Grid 3.0 Telecommunications Workshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Manatt manatt | phelps | phillips New York State Health Information Technology Summit Initiative Overview and Update Rachel Block, Project Director United.
Advertisements

September 30, 2011 OASIS Open Smart Grid Reference Model: Standards Landscape Analysis.
Jerry FitzPatrick, NIST Chair Wednesday, May 26. Introduction - IKB PAP8 PAP14 DEWG Charter What should the T&D DEWG be doing? T&D DEWG or T and D DEWGs?
HIT Policy Committee Accountable Care Workgroup – Kickoff Meeting May 17, :00 – 2:00 PM Eastern.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
Convening Partners to Define the Landscape of the Future: Steps toward multi-partner Landscape Conservation Design June 2015 Steering Committee Workshop.
Halifax, 31 Oct – 3 Nov 2011ICT Accessibility For All SMART GRID ICT: SECURITY, INTEROPERABILITY & NEXT STEPS John O’Neill, Senior Project Manager CSA.
Geneva, Switzerland, April 2012 Introduction to session 7 - “Advancing e-health standards: Roles and responsibilities of stakeholders” ​ Marco Carugi.
Draft Modernization Roadmap for the Geospatial Platform Karen Siderelis NGAC Meeting March 25,2010.
June 17, 2009 Michael W. Howard, Ph.D. Sr. Vice President The Interoperable Smart Grid Evolving.
Shaping a Health Statistics Vision for the 21 st Century 2002 NCHS Data Users Conference 16 July 2002 Daniel J. Friedman, PhD Massachusetts Department.
Innovative Schools toolkit STRATEGIC WORKSHOP 2 Exploring good practice case studies.
THE SECURITY SECTOR REVIEW PROCESS. ISSUES Understanding: -Scope: What are the elements of a SS Review? -Need: Why review the Security Sector? -Process:
NHII 03 Homeland Security Group A Robert Esterhay, M.D. School of Public Health and Information Sciences University of Louisville, Kentucky Robert Esterhay,
Deerin Babb-Brott, Director National Ocean Council Office National Boating Federation 2013 Annual Meeting.
Enterprise Architectures Course Code : CPIS-352 King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah Saudi Arabia.
Advancing National Wireless Capability Date: March 22, 2016 Wireless Test Bed & Wireless National User Facility Paul Titus Department Manager, Communications.
UNGGIM – PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK. AGENDA > OVERVIEW OF PRIVATE SECTOR >PURPOSE AND VISION OF PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK > STRUCTURE AND TERMS OF REFERENCE.
LCC NETWORK STRATEGIC PLANNING Orientation Webinar for Strategic Planning Training and Workshop Participants July 21, 2014 Presenter: Michael Gale, LCC.
CARILEC. An Association of Electric Utilities CARILEC An Association of Electric Utilities The Caribbean Electric Utility Service Corporation (CARILEC)
Why KM is Important KM enhances mission command, facilitates the exchange of knowledge, supports doctrine development, fosters leaders’ development, supports.
Regulation of Medical Devices: Importance of a Globally Harmonized Approach Nicole Taylor Smith, JD September 2017.
Update from the Faster Payments Task Force
Unified Architecture Framework NATO Architecture CaT Introduction
Name Job title Research Councils UK
To Create Bristol’s Comprehensive Plan
MODULE 11 – SCENARIO PLANNING
5 OCTOBER 2015 MANILA, PHILIPPINES
Next Generation Distribution System Platform (DSPx)
2017 National Geospatial Preparedness Summit
ICT PSP 2011, 5th call, Pilot Type B, Objective: 2.4 eLearning
Agenda Time Activity 1410 Welcome and introductions 1415
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
How to write a Strategic Plan
IEEE Initiatives in Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems
USA Final Project Report
Ken Matthews Chair, Partnership Working Group 31 July 2013
ETSI Standardization Activities on M2M communications
Building Efficiency Accelerator
TSMO Program Plan Development
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
Vision Facilitation Template
Regional Workforce Skills Planning Initiative
Why the Multistakeholder Approach Works
Opening Remarks European Commission CEOS 2018 Chair
Oceans and Society: Blue Planet
Internet Interconnection
Karen Bartleson, President, IEEE Standards Association
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Interpreting Foresight Process Impacts:
Wireless Characterization for NIST PAP#2
Scanning the environment: The global perspective on the integration of non-traditional data sources, administrative data and geospatial information Sub-regional.
Presentation for information days Units involved:
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
Building Knowledge about ESD Indicators
European Open Science Cloud All Hands Meeting Pisa 8-9 March 2018
IEEE Initiatives in Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems
Wireless Characterization for NIST PAP#2
Employee engagement Delivery guide
ETSI Standardization Activities on Smart Grids
Economic Development Forum, Florence March
Environment and Development Policy Section
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
NextGRID: From Compute Grids to Grid SOAs and beyond
Building an Informatics-Savvy Health Department
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Joint ITU-WHO Workshop on e-Health Standards and Interoperability (Geneva, Switzerland, April 2012) Session 7 chair’s notes from session 7 open.
Energy Storage Roadmap & Flexibility Roadmap Information Session
RCA Workshop on RCARO Future Strategies July 2007
Collaborative regulation in the digital economy
Presentation transcript:

Grid 3.0 Telecommunications Workshop April 6 & 7, 2016 Irwindale, CA

Agenda April 6: April 7: 8:30 am – Welcome and Safety 8:40am – Why are we here? 8:50am – Setting the Stage - DOE 9:00am – DOE INL Workshop Findings 9:30am – State of Communications Tech 10:15am – Break 10:30am – Utility Panel Session Noon – Lunch 1:00pm – Key Issue Discussion 2:15pm – Break 2:30pm – Introduction to Future States 2:45pm – Future State Exercise 4:50pm - Summary of day 1 and plans for day 2 5:00pm – Adjourn for the day 6:00pm – No Host Dinner April 7: 8:30 am – Review and Prioritize Future States 9:15am – Industry Activity Presentations 10:15am – Break 10:30 – Industry Activity Presentations (cont.) 11:30am – Gaps and Actions Exercise Noon – Lunch 1:00pm – Gaps and Actions Exercise (cont.) 2:00 - Task Definition 3:00pm – Next Steps 3:30pm – Adjourn

Agenda – Day 1 8:30 am Welcome and Safety – John Bubb (SCE) 8:40am           Introduction / Workshop Objectives – Don Von Dollen (EPRI) 8:50am           Setting the stage – DOE view – Chris Irwin (DOE) 9:00am           Findings from the DOE Comms workshop – Paul Titus (INL) 9:30am           State of Communications Technology – Michael and Richardo This session designed to get everyone on the same page with communications technology terms and definitions to facilitate better information exchange in rest of workshop 10:15am        Break

Grid 3.0 Grid 3.0 is an informal, ad hoc collaboration to engage stakeholders and develop a roadmap to identify the critical activities needed to achieve the resilient, flexible and highly- interactive grid of the future – Grid 3.0. The objective of Grid 3.0 is to promote coordination and collaboration between organizations that are working to advance the industry towards the broad vision of Grid 3.0

Grid 3.0 Grid 3.0 is organizing workshops to engage subject matter experts in three specific areas: Architecture Interoperability Communications

Objective of the Grid 3.0 Communications Workshop Begin the process of developing a roadmap for addressing the critical communications-related issues needed to achieve the vision of Grid 3.0

Agenda – Day 1 8:30 am Welcome and Safety – John Bubb (SCE) 8:40am           Introduction / Workshop Objectives – Don Von Dollen (EPRI) 8:50am           Setting the stage – DOE view – Chris Irwin (DOE) 9:00am           Findings from the DOE Comms workshop – Paul Titus (INL) 9:30am           State of Communications Technology – Michael and Richardo This session designed to get everyone on the same page with communications technology terms and definitions to facilitate better information exchange in rest of workshop 10:15am        Break

Agenda – Day 1 10:30am Utility panel session Future vision for telecommunications in the electricity sector – 3 utilities – 15 minute presentation each followed by Q&A and general discussion.  The panelists will discuss their key application requirements, telecommunications vision (3-10 year view), and any projects/activities presently underway. 1:00pm          Key Issue Discussion Applications and Capabilities (other applications/requirements not revealed/discussed in panel) Inventory Creation Spectrum availability – public, private, shared Technology Wireless – LTE, WiMax, mesh (Silver Springs, ITron), point-to-point (microwave, Sensus), other (MDS serial radios) Wired – DDS circuit replacements, fiber WAN, fiber to the home, metro Ethernet, MPLS Infrastructure Ownership 2:15pm Break

GWAC Stack – Levels of Interoperability

2:45pm Future State Exercise - Facilitated Process: Agenda – Day 1 2:30pm          Introduction to Future States – what is a future state presentation 2:45pm          Future State Exercise - Facilitated Process: Participants write ideas for future states (future comms  capabilities) on cards – 15 minutes Go around the room and have people share their future state ideas (one at a time) – 60 minutes Facilitator refines/combines/adds future states and posts on wall – 5 minutes Participants provide input on grouping future states into categories (e.g. policy, technology, spectrum, ownership, etc.) – 15 minutes Do a sticky dot prioritization exercise – 15 minutes 4:50pm          Review of Day 1 – plan for Day 2 5:00pm          Adjourn 6:00pm          No host dinner

Roadmap Development Approach Future State Our Vision for the landscape in 3-10 Years

Roadmap Development Approach Future State Our Vision for the landscape in 3-10 Years GAP Barriers or challenges to achieve the Future State

Roadmap Development Approach Future State Our Vision for the landscape in 3-10 Years GAP Barriers or challenges to achieve the Future State Action Plan What needs to be done to bridge the Gap

What is a Future State? Based on previous workshops, aspirational “future states” were identified that collectively describe Grid 3.0.  An aspirational statement of a future capability of a device, system, organization or other aspect of electric system infrastructure, processes, and governance Generally stated in the context of or as a delta from the current state

Grid 3.0 Future States A: Develop a well articulated, industry shaped consensus on future states of the electric power grid through a collaborative process B: A clearly defined set of regulatory models with a clear understanding of the jurisdictions of the state and federal regulators C: Clear, sustainable business models and value propositions that allow the industry stakeholders to profitably support the needs of the economy D: Provide an environment where all stakeholders have an equal place at the table and the ability to explore a broad range of solutions to their needs and desires without artificial economic penalties E: Forums and processes exist to facilitate regional cooperation and collaboration across multiple stakeholder categories F: Provide a set of conceptual architecture models across the architecture domains which can be made available to any electric sector stakeholder as a starting point for sustainable businesses and processes G: Well defined points of interoperability characterized by agreed upon standards exist and are utilized by all electric sector stakeholders

Grid 3.0 Future States H: Provide a well defined decision support environment that uses the best principles of the industry architecture and interoperability to allow efficient use of both data and stakeholders knowledge and ability I: Provide a range of coordinated reference designs and documentation that supports the choices that stakeholders can make in their making, moving and using of electricity J: Well defined and clearly understood privacy ecosystem that both allows use of data to sustain the industry and provides for individual needs K: Well defined and clearly understood proactive security ecosystem that sustains the operational and business needs of all stakeholders L: Security information sharing processes including clearance processing are standardized and highly efficient M: Provide an environment that retains and attracts motivated individuals who thrive with continuous incremental education and skills improvement in an evolving industry N: Clearly defined and utilized metrics exist for electric system infrastructure (e.g. reliability, resiliency, quality, security, economics, customer-related and efficiency) O: Ubiquitous, low cost, reliable, resilient communications

One of the highest priority future states is: Grid 3.0 Future States One of the highest priority future states is: Well defined points of interoperability characterized by agreed upon standards exist and are utilized by all electric sector stakeholders One overarching statement that is the highest level future state for communications is: Ubiquitous, low cost, reliable, resilient communications For this workshop, we need to develop future states relevant to the communications space that drill down another level into the above statement Examples: Availability of SLA’s from service providers compatible with utility needs Best practice guidelines exist for utility application landscape

Everything Matters – Not Much Consensus

The magic of dynamic expansion of data G: Well defined points of interoperability characterized by agreed upon standards exist and are utilized by all electric sector stakeholders B: A clearly defined set of regulatory models C: Clear, sustainable business models and value propositions

John Bubb’s Mission Statement “Standards based end-to-end IP communications, highly available, resilient, multiservice, integrating wired and wireless mediums with modern layered security built-in from the start, with a 15 year useful life. Purpose built for utility applications and operating environments utilizing public and private infrastructure.”

Guadalajara Grill 14610 Garvey Ave. Baldwin Park, CA

John Bubb’s Mission Statement - Deconstructed Standards compliant, end-to-end IP communications highly available, resilient, multiservice integrating wired and wireless mediums modern layered security built-in from the start 15 year useful life Purpose built for utility applications and operating environments utilizing public and private infrastructure.”

Agenda April 6: April 7: 8:30 am – Welcome and Safety 8:40am – Why are we here? 8:50am – Setting the Stage - DOE 9:00am – DOE INL Workshop Findings 9:30am – State of Communications Tech 10:15am – Break 10:30am – Utility Panel Session Noon – Lunch 1:00pm – Key Issue Discussion 2:15pm – Break 2:30pm – Introduction to Future States 2:45pm – Future State Exercise 4:50pm - Summary of day 1 and plans for day 2 5:00pm – Adjourn for the day 6:00pm – No Host Dinner April 7: 8:30 am – Review and Planning 8:40am – Industry Activity Presentations 10:15am – Break 10:30am – Gaps and Actions Exercise Noon – Lunch 1:00pm – Task Definition 2:00pm – Next Steps 3:30pm – Adjourn