the annual conference she a participant on panels for the breakout sessions. She has been an invited speaker at industry conferences presenting regulatory and human subject protection topics and also conducts webinars on the same topics for various originations. A high school graduate from a small Midwest town, she has gained working knowledge of the research industry from highly educated individuals, to whom she credits her success. In 2007, Lynn satisfactory completed all the stated requirements to earn her Certification of Clinical Research Professionals (CCRP). AtoZ Compliance, 2754 80th Avenue, New Hyde Park, NY 11040 Email: support@atozcompliance.com Toll Free: +1- 844-414-1400 Tel: +1-516-900-5509 Fax: +1-516-300-1584 Our support team is available from 9:00AM - 5:00PM Eastern; Monday to Friday