North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Evaluation Summary Sheet

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth Using meaningful evaluation to increase effectiveness of teachers and leaders.
Advertisements

NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Public Schools of Robeson County ASW Analysis of Student Work ASW Analysis of Student Work The Standard 6 Process: What Teachers Need to Know Now The Standard.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
Analysis of Student Work Coordinator and Think Tank Update Broadcast: Wednesday, July 16 1:00 – 3:00 p.m.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Rubric
The North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards (NCPTS) & Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) “ Beginning the School Year” Facilitated by – Dreisa Sherrill.
NC PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS AND EVALUATION PROCESS.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
Fall 2012 LEP Coordinator Meeting Helga Fasciano Section Chief, K-12 Programs Federal Update.
Every Student READY. North Carolina Educator Evaluation A process for professional growth.
The North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards (NCPTS) & Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) “ Beginning the School Year” Facilitated by Brian Foster.
NC Educator Evaluation System Overview Jessica Garner Professional Development Lead Region 6
M.D.G. Scholars Program -Capstone Presentation-.
N.C. Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Teacher Evaluation Process January 28, 2013.
Update on Teacher Effectiveness Presented to the Personnel Administrators of North Carolina (PANC) October 18, 2011 Eliz Colbert and Robert Sox Educator.
NC Professional Teaching Standards. North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
North Carolina Healthful Living Leaders Webinar May 29, :30 – 4:30 p.m.
Principals and Assistant Principals New to the NCEES Process September 28, 2012 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
NCEES Train the Trainer September 25, 2012 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System.
New Hanover County Schools Board of Education Presentation November 19, 2013.
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Analyzing Student Work to Change Teacher Practice.
EVAAS for Teachers: Overview and Teacher Reports Every Student READY.
HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Jessica Garner
Welcome to READY Principals Spring 2015 NC Department of Public Instruction Educator Effectiveness Division
Local HR and NCDPI Tom Tomberlin September 29, 2015 Fall PANC.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards.
North Carolina Student Growth Portfolio Spring 2013 Pilot Arts Education, Healthful Living, World Languages February 25, 2013.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards These standards serve as the basis for teacher preparation, teacher evaluation, and professional development.
Draft – March Check for Updates to this Presentationhttp://
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
The correlation between. NCPTS North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards ISTE*T The National Technology Standards for Teachers.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Teacher Effectiveness:
EVAAS EVALUATION EFFECTIVENESS …AND WHAT DOES IT SAY???
Principal READY Spring 2017 Tom Tomberlin February 16, 2017
Teacher Evaluation Process
IMPLEMENTATION - JANUARY 2013
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards
Framework for Teaching * Distinguished & Leadership Roles
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
NC Educator Evaluation System Overview
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System
NORTH CAROLINA Educator Effectiveness Update
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process August 2, 2012
Arts Education Think Tank
Identifying Multiple Measures and Defining Significance
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation and EVAAS
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process August 17, 2012
NBPTS 5 Core Propositions North Carolina Teaching Standards
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
What Teachers Need to Know Now
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
State Assessment Update
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Presentation transcript:

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Evaluation Summary Sheet Draft January 2012: Assume SBE Adoption of Option One in TCP-C-006 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Evaluation Summary Sheet Name: Martha Washington School: Independence Elementary School LEA: Freedom County Schools Licensure: Career-Status Overall Status: Effective Standard One: Teachers demonstrate leadership. Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished Standard Two: Teachers establish a respectful environment. Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished Standard Three: Teachers know the content they teach. Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished DRAFT Standard Four: Teachers facilitate learning for their students. Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished Standard Five: Teachers reflect on their practice. Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished Standard Six: Teachers contribute to the academic success of students. *Only three-year rolling average is used to determine overall status* Year One (2009 – 2010) Year Two (2010 – 2011) Year Three (2011 – 2012) Three-Year Rolling Average* Individual Student Growth: .8 School-wide Student Growth: .1 Year One Growth: .73 Individual Student Growth: 1.2 School-wide Student Growth: .5 Year Two Growth: 1.13 Individual Student Growth: .7 Year Three Growth: .68 .85 Does not meet expected growth Meets expected growth Exceeds expected growth Does not meet expected growth Meets expected growth Exceeds expected growth Does not meet expected growth Meets expected growth Exceeds expected growth Does not meet expected growth Meets expected growth Exceeds expected growth Overall Status: Needs improvement Effective Highly Effective